Pulmonary Medicine

Pulmonary Medicine / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Pulmonary Tuberculosis

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 745483 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/745483

Yone Vila Nova Cavalcanti, Maria Carolina Accioly Brelaz, Juliana Kelle de Andrade Lemoine Neves, José Candido Ferraz, Valéria Rêgo Alves Pereira, "Role of TNF-Alpha, IFN-Gamma, and IL-10 in the Development of Pulmonary Tuberculosis", Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 745483, 10 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/745483

Role of TNF-Alpha, IFN-Gamma, and IL-10 in the Development of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Academic Editor: José R. Lapa e Silva
Received30 Aug 2012
Revised31 Oct 2012
Accepted05 Nov 2012
Published28 Nov 2012


Host immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by cellular immunity, in which cytokines and Th1 cells play a critical role. In the process of control of the infection by mycobacteria, TNF-alpha seems to have a primordial function. This cytokine acts in synergy with IFN-gamma, stimulating the production of reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs), thus mediating the tuberculostatic function of macrophages, and also stimulating the migration of immune cells to the infection site, contributing to granuloma formation, which controls the disease progression. IFN-gamma is the main cytokine involved in the immune response against mycobacteria, and its major function is the activation of macrophages, allowing them to exert its microbicidal role functions. Different from TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma, IL-10 is considered primarily an inhibitory cytokine, important to an adequate balance between inflammatory and immunopathologic responses. The increase in IL-10 levels seems to support the survival of mycobacteria in the host. Although there is not yet conclusive studies concerning a clear dichotomy between Th1 and Th2 responses, involving protective immunity and susceptibility to the disease, respectively, we can suggest that the knowledge about this responses based on the prevailing cytokine profile can help to elucidate the immune response related to the protection against M. tuberculosis.

1. Introduction

The genus Mycobacterium displays more than 100 known species, with a broad geographic distribution, habitat diversity, and diverse relations with other organisms, including more than 20 species presenting different degrees of pathogenicity to humans [1]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) (MTB), an intracellular facultative bacillus, is the most frequent species isolated in human tuberculosis (TB) cases.

Pulmonary tuberculosis is a global public health problem, presenting high incidence in Brazil. It is still the world’s leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. Most infections are asymptomatic and latent however around 5% to 10% of infected people progress to the disease development at each year, pulmonary tuberculosis being found in most cases. Each second a person is infected with M. tuberculosis in the world. From the lungs, the organism is efficiently transmissible through aerosol. It is estimated that, on average, a person with active TB can infect between 10 and 15 individuals per year [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) works intensively to significantly reduce the TB cases and halve this disease death number until 2015 [3]; however, the number of multidrug-resistant TB cases is rising, and this increasingly compromises the disease control [4, 5].

Latent TB is defined as an infection with M. tuberculosis that remains within macrophages without replicate, but that retains the ability to exit latency and cause active disease when there is an interruption of the protective immune response. The reactivation of a latent infection requires the activation of the quiescent bacilli. Several factors can trigger the development of active disease from reactivation of latent infection, which usually involves the decline of the immune response. HIV infection is the most important risk factor for progression to active disease due to depletion of CD4+ T cells [6]. Advanced age, malnutrition, and medical conditions that compromise the immune system are also risk factors for the reactivation [7, 8].

Tuberculosis progression is associated with the immune status. It is known that host protective immune response against this pathogen is mediated by cellular immunity, in which certain cytokines and Th1 cells have a critical role [9]. Understanding the mechanisms involved in this response, and in particular the function of the cytokine network involved in this disease, is of significant relevance to reach advances in the development of effective control and prevention [10].

2. Cytokines

Cytokines are molecules that mediate mainly the intercellular communication in the immune system, being produced by different cell types. Cytokines have pleiotropic and regulatory effects and participate in the host defense and in inflammatory and tissue reparation processes [11].

In tuberculosis, an effective and coordinated participation of different cytokines was already identified, such as interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-23, IL-27, IL-18, IL-1, IL-7, and IL-15 [5]. An important aspect associated with the production of cytokines in MTB infections is the activation of macrophages in response to IFN-γ and TNF-α signaling [12]. Nonactivated macrophages are the usual habitat of MTB, which resists in the intracellular environment, blocking the phagosome fusion with the lysosome, thus avoiding its exposure to low pH and to reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs), important to its destruction [12]. IFN-γ activated macrophages transpose this blockage and form phagolysosomes expressing RNIs able to eliminate MTB in the infection sites [13]. The cord factor, the 19KDa lipoprotein, and other MTB components induce the production of IL-12 by macrophages, thereby mobilizing the Th1 cytokine pathway. Figure 1 shows the initial immune protection to M. tuberculosis.

Several cytokines, including interleukin IL-12, IL-17, and IL-23, contribute to the host response to mycobacteria, improving the development of Th1 cells [14]. Among Th1 cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α were identified as the most important agents of the antimycobacterial cytokine cascade. This is due to the formation as well as the maintenance of the granuloma, which is mediated by TNF-α acting synergistically with IFN-γ in the activation of macrophages to produce effector molecules [15].

Recently, a new population of cells was identified and named Th17. These cells produce IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22 as signature cytokines [16, 17]. The IL-17 receptor is expressed in different organs including the liver, lung, and spleen, and different cell types are able to respond to IL-17, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts. The responses induced by the IL-17 gene include expression of proinflammatory genes, chemokines, IL-6, IL-8, and antimicrobial proteins. Recent data suggest a superior and more complex role for these cells and their cytokines in different intracellular infections, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses in different mucosal surfaces [18]. Therefore, the balance between protection and Th17 cell-mediated pathology is the key in the definition of consequences in mucosal infections [19].

Th17 cells also participate in the inflammatory response at an early mycobacterial infection; however, the production of IL-17 in the lungs is mainly immunosuppressive of IFN-γ. The protective potential role of Th17 cells during the early phase of infection with M. tuberculosis is unknown [20]. There are evidences on the role of IL-17 during mycobacterial infections. Pulmonary infection with BCG or M. tuberculosis stimulated the early secretion of IL-17 from the day 1 to 14 and sequentially the development of T cells secreting IFN-γ. Pulmonary infected IL-17 deficient mice with BCG showed a reduction in the delayed hypersensitivity responses, with a deficiency in granuloma formation in the lungs, suggesting that IL-17 is required for an efficient development of Th1 responses [20].

The secretion of IL-23 is essential for the secretion of IL-17, and people with deficiency in the IL-12Rβ1 gene have low capacity to produce IL-23, and they have a lower production of IFN-γ. IL-12 is a cytokine that reduces the expression of IL-17, and this appears to show a self-regulation on inflammation. The balance between the secretions of IL-23/IL-17 and IL-12/IFN-γ appears to be essential for the regulation of inflammation in response to M. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria [21].

Among the cytokines that are being studied in response to M. tuberculosis, we can also emphasize interleukin-1. Interleukin-1 is necessary for the control of infection with M. tuberculosis, but the role of its two ligands, IL-1α and IL-1β, and its regulation in vivo are poorly understood. An important feature of IL-1 is its control on transcription, arranging the levels of transcription and signal transduction, as evidenced by the variety of immunopathologies and autoinflammatory diseases that occur in the absence of regulation of IL-1 [22, 23]. Little is known about the expression and processing of IL-1 in the context of infection with M. tuberculosis in vivo. The populations of cells that produce IL-1 during infection have not yet been characterized [24].

Guler et al. [25] investigated the role of IL-1α and IL-1β during chronic infection with M. tuberculosis and spontaneous reactivation of it in mice. Blockade of IL-1α, but not IL-1β, resulted in increased susceptibility to chronic infection with M. tuberculosis. When they neutralized IL-1α or IL-1β alone, they did not observe an increase in the reactivation of latent tuberculosis. The generation of antibodies neutralizing IL-1α and IL-1β simultaneously did not influence weight gain during reactivation, and they observed a slight increase in the lung bacilli count when compared to the immunized control group. Thus, their results suggested that IL-1α is the prime mediator of the IL-1RI-dependent and protective innate immune responses to M. tuberculosis in mice.

In a recent study the role of IL-1 in host resistance was demonstrated by inducing antibodies against this cytokine, which resulted in an increased mortality during chronic infection [25].

The granuloma is a typical structure of this disease, where we can find CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, fibroblasts, and giant multinucleated cells. IFN-γ-producing CD4 T lymphocytes contribute to the generation of granulomas, besides being important costimulators to the adequate activation of CD8 T lymphocytes. The importance of CD4 T lymphocytes function is seen in patients with HIV, where the risk of TB increases with the decrease of the cells counting [26].

Many events mediated by cytokines are important to the establishment of immunity against MTB and the expression of host resistance [11].

Response against M. tuberculosis
CD4+ T cells exert regulatory activity on macrophage function, as well as cytolytic CD8+ lymphocytes. The effector function for the bacterial elimination is mediated by macrophages that are activated by cytokines derived from T lymphocytes, particularly IFN-γ and TNF-α.

3. Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)

The tumor necrosis factor (TNF, TNF-α) was originally characterized as a necrosis inductor in sarcomas in vivo [27]. TNF-α is a proinflammatory cytokine which exerts multiple biological effects. TNF-α expression is strictly controlled, since its superproduction can mediate damaging effects found in the septic shock such as arterial hypotension, disseminated vascular coagulation, and lethal hypoglycemia.

In the process of mycobacterial infection control, TNF-α seems to have a primordial role, acting upon a wide variety of cells. The main producing cells are activated macrophages, T lymphocytes, and dendritic cells [2729]. This cytokine acts in synergy with IFN-γ, stimulating the production of reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs), thus mediating the tuberculostatic function of macrophages [30, 31]. TNF-α also stimulates the migration of immune cells to the infection site, contributing to the granuloma formation, capable of controlling the disease progression [32].

TNF-α blocking has dramatic effects on the progression of tuberculosis in experimental models. Neutralization of TNF-α in murine models results in tuberculosis aggravation or reactivation [32]. The excision of the TNF-α gene or its receptor results in deviant granulomas or fulminant acute tuberculosis [33, 34]. Studies have also revealed that TNF-α is expressed in MTB-infected tissues during the whole latent phase of infection [35], suggesting a contribution, with other cytokines like IFN-γ, in the control of the bacillus multiplication.

Increased levels of TNF-α are commonly detected in culture supernatants of peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs) from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis stimulated with mycobacterial antigens [10, 36, 37]. Moura [38] evaluating the immune response of patients prior to and after treatment noticed that patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis produced increased levels of TNF-α; however they did not observe significant difference in these cytokine levels after treatment, concluding that these results reinforce this cytokine’s role at both the physiopathology and in the protective immunity of the disease.

A recent study investigated the role played by the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) in the human alveolar macrophage innate responses and revealed that significant levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were produced after the recognition of the ligand with the muramyl dipeptide (MDP). Alveolar macrophage treatment with MDP has improved the control of intracellular growth of M. tuberculosis, activity associated with a significant production of TNF-α and IL-6 [39].

One of the most overwhelming lines of evidence of the protective effects of TNF-α is, perhaps, provided by the observation that patients with rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with TNF-α antagonists (monoclonal antibodies against TNF-α or TNF-α soluble receptors) have a significant increased risk of reactivating latent TB [4042].

On the other hand, there is also evidence showing that TNF-α may be associated with immunopathological responses in tuberculosis, aforementioned also as the head mediator of the destruction of the pulmonary tissue [43]. Elevated levels of TNF-α are related to an excessive inflammation with necrosis and cachexy [44, 45].

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) relative roles in MTb have been a subject of controversy. It was described that mycobacteria decreases the production of TNF in human PBMCs, skill which probably contributes to its ability to establish chronic infections [46]. Produced by macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and some endothelial cells, TNF-α coordinates the inflammatory response via induction of other cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6), and the recruitment of immune and inflammatory cells through the induction of chemokine and supraregulation of adhesion molecules. Experimental models have shown that TNF-α plays an important role not only in host response against M. tuberculosis but also in the immunopathology of tuberculosis [47].

TNF-α increases the capacity of macrophages to phagocytose and kill mycobacteria and stimulates apoptosis of macrophages, depriving bacilli of host cells and leading to death and presentation by dendritic cells of mycobacterial antigens [48]. In vivo TNF-α is required for the formation and maintenance of granulomas. Neutralization of TNF-α produced by mice chronically infected with M. tuberculosis specific monoclonal antibodies disrupts the integrity of granulomas, exacerbates infection, and increases mortality [49].

M. tuberculosis evolved and has developed mechanisms which interact and modulate the host immune response. Mycobacterium expresses surface antigens that can induce the production of IL-10 and IL-4, which typically have anti-inflammatory effects [50, 51]. The high expression of IL-4 has been implicated as a virulence factor, both for the anti-inflammatory ability and also for its apparent capacity to promote tissue damage in association with TNF-α [52]. These studies suggest that IL-4 (alone or jointly with TNF-α) may play a role in tissue destruction and/or cell death during infection by M. tuberculosis. TNF-α is one of the most powerful controlling factors for the recruitment of monocytes and is a potent inducer of cell death by apoptosis [53]. Necrosis, on the other hand, is associated with the lysis of the infected cell, the release of feasible M. tuberculosis, and damage to the surrounding tissues [54]. TNF-α is also a key cytokine involved in this event.

4. Interferon Gamma (IFN- )

Interferons (IFNs) are substances originally identified at cellular culture supernatants infected by virus and that appeared to interfere directly in the viral replication, hence its denomination [55]. Divided into two major types, type I IFNs are induced and act effectively in responses against viruses: IFN-α is secreted mainly by leucocytes, and IFN-β is produced by fibroblasts. Type II interferon, now referred to as IFN-γ, is synthesized mostly by T lymphocytes and NK cells after this cells activation with immune and inflammatory stimuli, rather than viral infection [56]. IFN-γ is the chief cytokine involved in the protective immune response against mycobacterial infection. It is produced primarily by CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes and NK cells. It is also known that natural killer T cells (NKT) and γδ T lymphocytes, cells with a narrow repertoire of antigen recognition, can also produce IFN-γ in response to mycobacterial stimulation, displaying protection against M. tuberculosis infection both in vitro and in vivo [12].

The main function of IFN-γ is macrophage activation, rendering them able to exert its microbicidal functions. It operates also enhancing the antigen presentation through the induction of the expression of molecules from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II and promoting the differentiation of CD4 T lymphocytes to the Th1 subpopulation [5759]. IFN-γ induces the transcription of more than 200 genes in macrophages, including those for the production of antimicrobial molecules such as oxygen free radicals and nitric oxide, which represent one of the best effector mechanisms for elimination of M. tuberculosis [60]. However, some mycobacterial antigens, such as the 19 kDa lipoprotein, have the potential to mitigate the response of macrophages by blocking the transcription of subsets of genes responsive for IFN-γ [61, 62].

A series of clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated the importance of IFN-γ production in the control of tuberculosis [6365]. Experiments in mice revealed that IFN-γ is an essential cytokine for macrophage activation and mycobacteria death in the intracellular environment. Cooper et al. [66] and Flynn et al. [67] have demonstrated that mice deprived from the IFN-γ genes have experienced fulminant infection by M. tuberculosis.

Individuals with a deficiency in the IFN-γ receptor gene have shown to be extremely susceptible to mycobacterial infections [68]. The complete deficiency of IFN-γ receptor in humans is associated with increased severity in the course of infection, poor formation of granulomas, multibacillary lesions, and progressive infection [69]. Studies with individuals that presented genetic mutations in the IFN-γ receptor have also proven that they presented high susceptibility to atypical mycobacterial infections [70].

The interleukin-12 (IL-12)/interferon-γ (IFN-γ) axis is determinant to the generation of Th1 lymphocytes, activation of macrophages by T cells, and further elimination of bacteria. A series of mutations associated to these axis components were identified in humans: these include mutation in the IL-12Rβ1, IL-12p40, IFN-γR2 genes, and the signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT-1). Most infections associated with these Mendelian disorders arise from the use of BCG or environmental mycobacteria. Nevertheless, some of the disorders are also associated with an increased susceptibility to M. tuberculosis (IFN-γR2 and IL-12p40) [71, 72].

IL-12 enhances IFN-γ production by NK cells and expands antigen specific Th1 cells. Other cytokines such as IL-23, IL-18, and IL-27 are also important inducers of IFN-γ. About 20 days are enough to produce IFN-γ by Th1 lymphocytes, which results in its accumulation in the lungs and bacterial growth arrest [73]. IL-18, a cytokine produced by monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, cooperates with IL-12 to induce IFN-γ production [61]. Studies clearly indicate that IL-18 contributes to protect against infection by mycobacteria [74, 75]. Moreover, IL-18 deficient mice when infected with M. tuberculosis present reduced levels of IFN-γ compared with normal mice, despite the standard levels of IL-12 [76].

Morosini and colleagues [77] emphasize through data that they found in their study the view that in humans, at least at certain stages of pulmonary tuberculosis, there is a differential compartmentalization of IFN-γ and of the regulatory cytokine IL-12 and IL-10, where the protection factor associated with the secretion of IL-12 is present in the lungs and the component associated with immunosuppressive IL-10 secretion is predominant in peripheral blood. Furthermore, their results indicate a more critical role for IL-18 in the host response to M. tuberculosis in humans, suggesting that IL-18 may act as a factor for induction of IFN-γ in the lungs, whereas one can have immunoregulatory activity on peripheral circulation [77].

Studies report that patients with less severe forms of pulmonary tuberculosis have a predominance of Th1 cytokines such as IFN-γ, whereas the increase in IL-4 levels, a Th2 type cytokine, is related to the disease severity [78, 79]. Torres et al. [80] studied the immune response of patients’ PBMCs with active tuberculosis and their healthy household contacts in response to the 30-KDa antigen from M. tuberculosis. Their results demonstrated a defect in the IFN-γ production by patients in response to the investigated antigen and a strong response to this antigen by the healthy communicants’ cells, suggesting a protective role of IFN-γ in those individuals.

After inhalation and subsequent infection with M. tuberculosis in the lungs, dendritic cells infected with the bacilli migrate to the regional lymph node, which occurs, on average, around 14 days after infection, initiating the activation of T cells [81]. A model study used dendritic cells infected with M. tuberculosis inoculated intratracheally in the lung and as a result found that dendritic cells exposed to M. tuberculosis prior to inoculation are better in migrating to the lymph node and in T cell activation [82, 83]. These findings, in association with information about the secretion of cytokines and activation of the populations of CD4+ T cells, indicate that different subtypes of CD4+ T cells involved in protection in tuberculosis are activated in the initial phases of infection and produce cytokines classically considered immune protectors such as IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α [84, 85].

There is evidence that CD4+ T cells may contribute both to the control of M. tuberculosis as well as of immunopathology, contributing to morbidity and mortality in tuberculosis disease. Reference [86] quantified the variation of IFN-γ/IL-17 in response to specific antigens of M. tuberculosis in patients with a positive PPD test and healthy individuals and observed a large variation in the amounts of IL-17 and IFN-γ secreted in response to the various antigens used.

5. Interleukin-10 (IL-10)

Due to its ability to inhibit the T lymphocyte production of cytokines, IL-10 was originally described as a cytokine synthesis inhibitory factor (CSIF) [86]. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that IL-10 could also inhibit Th1 and Th2 subpopulations in vitro [87, 88]. IL-10 acts inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-12) and the action of antigen presenting cells, blocking the activation of T lymphocytes through the inhibition of expression of MHC class II molecules [89, 90]. Therefore, it has an immunoregulatory function [91].

IL-10 is produced by macrophages and T lymphocytes during M. tuberculosis infection. Unlike TNF-α and IFN-γ, IL-10 is considered primarily an inhibitory cytokine, important to the adequate balance between inflammatory and immunopathological responses. However, the increase in IL-10 levels appears to support the mycobacterial survival in the host. Mice with defective IL-10 exhibit an increase in the antimycobacterial immunity [92]. IL-10 reduces the protective response to MTB in the CBA mice strain, in which IL-10 is produced by phagocytes in the interior of the pulmonary lesion and where a reduction in the TNF and IL-12p40 expression can be observed [93]. IL-10 is also able to induce the reactivation of tuberculosis in animals [94].

IL-10 is increased in samples obtained from patients with TB, and a higher capacity of IL-10 production is associated with an increase in the disease incidence. In human tuberculosis, IL-10 production is higher in anergic patients, suggesting that M. tuberculosis induces IL-10 production, suppressing an effective immune response [95]. Macrophages from patients suffering from tuberculosis are suppressed in vitro, and the inhibition of IL-10 reverts partially this suppression [90]. In another study, IL-10 was capable of directly inhibiting the responses of CD4 T lymphocyte from donors with latent TB and also reduced the expression of MHC class I and II, CD40, B7-1, and B7-2 of monocytes infected with MTB [96].

Lowering the protective cellular immune response is the M. tuberculosis aim to survive in the host. IL-10 and other inhibitory mediators of the inflammatory response (TGF-βRII, IL-1Rn e IDO) are detected in the sputum samples of patients with TB, whereas 30 days after treatment their level decreases considerably, while an increase in the Th1 response is observed [97].

In some human populations, an increase in IL-10 expression was identified, being possible to correlate it with an inefficiency in the BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) vaccination [98]. The analysis of the IL-10 gene polymorphisms involved in the development of infectious diseases suggests that this polymorphism has a critical role in the immunity and progression of inflammation. The increase in IL-10 production can, in particular, suppress the immune response and promote progression of the disease [99].

Regarding the immunopathogeny of TB, it is unquestionable the immunosuppressor role presented by IL-10 [100, 101]. Nonetheless, some studies have not detected increased levels of this cytokine in PBMCs from patients with active TB in response to mycobacterial antigens [102].

6. Cytokines in Household Tuberculosis Contact Cases

The study of household contacts of TB cases is of essential importance to the programs for combat and control of tuberculosis, in other words, the epidemiologic surveillance of household contacts as a means for early diagnosis of TB cases and the decrease of the spread of the disease [103].

Some studies assessed the cytokine profile in groups of healthy contacts individuals. From these works, it is important to mention Demissie [104], who conducted a study comparing the immune response of infected individuals in the latent stage with TB patients. The results demonstrated that TB patients presented a low production of IFN-γ and IL-2 cytokines when compared to individuals with latent infections. This suggests that the control of TB in the latent stage is not only associated with increased expression of Th1 cytokines, but also with the suppression of IL-4 activity [104]. Later, the same group [105] compared the expression of IL-4, IL-4δ2, and IFN-γ in the peripheral blood of household contacts of TB patients presenting positive sputum. The results demonstrated that the expression of IL-4 was slightly higher in household contacts when compared to the controls from the community. However, when the household contacts were divided into groups with or without immunological signs of infection with M. tuberculosis, the expression of IL-4 was clearly elevated in the positive ESAT-6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6, an MTB antigen) group and the expression of Th1 cytokines such as IFN-γ was low. Thus, they suggest that a strong response to the antigen ESAT-6 in individuals exposed to M. tuberculosis correlates with a low expression of IFN-γ and higher expression of IL-4 and that possibly this profile is associated with a poor prognosis [105]. The results founded by our group [106] demonstrated that individuals with or without a previous history of tuberculosis and exposed to M. tuberculosis showed a Th1 (TNF-α and IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL-10 and TGF-β) profile of cytokines, similar to that found by Demissie [105], with an IFN-γ production relatively low when compared to IL-10. These cytokines would be involved in shifting the state of latency to the stage of clinical tuberculosis [106].

The presence of high levels of IL-10 in the plasma of household contacts was unexpected for the group of [107], since they have also found high levels of IL-10 in the studied patients. However, there are few reports in the literature on the production of IL-10 by household contacts of patients with tuberculosis [107]. According to [107], these levels are due to stimulation of mycobacterial antigens that induce this cytokine production by mononuclear cells. Moreover, we can suggest that IL-10 was involved in the natural defense that goes against excessive proinflammatory responses generated by TNF-α. Therefore, the simultaneous presence of IL-10 and TNF-α in household communicating TB patients might be beneficial to these individuals [105]. IL-10 may be required to modulate proinflammatory effects in patients and in healthy household tuberculosis individuals.

Table 1 summarizes the main cytokines, associated studies, and references described in this paper.

CytokineTuberculosis studyReferences

TNF-αStudies in murine models[3235, 44]
Studies in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis[3639]

IFN-γStudies in murine models[45, 66, 67, 76]
Clinical studies[6365, 7780, 85]
Genetic studies[6872]

IL-10Studies in murine models[9294]
Studies in patients with tuberculosis[95102]

Other cytokinesStudies in tuberculosis[14, 1621, 24, 25]

7. Final Thoughts

The host resistance against infection with M. tuberculosis starts with the innate immunity, involving the interaction of the bacillus with macrophages and dendritic cells. Little is known about the transition between the initial control of infection and the establishment of latent infection, which is largely due, in part, to the lack of appropriate animal models [108].

Although there are still no conclusive studies about a clear dichotomy between Th1 versus Th2 response, involving protective immunity and disease susceptibility, respectively, we can conclude that the knowledge of Th1 and Th2 responses helps to elucidate the immune protection profile of the host against M. tuberculosis.


  1. D. N. Sato, “Mycobacterium,” in Bacteriologia—um texto ilustrado, C. H. P. M. e Silva, Ed., pp. 285–315, Eventos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  2. WHO, Global Tuberculosis Control, 2011.
  3. WHO, The Global Plan Tuberculosis to Stop TB, 2011–2015, 2012.
  4. M. Baliza, A. H. Bach, G. L. de Queiroz et al., “High frequency of resistance to the drugs isoniazid and rifampicin among tuberculosis cases in the City of Cabo de Santo Agostinho, an urban area in Northeastern Brazil,” Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Tomioka, Y. Tatano, C. Sano, and T. Shimizu, “Development of new antituberculous drugs based on bacterial virulence factors interfering with host cytokine networks,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 302–317, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. L. Corbett, C. J. Watt, N. Walker et al., “The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 163, no. 9, pp. 1009–1021, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. R. Frieden, T. R. Sterling, S. S. Munsiff, C. J. Watt, and C. Dye, “Tuberculosis,” The Lancet, vol. 362, no. 9387, pp. 887–899, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. E. Dooley and R. E. Chaisson, “Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus: convergence of two epidemics,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 737–746, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Kinjo, K. Kawakami, K. Uezu et al., “Contribution of IL-18 to Th1 response and host defense against infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a comparative study with IL-12p40,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 323–329, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. C. H. Wang, H. C. Lin, C. Y. Liu et al., “Upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cytokine secretion in peripheral blood monocytes from pulmonary tuberculosis patients,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 283–291, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. Gupta, A. Kaul, A. G. Tsolaki, U. Kishore, and S. Bhakta, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis: immune evasion, latency and reactivation,” Immunobiology, vol. 217, no. 3, pp. 363–374, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. M. Cooper and S. A. Khader, “The role of cytokines in the initiation, expansion, and control of cellular immunity to tuberculosis,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 191–204, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. D. Lawn, L. Myer, D. Edwards, L. G. Bekker, and R. Wood, “Short-term and long-term risk of tuberculosis associated with CD4 cell recovery during antiretroviral therapy in South Africa,” AIDS, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 1717–1725, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. A. Khader, G. K. Bell, J. E. Pearl et al., “IL-23 and IL-17 in the establishment of protective pulmonary CD4+ T cell responses after vaccination and during Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 369–377, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. G. Lin and J. L. Flynn, “Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. E. Harrington, R. D. Hatton, P. R. Mangan et al., “Interleukin 17-producing CD4+ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1123–1132, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Park, Z. Li, X. O. Yang et al., “A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1133–1141, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Kader, X. Wang, M. Piatak et al., “α4+β7hiCD4+ memory T cells harbor most Th-17 cells and are preferentially infected during acute SIV infection,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 439–449, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. E. Torrado and A. M. Cooper, “IL-17 and Th17 cells in tuberculosis,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 455–462, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. M. Wozniak, B. M. Saunders, A. A. Ryan, and W. J. Britton, “Mycobacterium bovis BCG-specific Th17 cells confer partial protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the absence of γ interferon,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 4187–4194, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. I. L. D. Moutinho, “Tuberculose: aspectos imunológicos na infecção e na doença,” Revista Médica de Minas Gerais, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  22. C. A. Dinarello, “Immunological and inflammatory functions of the interleukin-1 family,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 519–550, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Garlanda, D. Di Liberto, A. Vecchi et al., “Damping excessive inflammation and tissue damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by toll IL-1 receptor 8/single Ig IL-1-related receptor, a negative regulator of IL-1/TLR signaling,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 3119–3125, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. M.-B. Katrin, B. B. Andrade, D. L. Barber et al., “Innate and adaptive interferons suppress IL-1a and IL-1b production by distinct pulmonary myeloid subsets during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Immunity, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1023–1034, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. Guler, S. P. Parihar, G. Spohn, P. Johansen, F. Brombacher, and M. F. Bachmann, “Blocking IL-1α but not IL-1β increases susceptibility to chronic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice,” Vaccine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1339–1346, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. E. A. Carswell, L. J. Old, Kassel, R. L. Green, N. Fiore, and B. Williamson, “An endotoxin-induced serum factor that causes necrosis of tumors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 3666–3670, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. F. Barnes, S. Lu, J. S. Abrams, E. Wang, M. Yamamura, and R. L. Modlin, “Cytokine production at the site of disease in human tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 3482–3489, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  28. C. H. Ladel, G. Szalay, D. Riedel, and S. H. E. Kaufmann, “Interleukin-12 secretion by Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1936–1938, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  29. N. V. Serbina and J. L. Flynn, “Early emergence of CD8+ T cells primed for production of type 1 cytokines in the lungs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 3980–3988, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. Yu, C. Mitchell, Y. Xing, R. S. Magliozzo, B. R. Bloom, and J. Chan, “Toxicity of nitrogen oxides and related oxidants on mycobacteria: M. tuberculosis is resistant to peroxynitrite anion,” Tubercle and Lung Disease, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 191–198, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. A. Scanga, V. P. Mohan, K. Yu et al., “Depletion of CD4+ T cells causes reactivation of murine persistent tuberculosis despite continued expression of interferon γ and nitric oxide synthase 2,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 347–358, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. V. P. Mohan, C. A. Scanga, K. Yu et al., “Effects of tumor necrosis factor α on host immune response in chronic persistent tuberculosis: possible role for limiting pathology,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1847–1855, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. L. Flynn, M. M. Goldstein, J. Chan et al., “Tumor necrosis factor-α is required in the protective immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice,” Immunity, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 561–572, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. G. D. Bean, D. R. Roach, H. Briscoe et al., “Structural deficiencies in granuloma formation in TNF gene-targeted mice underlie the heightened susceptibility to aerosol Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, which is not compensated for by lymphotoxin,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 6, pp. 3504–3511, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. L. Flynn, C. A. Scanga, K. E. Tanaka, and J. Chan, “Effects of aminoguanidine on latent murine tuberculosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 1796–1803, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  36. D. Dlugovitzky, M. L. Bay, L. Rateni et al., “Influence of disease severity on nitrite and cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB),” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 343–349, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. Al-Attiyah, A. El-Shazly, and A. S. Mustafa, “Comparative analysis of spontaneous and mycobacterial antigen-induced secretion of Th1, Th2 and pro-inflammatory cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells of tuberculosis patients,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 623–632, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. P. Moura, “Avaliação da resposta immune cellular e humoral antes e depois do tratamento da tuberculose pulmonar,” Tese, p. 90, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  39. E. Juárez, C. Carranza, F. Hernández-Sánchez et al., “NOD2 enhances the innate response of alveolar macrophages to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in humans,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 880–889, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. N. Maini, P. C. Taylor, E. Paleolog et al., “Anti-tumour necrosis factor specific antibody (infliximab) treatment provides insights into the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. I56–I60, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  41. I. Solovic, M. Sester, J. J. Gomez-Reino et al., “The risk of tuberculosis related to tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapies: a TBNET consensus statement,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1185–1206, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Stallmach, S. Hagel, and T. Bruns, “Adverse effects of biologics used for treating IBD,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 167–182, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. L. Flynn, J. Chan, and P. L. Lin, “Macrophages and control of granulomatous inflammation in tuberculosis,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. G. Bekker, A. L. Moreira, A. Bergtold, S. Freeman, B. Ryffel, and G. Kaplan, “Immunopathologic effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha in murine mycobacterial infection are dose dependent,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 6954–6961, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Ehlers, J. Benini, H. D. Held, C. Roeck, G. Alber, and S. Uhlig, “αβ T cell receptor-positive cells and interferon-γ, but not inducible nitric oxide synthase, are critical for granuloma necrosis in a mouse model of mycobacteria-induced pulmonary immunopathology,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 194, no. 12, pp. 1847–1859, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. Jönsson, M. Ridell, and A. E. Wold, “Phagocytosis and cytokine response to rough and smooth colony variants of mycobacterium abscessus byhuman peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica. In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. I. Dambuza, N. Allie, L. Fick et al., “Efficacy of membrane TNF mediated host resistance is dependent on mycobacterial virulence,” Tuberculosis, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 221–234, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Keane, H. G. Remold, and H. Kornfeld, “Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 2016–2020, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  49. C. M. Robinson, J. Y. Jung, and G. J. Nau, “Interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor, and interleukin-18 cooperate to control growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human macrophages,” Cytokine, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 233–241, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Manca, M. B. Reed, S. Freeman et al., “Differential monocyte activation underlies strain-specific Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 5511–5514, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y. van Kooyk and T. B. H. Geijtenbeek, “DC-SIGN: escape mechanism for pathogens,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 697–709, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. T. Seah and G. A. W. Rook, “IL-4 influences apoptosis of mycobacterium-reactive lymphocytes in the presence of TNF-α,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1230–1237, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  53. S. Stenger, “Immunological control of tuberculosis: role of tumour necrosis factor and more,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 64, supplement 4, pp. iv24–iv28, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Bocchino, D. Galati, A. Sanduzzi, V. Colizzi, E. Brunetti, and G. Mancino, “Role of mycobacteria-induced monocyte/macrophage apoptosis in the pathogenesis of human tuberculosis,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 375–383, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  55. A. Isaacs, J. Lindenmann, and R. C. Valentine, “Virus interference. II. Some properties of interferon,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, vol. 1471, no. 927, pp. 268–273, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  56. G. H. Schreiber and R. D. Schereiber, “Interferon-γ,” in The Cytokine Handbook, A. W. Thomson and M. T. Lotze, Eds., vol. 1, chapter 24, pp. 567–601, Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition. View at: Google Scholar
  57. I. E. A. Flesch, J. H. Hess, S. Huang et al., “Early interleukin 12 production by macrophages in response to mycobacterial infection depends on interferon γ and tumor necrosis factor α,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 181, no. 5, pp. 1615–1621, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  58. M. J. Fenton, M. W. Vermeulen, S. Kim, M. Burdick, R. M. Strieter, and H. Kornfeld, “Induction of γ interferon production in human alveolar macrophages by Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 5149–5156, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  59. A. Oberholzer, C. Oberholzer, and L. L. Moldawer, “Cytokine signaling—regulation of the immune response in normal and critically ill states,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 28, no. 4, supplement, pp. N3–N12, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  60. A. M. Cooper, “Cell-mediated immune responses in tuberculosis,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 393–422, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. J. Gehring, R. E. Rojas, D. H. Canaday, D. L. Lakey, C. V. Harding, and W. H. Boom, “The Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19-kilodalton lipoprotein inhibits γ interferon-regulated HLA-DR and FcγR1 on human macrophages through toll-like receptor 2,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 4487–4497, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. C. V. Harding, R. K. Pai, M. Convery, T. A. Hamilton, and W. Henry Boom, “Inhibition of IFN-γ-induced class II transactivator expression by a 19-kDa lipoprotein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a potential mechanism for immune evasion,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 175–184, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  63. R. C. O. Tavares, J. Salgado, V. B. Moreira et al., “Cell proliferation and interferon-γ response to recombinant MBP-3, NarL, MT-10.3, and 16kDa Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in Brazilian tuberculosis patients,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 857–861, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  64. A. Nienhaus, A. Schablon, and R. Diel, “Interferon-γ release assay for the diagnosis of latent TB infection—analysis of discordant results, when compared to the tuberculin skin test,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 7, Article ID e2665, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. J. C. T. Costa, R. Silva, R. Sá, M. J. Cardoso, C. Ribeiro, and A. Nienhaus, “Comparison of interferon-γ release assay and tuberculin test for screening in healthcare workers,” Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 211–221, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  66. A. M. Cooper, D. K. Dalton, T. A. Stewart, J. P. Griffin, D. G. Russell, and I. M. Orme, “Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon γ gene-disrupted mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2243–2247, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. L. Flynn, J. Chan, K. J. Triebold, D. K. Dalton, T. A. Stewart, and B. R. Bloom, “An essential role for interferon γ in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2249–2254, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. J. Newport, C. M. Huxley, S. Huston et al., “A mutation in the interferon-γ-receptor gene and susceptibility to mycobacterial infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 26, pp. 1941–1949, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. T. H. M. Ottenhoff, F. A. W. Verreck, M. A. Hoeve, and E. van de Vosse, “Control of human host immunity to mycobacteria,” Tuberculosis, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 53–64, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. E. Jouanguy, F. Altare, S. Lamhamedi et al., “Interferon-γ-receptor deficiency in an infant with fatal bacille Calmette-Guérin infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 26, pp. 1956–1961, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  71. J. L. Casanova and L. Abel, “Genetic dissection of immunity to mycobacteria: the human model,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 20, pp. 581–620, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. G. S. Cooke and A. V. S. Hill, “Genetics of susceptibility to human infectious disease,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 967–977, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. H. M. S. Algood, J. Chan, and J. L. Flynn, “Chemokines and tuberculosis,” Cytokine and Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 467–477, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. V. E. García, K. Uyemura, P. A. Sieling et al., “IL-18 promotes type 1 cytokine production from NK cells and T cells in human intracellular infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 162, no. 10, pp. 6114–6121, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  75. R. Vankayalapati, B. Wizel, S. E. Weis, B. Samten, W. M. Girard, and P. F. Barnes, “Production of interleukin-18 in human tuberculosis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 234–239, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. I. Sugawara, H. Yamada, H. Kaneko, S. Mizuno, K. Takeda, and S. Akira, “Role of interleukin-18 (IL-18) in mycobacterial infection in IL-18- gene-disrupted mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 2585–2589, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  77. M. Morosini, F. Meloni, A. M. Bianco et al., “The assessment of IFN-γ and its regulatory cytokines in the plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 994–1000, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  78. D. Dlugovitzky, A. Torres-Morales, L. Rateni et al., “Circulating profile of Th1 and Th2 cytokines in tuberculosis patients with different degrees of pulmonary involvement,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 203–207, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Dlugovitzky, M. L. Bay, L. Rateni et al., “In vitro synthesis of interferon-γ, interleukin-4, transforming growth factor-β and interleukin-1β by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from tuberculosis patients: Relationship with the severity of pulmonary involvement,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 210–217, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. Torres, T. Herrera, H. Villareal, E. A. Rich, and E. Sada, “Cytokine profiles for peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis and healthy household contacts in response to the 30-kilodalton antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 176–180, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  81. A. J. Wolf, B. Linas, G. J. Trevejo-Nuñez et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects dendritic cells with high frequency and impairs their function in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 2509–2519, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  82. S. A. Khader, S. Partida-Sanchez, G. Bell et al., “Interleukin 12p40 is required for dendritic cell migration and T cell priming after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 7, pp. 1805–1815, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. C. Demangel, P. Bertolino, and W. J. Britton, “Autocrine IL-10 impairs dendritic cell (DC)-derived immune responses to mycobacterial infection by suppressing DC trafficking to draining lymph nodes and local IL-12 production,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 994–1002, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. Y. J. Jung, L. Ryan, R. LaCourse, and R. J. North, “Properties and protective value of the secondary versus primary T helper type 1 response to airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 12, pp. 1915–1924, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. L. Fan, H. Xiao, Z. Hu, and J. D. Ernst, “Variation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-specific IFN-c and IL-17 responses in healthy tuberculin skin test (TST)-positive human subjects,” PLoS ONE, no. 8, Article ID e42716, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. D. F. Fiorentino, M. W. Bond, and T. R. Mosmann, “Two types of mouse T helper cell. IV. Th2 clones secrete a factor that inhibits cytokine production by Th1 clones,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 170, no. 6, pp. 2081–2095, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. R. de Waal Malefyt, H. Yssel, and J. E. de Vries, “Direct effects of IL-10 on subsets of human CD4+ T cell clones and resting T cells: specific inhibition of IL-2 production and proliferation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 150, no. 11, pp. 4754–4765, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  88. L. Schandene, C. Alonso-Vega, F. Willems et al., “B7/CD28-dependent IL-5 production by human resting T cells is inhibited by IL-10,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 152, no. 9, pp. 4368–4374, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  89. S. A. Fulton, J. V. Cross, Z. T. Toossi, and W. H. Boom, “Regulation of interleukin-12 by interleukin-10, transforming growth factor-β, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ in human monocytes infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 178, no. 4, pp. 1105–1114, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  90. J. L. Flynn and J. Chan, “Immunology of tuberculsis,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 19, pp. 93–129, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A. D'Andrea, M. Aste-Amezaga, N. M. Valiante, X. Ma, M. Kubin, and G. Trinchieri, “Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits human lymphocyte interferon γ-production by suppressing natural killer cell stimulatory factor/IL-12 synthesis in accessory cells,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 178, no. 3, pp. 1041–1048, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  92. P. J. Murray and R. A. Young, “Increased antimycobacterial immunity in interleukin-10-deficient mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 3087–3095, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  93. G. L. Beamer, D. K. Flaherty, B. D. Assogba et al., “Interleukin-10 promotes Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease progression in CBA/J mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 5545–5550, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  94. M. I. Henao, C. Montes, S. C. París, and L. F. García, “Cytokine gene polymorphisms in Colombian patients with different clinical presentations of tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. V. A. Boussiotis, E. Y. Tsai, E. J. Yunis et al., “IL-10-producing T cells suppress immune responses in anergic tuberculosis patients,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 105, no. 9, pp. 1317–1325, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  96. R. E. Rojas, K. N. Balaji, A. Subramanian, and W. H. Boom, “Regulation of human CD4+αβ T-cell-receptor-positive (TCR+) and γδ TCR+ T-cell responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis by interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor β,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 6461–6472, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  97. A. S. Almeida, P. M. Lago, N. Boechat et al., “Tuberculosis is associated with a down-modulatory lung immune response that impairs Th1-type immunity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 718–731, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. R. E. Weir, G. F. Black, H. M. Dockrell et al., “Mycobacterial purified protein derivatives stimulate innate immunity: Malawians show enhanced tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-10 responses compared to those of adolescents in the United Kingdom,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 1807–1811, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. H. D. Shin, B. L. Park, L. H. Kim, H. S. Cheong, I. H. Lee, and S. K. Park, “Common interleukin 10 polymorphism associated with decreased risk of tuberculosis,” Experimental and Molecular Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 128–132, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  100. C. B. Pereira, M. Palaci, O. H. M. Leite, A. J. S. Duarte, and G. Benard, “Monocyte cytokine secretion in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis differs from that of healthy infected subjects and correlates with clinical manifestations,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. A. A. Awomoyi, A. Marchant, J. M. M. Howson, K. P. W. J. McAdam, J. M. Blackwell, and M. J. Newport, “Interleukin-10, polymorphism in SLC11A1 (formerly NRAMP1), and susceptibility to tuberculosis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 186, no. 12, pp. 1808–1814, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. J. F. McDyer, M. N. Hackley, T. E. Walsh, J. L. Cook, and R. A. Seder, “Patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with low CD4+ T cell counts have impaired Th1 responses,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 492–500, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  103. C. E. Gazeta, M. L. S. Santos G, S. H. F. Vendramini, J. M. Pinto Neto, and T. C. S. Villa, “Controle de comunicantes de tuberculose no Brasil: Revisão de literatura (1984–2004),” Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 306–313, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  104. A. Demissie, M. Abebe, A. Aseffa et al., “Healthy individuals that control a latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis express high levels of Th1 cytokines and the IL-4 antagonist IL-4δ2,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 11, pp. 6938–6943, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  105. A. Demissie, L. Wassie, M. Abebe et al., “The 6-kilodalton early secreted antigenic target-responsive, asymptomatic contacts of tuberculosis patients express elevated levels of interleukin-4 and reduced levels of γ interferon,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 2817–2822, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. Y. V. N. Cavalcanti, V. R. A. Pereira, L. C. Reis et al., “Evaluation of memory immune response to mycobacterium extract among household contact of tuberculosis cases,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. J. O. Olobo, M. Geletu, A. Demissie et al., “Circulating TNF-α, TGF-β, and IL-10 in tuberculosis patients and healthy contacts,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. S. A. Sharpe, E. Eschelbach, R. J. Basaraba et al., “Determination of lesion volume by MRI and stereology in a macaque model of tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 405–416, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Yone Vila Nova Cavalcanti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.