Subjective Experiences and Sensitivities in Women with Fibromyalgia: A Quantitative and Comparative Study

De Roa, P.; Paris, P.; Poindessous, J. L.; Maillet, O.; Héron, A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8269564

Pain Research and Management

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 8269564 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8269564

Subjective Experiences and Sensitivities in Women with Fibromyalgia: A Quantitative and Comparative Study

P. De Roa,¹P. Paris,²J. L. Poindessous,³O. Maillet,⁴and A. Héron^4,5

Academic Editor: Jacob Ablin

Received08 Dec 2017

Revised23 Feb 2018

Accepted28 Feb 2018

Published01 Apr 2018

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a chronic widespread pain syndrome associated with chronic fatigue. Its pathogenesis is not clearly understood. This study presents subjective experiences and sensitivities reported by fibromyalgia patients, which should be considered in primary care to avoid medical nomadism, as well as stigmatization of the patients. The prevalence of significant characteristics was compared with others patients consulting at the same pain unit who suffer from rebel and disabling form of chronic migraine. Psychometric tests were anonymously completed by 78 patients of the Pain Unit (44 fibromyalgia patients and 34 migraine patients). Tests evaluated pain (Visual Analog scale), childhood traumas (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), lack of parental affection, stressful life events (Holmes and Rahe Scale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), perceived hypersensitivity to 10 stimuli, and hyperactivity before illness. However, pain scores were comparable in the two groups, and the prevalence was significantly higher in fibromyalgia patients than in migraine patients for anxiety (81.8% versus 51.5%) and depression (57.1% versus 8.8%). Childhood physical abuses were more frequently reported in fibromyalgia than in migraine cases (25% versus 3%). Similarly, the feeling of lack of parental affection, subjective hypersensitivity to stress and stimuli (cold, moisture, heat, full moon, and flavors) or hyperactivity (ergomania), appeared as prominent features of fibromyalgia patients. Fibromyalgia patients considered themselves as being hypersensitive (mentally and physically) compared to migraine patients. They also have higher depression levels. Beyond somatic symptoms, precociously taking account of psychosocial and behavioral strategies would highly improve treatment efficiency of the fibromyalgia syndrome.

1. Introduction

Fibromyalgia is a chronic widespread pain syndrome associated with chronic fatigue. It affects 2–4% of the adult population, with a higher incidence in women [1, 2]. Considering the musculoskeletal pain symptoms, the World Health Organization quoted fibromyalgia as a rheumatologic disease (M79.7). If the reality of fibromyalgia syndrome is recognized, at least in its severe form, its causes and pathophysiology remain poorly understood and controversial. In 1990, the American College of Rheumatology specified diagnostic criteria of fibromyalgia [3]. In 2010, new criteria appeared taking into account nonrestorative sleep, cognitive impairment, and variable somatic symptoms associated with chronic pain [4].

Recent studies reported that interaction between genetic predispositions [5, 6], biochemical factors, psychological profiles [7], and triggering events which sensitize the central nervous system [8–10], could contribute to the etiology of the fibromyalgia syndrome.

During the clinical examination of painful patients at the Chronic Pain Unit, we used a semistructured interview. The consultation usually lasted 90 minutes and focused on the life history. The attentive listening of fibromyalgia patients revealed life adversity, especially during childhood. Patients usually reported lack of affection, indifference, neglect, or abuse from their family, in accordance with a recent meta-analysis which suggested that childhood traumas could be associated with fibromyalgia syndrome [11, 12]. In addition, patients often mentioned other life’s traumas: bereavements, abandon, rapes, severe illness, or accidents. They also reported high sensitivity to stimuli and professional harassment.

The present cross-sectional study aimed to characterize childhood experiences, perceived lack of parental affection, hypersensitivity to stimuli, life stressors, anxio-depression, and ergomania mentioned by French fibromyalgia patients. The prevalence of these parameters was quantified using self-report questionnaires and was compared to that assessed in migraine patients treated in the same Pain Unit (as a control group). Indeed, fibromyalgia and migraine both preferentially affected women and resulted in a comparable pain score on the Visual Analogic Scale. They both represented chronic, rebels, and disabling forms of the pathologies, justifying the orientation of the patients to the Pain Unit [4, 13, 14].

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

Subjects included in the study were adult women who consulted for fibromyalgia or migraine at the Pain Unit of Dreux Hospital. These patients were generally addressed by a neurologist or a rheumatologist, most often at the tertiary level after medical nomadism. Migraine patients were sent to the Pain Unit because of their resistance to treatments and daily chronic headaches.

In the case of fibromyalgia, the diagnosis was confirmed in the Pain Unit using the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology from 1990 to 2010 in case of fibromyalgia [3, 4]. The pain was chronic, that is, present for more than 3 months and resistant to usual drugs. It was associated with abnormal tenderness, fatigue, stiffness, sleep disturbance, depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment. The presence of widespread chronic pain was reported on at least 7 of 19 possible tender points of the body and associated with 4 groups of symptoms whose patient quoted the discomfort from 0 to 3 (sum ≥ 6/12): chronic fatigue (more than 3 months), sleep disorders, cognitive disorders, and functional disorders. Additional examinations were normal.

In the case of migraine, the diagnosis had used the criteria of the International Headache Society [13] in case of migraine diagnosis mentioned at least 5 headache attacks lasting 4–72 hours (untreated or unsuccessfully treated). Headache had at least two of the following characteristics: unilateral location, pulsating quality, moderate or severe pain intensity, and aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity (e.g., walking or climbing stairs), and during headache at least one of the following had occurred: nausea and/or vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia, not attributed to another disorder. Additional clinical examinations were normal out of crises.

Patients with serious organic pathology evidenced by biological or imagery analysis (inflammatory arthritis and thyroid pathologies), sleep apnea, psychosis, or delirium, were excluded from the study. Fibromyalgia patients with migraine were also excluded from the study to avoid intergroup interferences that may reduce the visibility of the effects.

2.2. Evaluation Tools

A set of 6 self-report questionnaires were sent by post to the patients. Questionnaires should be returned anonymously completed, within two months. The set of questionnaires contained the following:(i)The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess subjective perception of global pain on a 10 cm line (0, no pain, to 10, pain as bad it could be) [15].(ii)The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) (French version), a 70-item self-administered inventory providing reliable and valid retrospective assessment of child abuse and neglect [16, 17]. Items asked about experiences in childhood and adolescence and were rated on a 5 point Likert-type scale with response options ranging from Never True to Very Often True. The CTQ had five clinical scales measuring physical and psychological maltreatments: physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, and physical and emotional neglect.(iii)The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), determining a score of anxiety and a score of depression [18]. These two scores varied from 0 to 21.(iv)The Holmes and Rahe stress scale, measuring the level of stress associated with 43 life events that could contribute to illness if occurring in the past 2 years [19]. Events were scored from 11 to 100. If global score >150, the stress level is high or very high (if 150 < total score ≤ 300) with a risk of illness. When total score ≤150, the stress was considered as moderate with a slight risk of illness.(v)One questionnaire concerned the sensitivity of the patient to ten different stimuli (light, noise, cold, warm, humidity, flavors, odors, full moon, allergies, and drugs). It allowed evaluation of the subjective sensitivity perceived by the patients. The question was, “Would you say that you are very sensitive to the following stimuli?” Possible answers for each stimulus were “yes” or “no.”(vi)Three further questions were added two regarding the lack of affection perceived during childhood (“I have missed affection from my mother/father”) and another one evaluating the subjective activity level before illness (“Before my illness, I was a very active person”). The possible answers were “Never true,” “Rarely true,” “Sometimes true,” “Often true,” and “Very often true,” respectively, quoted from 1 to 5.

After reception of the filled questionnaires, data analysis was realized on Excel by the Clinical Research Unit. The results were expressed in average ± standard deviation for scores or in percentage for frequencies. The statistic tests comparing fibromyalgia to migraine patients were realized with Student’s t-test or the test of χ₂ of Pearson. A value of was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

The analysis focused on 78 questionnaires returned by the patients to the Clinical Research Unit (44 from fibromyalgia patients F and 34 from migraine patients M). Main characteristics of the two groups of women were comparable with mean age of 45 ± 12 years and mean pathology duration of 12 ± 10 years.

The Visual Analogic Scores (VASs) evaluating pain during the best moments, the worst moments, and at present (i.e., when patients completed the questionnaire). In the fibromyalgia group, mean VAS varied from 3.3 ± 1.9 during the best moments to 8.9 ± 1.4 during the worst moments. Scores were comparable and not statistically significant in the migraine group (resp. 1.8 ± 2.3 and 8.7 ± 1.2, data not shown).

Concerning maltreatments retrospectively evaluated by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), emotional neglect was the most frequently maltreatment reported by fibromyalgia patients (56.8%), followed by physical and sexual abuses (25% of patients), emotional abuse (20.5%), and physical neglect (9.1%) (Figure 1(a)). History of physical abuse was more frequently reported in the fibromyalgia group (25%) than in the migraine group (2.9%) . Physical abuse was defined as bodily assaults on a child by an older person that could lead to or had resulted in injuries. The percentage of patients reporting other maltreatments, emotional maltreatments (humiliation, deamination, and failure of caretakers to provide emotional and psychological needs), physical neglects, or sexual abuses, did not statistically differ between the two groups. However, 52–66% of fibromyalgia patients reported lacks of parental affection versus 26% of migraine patients ( for lacks of maternal affection and for lacks of paternal affection) (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Prevalence of anxiety and depression was higher in fibromyalgia than in migraine (81.8% versus 51.5%, and 57.1% versus 8.8%, , resp.) (Figure 2).

Stress evaluation by the Holmes and Rahe test showed that 74% of fibromyalgia patients (versus 36% for migraine patients, ) reported major life stressors (score >150) to have occurred during the 2 years preceding the test (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Results of the Holmes and Rahe stress scale measuring the level of stress associated with life events occurred in the past 2 years. Events were scored from 11 to 100. If global score>150, the stress level is high or very high and could contribute to the illness. When total score ≤150, the stress was considered as moderate to low. Results show the percentage of fibromyalgia and migraine patients with low (on the left) or high (on the right) score of stress. Statistical significances between the two groups .

In addition to stress sensitivity, fibromyalgia patients reported being particularly sensitive to external stimuli, with a significant difference for 5 of them in comparison with migraine patients cold, moisture, heat, full moon, and flavors (Figure 4). The difference was not statistically significant for noise, light, odors, and drugs sensitivity.

Considering professional activity, 89% of fibromyalgia patients (versus 67% of migraine patients, ) considered to have been very active people before illness (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

This quantitative and comparative study showed that despite a comparable level of pain score and invalidating impact of the disease in the two groups (fibromyalgia and migraine), the prevalence of abuses and deprivations (during infancy) reported by fibromyalgia women, as well as their current subjective sensitivity to stress and stimuli, was higher than in the migraine group. In addition, the fibromyalgia patients considered themselves to have been hyperactive women before their illness. Anxiety and depression were also significantly more frequent than in migraine patients.

In our study, physical abuses in childhood were retrospectively reported by 25% of adult fibromyalgia women. This prevalence was significantly higher than that measured in the migraine group or for the general female population [17]. Even if the causes of fibromyalgia are currently unknown, several studies suggested that physical traumas occurring during childhood could contribute to the physiopathology of this syndrome [7, 20, 21]. This etiology would differ from that of migraine: while the genetic and neurovascular origin of migraine is frequently reported [22], the fibromyalgia syndrome rather would be associated with psychic and environmental events occurring along a traumatic life history. The psycho-affective impact of traumatic experiences would contribute to their illness.

Moreover, the fibromyalgia patients declared more affective deficiencies than did migraine women. A lack of attention or of parental presence was more frequent and could have durably affected these patients [23, 24]. Some recent studies showed that a premature birth, a maternal deprivation or a kind of insecure affection could be associated with chronic pain and foster the pain sensitivity (for review, cf. [21]). This was confirmed by the high “emotional neglect” score measured by CTQ in fibromyalgia patients. This score was also very high in migraine patients, and the difference between the two groups was not significant. This may seem inconsistent with the precedent differences mentioned for affective deprivation. However, this apparent inconsistency could be explained by the fact that whereas the CTQ referred to the relationships between the child and all the members of the family, concerning lack of affection, the child stated directly father and mother affection, so referred to the primordial attachment [23].

In addition to our observations, a recent study revealed that other childhood adversities could be associated with fibromyalgia: financial difficulties, conflicts in the family, parental divorce, chronic illnesses in the family, or alcohol problems [25]. These types of adversities could be at the origin of parental difficulties predisposing to a familial climate with lack of affection, emotional deprivation, or physical abuse of the patients during childhood.

The sensitivity to stimuli reported by patients and the results of the Holmes and Rahe test showed a multimodal hypersensitivity (cold, moisture, heat, full moon, and flavors), as well as increased sensitivity to stress, in fibromyalgia patients compared to those with migraine. Hypersensitivity in fibromyalgia has recently been shown to be correlated with neurophysiological events and depression [26].

Early traumatic events and affective deprivations during childhood could have disturbed the development of neurotransmitter systems, the pain processing, and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis involved in stress management [7, 27, 28]. In fibromyalgia patients, early physical abuse could then have increased responsiveness of the central nervous system to a variety of stimuli. This central sensitization would occur because of decreased functional connectivity in the descending pain-modulating system [8] and augmented responses in sensory integration [26]. Moreover, modification of diurnal cortisol level associated with childhood maltreatment has been described in fibromyalgia and could contribute to great emotional distress and high catastrophism observed in these patients [29, 30]. Increased sympathetic activity has been suggested in fibromyalgia [31] and could explain the high sensitivity to stress.

Ergomania or professional hyperactivity was another feature observed in 89% of cases of fibromyalgia patients, as already described [32, 33]. Although in our study the declarative questionnaire could have been tainted by idealization, another study showed that the entourage of the patients usually confirmed this singularity [33]. Ergomania could be the expression of a low self-esteem associated with parental failures, or a strategy to escape depression as it has been described in maltreated children [32, 34].

Moreover, it should be noted that, in our study, depression was still observed in 57% of fibromyalgia patients (versus 9% of migraine patients, ). The higher depressive rate of fibromyalgia patients could explain multimodal hypersensitivity [26] as well as their painful memory, catastrophism, and sleep alteration characteristic of the syndrome [35–37].

Finally, the nonrestorative awake sleep, associated with depression, anxiety, and multimodal hypersensitivity, could induce a permanent state of hypervigilance in fibromyalgia patients. Initially, this state would have been induced by insecure environment of fibromyalgia patients during childhood [21, 38]. All senses were maintained in alarm. Patients would then become more sensitive to stressful events (separation, layoff, financial problems, accident, disease, bereavement, etc.), with exacerbated physic or psychic stress related to daily life events [21, 30]. All these parameters associated with defensive hyperactivity and sleep deprivation would constitute a fertile field for the development of fibromyalgia. With time, sleep deprivation, natural decline of performances, and resistance with age would amplify symptoms. Hypervigilance and hyperactivity would result in overactivity, depression, and chronic fatigue, which ultimately lead to state of breakdown and exhaustion or “burn out” (professional, parental, conjugal, domestic, and social). The occurrence of musculoskeletal diseases such as osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, inflammatory rheumatism, or other painful diseases would switch the patient from ergomania to invalidity. This would generate misunderstanding from relatives and medical team. Only personal positive adaptive and coping strategies could delay the switchover [39]. Patients with chronic migraine are frequently affected by diffuse pain, framed in fibromyalgia diagnosis. This comorbidity could be supported by common pathophysiological mechanisms [40].

This study has several strengths including the relatively large sample with clear diagnoses and the use of validated psychometric tests in order to objectivize psycho-affective parameters. However, it also includes some limitations. Bias is possible because it is a retrospective study based on self-reports. Patient memories may not be accurate and not objective. Moreover, the recruitment from the same unit and, a fortiori, from the same region and country, may limit generalizability of the findings. Results need to be confirmed by a multicenter international study. Further studies might also examine the role of emotional neglect in migraine patients.

Nevertheless, the results corroborate and objectivize our clinical experience and conform with the existing literature. The study invites to more attention to psycho-affective aspects in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients.

5. Conclusion

Our results confirm that life history and sensitivities of fibromyalgia patients should be more systematically taken into consideration in clinical practice. Fibromyalgia patients considered themselves as being more sensitive mentally and physically compared to migraine patients. They also have higher depression levels. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome taking account of psycho-affective impact of life experiences, stress management, behavioral, and coping strategies, should limit further examinations, medical nomadism, and stigmatization of fibromyalgia patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Yves Gruel (CHU Tours, France) and Dr. Zelda Sense for the proofreading of the manuscript.

References

F. Wolfe, K. Ross, J. Anderson, I. Jon Russell, and L. Hebert, “The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Clauw, “Fibromyalgia: a clinical review,” Journal of the American Medical Association-Journals, vol. 311, no. 15, pp. 1547–1555, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wolfe, H. A. Smythe, M. B. Yunus et al., “The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the multicenter criteria committee,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 160–172, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wolfe, D. J. Clauw, M. A. Fitzcharles et al., “The American College of Rhumatology: preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity,” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 600–610, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. H. Lee, S. J. Choi, J. D. Ji, and G. G. Song, “Candidate gene studies of fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Rheumatology International, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 417–426, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Ablin and D. Buskila, “Update on the genetics of the fibromyalgia syndrome,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Loevinger, E. A. Shirtcliff, D. Muller et al., “Delineating psychological and biomedical profiles in a heterogeneous fibromyalgia population using cluster analysis,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 677–685, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Cagnie, I. Coppieters, S. Denecker, J. Six, L. Danneels, and M. Meeus, “Central sensitization in fibromyalgia? A systematic review on structural and functional brain MRI,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Schmidt-Wilcke, E. Ichesco, J. P. Hampson et al., “Resting state connectivity correlates with drug and placebo response in fibromyalgia patients,” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 6, pp. 252–261, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ablin, L. Neumann, and D. Buskila, “Pathogenesis of fibromyalgia-a review,” Joint Bone Spine, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Haüser, M. Kosseva, N. Uceyler et al., “Emotional, physical and sexual abuse in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 808–820, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hellou, W. Häuser, I. Brenner et al., “Self-reported childhood maltreatment and traumatic events among Israeli patients suffering from fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis,” Pain Research and Management, vol. 2017, Article ID 3865249, 8 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Headache Classification Committee, “The international classification of headache disorders, cranial neuralgia and facial pain,” Cephalalgia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–160, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS), “The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version),” Cephalalgia, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 629–808, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Huskisson, “Visual analogue scale,” in Pain Measurement and Assessment, R. Melzack, Ed., pp. 33–37, Raven Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
D. P. Bernstein, L. Fink, L. Handelsman et al., “Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 151, no. 8, pp. 1132–1136, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Paquette, L. Laporte, M. Bigras, and M. Zoccolillo, “Validation de la version française du CTQ et prévalence de l’histoire de maltraitance,” Santé mentale au Québec, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 201–220, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Zigmond and R. P. Snaith, “The hospital anxiety and depression scale,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 361–370, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Holmes and R. H. Rahe, “The social readjustment rating scale,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 213–218, 1967.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Haviland, K. R. Morton, K. Oda, and G. E. Fraser, “Traumatic experiences, major life stressors, and self-reporting a physician-given fibromyalgia diagnosis,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 335–341, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Low and P. Schweinhardt, “Early life adversity as a risk factor for fibromyalgia in later life,” Pain Research and Treatment, vol. 2012, Article ID 140832, 15 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Anttila, H. Stefansson, M. Kallela et al., “Genome-wide association study of migraine implicates a common susceptibility variant on 8q22.1,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 869–873, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bowlby, “Attachment theory and its therapeutic implications,” Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 6, pp. 5–33, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Main, K. Kaplan, and J. Cassidy, “Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation,” in Growing Points in Attachment Theory and Research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, I. Bretherton and E. Waters, Eds., vol. 50, pp. 66–106, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Varinen, E. Kosunen, K. Mattila, T. Koskela, and M. Sumanen, “The relationship between childhood adversities and fibromyalgia in the general population,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 99, pp. 137–142, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. López-Solà, C. W. Woo, J. Pujol et al., “Towards a neurophysiological signature for fibromyalgia,” Pain, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
C. J. Vierck, “Mechanisms underlying development of spatially distributed chronic pain (fibromyalgia),” Pain, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 242–263, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Desmeules, J. Chabert, M. Rebsamen et al., “Central pain sensitization, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, and emotional factors in fibromyalgia,” Journal of Pain, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Nicolson, M. C. Davis, D. Kruszewski et al., “Childhood maltreatment and diurnal cortisol patterns in women with chronic pain,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 471–480, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. R. Edwards, C. Cahalan, G. Mensing, M. Smith, and J. A. Haythornthwaite, “Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in the rheumatic diseases,” Nature Reviews Rheumatology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 216–224, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Chervin, M. Teodorescu, R. Kushwaha et al., “Objective measures of disordered sleep in fibromyalgia,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2009–2016, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Van Houdenhove and E. Neerinckx, “Is “ergomania” a predisposing factor to chronic pain and fatigue?” Psychosomatics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 529-530, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Van Houdenhove, E. Neerinckx, P. Onghena, R. Lysens, and H. Vertommen, “Premorbid “overactive” lifestyle in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. An etiological factor or proof of good citizenship?” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 571–576, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Cyrulnik, “Ethology and the biological correlates of mood,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 217–221, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Poindessous and A. Héron, “A study of sleeping problems in patients with fibromyalgia,” La Lettre de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 110–115, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Diaz-Piedra, L. L. Di Stasi, C. M. Baldwin et al., “Sleep disturbances of adult women suffering from fibromyalgia: a systematic review of observational studies,” Sleep Medicine Reviews, vol. 21, pp. 86–99, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Yalcin and M. Barrot, “The anxiodepressive comorbidity in chronic pain,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 520–527, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cedraschi, E. Girard, C. Luthy, M. Kossovsky, J. Desmeules, and A.-F. Allaz, “Primary attributions in women suffering fibromyalgia emphasize the perception of a disruptive onset for a long-lasting pain problem,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 265–269, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. De Tommaso, A. Federici, A. Loiacono, M. Delussi, and O. Todarello, “Personality profiles and coping styles in migraine patients with fibromyalgia comorbidity,” Comprehensive Psychiatry, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. De Tommaso and V. Sciruicchio, “Migraine and central sensitization: clinical features, main comorbidities and therapeutic perspectives,” Current Rheumatology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113–126, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 P. De Roa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4832

Downloads

1378

Citations