Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
PPAR Research
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 498352, 9 pages
Review Article

Dietary Modulation of Inflammation-Induced Colorectal Cancer through PPAR

Cell and Organism Section, Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition Laboratory, Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

Received 15 December 2008; Revised 9 February 2009; Accepted 19 February 2009

Academic Editor: Rosa Canuto

Copyright © 2009 Ashlee B. Carter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Mounting evidence suggests that the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) is dramatically increased for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. For instance, patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC) have a 12–20% increased risk for developing CRC. Preventive strategies utilizing nontoxic natural compounds that modulate immune responses could be successful in the suppression of inflammation-driven colorectal cancer in high-risk groups. The increase of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR- ) expression and its transcriptional activity has been identified as a target for anti-inflammatory efforts, and the suppression of inflammation-driven colon cancer. PPAR down-modulates inflammation and elicits antiproliferative and proapoptotic actions in epithelial cells. All of which may decrease the risk for inflammation-induced CRC. This review will focus on the use of orally active, naturally occurring chemopreventive approaches against inflammation-induced CRC that target PPAR and therefore down-modulate inflammation.

1. Introduction

The molecular basis for colorectal cancer (CRC) stems from genomic instability through genetic mutations linked to oxidative damage from chronic inflammation [1, 2]. Dissecting the inflammatory networks in the gut and identifying novel chemopreventive approaches are important because over 149 000 people will be diagnosed with CRC in 2009 in the United States; although there is a trend to a lower incidence that probably can be attributed to extensive screening and prevention efforts, almost 50 000 people will die of colon cancer this year [3, 4]. Furthermore, CRC is still the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The most common risk factors for CRC include genetic predispositions (adenomatous polyposis coli, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) and exposure to radiation but intestinal inflammation (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease) also drastically increase the risk for developing colon cancer especially at early ages ( 30 years of age) [5]. For instance, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other types of chronic inflammation increase the risk for developing more severe colorectal cancer by 2 or 3 fold [2, 6]. Thus, the role of the immune system in the development and pathology of cancer is a large and growing area of research [1]. In addition, developing effective chemopreventive interventions is both timely and urgently needed.

The alimentary tract is a sterile organ at very early stages of development (i.e., embryonic and fetal phases). However, after birth, the gastrointestinal mucosa, particularly that lining the large intestine and terminal ileum, evolves to become densely colonized by bacteria. Specifically, from birth to weaning, successive waves of microorganisms will colonize the mucosa with a final result of 500–1000 species, which amount to 100 trillion discreet microorganisms, residing in the large intestine of adult humans [7]. The number of gut microorganisms is 10 times greater than the total number of somatic and stem cells [8]. In healthy individuals, these bacteria contribute to the regulation of T cell responses [9]. With a few exceptions, the lack of regulation leads to excessive polarization toward a T helper 1 (Th1) phenotype and initiation of IBD. The cellular interactions between T cells and antigen-presenting cells occurring in the gut mucosa and draining lymph nodes are tightly regulated to prevent excessive immune responses to foods and the gut microflora, whereas a defect in down-regulation of the immune responses predominates in individuals with IBD. The distribution and function of lamina proprial macrophages and T cells in the gut mucosa are important determinants of the extent and severity of the inflammatory process, and thus, represent targets for anti-inflammatory compounds. Bioactive food ingredients such as n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) are well recognized to suppress colonic inflammation and decrease the risk of colorectal cancer [10]. However, the limited understanding about their mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action has halted further progress in the development of nutrition-based approaches for preventing this devastating and widespread disease.

Many of the anti-inflammatory bioactive food ingredients and nutraceuticals elicit its actions through nuclear receptors, a broad class of transcription factors which regulate the expression of genes [11]. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), which make up a fatty acid binding subfamily of nuclear receptors, are involved regulating immune responses and therefore are potential therapeutic targets for CRC [12]. Nuclear receptors are common pharmaceutical targets for diabetes, IBD, endotoxemia. Of note, about 13% of all FDA-approved drugs target nuclear receptors [13]. Thus, they offer a great potential as targets for novel chemopreventive agents against both gut inflammation and inflammation-induced CRC.

2. Significance of CRC

Colorectal cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer, second only to lung cancer [14]. In 2004, over 35% of all men and women in the United States diagnosed with CRC died. The risk of colorectal cancer in the general population is less than 7%, though chronic inflammation including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD)—the two clinical manifestations of IBD—can increase the risk of colorectal cancer. More specifically, the risk of developing colorectal cancer for an ulcerative colitis patient is estimated to be 2% after 10 years, 8% after 20 years, and 18% after 30 years of disease onset [15].

Demographics is another factor related to CRC, although not as strong as inflammation. Evidence suggests that ethnicity, gender, and geography all play a role. For instance, African American males over 50 living in the Western world are statistically at the highest risk for CRC [16]. Overall, inflammation emerges as the major factor for developing CRC. The consequences of CRC can be significant as the main therapies include colon removal which can lower dramatically a patient’s quality of life, or lifelong surveillance including regular colonoscopies and medications, some of which have significant side effects [2]. In addition, in contrast to the more limited cost of chemoprevention, the cost of palliative treatment can represent a major burden for many CRC patients, with frequent hospital visits and expensive medications. Over 1.8 billion dollars are spent in medical care for IBD patients per year [16]. All of which could be minimized with more effective chemopreventive approaches.

3. The Role of the Mucosal Immune System in CRC

The mucosal immune system consists of cells and organs associated with body surfaces directly exposed to the environment, including lymphoid tissues associated with the lachrymal, salivary, gastrointestinal, respiratory and urogenital tracts as well as the lactating breasts [17]. The mucosal immune system is divided into inductive sites, where the immune responses are initiated or induced (antigen presentation to T cells) and effector sites, where responses are elicited (e.g., cytokine production, pathogen destruction).

Interestingly, about 70% of the immune system is localized in the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, understanding its architecture, functions, and how to favorable manipulate them is paramount for a rational design of chemopreventive approaches against both gastrointestinal inflammation and CRC. The gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) includes tonsils (lingual tonsils or Waldeyer’s ring), adenoids (nasopharyngeal tonsils), appendix and specialized structures called Peyer’s Patches, draining lymph nodes (i.e., mesenteric lymph nodes) in inductive sites and diffuse lymphoid tissue including intraepithelial lymphocytes and lamina propria cells (i.e., T cells, B cells, plasma cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, eosinophils, and mast cells) and isolated follicles in effector sites. Alterations in the GALT are well recognized to be an important mechanism underlying impaired host defense in CRC patients. Diet plays an important role in shaping the GALT as the lack of enteral delivery of nutrients decreases the numbers of T cells in the intraepithelial spaces and lamina propria of colorectal cancer patients [18]. In addition, the gastrointestinal tract is in very close proximity with the intraabdominal white adipose tissue (WAT) which in obese and overweight individuals is populated by large numbers of inflammatory macrophages [19]. Thus, the cross-talk between the GALT and WAT may play a role in shaping inflammatory responses that lead to CRC. In this regard, Crohn et al. in 1932 published a landmark paper characterizing for the first time Crohn’s disease [20]. In this study, changes in the appearance in mesenteric adipose tissue were reported to be a key characteristic of the disease. In line with those early findings, we have recently found that macrophage infiltration into the intra-abdominal fat worsens the severity of experimental IBD [21]. Epidemiological evidence suggests a link between obesity and human CRC [22]. While the specific mechanisms underlying this link remain unknown, obesity-related inflammation represents a plausible explanation for this increased risk. The better understanding of the relationship between GALT and WAT may uncover some novel insights on mechanisms of carcinogensis and shed new light on possible preventive approaches.

The immune modulatory activities that aid in CRC chemoprevention by suppressing inflammation differ from the type of immune modulation after carcinogenesis has already occurred. Different modulatory agents should be sought for before and after carcinogenesis in order to heighten antitumor immune responses (i.e., T helper 1 and CD8+ T cell-mediated cytolytic responses) and to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy. The mucosal immune system will play a crucial role in both phases of the disease. Interestingly, PPAR is expressed by all cell types that play a major role in the pathogenesis of CRC, including epithelial cells, T cells, and macrophages [23]. Therefore their function can theoretically be modulated by this nuclear receptor.

4. Inflammation-Induced CRC

It is estimated that approximately 15% of deaths in patients with CD and UC can be attributed to inflammation-induced CRC. The risk of developing CRC for CD and UC patients increases yearly, eventually reaching 12–20% increased risk after living with disease for 30 years [24]. Markers of inflammation like C reactive protein (CRP) whose synthesis occurs in hepatocytes and is induced by IL-6 and TNF- in the serum have even been used as predictors of disease severity in advanced stages of CRC [16, 25]. While the exact mechanism for this elevated risk is still unknown, recent studies have been investigating whether the marked reduction in levels of the nuclear receptor PPAR   in colons of UC patients may play a role in their increased susceptibility to developing colorectal cancer [26]. The exact mechanisms by which inflammation leads to CRC are slowly being elucidated.

The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF- B), which is found at the crossroads of many inflammatory pathways, has also been linked to tissue repair [27]. Aberrant NF- B signaling has been proposed to be one of the mechanisms by which chronic inflammation leads to cancer [28]. In a murine model of intestinal cancer, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)min/+ mice, it was shown that the TLRs and IL-1R, through the adaptor MyD88, control the signaling of many genes which modify tumorigenesis in the intestine, including the NF- B-mediated genes IL-6 and IL-1 [29]. Loss-of-function studies demonstrated that MyD88-induced IL-6 was necessary for colon carcinogenesis [30].

Another upstream regulator of NF- B, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF- ), also plays a role in the development of IBD and CRC. TNF- is a pro-inflammatory cytokine which activates NF- B as a positive autocrine feedback signal. Once activated, NF- B induces further production of TNF- and other pro-inflammatory mediators [31]. The positive feedback loop between TNF- and NF- B may lead to the overactivation of the NF- B tissue repair pathways, which in turn leads to tumorigenesis. Blockade of NF- B dramatically reduced tumor incidence by 75% in mice with DSS colitis [32]. Popivanova et al. more recently showed that treatment of DSS-challenged mice with a TNF- inhibitor also reduces tumor incidence [33]. High levels of circulating TNF- in plasma are associated with colorectal adenomas [34], further confirming the link between systemic inflammation and CRC.

One of the hallmarks of cancer cells is an uncontrolled growth and supported by a metabolic shift from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism [35]. This leads to an increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the electron transport chain. A state of chronic inflammation may also increase production of ROS as cytokines in inflammatory sites recruit macrophages and neutrophils which produce ROS. The ROS damage DNA which leads to mutations and the development of cancer [36]. ROS are also involved in pathways which progress tumor growth by increasing the production of interleukin 8 (IL-8) and inducible nitric oxide (iNOS), and inducing the secretion of matrix metalloprotease-1 (MMP-1) [37]. This illustrates an interaction between dysregulated host responses characterized by excessive inflammation resulting in genotype changes (i.e., mutations) that will in turn lead to CRC.

5. Role of PPAR in Regulating Inflammation-Induced CRC

The PPARs are a subfamily of nuclear hormone receptors which recognize a wide range of ligands, then heterodimerize with retinoid X receptor (RXR), and regulate expression of responsive genes. They also antagonize the activity of transcription factors, involved in inflammation and immunity such as NF- B, activator protein-1 (AP-1), nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), and STATs [38]. Three different isotypes of PPARs, each of which represents a therapeutic target, have so far been identified: PPAR , PPAR , and PPAR [39]. Of the three subtypes, PPAR , in particular, represents a potential therapeutic target for CRC and IBD chemoprevention. However, the apparent ability of PPAR to promote differentiation and maturation of epithelial cells has also led to studies of its potential role in the cause of CRC. Animal studies suggest both pro- and anticancer properties in the colon [4042], though the bulk of studies point to PPAR ligands as chemopreventative agents [43].

PPAR is found in monocytes, macrophages, T cells, dendritic cells, skeletal muscle, adipocytes, and gastrointestinal epithelium and is involved in wide range of processes including the regulation of lipid and glucose homeostasis, inflammation, and adipocyte differentiation [38, 44]. One way by which PPAR acts in an anti-inflammatory capacity is through the inhibition of NF- B activity. More specifically, PPAR can interact directly with the NF- B subunits p50 and p65 [45]. In fact PPAR    has been shown to antagonize the NF- B activities through several mechanisms. A nonpathogenic bacterium present in the human gut, B. thetaiotaomicron, acts in an anti-inflammatory capacity in Caco-2 cells by stimulating PPAR to act as a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttle for the p65 subunit of NF- B. PPAR binds to the p65 subunit and prevents NF- B transcriptional regulation by exporting it from the nucleus [46]. In macrophages, sumoylation of PPAR ligand-binding domain prevents the removal of the nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR)/histone deacetylase-3 (HDAC3) complex from the promoters of proinflammatory genes and, therefore, blocks NF- B [47, 48]. Stimulation of colonic epithelial cells with PPAR ligands prevents the immune-induced degradation of I B, anchoring NF- B in the cytosol [49]. Overall, the inhibition of NF- B in response to the activity of PPAR ligands attenuates the expression of various cytokines and inflammatory cells in colonic epithelial cells such as IL-1beta, COX-2, IL-6 IL-8, TNF- , IFN- , and iNOS [4851].

Increased expression of PPAR in human colorectal cancer cell lines treated with troglitazone, a PPAR agonist, is associated with increased differentiation [52]. This effect may exert itself due to the interaction of PPAR with the coactivator protein, Hic5, expressed in colonic epithelial cells. The expression of both Hic5 and PPAR is down-regulated in tumors. This interaction mediates induction of gut epithelial differentiation markers such as keratin 20 in gastrointestinal cells [53].

Pioglitazone, a synthetic agonist for PPAR , increases protein expression of caspase-3, a pro-apoptotic protein, and decreases protein expression of apoptotic inhibitory proteins Bcl-2, COX-2, and XIAP in retinoblastoma protein (RB)-deficient human CRC cells (SNU-C4 and SNU-C2A) [54]. These results have been demonstrated with several CRC cell lines using a number of PPAR agonists [5558]. However, a limited number of mechanistic studies in inflammation-induced CRC are available using naturally occurring agonists of PPAR .

6. Potential Use of Naturally Occurring Agonists of PPAR for CRC Chemoprevention

A number of studies have examined the use of naturally occurring compounds for the prevention and treatment of inflammatory diseases and several types of cancer (Table 1). These naturally occurring compounds represent naturally occurring agonists of PPAR   and/or potential therapies for inflammation induced-CRC. However, only a few have shown efficacy in the prevention or treatment of CRC. Among those are n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which are known ligands or activators for PPARs. An active role for protein syndecan-1, which is regulated by PUFAs and a PPAR molecular target, has recently been identified in causing apoptosis in both prostate and breast cancer cells [83]. There is also some evidence to suggests docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), one of the PUFAs, is important in cellular apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colorectal cancer. DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) work at the molecular level through signaling pathways putting stress on proliferating cells and ultimately causing changes in gene expression of cancer cell lines [84]. DHA has generated promising results in animal studies with transplantable or chemically induced tumor. Success in some preclinical animal studies has led to clinical trials, many of which are ongoing, which use n-3 PUFAs as a nutritional supplement to reduce inflammation and modulate immune response [85]. Previously, we have demonstrated that dietary supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) upregulated colonic expression of PPAR and downregulated colonic expression of TNF- and inflammatory lesions in DSS-challenged pigs [86]. In DSS-challenged mice, immune and epithelial cell PPAR   was required for the anti-inflammatory efficacy of CLA [75].

Table 1: Natural compounds with therapeutic action against inflammation.

Another naturally occurring agent which shows promise in CRC is -Tocopherol—a vitamin that decreases COX-2 activity and nitric oxide (NO) expression [87]. The chemoprotective effect of -Tocopherol may also occur through an upregulation PPAR as treatment of human colon cancer cells (SW480 cells) with both 5 and 10  M concentrations of -Tocopherol resulted in an increase of both PPAR mRNA and protein expression [88].

The role of diet in colorectal cancer may be even more important than in other cancers due to the direct effect compounds have with the gut. This local effect has been shown to be critical for curcumin—a compound with negligible distribution outside the gut [89]. Broadly, methods of direct inhibition through nutraceuticals include reducing damage to DNA by neutralizing carcinogens, cytotoxicity or apoptosis of tumor cells, antiangiogenesis, and acting as anti-inflammatory agents [90]. In line with the concept of personalized medicine, some physicians recommend that people with a family history of cancers, or previously detected dysplasia or microtumors consume nutraceuticals first and foremost in the form of food and also in the form of multivitamins to decrease the risk of cancer [90]. However, the limited understanding of the mechanisms of action underlying the effects of botanicals, vitamins, and fatty acids has slowed down the rational development of preventive and therapeutic approaches against inflammation-induced CRC.

7. Conclusions and Future Directions

People with CD or UC are predisposed to developing CRC, an outcome that depends on the extent and duration of chronic inflammation, which in turn is dependent on NF- B and ROS activity [6] (Figure 1). The key to maintaining homeostasis in the gut entails both downregulating inflammation as a chemopreventative method and promoting epithelial cell apoptosis and anti-tumor immune responses after the onset of cancer. As such, it is reasonable to suspect that introducing bioactive food ingredients which modulate NF- B or ROS pathways could be used to regulate inflammation before the onset of cancer. PPAR ligands have consistently acted as modulators and suppressors of NF- B activity [4548, 91].

Figure 1: Chronic inflammation activates pathways leading to cancer. Chronic inflammation stemming from ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), the two clinical manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease, activates nuclear factor- B (NF- B) downstream of MyD88 through the TLR and IL-1R. In turn, NF- B activation increases the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1 . TNF- also activates NF- B which, in turn, increases the expression of TNF- , leading to a positive feedback loop between TNF- and NF- B. Chronic inflammation also leads to the production of ROS which can damage DNA which can cause mutations responsible for tumorigenesis. ROS also cause the production of IL-8, iNOS, and MMP-1, which promote tumor growth. On the other hand, activation of PPAR can block carcinogenesis at two levels: (1) by antagonizing NF- B activity and (2) by suppressing IL-8 and iNOS expression.

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are a well-known class of diabetes medication which acts as PPAR ligands. TZDs also suppress tumorigenesis in several types of cancers, including colon cancer [92]. Therefore, the identification of novel, naturally occurring PPAR ligands may represent a promising route of CRC chemoprevention.

There is also strong potential for the use of these bioactive compounds in conjunction with current treatments as this approach has already been shown to have positive results in cancer treatment [43].

The therapeutic effects of dietary CLA, and PUFAs through the activation of PPAR have already been summarized. Natural compounds for the treatment of CRC through PPAR have the potential to modulate the immune response and to be safe, easily accessible, and cost-effective.


This work is supported by a grant award no. 5R01AT4308 of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of Health awarded to the third author, European Commission grant no. 224836, and funds from the Nutritional Immunology and Molecular Nutrition Laboratory.


  1. I. Atreya and M. F. Neurath, “Immune cells in colorectal cancer: prognostic relevance and therapeutic strategies,” Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 561–572, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Xie and S. H. Itzkowitz, “Cancer in inflammatory bowel disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 378–389, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. B. A. Miller, K. C. Chu, B. F. Hankey, and L. A. G. Ries, “Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S,” Cancer Causes & Control, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 227–256, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. L. A. Ries, D. Melbert, M. Krapcho et al., Eds., “SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2005,” Annual Report, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Spunt, W. Furman, M. La Quaglia, M. Bondy, and R. Goldberg, “Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15 to 29 years of age,” SEER AYA Monograph, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md, USA, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. L. Zisman and D. T. Rubin, “Colorectal cancer and dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 2662–2669, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. G. Greicius, V. Arulampalam, and S. Pettersson, “A CLA's act: feeding away inflammation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 994–996, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. C. Savage, “Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 31, pp. 107–133, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Chow and S. K. Mazmanian, “Getting the bugs out of the immune system: do bacterial microbiota “fix” intestinal T cell responses?” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. R. Ferguson and M. Philpott, “Cancer prevention by dietary bioactive components that target the immune response,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 459–464, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. M. Olefsky, “Nuclear receptor minireview series,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 40, pp. 36863–36864, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. E. K.-H. Chow, B. Razani, and G. Cheng, “Innate immune system regulation of nuclear hormone receptors in metabolic diseases,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Overington, B. Al-Lazikani, and A. L. Hopkins, “How many drug targets are there?” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 993–996, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. L. V. McFarland, “State-of-the-art of irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease research in 2008,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 2625–2629, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. P. L. Lakatos and L. Lakatos, “Risk for colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: changes, causes and management strategies,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 25, pp. 3937–3947, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. A. Read, S. T. B. Choy, P. J. Beale, and S. J. Clarke, “Evaluation of nutritional and inflammatory status of advanced colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with survival,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 78–85, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. K. Murphy, P. Travers, and M. Walport, Janeway's Immunobiology, Garland Science, Taylor & Francis, LLC, New York, NY, USA, 7th edition, 2008.
  18. K. Okamoto, K. Fukatsu, C. Ueno et al., “T lymphocyte numbers in human gut associated lymphoid tissue are reduced without enteral nutrition,” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 56–58, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. E. Shoelson, J. Lee, and A. B. Goldfine, “Inflammation and insulin resistance,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 116, no. 7, pp. 1793–1801, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. B. B. Crohn, L. Ginzburg, and G. D. Oppenhaimer, “Regional ileitis, a pathologic and clinical entity,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1323–1329, 1932. View at Google Scholar
  21. J. Bassaganya-Riera, G. Ferrer, O. Casagran et al., “F4/80hiCCR2hi macrophage infiltration into the intra-abdominal fat worsens the severity of experimental IBD in obese mice with DSS colitis,” e-SPEN, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. e90–e97, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. A. Moghaddam, M. Woodward, and R. Huxley, “Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2533–2547, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. L. Széles, D. Töröcsik, and L. Nagy, “PPARγ in immunity and inflammation: cell types and diseases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1771, no. 8, pp. 1014–1030, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. P. Munkholm, “Review article: the incidence and prevalence of colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 18, supplement 2, pp. 1–5, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J.-Y. Blay, S. Negrier, V. Combaret et al., “Serum level of interleukin 6 as a prognosis factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma,” Cancer Research, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3317–3322, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Desreumaux and S. Ghosh, “Review article: mode of action and delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid—new evidence,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 24, supplement 1, pp. 2–9, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. L.-W. Chen, L. Egan, Z.-W. Li, F. R. Greten, M. F. Kagnoff, and M. Karin, “The two faces of IKK and NF-κB inhibition: prevention of systemic inflammation but increased local injury following intestinal ischemia-reperfusion,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 575–581, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. E. Naugler and M. Karin, “NF-κB and cancer—identifying targets and mechanisms,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Rakoff-Nahoum and R. Medzhitov, “Regulation of spontaneous intestinal tumorigenesis through the adaptor protein MyD88,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5834, pp. 124–127, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. W. E. Naugler, T. Sakurai, S. Kim et al., “Gender disparity in liver cancer due to sex differences in MyD88-dependent IL-6 production,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5834, pp. 121–124, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. F. Balkwill, “TNF-α in promotion and progression of cancer,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 409–416, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. F. R. Greten, L. Eckmann, T. F. Greten et al., “IKKβ links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer,” Cell, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 285–296, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. B. K. Popivanova, K. Kitamura, Y. Wu et al., “Blocking TNF-α in mice reduces colorectal carcinogenesis associated with chronic colitis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 560–570, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. S. Kim, T. O. Keku, C. Martin et al., “Circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and risk of colorectal adenomas,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 323–328, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. O. Warburg, “On the origin of cancer cells,” Science, vol. 123, no. 3191, pp. 309–314, 1956. View at Google Scholar
  36. H. Pelicano, D. Carney, and P. Huang, “ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. A. Roessner, D. Kuester, P. Malfertheiner, and R. Schneider-Stock, “Oxidative stress in ulcerative colitis-associated carcinogenesis,” Pathology Research and Practice, vol. 204, no. 7, pp. 511–524, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. E. A. Thompson, “PPARγ physiology and pathology in gastrointestinal epithelial cells,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 167–176, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  39. R. Kostadinova, W. Wahli, and L. Michalik, “PPARs in diseases: control mechanisms of inflammation,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 25, pp. 2995–3009, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Lefebvre, B. Paulweber, L. Fajas et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is induced during differentiation of colon epithelium cells,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 331–340, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. E. Saez, P. Tontonoz, M. C. Nelson et al., “Activators of the nuclear receptor PPARγ enhance colon polyp formation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1058–1061, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. P. Sarraf, E. Mueller, W. M. Smith et al., “Loss-of-function mutations in PPARγ associated with human colon cancer,” Molecular Cell, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 799–804, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. I. A. Voutsadakis, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and colorectal carcinogenesis,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 917–928, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. H. P. Koeffler, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and cancers,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  45. S. W. Chung, B. Y. Kang, S. H. Kim et al., “Oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibits interleukin-12 production in lipopolysaccharide-activated mouse macrophages via direct interactions between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and nuclear factor-κB,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 42, pp. 32681–32687, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  46. D. Kelly, J. I. Campbell, T. P. King et al., “Commensal anaerobic gut bacteria attenuate inflammation by regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic shutting of PPAR-γ and ReIA,” Nature Immunology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 104–112, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. G. Pascual, A. L. Fong, S. Ogawa et al., “A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-γ,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7059, pp. 759–763, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. C. Jennewein, A. M. Kuhn, M. V. Schmidt et al., “Sumoylation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by apoptotic cells prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced NCoR removal from kappaB binding sites mediating transrepression of proinflammatory cytokines,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 8, pp. 5646–5652, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  49. C. G. Su, X. Wen, S. T. Bailey et al., “A novel therapy for colitis utilizing PPAR-γ ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammatory response,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 383–389, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  50. R. Marion-Letellier, M. Butler, P. Déchelotte, R. J. Playford, and S. Ghosh, “Comparison of cytokine modulation by natural peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ ligands with synthetic ligands in intestinal-like Caco-2 cells and human dendritic cells—potential for dietary modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in intestinal inflammation,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 939–948, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  51. J. D. Ramakers, M. I. Verstege, G. Thuijls, A. A. Te Velde, R. P. Mensink, and J. Plat, “The PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone impairs colonic inflammation in mice with experimental colitis,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Kato, T. Kusumi, S. Tsuchida, M. Tanaka, M. Sasaki, and H. Kudo, “Induction of differentiation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ expression in colon cancer cell lines by troglitazone,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 73–79, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. S. Drori, G. D. Girnun, L. Tou et al., “Hic-5 regulates an epithelial program mediated by PPARγ,” Genes & Development, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 362–375, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. C. J. Lee, J. S. Han, C. Y. Seo et al., “Pioglitazone, a synthetic ligand for PPARγ, induces apoptosis in RB-deficient human colorectal cancer cells,” Apoptosis, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 401–411, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. W. K. Leung, A. Bai, V. Y. W. Chan et al., “Effect of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ ligands on growth and gene expression profiles of gastric cancer cells,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 331–338, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. A. Cerbone, C. Toaldo, S. Laurora et al., “4-Hydroxynonenal and PPARγ ligands affect proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in colon cancer cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1661–1670, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. M. S. Lin, W. C. Chen, X. Bai, and Y. D. Wang, “Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ inhibits cell growth via apoptosis and arrest of the cell cycle in human colorectal cancer,” Journal of Digestive Diseases, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. G. G. Chen, J. F. Lee, S. H. Wang, U. P. F. Chan, P. C. Ip, and W. Y. Lau, “Apoptosis induced by activation of peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor-gamma is associated with Bcl-2 and Nf-kB in human colon cancer,” Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 22, pp. 2631–2646, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. S. Duessel, R. M. Heuertz, and U. R. Ezekiel, “Growth inhibition of human colon cancer cells by plant compounds,” Clinical Laboratory Science, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 151–157, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  60. J. A. Baur, K. J. Pearson, N. L. Price et al., “Resveratrol improves health and survival of mice on a high-calorie diet,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7117, pp. 337–342, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. A. Harari, D. Harats, D. Marko et al., “A 9-cisβ-carotene-enriched diet inhibits atherogenesis and fatty liver formation in LDL receptor knockout mice,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 1923–1930, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  62. B. E. Bachmeier, I. V. Mohrenz, V. Mirisola et al., “Curcumin downregulates the inflammatory cytokines CXCL1 and -2 in breast cancer cells via NFκB,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 779–789, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. H. Hatcher, R. Planalp, J. Cho, F. M. Torti, and S. V. Torti, “Curcumin: from ancient medicine to current clinical trials,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1631–1652, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. E. Jennings, “Folic acid as a cancer-preventing agent,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 297–303, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. W. L. Stone, K. Krishnan, S. E. Campbell, M. Qui, S. G. Whaley, and H. Yang, “Tocopherols and the treatment of colon cancer,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1031, pp. 223–233, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. N. Nieto, M. I. Fernandez, M. I. Torres, A. Ríos, M. D. Suarez, and A. Gil, “Dietary monounsaturated n-3 and n-6 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids affect cellular antioxidant defense system in rats with experimental ulcerative colitis induced by trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2676–2687, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. A. G. Pittas, S. S. Harris, P. C. Stark, and B. Dawson-Hughes, “The effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose and markers of inflammation in nondiabetic adults,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 980–986, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. I. Chung, G. Han, M. Seshadri et al., “Role of vitamin D receptor in the antiproliferative effects of calcitriol in tumor-derived endothelial cells and tumor angiogenesis in vivo,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 967–975, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. A. Schatzkin, T. Mouw, Y. Park et al., “Dietary fiber and whole-grain consumption in relation to colorectal cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1353–1360, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  70. E. Lecona, J. I. Barrasa, N. Olmo, B. Llorente, J. Turnay, and M. A. Lizarbe, “Upregulation of annexin A1 expression by butyrate in human colon adenocarcinoma cells: role of p53, NF-Y, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 4665–4674, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. M. Guslandi, G. Mezzi, M. Sorghi, and P. A. Testoni, “Saccharomyces boulardii in maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1462–1464, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. C. I. Fotiadis, C. N. Stoidis, B. G. Spyropoulos, and E. D. Zografos, “Role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in chemoprevention for colorectal cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 42, pp. 6453–6457, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  73. M. Roller, Y. Clune, K. Collins, G. Rechkemmer, and B. Watzl, “Consumption of prebiotic inulin enriched with oligofructose in combination with the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium lactis has minor effects on selected immune parameters in polypectomised and colon cancer patients,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 676–684, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. A. Murakami, H. Ashida, and J. Terao, “Multitargeted cancer prevention by quercetin,” Cancer Letters, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 315–325, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. J. Bassaganya-Riera, K. Reynolds, S. Martino-Catt et al., “Activation of PPAR γ and Δ by conjugated linoleic acid mediates protection from experimental inflammatory bowel disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 777–791, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. C. Z. Wang, J. T. Xie, B. Zhang et al., “Chemopreventive effects of Panax notoginseng and its major constituents on SW480 human colorectal cancer cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1149–1156, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  77. J. L. Funk, J. B. Frye, J. N. Oyarzo et al., “Efficacy and mechanism of action of turmeric supplements in the treatment of experimental arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3452–3464, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. M. Cotterchio, B. A. Boucher, M. Manno, S. Gallinger, A. Okey, and P. Harper, “Dietary phytoestrogen intake is associated with reduced colorectal cancer risk,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 136, no. 12, pp. 3046–3053, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  79. J. L. Slavin, “Mechanisms for the impact of whole grain foods on cancer risk,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 19, supplement 3, pp. 300S–307S, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  80. T. Yoshida, M. Konishi, M. Horinaka et al., “Kaempferol sensitizes colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 375, no. 1, pp. 129–133, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. H. Raza and A. John, “In vitro effects of tea polyphenols on redox metabolism, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in PC12 cells,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1138, pp. 358–365, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. G. Gordillo, H. Fang, S. Khanna, J. Harper, G. Phillips, and C. K. Sen, “Oral administration of blueberry inhibits angiogenic tumor growth and enhances survival of mice with endothelial cell neoplasm,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. I. J. Edwards and J. T. O'Flaherty, “Omega-3 fatty acids and PPARγ in cancer,” PPAR Research, vol. 2008, Article ID 358052, 14 pages, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. C. H. Jakobsen, G. L. Storvold, H. Bremseth et al., “DHA induces ER stress and growth arrest in human colon cancer cells: associations with cholesterol and calcium homeostasis,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2089–2100, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  85. I. M. Berquin, I. J. Edwards, and Y. Q. Chen, “Multi-targeted therapy of cancer by omega-3 fatty acids,” Cancer Letters, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 363–377, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. J. Bassaganya-Riera and R. Hontecillas, “CLA and n-3 PUFA differentially modulate clinical activity and colonic PPAR-responsive gene expression in a pig model of experimental IBD,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 454–465, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. S. Campbell, W. Stone, S. Whaley, and K. Krishnan, “Development of gamma (γ)-tocopherol as a colorectal cancer chemopreventive agent,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 249–259, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. S. E. Campbell, W. L. Stone, S. G. Whaley, M. Qui, and K. Krishnan, “Gamma (γ) tocopherol upregulates peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) gamma (γ) expression in SW 480 human colon cancer cell lines,” BMC Cancer, vol. 3, article 25, pp. 1–13, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. G. Garcea, D. P. Berry, D. J. L. Jones et al., “Consumption of the putative chemopreventive agent curcumin by cancer patients: assessment of curcumin levels in the colorectum and their pharmacodynamic consequences,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 120–125, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  90. R. Béliveau and D. Gingras, “Role of nutrition in preventing cancer,” Canadian Family Physician, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1905–1911, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  91. S. M. Jackson, F. Parhami, X.-P. Xi et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators target human endothelial cells to inhibit leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2094–2104, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  92. C Blanquicett, J Roman, and C. M. Hart, “Thiazolidinediones as anti-cancer agents,” Cancer Therapy, vol. 6A, pp. 25–34, 2008. View at Google Scholar