Pathology Research International

Pathology Research International / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 748740 |

Anthonio Adefuye, Arieh Anthony Katz, Kurt Jason Sales, "The Regulation of Inflammatory Pathways and Infectious Disease of the Cervix by Seminal Fluid", Pathology Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 748740, 9 pages, 2014.

The Regulation of Inflammatory Pathways and Infectious Disease of the Cervix by Seminal Fluid

Academic Editor: Runjan Chetty
Received11 Jun 2014
Accepted31 Jul 2014
Published11 Aug 2014


The connection between human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the consequent sequelae which establishes cervical neoplastic transformation and invasive cervical cancer has redefined many aspects of cervical cancer research. However there is still much that we do not know. In particular, the impact of external factors, like seminal fluid in sexually active women, on pathways that regulate cervical inflammation and tumorigenesis, have yet to be fully understood. HPV infection is regarded as the initiating noninflammatory cause of the disease; however emerging evidence points to resident HPV infections as drivers of inflammatory pathways that play important roles in tumorigenesis as well as in the susceptibility to other infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Moreover there is emerging evidence to support a role for seminal fluid, in particular, the inflammatory bioactive lipids, and prostaglandins which are present in vast quantities in seminal fluid in regulating pathways that can exacerbate inflammation of the cervix, speed up tumorigenesis, and enhance susceptibility to HIV infection. This review will highlight some of our current knowledge of the role of seminal fluid as a potent driver of inflammatory and tumorigenic pathways in the cervix and will provide some evidence to propose a role for seminal plasma prostaglandins in HIV infection and AIDS-related cancer.

1. Introduction

Cervical cancer is a malignant neoplasm arising from the cervical squamous or columnar and glandular epithelial cells that line the cervix-uteri in women. Neoplastic transformation of these cells is initiated by infection of the cervical epithelium with high risk oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and is largely regarded as an infectious disease [1, 2]. Around 180 different types of HPV have been described to date [3]. Of these, around 40 types are known to infect the anogenital tract, giving rise to genital warts, condylomata or cancers, and their precursor lesions [4]. The primary route for genital infection is via exposure of the mucosa (vaginal, oral, or anal) to HPV present in bodily fluids (mainly seminal fluid, but can also be passed on by saliva) or via skin to skin contact and transmission during sexual intercourse [4].

HPV infects the basal keratinocyte [4]. After infection the cell divides and the life cycle of the virus closely follows that of the keratinocyte as it differentiates and matures. Early viral genes, such as the E6 and E7 oncogene, are expressed in the undifferentiated basal and parabasal layers, whilst expression of the late genes and viral DNA replication occurs in the upper more differentiated granular or cornified layers of the epithelium [4, 5]. The virus is a molecular “hitchhiker” completely lacking any ability to facilitate its own replication and hence is solely reliant on the cellular machinery of its host for propagation. As the cell differentiates, the viral capsid forms and the resultant virion can be released at the cell surface to infect other host cells [46] or to be passed on during sexual intercourse to infect another individual. During the initial phase of infection, the HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes are transcribed and translated and it is the E6 and E7 oncoproteins that do most of the cancer-transformation of the infected cell. Recent studies have now shown that HPV mediated transformation occurs by chromosomal alterations, due in part to the actions of the HPV E6 and E7 oncogene, which induce epigenetic changes and changes in miRNA expression to facilitate cellular immortality and neoplastic transformation [711].

HPV infections are nonlytic and as such, the host does not mount an inflammatory response at the onset of infection. However, it is emerging that resident HPV oncogenes can regulate cellular effectors, including miRNAs and genes involved in tissue remodeling events in neoplastic cervical epithelial cells, which are critical regulators of the inflammatory processes in cancerous tissue [12, 13].

Emerging evidence points to a role for resident HPV oncogenes in driving tumor-associated inflammation in immortalized cells by inducing the inflammatory cyclooxygenase- (COX-) prostaglandin (PG) axis and elevating cytokine networks [1416]. Two isoforms of cyclooxygenase enzymes have been described in humans, namely, COX-1 and COX-2, which catalyze the rate limiting conversion of arachidonic acid, derived by de-esterification of plasma membrane phospholipids or dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids, to eicosanoids (prostaglandins, thromboxanes, and prostacyclins) [17]. Many chronic inflammatory diseases and cancers are all associated with upregulation in COX enzyme expression and aberrant biosynthesis of proinflammatory eicosanoids [18, 19]. Elevated signaling of prostaglandins has been observed in uterine-cervical cancers and is considered a key modulator of tumor progression [1922].

Prostaglandins mediate their effects via coupling to specific prostanoid G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [23]. In the past two decades, many studies have highlighted that prostaglandins, produced as a consequence of elevated COX enzyme expression, can act via these prostanoid GPCRs to promote extensive tissue remodeling within tumours by evoking all the classical hallmarks of cancer, namely, cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, inhibition of apoptosis, and alteration in vascular permeability, to allow immune cell extravasation from the vasculature and inflammation [19, 24]. These hallmarks of cancer in cervical cancer cells have now all been shown to be driven by HPV oncogenes via the induction of potent proinflammatory pathways—in particular, by inducing expression of the immediate early oncogene COX-2 and expression of the E-series prostaglandin receptors (PTGER) such as PTGER2 and PTGER4 [1416]. In addition to the regulation of tumorigenic pathways by endogenous prostaglandins, produced in cervical cells after HPV infection and neoplastic transformation, the cervix (and vagina) can also be regulated by seminal fluid and in particular seminal plasma prostaglandins, like PGE2 [2527].

2. The Role of Seminal Fluid in Regulating Cervical Inflammation and Tumorigenesis

The male ejaculate is a complex organic fluid comprising of secretions of multiple bioactive molecules derived from the Cowper’s and Littre’s glands (5%), prostate (15–30%), and the seminal vesicles (65–70%) [28]. Secretions from each of these reproductive organs are biochemically distinct and on mixing, as occurs at ejaculation, give rise to the complex biochemical nature of the seminal plasma (SP; also called seminal fluid), the main constituent of the ejaculate. The spermatozoa during ejaculation are bathed in this fluid, which has conventionally been viewed as a nutritive, protective, and transport medium for the mammalian spermatozoa [29]. Semen deposition into the female reproductive tract results in modulated immunity and introduction of an inflammatory response in the mucosa, which promotes conditions for favorable conception and pregnancy [29, 30]. In rodents and humans, studies have shown that SP contains signaling molecules which can bind to cognate epithelial receptors in the female reproductive tract to trigger inflammatory gene expression, modifications in cellular structure, and tissue remodeling events in a sequence that closely resembles an inflammatory response [29].

In mammals, the most striking physiological effects of this inflammatory response can be observed after insemination, where a prompt and dramatic influx of inflammatory cells can be observed to infiltrate the site of semen deposition [29]. These cellular changes have been studied in detail in rodents, where a surge in inflammatory cytokines and chemokines can be seen in cervical and uterine epithelial cells after administration of seminal plasma [3133]. These proinflammatory mediators stimulate the extravasation and infiltration of cervical subepithelial stroma by immune cells. Similarly, in humans coitus elicits immune cell (neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes) recruitment into the superficial epithelial and deep stroma tissues of the female reproductive tract [34].

In sexually active women, the degree at which SP normally activates the secretion of these proinflammatory components in any compartment of the female reproductive tract is poorly understood. However, exposure of the cervix to seminal plasma during coitus has been shown to elicit substantial changes in the leukocyte populations within the cervix, initiating a reaction reminiscent of the inflammatory response with effects that penetrate through the stratified epithelial layer and deep into the stroma of the ectocervix [35]. The role of seminal plasma in these studies in mediating leukocyte influx in the cervix was confirmed in control subjects where an absence of inflammatory response was seen with condom-protected coitus or in women abstaining from coitus [35].

Seminal plasma is thought to control the influx of immune cells and expand inducible regulatory T cell population to produce immune tolerance for conception [3537] via the activation of proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine networks [38]. Under pathological conditions or in women with neoplastic cervical lesions—post-HPV infection—the inflammatory response initiated by SP could be exaggerated and could drive pathways which regulate tumorigenesis. Indeed, in vitro studies have shown that SP induces the expression of inflammatory COX-1 and COX-2, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-11, and chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL8 in cervical adenocarcinoma cells [26, 39] in vitro and in animal models in vivo to regulate blood vessel recruitment and angiogenesis (Figure 1) [26, 39]. The induced expression of these effector molecules in neoplastic cervical epithelial cells by direct stimulation with seminal plasma suggests that repeated exposure of the cervix to seminal fluid in the absence of barrier contraception could exacerbate tumour-associated inflammation and could enhance disease progression (Figure 1).

In addition to direct exposure of the epithelial layer surrounding the anterior and posterior vaginal fornix, ecto- and endocervix to seminal fluid during intercourse, direct absorption of components of seminal plasma can enter into the endometrial or peritoneal bed. The intravaginal absorption of male hormones has been described [40], and vaginal absorption of molecules is widely regarded as a potential means of drug delivery in women. Absorption may occur as a result of hematogenous dissemination or direct tissue perfusion through the anterior or posterior vaginal fornix [41]. Although it is likely that the concentrations of inflammatory mediators in SP in the recipient woman after intercourse would be orders of magnitude lower than that found in semen, concentrations of inflammatory mediators would nevertheless be greater in sexually active women and could impact in situ on inflammation and tumour growth. Indeed, prostaglandins, especially PGE2, are present in seminal plasma in orders of magnitude greater than at the site of infection or endogenously regulated inflammation [42]. PGE2 has recently been described as the main constituent of seminal fluid responsible for regulating inflammatory gene expression in vaginal epithelial cells [27]. Since expression of the PGE2 receptors is elevated in cervical cancers [21, 22], it is likely that seminal plasma (and in particular the PGE2 present in seminal plasma) can regulate inflammatory and tumorigenic pathways directly via paracrine interactions with their cognate GPCRs in the cervix to regulate many of the hallmarks of tumorigenesis, including angiogenesis (Figure 1) [43, 44], cellular proliferation, and immune cell regulation.

The origins of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are thought to predate the first half of the 20th century, where zoonotic transmission of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), found in chimpanzees, occurred, giving rise to HIV, as we know it today [45]. To date, HIV has infected more than 60 million people and caused more than 25 million deaths [46]. Current data estimate that approximately 35 million people currently live with HIV worldwide [46]. In 2012 alone there were around 2.3 million new infections and 1.6 million deaths due to HIV/AIDS worldwide [46]. These figures highlight that 30 years on, after the first reported cases of HIV/AIDS, HIV still remains a major global health pandemic and one of the leading causes of death and disease in women of reproductive age [47]. Morbidity is driven by depletion of the immune system. HIV attacks the immune system by targeting CD4+ cells and increases the risk of acquiring opportunistic infections. In 1993, cervical cancer was classified as an AIDS-defining disease in women infected with HIV [48], highlighting HIV as an important risk factor/cofactor in the development of invasive cervical cancer.

It has been well documented that unprotected sexual intercourse is the major route of HIV infection with infected seminal plasma being the major transmission vector [4951]. After deposition of semen into the female genital tract, dramatic tissue remodeling events occur [29, 52, 53]. Although these events are thought to promote fertilization and pregnancy, the alterations to the local cellular environment could also enhance HIV susceptibility. Some of the alterations in the local environment which could impact on HIV susceptibility include immune cell recruitment and activation; alterations in epithelial integrity; alterations in the mucous barrier in the genital tract; alterations in the levels of naturally occurring flora and antimicrobials in the genital tract; and alterations in the balance of inflammatory/anti-inflammatory mediators in the genital mucosa [54].

Once HIV has been deposited within the genital tract, infectious virus must cross the mucosal epithelium to interact with macrophages, CD4+ T lymphocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs). Transmission occurs via transcytosis of virions through the genital epithelium [50, 55] or through exposed genital lesions in the mucosa [5658] or microabrasions in the vagina [59].

HIV infects cells via receptors on the host cell surface. Initially, the virus attaches to the surface of the host cells. This can occur via heparin sulphate proteoglycans [60]. The initial step in membrane fusion begins with binding of the viral envelope protein (Env, consisting of a trimer of gp120-gp41 heterodimers) to the CD4 cell surface protein and a chemokine coreceptor present on the host cell [61]. Most HIV-1 variants use CCR5 and CXCR4 as the main coreceptor in vivo; however up to 12 other chemokine coreceptors for HIV infection have been identified in vitro [62, 63].

The cervicovaginal epithelium displays heterogeneous tissue architecture, comprising a multilayered stratified squamous epithelium at the vaginal-ectocervical interface, whilst the endocervix is lined with a single layered columnar epithelium. The epithelial surface expresses all the receptors necessary for HIV infection including CD4, CCR5, CXCR4 [64, 65], and various other G protein-coupled coreceptors (GPCRs) known to mediate entry of HIV into cells (including CCR2b, CXCR6, and GPR1) [63, 66], indicating a vast area of the female genital tract that can potentially be infected. Furthermore the transformation zone (the interface between the squamous ectocervix and columnar endocervical canal) is thought to be particularly susceptible to HIV infection as it has an enhanced population of CD4+ T cells [55, 67]. Recent studies have highlighted that cervical epithelium can become productively infected and behave as viral reservoirs, which sequester virus and facilitate introduction of virus to leukocytes present in the submucosa [68, 69].

4. The Role of Semen in Modulating HIV Infectivity

Beyond its role as a carrier for delivery of HIV during receptive vaginal or anal intercourse, semen has been suggested to play a more major role in HIV transmission. In addition to local changes in tissue architecture, inflammatory cell recruitment, and secretion of inflammatory mediators in the female genital tract, semen may facilitate or inhibit mucosal HIV infection via multiple mechanisms to impact on susceptibility.

One mechanism by which semen could enhance sexual transmission of HIV was demonstrated by Munch and colleagues in 2007 [70]. To identify natural agents that might play a role in sexual transmission of HIV, Munch and colleagues developed a complex peptide/protein library derived from human seminal plasma which was screened for novel inhibitors and enhancers of HIV infection. They found that naturally occurring fragments of the prostatic acidic phosphatase (PAP) dramatically enhance HIV infection [70]. Functional and structural analyses showed that PAP forms amyloid fibrils, termed semen-derived enhancer of virus infection (SEVI), which markedly increased HIV infection [70]. SEVI capture HIV and promote the attachment and fusion of the virus to the cell surface to increase infection of both R5 and X4 tropic HIV-1 to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), DCs, and macrophages in vitro. In an in vivo experiment to demonstrate the enhancing effect mediated by SEVI, using hCD4/hCCR5-transgenic rats challenged with HIV-1 or SEVI-treated HIV-1 by tail vein injection, it was discovered that pretreatment of HIV with SEVI resulted in a 5-fold increase in the number of HIV cDNA copies found in the splenocyte extracts from infected rats [70]. The increase in HIV infectivity when treated with SEVI in vitro suggests that it might favor sexual transmission of HIV. This, however, has been shown to be highly dependent on the individual semen donor and correlates with the level of SEVI [71].

Another study highlighting a role for semen in enhancing HIV-1 infections has been reported by Bouhlal and colleagues (2002) [72]. These authors showed that opsonization of HIV-1 by semen complement fragments enhances infection in human epithelial cells. In this study, it was demonstrated that both R5- and X4-tropic viruses could infect epithelial cells and that infection of cells was enhanced 2-fold when virus was added to semen prior to incubation with the epithelial cells and that this effect was complement dependent [72]. There is also evidence that semen can raise the pH of the vaginal fluid from a normally acidic pH to a neutral pH 7. This natural buffering capacity of semen might further enhance HIV stability and create an environment conducive to infection [73, 74]. Other proposed mechanisms of semen-mediated HIV transmission include the role of spermatozoa in efficient transmission of HIV to dendritic cells [75], semen-mediated inflammation [76], semen-mediated immunomodulation, and suppression of both innate and adaptive immune response against HIV [77], and more recently semen lactoferrin has been shown to promote expression of CCL20 in epithelial cells to potentially enhance HIV transmission [78].

Although semen has been shown to be permissive to infection of certain cell types there is also evidence that certain constituents of seminal plasma can impede HIV infectivity. For example, mucin-6 can prevent the capture of HIV-1 by dendritic cells (DC) such as DC-SIGN (DC-specific-intracellular-adhesion-molecule-3-grabbing-nonintegrin) [79, 80]. Productive infection of certain DC in vivo is still a matter of debate; however, they are important for early HIV pathogenesis and transfer of virus to CD4+ T cells [81, 82]. In addition cationic polypeptides [83] contained in seminal plasma and reactive oxygen species produced by leukocytes and spermatozoa are known to provide antiviral activity against HIV [84]. More research is needed to elucidate the collective effects of all these effectors in semen in modulating the cervico-vaginal environment after intercourse and the impact on HIV susceptibility in women.

5. The Role of Semen in Regulation of Cell Surface Receptors and Signaling

Constituents of seminal plasma, including TGFβ, EGF, prostaglandins, and soluble complement components could directly regulate HIV susceptibility via the interaction with or modulation of expression of cell surface receptors present on mucosal epithelial and immune cells [19, 25, 29, 52, 85]. For example, Bouhlal and colleagues showed that complement activation in seminal fluid generates C3 cleavage and augments HIV-1 infection in epithelial cells via a complement receptor type 3- (CR3-) mediated mechanism [72]. CR3 is expressed on the apical surface of epithelial cells including cells of the ecto- and endocervix, endometrium, and fallopian tube [86]. This suggests that opsonization of HIV with complement is important in the early events surrounding mucosal transmission of HIV [87]. Furthermore as highlighted earlier, the epithelial surface expresses all the receptors necessary for HIV infection including CD4, CCR5, CXCR4 [64, 65], and various other G protein-coupled coreceptors (GPCRs) known to mediate entry of HIV into cells (including CCR2b, CXCR6, and GPR1) [63, 66]. Some of these receptors display cyclical variations during the menstrual cycle indicating that susceptibility of cells could be different in women, depending on the phase of the menstrual cycle [65]. In women with genital tract pathologies, and cervical cancers in particular, expression of chemokine receptors such as CXCR4 and CCR5 is elevated [88, 89]. Chemokine receptors like CXCR4 are known to play a role in lymph node metastasis during advanced-stage disease [89]; however their elevated expression in cervical cancers could potentially be hijacked by HIV for entry. Furthermore, CXCR4 expression can be regulated by HPV oncogenes [90] and prostaglandins (PGE2) [91] in the female genital tract (Figure 1) and could potentially be enhanced following sexual exposure to semen and seminal plasma PGE2. Indeed, seminal plasma has been shown to increase CCR5 expression in target lymphocytes [92], and seminal plasma and PGE2 have been shown to increase CCR5 expression in cervical epithelial cells via induction of the PGE2 receptor signalling pathway [88], indicating the potential for enhancing the preferential transmission of R5 tropic HIV. These observations suggest that HPV infection, inflammatory mediators, and semen can drive expression of HIV coreceptors on cervical epithelial cells. Elevated HIV receptors, which can themselves be regulated by seminal plasma prostaglandins [88], could then enhance the susceptibility of these women to HIV infection.

As highlighted earlier, cervical cancer is an AIDS-related disease. Recently Fitzgerald and colleagues have demonstrated that HIV infection in women with HPV positive cervical cancers increases COX-2 expression and systemic PGE2 levels [93]. In cervical cancers, expression of the PGE2 receptors is elevated in cervical epithelial cells [21]. In the case of women with dual HPV and HIV infection, where PGE2 receptor expression is elevated together with elevated circulating PGE2 concentrations, the enhanced ligand-receptor signalling mediated by PGE2 could potentially exacerbate inflammation and drive tumour progression and morbidity. These data provide some compelling evidence into a possible mechanism whereby HIV infection can increase AIDS-related cervical cancer progression in women with cervical cancer.

6. Conclusions

There is significant evidence that the cervicovaginal microenvironment is modified during sexual intercourse by semen to enhance conception and pregnancy via the remodeling of multiple tissue compartments. Opportunistic infections and HIV present during intercourse can hijack the pathways mediating this response to seminal fluid and can be enhanced by factors present in seminal fluid. As demonstrated schematically in Figure 1, there is further evidence for a role for seminal plasma and seminal plasma prostaglandins, like PGE2, in regulating inflammation and pathways which regulate tumor progression in cervical cancers. Furthermore, there is evidence that seminal plasma and PGE2 can increase susceptibility to HIV infection by modulating the local inflammatory response in the cervix and elevating expression of HIV receptors in cervical epithelial cells and lymphocytes. Once infected, HIV can potentially enhance tumorigenesis by increasing systemic PGE2, which has been shown to promote tumour progression. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that inhibit the synthesis of PGE2, or drugs that inhibit the actions of PGE2, like specific PGE2 receptor antagonists, have demonstrated dramatic anti-inflammatory and antineoplastic activity for a variety of cancers [94, 95] by inhibition of the COX-prostaglandin pathway. These compounds may prove useful in reducing inflammation and the progression of AIDS-related cervical cancer in women and may also prevent the semen-induced upregulation in cellular machinery that could enhance HIV infection. More research is needed to determine the potential effectiveness of such interventions in women’s health.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


Arieh A. Katz and Kurt J. Sales were supported by grant funding to the MRC/UCT Receptor Biology Research Unit by the Medical Research Council of South Africa (MRC). Kurt J. Sales was supported by the following grants: Poliomyelitis Research Foundation of South Africa (PRF), Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and University of Cape Town Research Committee (URC). The funders played no role in the design or interpretation of the paper or the decision to publish.


  1. H. Zur Hausen, “Immortalization of human cells and their malignant conversion by high risk human papillomavirus genotypes,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 405–411, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. zur Hausen, “Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers—a brief historical account,” Virology, vol. 384, no. 2, pp. 260–265, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Bernard, R. D. Burk, Z. Chen, K. van Doorslaer, H. Z. Hausen, and E. de Villiers, “Classification of papillomaviruses (PVs) based on 189 PV types and proposal of taxonomic amendments,” Virology, vol. 401, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Stanley, “Human papillomavirus and cervical carcinogenesis,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 663–676, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. A. Stanley, “Epithelial cell responses to infection with human papillomavirus,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 215–222, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. A. Stanley, “Genital human papillomavirus infections: current and prospective therapies,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 681–691, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. D. M. Steenbergen, J. De Wilde, S. M. Wilting, A. A. T. P. Brink, P. J. F. Snijders, and C. J. L. M. Meijer, “HPV-mediated transformation of the anogenital tract,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 32, supplement 1, pp. S25–S33, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Botezatu, C. D. Goia-Rusanu, I. V. Iancu et al., “Quantitative analysis of the relationship between microRNA-124a, -34b and -203 gene methylation and cervical oncogenesis,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. M. Wilting, P. J. F. Snijders, W. Verlaat et al., “Altered microRNA expression associated with chromosomal changes contributes to cervical carcinogenesis,” Oncogene, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 106–116, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Bierkens, S. M. Wilting, W. N. van Wieringen et al., “Chromosomal profiles of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia relate to duration of preceding high-risk human papillomavirus infection,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. E579–E585, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. M. Wilting, R. A. A. van Boerdonk, F. E. Henken et al., “Methylation-mediated silencing and tumour suppressive function of hsa-miR-124 in cervical cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 167, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. Kaczkowski, M. Morevati, M. Rossing, F. Cilius, and B. Norrild, “A decade of global mRNA and miRNA profiling of HPV-positive Cell lines and clinical specimens,” The Open Virology Journal, vol. 6, pp. 216–231, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  13. B. Kaczkowski, M. Rossing, D. K. Andersen et al., “Integrative analyses reveal novel strategies in HPV11,-16 and -45 early infection,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, article 515, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Subbaramaiah and A. J. Dannenberg, “Cyclooxygenase-2 transcription is regulated by human papillomavirus 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins: evidence of a corepressor/coactivator exchange,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 3976–3985, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Oh, S. Kim, E. Cho, Y. Song, W. Kim, and Y. Juhnn, “Human papillomavirus type 16 E5 protein inhibits hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis by stimulating ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation of Bax in human cervical cancer cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 402–410, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Oh, S. Kim, Y. Lee et al., “Human papillomavirus E5 protein induces expression of the EP4 subtype of prostaglandin E2 receptor in cyclic AMP response element-dependent pathways in cervical cancer cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 141–149, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. T. Rizzo, “Cyclooxygenase-2 in oncogenesis,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 412, no. 9-10, pp. 671–687, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. P. Wymann and R. Schneiter, “Lipid signalling in disease,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 162–176, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. N. Jabbour, K. J. Sales, R. D. Catalano, and J. E. Norman, “Inflammatory pathways in female reproductive health and disease,” Reproduction, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 903–919, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. S. Ryu, K. H. Chang, H. W. Yang, M. S. Kim, H. C. Kwon, and K. Oh, “High cyclooxygenase-2 expression in stage IB cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis or parametrial invasion,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 320–325, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. J. Sales, A. A. Katz, M. Davis et al., “Cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandin E2 synthesis are up-regulated in carcinomas of the cervix: a possible autocrine/paracrine regulation of neoplastic cell function via EP2/EP4 receptors,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 2243–2249, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. J. Sales, A. A. Katz, B. Howard, R. P. Soeters, R. P. Millar, and H. N. Jabbour, “Cyclooxygenase-1 is up-regulated in cervical carcinomas: autocrine/paracrine regulation of cyclooxygenase-2, prostaglandin E receptors, and angiogenic factors by cyclooxygenase-1,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 424–432, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  23. S. Narumiya, Y. Sugimoto, and F. Ushikubi, “Prostanoid receptors: structures, properties, and functions,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1193–1226, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  24. H. N. Jabbour and K. J. Sales, “Prostaglandin receptor signalling and function in human endometrial pathology,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 398–404, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. J. Sales, A. A. Katz, R. P. Millar, and H. N. Jabbour, “Seminal plasma activates cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2 receptor expression and signalling in cervical adenocarcinoma cells,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1065–1070, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. J. Sales, J. R. Sutherland, H. N. Jabbour, and A. A. Katz, “Seminal plasma induces angiogenic chemokine expression in cervical cancer cells and regulates vascular function,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1823, no. 10, pp. 1789–1795, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Joseph, I. A. Zalenskaya, L. C. Sawyer, N. Chandra, and G. F. Doncel, “Seminal plasma induces prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PTGS) 2 expression in immortalized human vaginal cells: involvement of semen prostaglandin E2 in PTGS2 upregulation,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 88, no. 1, article 13, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. H. Owen and D. F. Katz, “A review of the physical and chemical properties of human semen and the formulation of a semen simulant,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 459–469, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. A. Robertson, “Seminal plasma and male factor signalling in the female reproductive tract,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 322, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. J. Schuberth, U. Taylor, H. Zerbe, D. Waberski, R. Hunter, and D. Rath, “Immunological responses to semen in the female genital tract,” Theriogenology, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1174–1181, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. De, R. Choudhuri, and G. W. Wood, “Determination of the number and distribution of macrophages, lymphocytes, and granulocytes in the mouse uterus from mating through implantation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 252–262, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. T. McMaster, R. C. Newton, S. K. Dey, and G. K. Andrews, “Activation and distribution of inflammatory cells in the mouse uterus during the preimplantation period,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 1699–1705, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  33. S. A. Robertson, V. J. Mau, K. P. Tremellen, and R. F. Seamark, “Role of high molecular weight seminal vesicle proteins in eliciting the uterine inflammatory response to semen in mice,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 265–277, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. I. J. Pandya and J. Cohen, “The leukocytic reaction of the human uterine cervix to spermatozoa,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 417–421, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  35. D. J. Sharkey, K. P. Tremellen, M. J. Jasper, K. Gemzell-Danielsson, and S. A. Robertson, “Seminal fluid induces leukocyte recruitment and cytokine and chemokine mRNA expression in the human cervix after coitus,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 2445–2454, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. A. Robertson, L. R. Guerin, J. J. Bromfield, K. M. Branson, A. C. Ahlström, and A. S. Care, “Seminal fluid drives expansion of the CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell pool and induces tolerance to paternal alloantigens in mice,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1036–1045, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. M. Moldenhauer, K. R. Diener, D. M. Thring, M. P. Brown, J. D. Hayball, and S. A. Robertson, “Cross-presentation of male seminal fluid antigens elicits T cell activation to initiate the female immune response to pregnancy,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 12, pp. 8080–8093, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. J. Sharkey, A. M. Macpherson, K. P. Tremellen, D. G. Mottershead, R. B. Gilchrist, and S. A. Robertson, “TGF-β mediates proinflammatory seminal fluid signaling in human cervical epithelial cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 1024–1035, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. R. Sutherland, K. J. Sales, H. N. Jabbour, and A. A. Katz, “Seminal plasma enhances cervical adenocarcinoma cell proliferation and tumour growth in vivo,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e33848, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. G. Ney, “The intravaginal absorption of male generated hormones and their possible effect on female behaviour,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 221–231, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Klemmt and A. R. Scialli, “The transport of chemicals in semen,” Birth Defects Research B—Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 119–131, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. W. Kelly, “Immunosuppressive mechanisms in semen: implications for contraception,” Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1686–1693, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  43. S. Battersby, K. J. Sales, A. R. Williams, R. A. Anderson, S. Gardner, and H. N. Jabbour, “Seminal plasma and prostaglandin E2 up-regulate fibroblast growth factor 2 expression in endometrial adenocarcinoma cells via E-series prostanoid-2 receptor-mediated transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Muller, K. J. Sales, A. A. Katz, and H. N. Jabbour, “Seminal plasma promotes the expression of tumorigenic and angiogenic genes in cervical adenocarcinoma cells via the E-series prostanoid 4 receptor,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 7, pp. 3356–3365, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. B. Korber, M. Muldoon, J. Theiler et al., “Timing the ancestor of the HIV-1 pandemic strains,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5472, pp. 1789–1796, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. UNAIDS, UNAIDS Report on Global AIDS epidemic. Geneva, UNAIDS, 2013,
  47. WHO Women's Health Fact Sheet No. 334, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
  48. A. M. Levine, “AIDS-related malignancies: the emerging epidemic,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 85, no. 17, pp. 1382–1397, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. J. Miller and R. J. Shattock, “Target cells in vaginal HIV transmission,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. Gupta and P. J. Klasse, “How do viral and host factors modulate the sexual transmission of HIV? Can transmission be blocked?” PLoS Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, article 79, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. T. Haase, “Targeting early infection to prevent HIV-1 mucosal transmission,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7286, pp. 217–223, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. A. Robertson, “Seminal fluid signaling in the female reproductive tract: lessons from rodents and pigs.,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 85, no. 13, pp. E36–E44, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. D. J. Sharkey, A. M. Macpherson, K. P. Tremellen, and S. A. Robertson, “Seminal plasma differentially regulates inflammatory cytokine gene expression in human cervical and vaginal epithelial cells,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 491–501, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. L. Rametse, A. J. Olivier, L. Masson, S. Barnabas, and L. R. McKinnon, “Role of semen in altering the balance between inflammation and tolerance in the female genital tract: does it contribute to HIV risk?” Viral Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 200–206, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  55. F. Hladik and M. J. McElrath, “Setting the stage: host invasion by HIV,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 447–457, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. R. Galvin and M. S. Cohen, “The role of sexually transmitted diseases in HIV transmission,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. Piot and M. Laga, “Genital ulcers, other sexually transmitted diseases, and the sexual transmission of HIV. The first two may be important risk factors for the third,” British Medical Journal, vol. 298, no. 6674, pp. 623–624, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. D. Serwadda, R. H. Gray, N. K. Sewankambo et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus acquisition associated with genital ulcer disease and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection: a nested case-control study in Rakai, Uganda,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 188, no. 10, pp. 1492–1497, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. K. Norvell, G. I. Benrubi, and R. J. Thompson, “Investigation of microtrauma after sexual intercourse,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 269–271, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  60. I. Mondor, S. Ugolini, and Q. J. Sattentau, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 attachment to HeLa CD4 cells is CD4 independent and gp120 dependent and requires cell surface heparans,” Journal of Virology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 3623–3634, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  61. C. B. Wilen, J. C. Tilton, and R. W. Doms, “Molecular mechanisms of HIV entry,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 726, pp. 223–242, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. B. J. Doranz, Z. H. Lu, J. Rucker et al., “Two distinct CCR5 domains can mediate coreceptor usage by human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Journal of Virology, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 6305–6314, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  63. N. Shimizu, A. Tanaka, A. Oue et al., “Broad usage spectrum of G protein-coupled receptors as coreceptors by primary isolates of HIV,” AIDS, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 761–769, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. G. R. Yeaman, S. Asin, S. Weldon et al., “Chemokine receptor expression in the human ectocervix: Implications for infection by the human immunodeficiency virus-type I,” Immunology, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 524–533, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. G. R. Yeaman, A. L. Howell, S. Weldon et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus receptor and coreceptor expression on human uterine epithelial cells: regulation of expression during the menstrual cycle and implications for human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Immunology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 137–146, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. H. Blaak, P. H. M. Boers, R. A. Gruters, H. Schuitemaker, M. E. van der Ende, and A. D. M. E. Osterhaus, “CCR5, GPR15, and CXCR6 are major coreceptors of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 variants isolated from individuals with and without plasma viremia,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1686–1700, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Pudney, A. J. Quayle, and D. J. Anderson, “Immunological microenvironments in the human vagina and cervix: mediators of cellular immunity are concentrated in the cervical transformation zone,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1253–1263, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. S. Dezzutti, P. C. Guenthner, J. E. Cummins Jr. et al., “Cervical and prostate primary epithelial cells are not productively infected but sequester human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 183, no. 8, pp. 1204–1213, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. Maher, X. Wu, T. Schacker, J. Horbul, and P. Southern, “HIV binding, penetration, and primary infection in human cervicovaginal tissue,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 32, pp. 11504–11509, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. J. Münch, E. Rücker, L. Ständker et al., “Semen-derived amyloid fibrils drastically enhance HIV infection,” Cell, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 1059–1071, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. K. Kim, M. Yolamanova, O. Zirafi et al., “Semen-mediated enhancement of HIV infection is donor-dependent and correlates with the levels of SEVI,” Retrovirology, vol. 7, article 55, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. H. Bouhlal, N. Chomont, N. Haeffner-Cavaillon, M. D. Kazatchkine, L. Belec, and H. Hocini, “Opsonization of HIV-1 by semen complement enhances infection of human epithelial cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 3301–3306, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. Tevi-Benissan, L. Belec, M. Levy et al., “In vivo semen-associated pH neutralization of cervicovaginal secretions,” Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, vol. 4, pp. 367–374, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  74. J. Ongradi, L. Ceccherini-Nelli, M. Pistello, S. Specter, and M. Bendinelli, “Acid sensitivity of cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1: clinical implications,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1433–1436, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. Ceballos, F. R. Lenicov, J. Sabatté et al., “Spermatozoa capture HIV-1 through heparan sulfate and efficiently transmit the virus to dendritic cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 206, no. 12, pp. 2717–2733, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. A. Robertson, S. O'Leary, and D. T. Armstrong, “Influence of semen on inflammatory modulators of embryo implantation,” Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement, vol. 62, pp. 231–245, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  77. R. W. Kelly and H. O. Critchley, “Immunomodulation by human seminal plasma: a benefit for spermatozoon and pathogen?” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2200–2207, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. A. G. Lourenco, M. C. Komesu, A. A. Machado, S. M. Quintana, and T. Bourlet, “Semen lactoferrin promotes CCL20 production by epithelial cells: involvement in HIV transmission,” World Journal of Virology, vol. 3, pp. 11–17, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  79. J. Sabatté, A. Ceballos, S. Raiden et al., “Human seminal plasma abrogates the capture and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to CD4+ T cells mediated by DC-SIGN,” Journal of Virology, vol. 81, no. 24, pp. 13723–13734, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M. J. Stax, T. van Montfort, R. R. Sprenger et al., “Mucin 6 in seminal plasma binds DC-SIGN and potently blocks dendritic cell mediated transfer of HIV-1 to CD4+ T-lymphocytes,” Virology, vol. 391, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. R. M. Steinman, A. Granelli-Piperno, M. Pope et al., “The interaction of immunodeficiency viruses with dendritic cells,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 276, pp. 1–30, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  82. C. Trumpfheller, C. G. Park, J. Finke, R. M. Steinman, and A. Granelli-Piperno, “Cell type-dependent retention and transmission of HIV-1 by DC-SIGN,” International Immunology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 289–298, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. J. A. Martellini, A. L. Cole, N. Venkataraman et al., “Cationic polypeptides contribute to the anti-HIV-1 activity of human seminal plasma,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 3609–3618, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. A. Agarwal and S. A. Prabakaran, “Mechanism, measurement, and prevention of oxidative stress in male reproductive physiology,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 963–974, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  85. O. A. Vanderpuye, C. A. Labarrere, and J. A. McIntyre, “The complement system in human reproduction,” The American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 27, no. 3-4, pp. 145–155, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. J. L. Edwards, E. J. Brown, K. A. Ault, and M. A. Apicella, “The role of complement receptor 3 (CR3) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection of human cervical epithelia,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 611–622, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. H. Stoiber, I. Frank, M. Spruth et al., “Inhibition of HIV-1 infection in vitro by monoclonal antibodies to the complement receptor type 3 (CR3): an accessory role for CR3 during virus entry?” Molecular Immunology, vol. 34, no. 12-13, pp. 855–863, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. K. J. Sales, A. Adefuye, L. Nicholson, and A. A. Kat, “CCR5 expression is elevated in cervical cancer cells and is upregulated by seminal plasma,” Molecular Human Reproduction, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. J. Kodama, T. Kusumoto, N. Seki et al., “Association of CXCR4 and CCR7 chemokine receptor expression and lymph node metastasis in human cervical cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Amine, S. Rivera, P. Opolon et al., “Novel anti-metastatic action of cidofovir mediated by inhibition of E6/E7, CXCR4 and Rho/ROCK signaling in HPV+ tumor cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 3, Article ID e5018, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. K. J. Sales, V. Grant, R. D. Catalano, and H. N. Jabbour, “Chorionic gonadotrophin regulates CXCR4 expression in human endometrium via E-series prostanoid receptor 2 signalling to PI3K-ERK1/2: implications for fetal-maternal crosstalk for embryo implantation,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 17, no. 1, Article ID gaq069, pp. 22–32, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. E. Balandya, S. Sheth, K. Sanders, W. Wieland-Alter, and T. Lahey, “Semen protects CD4+ target cells from HIV infection but promotes the preferential transmission of R5 tropic HIV,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 7596–7604, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. D. W. Fitzgerald, K. Bezak, O. Ocheretina et al., “The effect of HIV and HPV coinfection on cervical COX-2 expression and systemic prostaglandin E2 levels,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. T. Hida, J. Leyton, A. N. Makheja et al., “Non-small cell lung cancer cycloxygenase activity and proliferation are inhibited by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs,” Anticancer Research, vol. 18, no. 2A, pp. 775–782, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  95. J. Burn, A. Gerdes, F. Macrae et al., “Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9809, pp. 2081–2087, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Anthonio Adefuye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.