Clinical Study

Self-Managing Postoperative Pain with the Use of a Novel, Interactive Device: A Proof of Concept Study

Table 6

Efficacy analysis: study feedback (information obtained from the 48-hour questionnaire).

OutcomeGroup SGroup D

Worst reported pain since surgery; median (IQR) (scale 0–10)8 (4.75, 10)5.5 (3, 8)
Least reported pain since surgery; median (IQR) (scale 0–10)1.5 (0.75, 3)1.5 (0, 3.25)
Frequency of severe pain since surgery; median% (IQR)25% (17.5%, 42.5%)20% (7.5%, 42.5%)
Median (IQR) pain interference with
 Activities in bed7 (2, 8)5.5 (3, 7)
 Breathing/coughing4.5 (2, 8)4 (1, 6.25)
 Sleeping4.5 (0.75, 6)4 (1, 6)
 Out of bed activities5 (3, 7); 4 (1, 6);
Median (IQR) pain related
 Anxiety5 (1.75, 7.25)2 (0.75, 4.25)
 Helplessness5 (2, 7.25)2.5 (0, 6.25)
Median (IQR) side effects
 Nausea5 (1, 9.25)2.5 (1, 7)
 Drowsiness8 (2.75, 9)5 (1, 7.25)
 Itching0 (0, 3.25)0 (0, 3.25)
 Dizziness4 (0, 8)1.5 (0, 4.25)
Frequency of pain relief since surgery; median% (IQR)80% (67.5%, 90%)80% (70%, 90%)
Require more pain relief; yes (%)5 (19.2%)7 (26.9%)
Information about pain treatment received; yes (%)19 (73.1%)17 (65.4%)
Level of participation in pain treatment decisions; median (IQR)8 (5.75, 10)8 (3.25, 10)
Satisfied with the pain relief prescribed; median (IQR)8 (7.75, 9.25)8 (7.75, 10)
Satisfied with the pain control overall; median (IQR)8.5 (7, 9.25)9 (7, 10)

Score of 10 = completely interfered; score of 10 = extreme; score of 10 = severe.