Pathology Research International

Pathology Research International / 2013 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 712758 |

Taylor Chomiak, Nathanael Turner, Bin Hu, "What We Have Learned about Autism Spectrum Disorder from Valproic Acid", Pathology Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 712758, 8 pages, 2013.

What We Have Learned about Autism Spectrum Disorder from Valproic Acid

Academic Editor: Piero Tosi
Received09 Jul 2013
Revised16 Oct 2013
Accepted17 Oct 2013
Published08 Dec 2013


Two recent epidemiological investigations in children exposed to valproic acid (VPA) treatment in utero have reported a significant risk associated with neurodevelopmental disorders and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in particular. Parallel to this work, there is a growing body of animal research literature using VPA as an animal model of ASD. In this focused review we first summarize the epidemiological evidence linking VPA to ASD and then comment on two important neurobiological findings linking VPA to ASD clinicopathology, namely, accelerated or early brain overgrowth and hyperexcitable networks. Improving our understanding of how the drug VPA can alter early development of neurological systems will ultimately improve our understanding of ASD.

1. Introduction

The core clinicopathology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is currently thought to be characterized by accelerated or early brain tissue overgrowth in regions involved in emotional, social, and communication functions [16]. Although much of the earlier evidence regarding accelerated or early brain overgrowth was based on head circumference measurements which may not be as robust as previously thought [7] (but see [8]), more recent longitudinal brain imaging studies have provided further evidence of this abnormal pattern of brain growth in ASD [3, 6]. In fact, abnormal pathological overgrowth in ASD may even persist into adulthood in certain brain regions [9].

Exposure to exogenous chemicals during pregnancy can interfere with cortical development and the maturation of offspring. One such exogenous chemical is the short chain fatty acid valproic acid (VPA). VPA is a drug used in humans primarily for epilepsy and seizure control, although it has been used in many nonepileptic conditions as well [10]. Based on several case studies and small-scale population-based studies in humans [1116], in addition to mounting experimental evidence in animals [1732], VPA has known teratogenicity and has long been suspected as a risk factor for ASD. This year, however, both a prospective study and a large-scale population-based study were published providing the most substantial evidence to date linking prenatal VPA exposure to an increased risk of ASD [33, 34]. Thus, in this paper we will review epidemiological evidence linking VPA to ASD and will discuss two promising leads in the study of ASD in light of human clinical findings and the valproic acid animal model of ASD.

2. Valproic Acid and ASD: Epidemiological Evidence

Previous links between the antiepileptic drug VPA and ASD have been found and explored in several case studies and retrospective studies. VPA has long been known to cause physical malformations and developmental disabilities, features of the clinical entity termed fetal valproate syndrome (FVS). Laegreid and colleagues in a 1993 study examined seven children with FVS, two of which were also exposed to benzodiazepines. Two of the seven cases showed autistic traits, with 2 more showing marked developmental delays [16]. The next year Christianson et al. published a case study describing two sibling pairs, all having FVS to various degrees, with one having been diagnosed with infantile autism [11]. A second case of a boy with FVS and ASD was reported by Williams et al. in 1997, followed up with 5 more cases described by the same authors in 2001 [12, 13]. Several larger retrospective studies have also been published providing further support that in utero VPA exposure and fetal valproate syndrome may be linked to an increased risk of ASD, where, for example, it has been reported that the rate of ASD in the children of VPA-treated mothers may be roughly eight times larger than that of the general population [14, 15, 35]. Nevertheless, many of these studies had mentioned the need for future study to confirm the association between VPA and ASD.

A recently published prospective cohort study by Bromley et al. [33] explored the relationship between prenatal exposure to anti-epileptic drugs (including VPA) and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD, ADHD, and Dyspraxia. They performed an 11-year study, observing the physical and cognitive development of 415 children born to mothers with epilepsy and nonepileptic controls, with a final outcome of neurodevelopmental diagnosis by 6 years of age. Their results showed a significant increase in the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in those women taking VPA during pregnancy, with autism being the most frequent diagnosis. The researchers also suspected a dose-dependent mechanism of VPA action but were not able to show it with significance in the study due to low numbers of mothers taking VPA. Although this study had a fairly small cohort and a relatively early endpoint (the average age of diagnosis of ASD in the UK is 5–11 years of age), it was the first prospective study to explore the relationship of VPA to ASD [33].

A much larger and detailed population-based study by Christensen et al. [34] that focused more on ASD than other neurodevelopmental disorders was also published this year. The large sample (655,615 children) and thorough control of the study provide the strongest evidence to date on the relationship between VPA and ASD. Data were from children born in Denmark from 1996 through 2006 over 14 years until the end of 2010. In their analysis they controlled for other known risk factors of ASD and potential confounders such as parental psychiatric disease, parental age at conception, congenital malformations, and maternal epilepsy. They divided the outcomes as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or childhood autism (the most severe diagnosis, simply referred to as “autism”) and reported absolute risks over the 14 years and hazard ratios (HR) for each. The absolute risks for all children studied for ASD and autism were 1.53% and 0.48%, respectively, whereas for those exposed to VPA in utero, the risks were 4.42% (HR 2.9) and 2.5% (HR 5.2). In fact, even when looking at all stratifications and controls, it was concluded that there was a significantly increased risk of children developing either ASD or autism in women taking VPA during pregnancy [34].

Accumulating epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk of children developing a neurodevelopmental disorder, and ASD in particular, if their mothers take VPA during pregnancy. These findings should encourage a discussion on the risks and benefits of the treatment during pregnancy and provide an opportunity to explore how this chemical can alter early developing biological systems that may relate to ASD in animal models. This may facilitate the discovery of other VPA-like substances that may subsequently prove to be environmental or nutritional risk factors for the development of ASD, and these could further elucidate the role of exogenous chemicals on ASD pathology. The authors of the two recent papers discussed above also noted a need to define the mechanism behind the increased risk of ASD with VPA exposure. Several questions arise as to the relationship between environmental exposure to chemicals such as VPA in the manifestation of ASD [33, 34]. Christensen et al. suggested several mechanisms by which VPA may increase the risk of ASD that need further study, including interference in neurotransmitter function, neuronal apoptosis or plasticity, histone deacetylase inhibition, and disruption of folic acid metabolism [34]. Studying the effects of VPA on biological tissue will provide many avenues to explore the possible mechanism(s) of ASD.

3. Valproic Acid Rodent Model of ASD

The model of VPA exposure proposed by Rodier et al. in 1996 is one of the most frequently studied animal models of ASD [36, 37] (also see [38] for review). As reviewed by Dufour-Rainfray et al., this model exhibits many of the structural and behavioural features that can be observed in ASD patients [39]. For example, rats exposed to VPA in utero can exhibit physical malformations (e.g., ear malformations) which have been compared to similar abnormalities that have been observed in some autistic patients (e.g., posterior rotation of the outer ear) [39]. Furthermore, several independent laboratories have also shown that prenatal VPA exposure can lead to behavioral abnormalities that are strikingly similar to those observed in autistic patients; including decreased social interactions and sensitivity to pain, increased sensitivity to nonpainful stimuli, repetitive/stereotypic-like activity, increased anxiety, abnormally high and longer lasting fear memories which are over-generalized and harder to extinguish, and changes in specific types of pup ultrasonic vocalizations [1728, 30, 31, 39]. At the cellular level, recent morphological data has also suggested that a decrease in spine density in forebrain structures may be a substrate for distal hypo-connectivity, while the increase in dendritic length might support the enhancement of local hyperconnectivity [40]. As pointed out by the authors, this notion is consistent with the ‘‘intense world’’ theory of ASD which postulates a main neuropathology characterized by hyperfunctioning of local neural microcircuits [4042].

An animal model, to be considered as a relevant model of a psychiatric condition described in humans, should fit several criteria usually described as construct, face, and predictive validity [43]. Although the effects of VPA have been tested in rodents for many years, only relatively recently it has been used to model ASD in rodents for studying ASD-like behavioural features and potential treatment interventions [1, 26]. Roullet et al. have noted that the VPA model exhibits both construct and face validity [38], and recent work has now provided evidence that it may also exhibit predictive validity [26, 44]. For example, Schneider et al. previously reported that environmental enrichment including multisensory stimulation reversed almost all behavioral alterations observed in pups exposed to VPA in utero [26], while Woo and Leon have recently shown in a randomized controlled trial that environmental enrichment in the form of multiple sensorimotor stimuli was also effective in ameliorating some of the symptoms in autistic children [44].

It has been suggested that methodological issues may have limited the effectiveness of utilizing the prenatal VPA rodent model to study ASD [45]. Interestingly, similar to the prenatal model, many ASD-like behavioural and pathological features have also been observed with VPA exposure during the early postnatal period (equivalent to the third trimester and perinatal period in humans) as previously shown by Yochum et al. [4649]. This suggests a mechanism that is effective over different developmental time points and may offer an additional approach for studying ASD in rodents. Indeed, the postnatal VPA model may partly be explained by the clinical observation that the maternal serum VPA free-fraction increases in the third trimester and is highest at birth [50]. This is consistent with the idea that bioavailability may play an important role in VPA teratogenicity and that pre- and early postnatal VPA exposure may be quite useful in studying the effects of VPA to help elucidate neuropathological mechanisms of ASD [47]. For instance, VPA exposure during prenatal and early postnatal periods in rodents can lead to accelerated or early brain overgrowth that is reminiscent of that observed in humans. Prenatal VPA exposure on the one hand has been shown to induce a more generalized pathology and can induce macrocephaly in rat brain [51], while early postnatal VPA exposure, on the other hand, has been suggested to induce a more regionally selective pattern of aberrant overgrowth that may be particularly prominent in the temporal association cortex [49]. Thus, while it has been reported that the period of exposure to VPA that is likely to result in ASD is the first trimester of pregnancy, the possibility that ASD can also result from later effects should not be excluded [39].

4. Valproic Acid and Epigenetic Regulation

Dysregulated biochemical pathways can have a profound impact on key cellular processes that may ultimately alter neuronal and network developmental trajectories. We know that the coordinated execution of gene programs involved in neural network maturation is highly regulated by epigenetic processes and that many biochemical pathways can converge to influence these processes [5255] (Figure 1). Some of the mechanisms that may be involved include histone acetylation, histone methylation, and possibly DNA methylation.

Valproic acid is a commonly used antiepileptic drug [39]. Classically, the mechanism of action of VPA has focused on increases in brain concentrations of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the major inhibitory neurotransmitter [39], but has also included modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels and glutamatergic signaling [59]. However, it was previously shown in an animal model of seizure that VPA treatment did not significantly affect seizure strength or frequency for the first several days following induction but did, interestingly, protect the animals from seizure-induced cognitive impairment [60]. The authors concluded that their results could be explained, at least partially, by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition [60]. In fact, several studies have since been published supporting the notion that VPA may block HDAC activity in neurons [52, 58, 61].

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play an important role in regulating gene transcription and phenotype differentiation [5355]. For example, MacDonald and Roskams reported specific expression patterns of HDAC1 and HDAC2 (both class I HDACs) in the murine brain at multiple developmental ages. HDAC1 is expressed in neural stem cells/progenitors and glia, while HDAC2 is upregulated in postmitotic neuroblasts and neurons but not in fully differentiated glia [62]. HDAC modulation in different cell types and at different maturational time points may therefore lead to dramatically different outcomes and may help to explain why HDAC inhibition in adulthood can improve ASD-like symptoms in rodents exposed to VPA in utero [63].

VPA is a nonselective HDAC inhibitor. Class I HDACs, which include HDAC1 and HDAC2, are expressed in the CNS, and VPA has the net effect of inhibiting their activity via different mechanisms. VPA inhibits HDAC1 through interaction with the enzyme’s catalytic site, while VPA induces proteasomal degradation of HDAC2 [64, 65]. This is important as inhibition of class I HDACs can lead to increases in synapse numbers and a robust facilitation of excitatory synapse maturation [52]. Furthermore, VPA can also lead to increased neurite growth and promote neural proliferation [51, 66], both of which are thought to contribute to the accelerated or early overgrowth observed in ASD [1].

ASD structural pathology is regionally selective, exhibiting changes that are prominent in the prefrontal and temporal association cortices [13] that can even persist into adulthood [9]. These areas have been found to exhibit a slow and protracted endogenous pattern of development under normal conditions, remaining relatively immature well into postnatal life [6772]. This pattern of maturation appears to be needed for appropriate cognitive development and allowing for the maturation and stabilization of lower-order networks with which to build upon [7375]. However, the protracted maturation pattern of these prefrontal and temporal areas may confer an enhanced vulnerability to HDAC inhibition compared to networks that have already attained full maturity [1]. This vulnerability may lead to prominent increases in the structural assembly of synapses and growth of neural networks, both of which are thought to contribute to the underlying clinicopathology of ASD [1, 76].

Histone methylation is another important epigenetic mechanism related to histone acetylation that can regulate gene transcription, developmental gene programs, and cellular phenotype [55, 77, 78]. Much like that of histone acetylation, it has been proposed that histone methylation may be reversible, dynamic, and also important in the teratogenicity of VPA [78]. For example, Tung and Winn reported that not only did in utero exposure to VPA lead to HDAC inhibition and increased histone acetylation of mouse fetal tissue, but it was also associated with changes in histone methylation [78]. In fact, this study found significant increases in di- and trimethylated histone 3-K4 and significant decreases in monomethylated histone 3-K9, which may represent sites involved in gene activation and repression, respectively [77]. Indeed, these epigenetic changes are likely involved in the multiple genes that can be influenced by early VPA exposure [58].

Adding another layer of complexity to the epigenetic control of gene regulation is DNA methylation, where methyl groups covalently bound to the 5′ position of cytosine project into the major groove of DNA, thus inhibiting the binding of transcription factors [78]. While there is interplay between DNA methylation and histone acetylation [79], somewhat surprisingly, the significance of DNA methylation as a mechanism of VPA-induced teratogenesis remains debatable [78]. Thus, the role VPA plays on DNA methylation and the interplay between DNA methylation and histone acetylation will be an important area for future research.

5. Valproic Acid, Overconnectivity, and Hyperexcitable Networks

Clinically apparent seizures are not uncommon in ASD [80]. While there has been a long standing association between ASD and seizure, even children that do not present with clinical seizure can exhibit subclinical seizure and epileptiform electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities [80, 81]. Thus, it is postulated that accelerated or early brain overgrowth is accompanied by pathological changes in network excitability.

The rodent VPA model of ASD allows for intrusive electrophysiological study of living tissue unavailable in humans to uncover the nature and potential causes of these suspected electrophysiological abnormalities. One prevailing theory of ASD, the “intense world” theory [41, 42], has been refined through the study of the VPA rat model and postulates that several areas of the brain including the prefrontal cortex and amygdala display hyperreactivity of the microcircuitry of pyramidal cells compared to controls [22, 23, 41, 42, 56, 57]. The amygdala bares particular relevance, for example, as it has been functionally related to ASD due to its role in socioemotional behaviour and can also exhibit enlargement and hyperactivation in autistic children [82, 83]. Markram’s group has shown enhanced fear memories, enhanced fear generalization, and impaired fear extinction in prenatally exposed VPA treated rats, along with the other ASD-like behavioural phenotypes [23]. As well, electrophysiological data from lateral amygdaloid nucleus slices showed increased reactivity to stimulation, increased long-term potentiation, and impaired inhibition [23]. A similar result was found by Lin et al. as they also reported hyperexcitability and enhanced LTP in amygdala lateral nucleus pyramidal neurons following prenatal exposure to VPA [17]. These authors stated that the increased ratio of synaptic excitation/inhibition in the amygdala might be associated with the characteristic behaviour in this ASD model [17], which was reiterated by Kim et al. based on their own work showing increased expression of glutamatergic proteins in prefrontal networks of postnatal brains of rat offspring exposed to VPA in utero [84]. Finally, as impairments in the GABAergic system may critically contribute to an increased synaptic excitation/inhibition ratio, an additional mechanism may also involve reduced GABAergic inhibition as recently shown in the temporal cortex of rat pups following prenatal VPA exposure [85].

Although functional imaging studies of the autistic brain have long suggested decreased activity, these recent findings from the VPA model propose an alternate explanation wherein electrophysiological abnormalities may cause network hyperactivity within hyperconnected microcircuits [22, 42, 57]. Indeed, a recent imaging study has shown hyperconnectivity in several large-scale brain networks of children with ASD [86]. While previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have been somewhat contradictory, these recent findings suggest that further research into brain network connectivity may lead to a better understanding of the pathology of ASD in the brain [86].

Furthermore, prenatal VPA exposure has been shown to increase NMDA receptor NR2A and NR2B subunits [22], with NR2A being important in epileptogenesis [87]. Consequently, this enhanced activity may subsequently lead to greater activity-dependent processes involved in controlling structural aspects neuronal and synaptic network maturation and growth (Figure 1). For example, it has been shown that activity-induced NR2A activation can lead to increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression [87]. Thus, given that BDNF is important in neuronal development [8890] and epileptogenesis [91], this may be one of several signaling pathways involved in the clinicopathology of ASD.

While activity modulates not only structural aspects of neuronal connectivity such as dendritic branching and spine formation, it can also influence the neurochemical landscape of the neural network. For example, an emerging body of the literature is now providing mechanistic insight into neurotransmitter specification and the role of electrical activity in the developing nervous system [9294]. Consequently, alterations in the proportions of excitatory and inhibitory neural transmitter phenotypes may play a very important role in the pathophysiology associated with ASD [95]. A number of neurodevelopmental processes ranging from early events of cell proliferation and differentiation, to late events involving maturation of the dendritic arbors and synapses, can all be influenced by activity [92, 94]. Thus, further study on the electrophysiological changes associated with rodent brains exposed to VPA is likely to uncover convergent molecular pathway(s) that drive these changes.

6. Conclusion

Based on accumulating clinical data, it is becoming increasingly clear that VPA is an important risk factor associated with ASD. In addition, a growing body of animal literature is also showing that VPA can lead to ASD-like features in rodents. Moreover, published work suggests that the VPA model of ASD appears to exhibit all elements of a relevant model, namely, construct, face, and predictive validity, and therefore is likely to prove useful in elucidating mechanisms of ASD clinicopathology. It is also important to note that the significance of the two recent epidemiological studies discussed in this paper may also lie in the potential of revealing VPA-like environmental or nutritional substances that could increase the risk of ASD. For example, it was recently shown that in certain cell types global histone acetylation and HDAC activity could be regulated by metabolites of intermediate metabolism [96]. Based on studies primarily in nonneuronal cells, it is also now evident that other agents, including those in the human diet, can be converted by metabolism to intermediates that can influence HDAC activity [96, 97]. Thus, improving our understanding of how VPA and VPA-like compounds can alter early nervous system development will ultimately improve our understanding of ASD.


The authors would like to thank Johanna Hung for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper and Dr. Jeffrey Buchhalter for insightful discussion. This study was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research and CIHR Regenerative Medicine Initiative. Nathanael Turner is supported by a PURE studentship. Taylor Chomiak and Nathanael Turner are cofirst authors.


  1. T. Chomiak and B. Hu, “Alterations of neocortical development and maturation in autism: insight from valproic acid exposure and animal models of autism,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 36, pp. 57–66, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. Courchesne, K. Pierce, C. M. Schumann et al., “Mapping early brain development in autism,” Neuron, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 399–413, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. M. Schumann, C. S. Bloss, C. C. Barnes et al., “Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of cortical development through early childhood in autism,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 4419–4427, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. G. Amaral, C. M. Schumann, and C. W. Nordahl, “Neuroanatomy of autism,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 137–145, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Adolphs, “The neurobiology of social cognition,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 231–239, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. C. Hazlett, M. D. Poe, G. Gerig et al., “Early brain overgrowth in autism associated with an increase in cortical surface area before age 2 years,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 467–476, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Raznahan, G. L. Wallace, L. Antezana et al., “Compared to what? Early brain overgrowth in autism and the perils of population norms,” Biol Psychiatry, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 563–575, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. R. Morhardt, W. Barrow, M. Jaworski, and P. J. Accardo, “Head circumference in young children with autism: the impact of different head circumference charts,” Journal of Child Neurology, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. C. Ecker, J. Suckling, S. C. Deoni et al., “Brain anatomy and its relationship to behavior in adults with autism spectrum disorder: a multicenter magnetic resonance imaging study,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 195–209, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. A. Balfour and H. M. Bryson, “Valproic acid,” CNS Drugs, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 144–173, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. L. Christianson, N. Chesler, and J. G. R. Kromberg, “Fetal valproate syndrome: clinical and neuro-developmental features in two sibling pairs,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 361–369, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  12. G. Williams, J. King, M. Cunningham, M. Stephan, B. Kerr, and J. H. Hersh, “Fetal valproate syndrome and autism: additional evidence of an association,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 202–206, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. G. Williams and J. H. Hersh, “A male with fetal valproate syndrome and autism,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 632–634, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. S. J. Moore, P. Turnpenny, A. Quinn et al., “A clinical study of 57 children with fetal anticonvulsant syndromes,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 489–497, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. D. Rasalam, H. Hailey, J. H. G. Williams et al., “Characteristics of fetal anticonvulsant syndrome associated autistic disorder,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 551–555, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. Laegreid, M. Kyllerman, T. Hedner, B. Hagberg, and G. Viggedahl, “Benzodiazepine amplification of valproate teratogenic effects in children of mothers with absence epilepsy,” Neuropediatrics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 88–92, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  17. H. C. Lin, P. W. Gean, C.-C. Wang, Y. H. Chan, and P. Chen, “The amygdala excitatory/inhibitory balance in a valproate-induced rat autism model,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e55248, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. V. Bambini-Junior, L. Rodrigues, G. A. Behr, J. C. F. Moreira, R. Riesgo, and C. Gottfried, “Animal model of autism induced by prenatal exposure to valproate: behavioral changes and liver parameters,” Brain Research, vol. 1408, pp. 8–16, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. E. Binkerd, J. M. Rowland, H. Nau, and A. G. Hendrickx, “Evaluation of valproic acid (VPA) developmental toxicity and pharmacokinetics in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 485–493, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  20. D. Dufour-Rainfray, P. Vourc'h, A. Le Guisquet et al., “Behavior and serotonergic disorders in rats exposed prenatally to valproate: a model for autism,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 470, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. C. Kim, P. Kim, H. S. Go et al., “The critical period of valproate exposure to induce autistic symptoms in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Rinaldi, K. Kulangara, K. Antoniello, and H. Markram, “Elevated NMDA receptor levels and enhanced postsynaptic long-term potentiation induced by prenatal exposure to valproic acid,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 33, pp. 13501–13506, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Markram, T. Rinaldi, D. L. Mendola, C. Sandi, and H. Markram, “Abnormal fear conditioning and amygdala processing in an animal model of autism,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 901–912, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. I. Roullet, L. Wollaston, D. deCatanzaro, and J. A. Foster, “Behavioral and molecular changes in the mouse in response to prenatal exposure to the anti-epileptic drug valproic acid,” Neuroscience, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 514–522, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Schneider and R. Przewłocki, “Behavioral alterations in rats prenatally to valproic acid: animal model of autism,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 80–89, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Schneider, J. Turczak, and R. Przewłocki, “Environmental enrichment reverses behavioral alterations in rats prenatally exposed to valproic acid: issues for a therapeutic approach in autism,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 36–46, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Schneider, A. Roman, A. Basta-Kaim et al., “Gender-specific behavioral and immunological alterations in an animal model of autism induced by prenatal exposure to valproic acid,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 728–740, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. V. Vorhees, “Behavioral teratogenicity of valproic acid: selective effects on behavior after prenatal exposure to rats,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 173–179, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  29. C. V. Vorhees, “Teratogenicity and developmental toxicity of valproic acid in rats,” Teratology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 195–202, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  30. G. C. Wagner, K. R. Reuhl, M. Cheh, P. McRae, and A. K. Halladay, “A new neurobehavioral model of autism in mice: pre- and postnatal exposure to sodium valproate,” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 779–793, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. C. Felix-Ortiz and M. Febo, “Gestational valproate alters BOLD activation in response to complex social and primary sensory stimuli,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e37313, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. Mychasiuk, S. Richards, A. Nakahashi, B. Kolb, and R. Gibb, “Effects of rat prenatal exposure to valproic acid on behaviour and neuro-anatomy,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 34, pp. 268–276, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. R. L. Bromley, G. E. Mawer, M. Briggs et al., “The prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders in children prenatally exposed to antiepileptic drugs,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 637–643, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Christensen, T. K. Grønborg, M. J. Sørensen et al., “Prenatal valproate exposure and risk of autism spectrum disorders and childhood autism,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 309, no. 16, pp. 1696–1703, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. C. Dean, H. Hailey, S. J. Moore, D. J. Lloyd, P. D. Turnpenny, and J. Little, “Long term health and neurodevelopment in children exposed to antiepileptic drugs before birth,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 251–259, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  36. P. M. Rodier, J. L. Ingram, B. Tisdale, S. Nelson, and J. Romano, “Embryological origin for autism: developmental anomalies of the cranial nerve motor nuclei,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 370, no. 2, pp. 247–261, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  37. P. M. Rodier, J. L. Ingram, B. Tisdale, and V. J. Croog, “Linking etiologies in humans and animal models: studies of autism,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 11, no. 2-3, pp. 417–422, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. I. Roullet, J. K. Lai, and J. A. Foster, “In Utero exposure to valproic acid and autism—a current review of clinical and animal studies,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 36, pp. 47–56, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. Dufour-Rainfray, P. Vourc'h, S. Tourlet, D. Guilloteau, S. Chalon, and C. R. Andres, “Fetal exposure to teratogens: evidence of genes involved in autism,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1254–1265, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. E. Bringas, F. N. Carvajal-Floresa, T. A. López-Ramírez, M. Atzori, and G. Flores, “Rearrangement of the dendritic morphology in limbic regions and altered exploratory behavior in a rat model of autism spectrum disorder,” Neuroscience, vol. 241, pp. 170–187, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Markram and H. Markram, “The intense world theory-a unifying theory of the neurobiology of autism,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 4, p. 224, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. Markram, T. Rinaldi, and K. Markram, “The intense world syndrome-an alternative hypothesis for autism,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–96, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Belzung, S. Leman, P. Vourc'h, and C. Andres, “Rodent models for autism: a critical review,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 93–101, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. C. C. Woo and M. Leon, “Environmental enrichment as an effective treatment for autism: a randomized controlled trial,” Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 487–497, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  45. S. E. Lazic and L. Essioux, “Improving basic and translational science by accounting for litter-to-litter variation in animal models,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 14, p. 37, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Oguchi-Katayama, A. Monma, Y. Sekino, T. Moriguchi, and K. Sato, “Comparative gene expression analysis of the amygdala in autistic rat models produced by pre- and post-natal exposures to valproic acid,” Journal of Toxicological Sciences, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 391–402, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Reynolds, A. Millette, and D. P. Devine, “Sensory and motor characterization in the postnatal valproate rat model of autism,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 2-3, pp. 258–267, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C. L. Yochum, P. Dowling, K. R. Reuhl, G. C. Wagner, and X. Ming, “VPA-induced apoptosis and behavioral deficits in neonatal mice,” Brain Research, vol. 1203, pp. 126–132, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. Chomiak, V. Karnik, E. Block, and B. Hu, “Altering the trajectory of early postnatal cortical development can lead to structural and behavioural features of autism,” BMC Neuroscience, vol. 11, p. 102, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. E. Jager-Roman, A. Deichl, and S. Jakob, “Fetal growth, major malformations, and minor anomalies in infants born to women receiving valproic acid,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 997–1004, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  51. H. S. Go, K. C. Kim, C. S. Choi et al., “Prenatal exposure to valproic acid increases the neural progenitor cell pool and induces macrocephaly in rat brain via a mechanism involving the GSK-3beta/beta-catenin pathway,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1028–1041, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. W. Akhtar, J. Raingo, E. D. Nelson et al., “Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 form a developmental switch that controls excitatory synapse maturation and function,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 25, pp. 8288–8297, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. V. Balasubramaniyan, E. Boddeke, R. Bakels et al., “Effects of histone deacetylation inhibition on neuronal differentiation of embryonic mouse neural stem cells,” Neuroscience, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 939–951, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. Hsieh and F. H. Gage, “Epigenetic control of neural stem cell fate,” Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 461–469, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Hsieh and F. H. Gage, “Chromatin remodeling in neural development and plasticity,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 664–671, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. L. Sui and M. Chen, “Prenatal exposure to valproic acid enhances synaptic plasticity in the medial prefrontal cortex and fear memories,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 556–563, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. T. Rinaldi, C. Perrodin, and H. Markram, “Hyper-connectivity and hyper-plasticity in the medial prefrontal cortex in the valproic Acid animal model of autism,” Frontiers in Neural Circuits, vol. 2, p. 4, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  58. M. Fukuchi, T. Nii, N. Ishimaru et al., “Valproic acid induces up- or down-regulation of gene expression responsible for the neuronal excitation and inhibition in rat cortical neurons through its epigenetic actions,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. B. Monti, E. Polazzi, and A. Contestabile, “Biochemical, molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of valproic acid neuroprotection,” Current Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 95–109, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Jessberger, K. Nakashima, G. D. Clemenson Jr. et al., “Epigenetic modulation of seizure-induced neurogenesis and cognitive decline,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 22, pp. 5967–5975, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. Yasuda, M.-H. Liang, Z. Marinova, A. Yahyavi, and D.-M. Chuang, “The mood stabilizers lithium and valproate selectively activate the promoter IV of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neurons,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. L. MacDonald and A. J. Roskams, “Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 are expressed at distinct stages of neuro-glial development,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 237, no. 8, pp. 2256–2267, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. G. Foley, S. Gannon, N. Rombach-Mullan et al., “Class I histone deacetylase inhibition ameliorates social cognition and cell adhesion molecule plasticity deficits in a rodent model of autism spectrum disorder,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 750–760, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. J. Phiel, F. Zhang, E. Y. Huang, M. G. Guenther, M. A. Lazar, and P. S. Klein, “Histone deacetylase is a direct target of valproic acid, a potent anticonvulsant, mood stabilizer, and teratogen,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 39, pp. 36734–36741, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. O. H. Krämer, P. Zhu, H. P. Ostendorff et al., “The histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid selectively induces proteasomal degradation of HDAC2,” EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 3411–3420, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Y. Hao, T. Creson, L. Zhang et al., “Mood stabilizer valproate promotes ERK pathway-dependent cortical neuronal growth and neurogenesis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 29, pp. 6590–6599, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. C. F. Geier, K. Garver, R. Terwilliger, and B. Luna, “Development of working memory maintenance,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. G. Golarai, D. G. Ghahremani, S. Whitfield-Gabrieli et al., “Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 512–522, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. B. Luna, K. E. Garver, T. A. Urban, N. A. Lazar, and J. A. Sweeney, “Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood,” Child Development, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1357–1372, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. K. S. Scherf, M. Behrmann, K. Humphreys, and B. Luna, “Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories,” Developmental Science, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. F15–F30, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. P. Shaw, K. Eckstrand, W. Sharp et al., “Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 49, pp. 19649–19654, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. N. Gogtay, J. N. Giedd, L. Lusk et al., “Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 21, pp. 8174–8179, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. E. I. Knudsen, J. J. Heckman, J. L. Cameron, and J. P. Shonkoff, “Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America's future workforce,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 27, pp. 10155–10162, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. J. L. Elman, “Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small,” Cognition, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 71–99, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  75. S. R. Quartz, “The constructivist brain,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 48–57, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. P. Penzes, M. E. Cahill, K. A. Jones, J. Vanleeuwen, and K. M. Woolfrey, “Dendritic spine pathology in neuropsychiatric disorders,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 285–293, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. N. Mosammaparast and Y. Shi, “Reversal of histone methylation: biochemical and molecular mechanisms of histone demethylases,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 79, pp. 155–179, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. E. W. Tung and L. M. Winn, “Epigenetic modifications in valproic acid-induced teratogenesis,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 201–209, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. E. Handel, G. C. Ebers, and S. V. Ramagopalan, “Epigenetics: molecular mechanisms and implications for disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. R. Tuchman and I. Rapin, “Epilepsy in autism,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 352–358, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. M. G. Chez, M. Chang, V. Krasne, C. Coughlan, M. Kominsky, and A. Schwartz, “Frequency of epileptiform EEG abnormalities in a sequential screening of autistic patients with no known clinical epilepsy from 1996 to 2005,” Epilepsy and Behavior, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 267–271, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. K. M. Dalton, B. M. Nacewicz, T. Johnstone et al., “Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 519–526, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. C. W. Nordahl, R. Scholz, X. Yang et al., “Increased rate of amygdala growth in children aged 2 to 4 years with autism spectrum disorders: a longitudinal study,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. K. C. Kim, D. K. Lee, H. S. Go et al., “Pax6-dependent cortical glutamatergic neuronal differentiation regulates autism-like behavior in prenatally valproic acid-exposed rat offspring,” Molecular Neurobiology, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  85. A. Banerjee, F. García-Oscos, S. Roychowdhury et al., “Impairment of cortical GABAergic synaptic transmission in an environmental rat model of autism,” International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1309–1318, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. L. Q. Uddin, K. Supekar, C. J. Lynch et al., “Salience network-based classification and prediction of symptom severity in children with autism,” JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 869–879, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  87. Q. Chen, S. He, X. Hu et al., “Differential roles of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in activity-dependent brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene regulation and limbic epileptogenesis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 542–552, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. H. W. Horch and L. C. Katz, “BDNF release from single cells elicits local dendritic growth in nearby neurons,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1177–1184, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. A. K. McAllister, D. C. Lo, and L. C. Katz, “Neurotrophins regulate dendritic growth in developing visual cortex,” Neuron, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 791–803, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  90. A. K. McAllister, L. C. Katz, and D. C. Lo, “Neurotrophin regulation of cortical dendritic growth requires activity,” Neuron, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1057–1064, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. D. K. Binder, S. D. Croll, C. M. Gall, and H. E. Scharfman, “BDNF and epilepsy: too much of a good thing?” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. Stamou, K. M. Streifel, P. E. Goines, and P. J. Lein, “Neuronal connectivity as a convergent target of gene x environment interactions that confer risk for autism spectrum disorders,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 36, pp. 3–16, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. N. C. Spitzer, “Activity-dependent neurotransmitter respecification,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 94–106, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. N. C. Spitzer, “Electrical activity in early neuronal development,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7120, pp. 707–712, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. J. L. Rubenstein and M. M. Merzenich, “Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems,” Genes, Brain and Behavior, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 255–267, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. Vogelauer, A. S. Krall, M . A. McBrian, J.-Y. Li, and S. A. Kurdistani, “Stimulation of histone deacetylase activity by metabolites of intermediary metabolism,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 38, pp. 32006–32016, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. P. Rajendran, D. E. Williams, E. Ho, and R. H. Dashwood, “Metabolism as a key to histone deacetylase inhibition,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 181–199, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Taylor Chomiak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.