PPAR Research

PPAR Research / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) in Disease and Targeted Treatments

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 6694214 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6694214

Yujing Xia, Jingjing Li, Kan Chen, Jiao Feng, Chuanyong Guo, "Bergenin Attenuates Hepatic Fibrosis by Regulating Autophagy Mediated by the PPAR-γ/TGF-β Pathway", PPAR Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 6694214, 13 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6694214

Bergenin Attenuates Hepatic Fibrosis by Regulating Autophagy Mediated by the PPAR-γ/TGF-β Pathway

Academic Editor: Ravinder K. Kaundal
Received14 Oct 2020
Revised06 Dec 2020
Accepted15 Dec 2020
Published31 Dec 2020

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a pathological process involving diffuse extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition in the liver. It is typical of many chronic liver diseases, including cirrhosis, and effective drugs are needed. In this study, we explored the protective effect of bergenin on liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride and bile duct ligation. A variety of molecular biological methods (qRT-PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry) were employed to confirm the increased degree of hepatocyte injury and ECM formation in the disease model, consistent with autophagy and activation of the TGF-β pathway. Bergenin activated PPAR-γ and inhibited TGF-β and autophagy and decreased liver fibrosis by inhibiting hepatocyte necrosis and ECM formation in a dose-dependent manner. The results suggest that bergenin may be a promising drug candidate for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

1. Introduction

Liver fibrosis is a pathophysiological process in which various pathogenic factors continually damage the liver, resulting in extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and fibrous scar formation [1]. According to statistics, more than one million people worldwide die of end-stage liver disease caused by liver fibrosis every year [2]. Therefore, in recent years, experts in the field have explored treatments for liver diseases, especially liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. The consensus is that new drugs are needed to improve both diagnosis and treatment.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) is a ligand-activated receptor belonging to the type II nuclear hormone receptor superfamily that includes PPAR-α, PPAR-β/δ, and PPAR-γ subtypes [3, 4]. PPAR-γ is a key transcription factor of cell differentiation, which is closely related to fibrosis in important organs [5, 6]. Stavniichuk et al. confirmed that dual soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors can reduce renal fibrosis by activating PPAR-γ, and the same effect was observed in heart and lung fibrosis [79]. In liver fibrosis, PPAR-γ is involved in hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation and fibroblast transformation, which can reduce the overexpression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), type I collagen, and hydroxyproline in HSCs and thereby inhibit liver fibrosis [1012].

Autophagy, an important form of programmed cell death, is a highly conserved degradation process mediated by lysosomes in eukaryotes. The autophagy-related gene LC3-II was significantly upregulated in a carbon tetrachloride- (CCl4-) induced liver fibrosis model, and inhibition of autophagy activity could delay its progress. This may be because autophagy-mediated lipid degradation provides energy for HSC activation, thereby promoting ECM formation and the progression of liver fibrosis. However, PPAR-γ activation has been linked to autophagy [13, 14], but whether PPAR-γ plays an important role in the occurrence and development of liver fibrosis requires further investigation.

Existing liver fibrosis drugs acting at a single target are not particularly effective, and they cause unwanted side effects. Some active components of traditional Chinese medicines, such as procyanidin, crocin, astaxanthin, and fucoidan, are reported to exert strong antifibrosis effects [12, 1517]. Some reportedly regulate adipocytokines, thereby reducing liver inflammation and lowering oxidative stress [17, 18]. Bergenin is a natural secondary metabolite extracted from the roots, bark, and leaves of many families and genera of plants. Its pharmacological activities are diverse, and antitumour, antiviral, immune enhancement, wound repair, anticoagulant, analgesic, antitussive, antifungal, antiarrhythmic, antimalarial, and anti-inflammatory activities have been reported [1923]. However, liver fibrosis activity has not been reported.

The etiology and mechanism of liver fibrosis are complex. Traditional Chinese medicines can inhibit the activation of HSCs and exert antifibrosis effects via different mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to explore the antifibrosis effect of bergenin and its action mechanism based on the successful establishment of a liver fibrosis model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Establishment of a Hepatic Fibrosis Model

C57 mice weighing 20-25 g were purchased from Shanghai Experimental Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). They were reared at 25°C under a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. All mice were allowed free access to food and water. The CCl4-induced liver fibrosis model was established by intraperitoneal injection of 1 mL/kg body weight CCl4 (1 : 10 ; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in olive oil twice a week for 8 weeks [15]. In the BDL model, C57 mice were fasted for 12 h, injected intraperitoneally with 1.25% Nembutal (Sigma-Aldrich), anesthetised, and disinfected. Skin and muscle were removed layer by layer from the midline of the abdomen and ~1 cm above the perineum. The transparent bile duct accompanying the portal vein was found in the hilar region, and two 6-0 surgical sutures were embedded, and surgical knots were made. After confirming that there was no visceral injury or bleeding in the abdominal cavity, the abdomen was closed layer by layer and disinfected again. Mice were resuscitated in a dry and warm environment [24]. All animal experiments were carried out according to, and approved by, the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Medical University.

2.2. Reagents and Experiment Design

Bergenin (CAS: 477-90-7, ) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and dissolved in physiological saline. Primary antibodies α-SMA, CoI-I, TIMP1, LC3-I/II, Beclin-1, and β-actin were acquired from Proteintech Group (Chicago, IL, USA), and PPAR-γ, RXR-α, TGF-β1, Smad2, Smad3, and p-Smad2/3 were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). SYBR Premix Ex Taq was purchased from TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian, China).

A total of 64 mice were randomly divided into the CCl4 model group and the BDL model group, and serum and liver tissue samples were obtained as follows:

Sham operation group (sham,): intragastric administration of normal saline.

Model group (CCl4 or BDL,): model established as above.

Low dose group (CCl4/BDL+B20,): daily gavage, bergenin (20 mg/kg).

High dose group (CCl4/BDL+B40,): daily gavage, bergenin (40 mg/kg).

2.3. Assessment of Liver Function

Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and hydroxyproline were determined using an Olympus AU1000 Automatic Chemical Analyzer (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in the hospital laboratory.

2.4. Pathological Evaluation

Liver tissue was used to prepare paraffin sections that were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HE staining solution is alkaline, which stains chromatin and nucleic acid in the nucleus purple/blue, and eosin is an acidic dye, which stains components in the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix red, thereby revealing cell necrosis. In addition, Masson staining was used to probe the degree of fibrosis. Collagen fibers stain blue, and muscle fibers stain red, revealing fibers and inflammatory factors in tissues.

2.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from freeze-dried tissue and analysed for purity and concentration. RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA and stored at -20°C. Each 20 μL reaction included a predenaturation step at 93°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 93°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. Expression levels of target genes were determined relative to β-actin. The sequences of primers used in the experiment are shown in Table 1.


GenePrimer sequence (5-3)

LC3-IIForwardGACCGCTGTAAGGAGGTGC
ReverseAGAAGCCGAAGGTTTCTTGGG

Beclin-1ForwardATGGAGGGGTCTAAGGCGTC
ReverseTGGGCTGTGGTAAGTAATGGA

TIMP-1ForwardCGAGACCACCTTATACCAGCG
ReverseATGACTGGGGTGTAGGCGTA

α-SMAForwardCCCAGACATCAGGGAGTAATGG
ReverseTCTATCGGATACTTCAGCGTCA

TGF-β1ForwardCCCCTGCAAGACCATCGAC
ReverseCTGGCGAGCCTTAGTTTGGAC

CoI-1α1ForwardCAATGGCACGGCTGTGTGCG
ReverseAGCACTCGCCCTCCCGTCTT

PPAR-γForwardGGAAGACCACTGCATTCCTT
ReverseGTAATCAGCAACCATTGGGTCA

β-ActinForwardCTGGAACGGTGAAGGTGACA
ReverseAAGGGACTTCCTGTAACAATGCA

2.6. Western Blotting

Total protein was extracted from tissues, quantified by bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Kaiji, China), mixed with 5x loading buffer, and stored at -20°C. Based on the protein molecular weight, proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) at 80 V using appropriate gels. When the sample reached the lower layer of the gel, the voltage was changed to 120 V, and electrophoresis was stopped when the bromophenol blue indicator reached the bottom of the separating gel. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane at 200 mA, then incubated on a decolourising shaker at room temperature for 1 h. The PVDF membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing Tween (PBST). After washing with fresh PBST, the membrane was incubated in the secondary antibody solution for 1 h, then quickly rinsed. An Odyssey Two-colour Infrared Laser Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to scan and image the membranes. The quantitative evaluation was determined by relative band density.

2.7. Immunohistochemical Staining

The prepared paraffin sections were placed in a 60°C incubator and incubated for 120 min. After a series of dewaxing and hydration treatments, they were incubated at room temperature with 3% H2O2 for 10 min to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. After washing with distilled water to elicit antigen repair, the slices were placed in a container containing PBS and heated in a microwave oven for 15 min to keep the liquid temperature in the container between 92°C and 98°C, then cooled at room temperature for 20 min. After blocking, samples were incubated again at room temperature for 15 min. The working solution of the first antibody was added dropwise overnight at 4°C. After adding the second antibody, samples were washed and stained with DAB. After staining with HE and mixing with hydrochloric acid and alcohol, samples were dehydrated until transparent, sealed with neutral resin and a cover glass, and visualised under a light microscope, revealing the target molecules as yellow particles.

2.8. Electron Microscopy

Fresh liver tissues were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde, incubated with 0.2 mM calcium carbonate buffer for 4 h, and then fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. Samples were dehydrated using a series of ethanol solutions, soaked with epoxy resin, and sliced. Autophagy was observed using a JEM-1230 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Data were compared as calculated by Student-Newman-Keuls tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Bergenin Significantly Decreases Liver Fibrosis

Liver enzymes and hydroxyproline are important indicators that reflect the severity of liver fibrosis; hence, serum and pathological examination was carried out to evaluate the effects of the drug. The results showed that levels of ALT and AST in the CCl4 and BDL groups were increased, while levels of liver enzymes in drug treatment groups were significantly decreased, and the effect was more obvious with an increasing dose (Figure 1(a)). In accordance with the levels of liver enzymes, hydroxyproline was increased in the disease model groups, while bergenin treatment significantly reduced hydroxyproline levels (Figure 1(a)). HE staining revealed degeneration and necrosis of hepatocytes and proliferation of connective tissue in the disease model groups, and inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in some areas. Additionally, numerous blue collagen fibers were observed by Masson staining. Compared with the disease model groups, necrosis was improved in the drug groups, and the quantity of collagen fibers was decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1(b)). These results suggest that bergenin can effectively decrease levels of liver enzymes and alleviate liver fibrosis.

3.2. Bergenin Inhibits the Formation of Extracellular Matrix

The main components of ECM are hyaluronic acid (HA), fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), type I collagen (CoI-I), α-SMA, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). The results showed that levels of HA and LN in the disease model groups were significantly increased, while those in the bergenin groups were significantly decreased, and the effect was proportional to the drug concentration (Figure 2(a)). Furthermore, we used molecular biological methods to measure levels of α-SMA, CoI-I, and TIMP1. At the transcriptional level, all were significantly increased in the CCl4 and BDL model groups, while high concentrations of bergenin downregulated the expression of these markers (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). Similarly, the results of immunohistochemistry were consistent with the observed serum levels (Figure 2(d)). These results suggest that bergenin inhibits ECM depositions and thereby prevents liver fibrosis.

3.3. Bergenin Decreases Autophagy by Downregulating Beclin-1 and LC-3

Autophagy involves the phagocytosis of cytoplasmic proteins and organelles, their inclusion into vesicles, and fusion with lysosomes to form autophagic lysosomes, which provides energy for the activation of HSCs. The main proteins involved are LC-3II, Beclin-1, and p62. The results showed that mRNA levels of autophagy-related genes LC-3II and Beclin-1 in liver fibrosis model groups were significantly increased, while those in bergenin treatment groups were decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3(a)). In addition, western blotting and immunohistochemistry were used to measure the expression levels of tissue proteins, and the results were consistent with the gene transcription levels (Figure 3(b) and 3(c)). In the model group, more Beclin-1 and LC3-II proteins were stained with brown yellow particles by DAB compared with the sham group, while the positive area of the drug treatment group decreased with the increase of concentration. Electron microscopy was performed to observe autophagy directly, and the results showed that the number of autophagosomes was increased significantly in the disease model groups, but not in the drug groups (Figure 3(d)). In summary, bergenin could effectively reduce the levels of autophagy and block the energy supply needed for HSC activation.

3.4. Bergenin Inhibits the TGF-β1/Smads Pathway by Activating PPAR-γ

TGF-β1 mediates necrosis and autophagy by activating phosphorylated Smads in the nuclear region. PPAR-γ is a key molecule regulating TGF-β1, which is known to be inhibited by bergenin. In order to clarify the mechanism of action of the drug, we analysed gene and protein expression levels of related pathways. The results showed that expression of PPAR-γ was decreased in the liver fibrosis model, but the expression was stimulated by the drug. However, TGF-β1, active Smad2, and Smad3 displayed the opposite trend (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Based on the consistent expression of total Smad2 and Smad3, levels of TGF-β1 and phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 were upregulated in the liver fibrosis model, but decreased in the drug group, and the differences were statistically significant. Immunohistochemical staining was also used to elucidate the changes in the expression of pathway molecules. In the model group, the brown granules in the nucleus of PPAR-γ were significantly decreased but were upregulated in the drug treatment group. On the contrary, more TGF-β1 proteins were stained by DAB into brown granules compared with the sham group, while the yellow area of the drug treatment group showed a downward trend (Figure 4(c)). These results suggest that bergenin can inhibit the TGF-β1/Smads pathway by activating PPAR-γ, thereby halting the progression of autophagy in liver fibrosis.

4. Discussion

Modern medicine has shown that liver fibrosis is a dynamic process. However, whether this process is progressive or related to the presence of liver injury factors and whether liver injury lesions continue to develop remain unknown. Research on liver fibrosis has recently entered a new era. Great progress has been made in understanding liver fibrosis and drug-targeted therapy [1, 25]. Natural plant extracts have been shown to exert strong biological effects, and bergenin is effective for decreasing fibrosis in various organs. Herein, we explored the protective effects of bergenin on the liver.

CCl4 is one of the most widely used chemical toxicants to induce liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in experimental animals. In the endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes, free radicals produced by CCl4 can bind covalently to macromolecules in hepatocytes after being activated by cytochrome P450 oxidase in liver microsomes, which leads to the production of reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation, resulting in liver fibrosis [26]. By contrast, the BDL model is characterised by cholestasis and inflammation due to blockage of the extrahepatic biliary system, leading to a strong fibrosis reaction around the portal vein. The two models complement each other and are used to comprehensively evaluate the effects of drugs.

First, we explored the effects of the drug on liver function and quantitatively evaluated liver function and the degree of liver fibrosis based on ALT, AST, and hydroxyproline. The results showed that liver enzymes and hydroxyproline were increased in the serum of the liver fibrosis model, while the drug effectively reduced the levels of these indicators, suggesting that bergenin could effectively inhibit the release of ALT and AST and reduce the production of collagen.

Pathological staining of hepatocyte necrosis and Masson staining of collagen formation directly reflected the effectiveness of the drug, consistent with previous studies [13]. Furthermore, activation of HSCs, phenotypic changes, and ECM deposition are the central links in the occurrence of liver fibrosis [1]. Therefore, it is of great significance to study ECM components when evaluating the severity of liver fibrosis. Our results showed that bergenin decreased levels of α-SMA, CoI-I, MMP2, and TIMP1. Therefore, bergenin may protect hepatocytes from hepatic fibrosis and inhibit the formation of key components of ECM in serum and tissues, thereby inhibiting the process of liver fibrosis.

Autophagy involves phagocytosis of cytoplasmic proteins and organelles, their inclusion into vesicles, and fusion with lysosomes to form autophagic lysosomes, which degrade their contents [27, 28]. Studies have shown that when HSCs are activated, autophagy increases to provide energy to promote the secretion of ECM components [29]. One study demonstrated that miR-96-5p inhibits the activation of HSCs by regulating ATG7 to block autophagy [30], and another demonstrated that fucoidan can inhibit ECM deposition and autophagy in liver fibrosis [15]. Therefore, if autophagy can be effectively inhibited, liver fibrosis may be inhibited to some extent. Beclin-1 and LC3-II are markers of autophagy that are increased significantly during liver fibrosis, and bergenin effectively reduced their levels in the present work. By contrast, expression of P62 was higher when autophagy was decreased and lower when autophagy was increased. Therefore, bergenin increased the expression level of P62 in tissues. These results are consistent with previous findings showing that inhibition of autophagy can significantly inhibit liver fibrosis.

PPAR-γ is a member of the nuclear transcription factor superfamily and can form a heterodimer with retinol X receptor (RXR) to regulate the expression of related genes [31, 32]. The TGF-β/Smads pathway is important in the process of liver fibrosis and can be regulated by PPAR-γ. Various drugs can inhibit TGF-β production by activating PPAR-γ during fibrosis in different tissues [33, 34]. PPAR-γ binds directly to Smad3 and inhibits the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) induced by TGF-β in smooth muscle cells [35].

We also measured the expression of PPAR-γ and members of the TGF-β/Smads pathway in both disease model and drug treatment groups. The results showed that expression of PPAR-γ and RXR was increased to varying degrees following treatment with bergenin, which indicates that it might be a potential activator of PPAR-γ, similar to rosiglitazone and 15d-PGJ2 [3639]. In the drug treatment group, the TGF-β pathway was inhibited, and Smad2/3 that act downstream were not activated by phosphorylation and transported into the nucleus. Furthermore, the specific DNA sequence of Beclin-1 could not be bound to promote transcription, which reduced the likelihood of LC3-I to LC3-II transformation, resulting in P62 accumulation and blockage of autophagy, which decreased fibrosis due to a lack of energy supply for HSC activation (Figure 5).

In conclusion, bergenin inhibits autophagy and blocks the energy supply required for HSC activation, thereby decreasing ECM formation and hepatocyte damage, which may affect the PPAR-γ/TGF-β/Smads axis. These findings establish bergenin as a potentially promising drug for the treatment of liver fibrosis.

Data Availability

All data can be found in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control WBN liver Disease Research Fund, grant number CFHPC2019031, and Innovation Plan of Health System of Science and Technology Commission of Putuo District, Shanghai, grant number ptkwws201901.

References

  1. S. Mahdinloo, S. H. Kiaie, A. Amiri, S. Hemmati, H. Valizadeh, and P. Zakeri-Milani, “Efficient drug and gene delivery to liver fibrosis: rationale, recent advances, and perspectives,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1279–1293, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. H. Schwantes-An, R. Darlay, P. Mathurin et al., “Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis on alcohol-related liver cirrhosis identifies novel genetic risk factors,” Hepatology, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Trümper, I. Wittig, J. Heidler, F. Richter, B. Brüne, and A. von Knethen, “Redox regulation of PPARgamma in polarized macrophages,” PPAR Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 8253831, 16 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. Cordoba-Chacon, “Loss of hepatocyte-specific PPARgamma expression ameliorates early events of steatohepatitis in mice fed the methionine and choline-deficient diet,” PPAR Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 9735083, 13 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  5. Š. Tajnšek, D. Petrovič, M. G. Petrovič, and T. Kunej, “Association of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) with diabetic retinopathy in human and animal models: analysis of the literature and genome browsers,” PPAR Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 1783564, 8 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  6. Y. O. Yemchenko, V. I. Shynkevych, K. Y. Ishcheikin, and I. P. Kaidashev, “PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone reduced CD68+ but not CD163+ macrophage dermal infiltration in obese psoriatic patients,” PPAR Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 4548012, 6 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Zhang, L. You, and M. Zhao, “Rosiglitazone attenuates paraquat-induced lung fibrosis in rats in a PPAR gamma-dependent manner,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 851, pp. 133–143, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Liu, S. T. Lim, M. H. Y. Teo et al., “Collaborative regulation of LRG1 by TGF-β1 and PPAR-β/δ modulates chronic pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis,” Circulation. Heart Failure, vol. 12, no. 12, article e005962, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Stavniichuk, M. A. Hye Khan, M. M. Yeboah et al., “Dual soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor/PPAR-γ agonist attenuates renal fibrosis,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators, vol. 150, p. 106472, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Panebianco, J. A. Oben, M. Vinciguerra, and V. Pazienza, “Senescence in hepatic stellate cells as a mechanism of liver fibrosis reversal: a putative synergy between retinoic acid and PPAR-gamma signalings,” Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 269–280, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. N. Makled, M. H. Sharawy, and M. S. El-Awady, “The dual PPAR-α/γ agonist saroglitazar ameliorates thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rats through regulating leptin,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 392, no. 12, pp. 1569–1576, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Chhimwal, S. Sharma, P. Kulurkar, and V. Patial, “Crocin attenuates CCl4-induced liver fibrosis via PPAR-γ mediated modulation of inflammation and fibrogenesis in rats,” Human & Experimental Toxicology, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1639–1649, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Xiang, K. Chen, L. Xu, T. Wang, and C. Guo, “Bergenin exerts hepatoprotective effects by inhibiting the release of inflammatory factors, apoptosis and autophagy via the PPAR-γ pathway,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 14, pp. 129–143, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. W. Wang, C. Li, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Arsenic trioxide in synergy with vitamin D rescues the defective VDR-PPAR-gamma functional module of autophagy in rheumatoid arthritis,” PPAR Research, vol. 2019, Article ID 6403504, 11 pages, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. Guo, J. Li, K. Chen et al., “Protective effect of fucoidan from Fucus vesiculosus on liver fibrosis via the TGF-beta 1/Smad pathway-mediated inhibition of extracellular matrix and autophagy,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 10, pp. 619–630, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  16. L. Wu, Q. Zhang, W. Mo et al., “Quercetin prevents hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation and reducing autophagy via the TGF-β1/Smads and PI3K/Akt pathways,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 9289, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Feng, C. Wang, T. Liu et al., “Procyanidin B2 inhibits the activation of hepatic stellate cells and angiogenesis via the Hedgehog pathway during liver fibrosis,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 6479–6493, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Liu, L. Xu, C. Wang et al., “Alleviation of hepatic fibrosis and autophagy via inhibition of transforming growth factor-β1/Smads pathway through shikonin,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 263–276, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. F. Villarreal, D. S. Santos, P. S. S. Lauria et al., “Bergenin reduces experimental painful diabetic neuropathy by restoring redox and immune homeostasis in the nervous system,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 14, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Y. Ren, M. Shen, Y. Ding et al., “Study on preparation and controlled release in vitro of bergenin-amino polylactic acid polymer,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 153, pp. 650–660, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Ji, D. Wang, B. Zhang, and H. Lu, “Bergenin ameliorates MPTP-induced Parkinson's disease by activating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 823–833, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Feng, W. Dai, Y. Mao et al., “Simvastatin re-sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib by inhibiting HIF-1α/PPAR-γ/PKM2-mediated glycolysis,” Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research: CR, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 24, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Gao et al., “Bergenin-activated SIRT1 inhibits TNF-α-induced proinflammatory response by blocking the NF-κB signaling pathway,” Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 62, p. 101921, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. G. Tag, S. Sauer-Lehnen, S. Weiskirchen et al., “Bile duct ligation in mice: induction of inflammatory liver injury and fibrosis by obstructive cholestasis,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  25. K. Grat, M. Grat, and O. Rowinski, “Usefulness of different imaging modalities in evaluation of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Biomedicines, vol. 8, no. 9, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  26. G. K. Michalopoulos, “Hepatostat: liver regeneration and normal liver tissue maintenance,” Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1384–1392, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Galluzzi, J. M. Bravo-San Pedro, B. Levine, D. R. Green, and G. Kroemer, “Pharmacological modulation of autophagy: therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles,” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 487–511, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Antonioli, M. Di Rienzo, M. Piacentini, and G. M. Fimia, “Emerging mechanisms in initiating and terminating autophagy,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 28–41, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. F. Thoen, E. L. Guimarães, L. Dollé et al., “A role for autophagy during hepatic stellate cell activation,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1353–1360, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. Lu, T. Liu, K. Chen et al., “Isorhamnetin: a hepatoprotective flavonoid inhibits apoptosis and autophagy via P 38/PPAR-α pathway in mice,” Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, vol. 103, pp. 800–811, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  31. O. Y. Kytikova, J. M. Perelman, T. P. Novgorodtseva et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as a therapeutic target in asthma,” PPAR Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 8906968, 18 pages, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. Li, C. Guo, and J. Wu, “15-Deoxy--(12, 14)-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), an endogenous ligand of PPAR-gamma: function and mechanism,” PPAR Research, vol. 2019, Article ID 7242030, 10 pages, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. Vaamonde-Garcia, O. Malaise, E. Charlier et al., “15-Deoxy-Δ-12, 14-prostaglandin J2 acts cooperatively with prednisolone to reduce TGF-β-induced pro-fibrotic pathways in human osteoarthritis fibroblasts,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 165, pp. 66–78, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Saidi, M. Kasabova, L. Vanderlynden et al., “Curcumin inhibits the TGF-β1-dependent differentiation of lung fibroblasts via PPARγ-driven upregulation of cathepsins B and L,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 491, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Fu, J. Zhang, X. Zhu et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ inhibits transforming growth factor β-induced connective tissue growth factor expression in human aortic smooth muscle cells by interfering with Smad3,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 49, pp. 45888–45894, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. X. Sun, C. Guo, F. Zhao et al., “Vasoactive intestinal peptide stabilizes intestinal immune homeostasis through maintaining interleukin-10 expression in regulatory B cells,” Theranostics, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2800–2811, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Sikora-Wiorkowska, A. Smolen, G. Czechowska, K. Wiorkowski, and A. Korolczuk, “The role of PPAR gamma agonists - rosiglitazone and 15-deoxy-delta (12, 14)-prostaglandin J2 in experimental cyclosporine A hepatotoxicity,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 70, no. 6, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  38. Z. Heidari, I. M. Chrisman, M. D. Nemetchek et al., “Definition of functionally and structurally distinct repressive states in the nuclear receptor PPARγ,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 5825, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. L. Wu, C. Guo, and J. Wu, “Therapeutic potential of PPARγ natural agonists in liver diseases,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2736–2748, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Yujing Xia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views145
Downloads163
Citations

Related articles