Pain Research and Management

Pain Research and Management / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 7684762 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7684762

Gordana Nikolic, Biserka Nedeljkovic, Goran Trajkovic, Dragisa Rasic, Zlatica Mirkovic, Slavica Pajovic, Rade Grbic, Sandra Sipetic, Isidora Vujcic, "Pain, Physical Function, Radiographic Features, and Quality of Life in Knee Osteoarthritis Agricultural Workers Living in Rural Population", Pain Research and Management, vol. 2019, Article ID 7684762, 5 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7684762

Pain, Physical Function, Radiographic Features, and Quality of Life in Knee Osteoarthritis Agricultural Workers Living in Rural Population

Academic Editor: Massimiliano Valeriani
Received17 Apr 2019
Revised09 Jul 2019
Accepted10 Sep 2019
Published29 Sep 2019

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between the clinical manifestations, disease severity based on radiography images, functional activity level, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis in a rural population living in Serbian enclaves in Kosovo, as well as to determine the correlation between the WOMAC and the EQ-5D questionnaire in this population. Method. The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Internal Medicine Clinic, Clinical Hospital Center Pristina-Gracanica, located in Laplje Selo from February to December 2013. One hundred patients with confirmed (American College of Rheumatology criteria) knee osteoarthritis completed the EQ-5D and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires, rated pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and underwent knee radiographic examinations. Result. Most patients were obese with moderate radiographic changes according to the Kellgeren–Lawrence scale and suffered from very severe pain according to the VAS scale. The duration of disease significantly correlated with the WOMAC scores, VAS score, and all of the scores on the EQ-5D, except for mobility. The age of participants showed a similar correlation with the same variables. The patients with higher Kellgren–Lawrence scores (3-4) were significantly older, with a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) and longer duration of disease than patients with lower scores (1-2). Significantly higher VAS, pain/discomfort EQ-5D, and WOMAC pain and function scores were also recorded among patients with more significant radiological changes. The correlations between WOMAC and EQ-5D were satisfactory. Conclusion. The severity of clinical manifestations and radiographic area changes may affect functional ability and the quality of life in knee OA patients living in rural areas, which requires adequate treatment and physical therapy.

1. Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative disease that may occur at any period of life after adolescence, but the prevalence of this disease increases with age. Knee OA is becoming a great public health problem around the world due to increasing life expectancy, and it is considered the leading cause of disability in the general population in people older than 65 [1]. It manifests as joint pain, stiffness, a limited range of motion, crepitations, joint effusions, deformities, bony enlargements, and various grades of inflammation. Pain, as the basic disease symptom, is directly related to the radiographic changes and other symptoms and signs and is a reliable indicator of future disability [24].

There is an increasingly greater need to resolve the problem of disease management in knee OA patients, as interventions that delay or stop the disease progression do not exist. The presence of clinical manifestations causes functional deficits and loss of independence when performing everyday activities, depression and the social isolation of the patients, thereby increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality [59]. The instruments used to evaluate the quality of life are widely applied to measure pain and physical functioning, as well as mental, health, and social functioning [10, 11]. The EQ-5D is a widely used generic questionnaire for evaluating quality of life and has been shown to be a reliable and valid instrument in patients with knee OA [12], while WOMAC is a specific questionnaire that is frequently given preference over generic questionnaires due to its greater sensitivity in detecting minimal important differences in OA.

The Internal Medicine Clinic, as a facility of the Clinical Hospital Center Pristina-Gracanica, is situated in Laplje Selo; patients from all Serbian enclaves in the Kosovo territory south of the river Ibar (Gračanica, Štrpce, Novo Brdo, Ranilug, Pasjane, Parteš, and Klokot) are treated in this institution. According to the 2011 census results, 25,532 Serbs lived in this area [13].

The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between the clinical manifestations, disease severity based on radiography images, functional activity levels, and quality of life in patients with knee OA living in the rural population in Serbian enclaves, as well as to determine the correlation between the WOMAC and EQ-5D questionnaire in this population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The cross-sectional study was conducted in 2013 at the Internal Medicine Clinic Laplje Selo. One hundred consecutive patients with OA older than 40 years were included in the study; no one declined participation. The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Pristina University which was temporarily settled in Kosovska Mitrovica approved the study. The diagnosis of knee OA was established according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria [14]. Sample size calculation was based on a regression model with a prespecified number of predictors and coefficients of determination. The minimum required sample size needed to detect significance for the multiple regression model with four predictors, coefficient of determination of 0.2, alpha of 0.05, and power of 0.8, was 53.

Exclusion criteria were conditions leading to lower limb immobility or lower limb abnormality, degenerative processes on other bone-joint structures of the lower limbs and spinal column (excluding the knees), use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs immediately prior the examination (up to 7 days prior the conducted research), patients requiring hospital treatment, and patients with any systemic connective tissue disease.

The patients gave written consent prior to study enrolment after they were informed of the purpose and objectives of the research.

2.2. Measurement

Radiography of both knees in the anteroposterior and lateral projections was performed for each patient. The radiography images were interpreted and scored for overall radiographic severity using Kellgren–Lawrence grades (0–4) by one radiologist, who was blinded to patients’ details. To facilitate data analysis, Kellgren–Lawrence stage 1 or 2 were grouped as early and stage 3-4 as late radiological OA.

For each participant, height and weight were measured and recorded by a rheumatologist; body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in metres. All patients completed the EQ-5D and WOMAC questionnaire (Likert version). The intensity of pain in patients with OA was assessed by using a visual analogue scale (VAS), consisting of a 10 cm-long horizontal line marked with “no pain” on one end, and “worst pain imaginable” on the other end. The patients marked the place that corresponds best to their pain intensity on the given line. The numerical values on the VAS were obtained as the distance in centimeter from “no pain” to the point marked on the line by each patient.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic and clinical characteristics. The relationships of certain characteristics such as age, duration of disease, and BMI with the WOMAC and EQ-5D subscales were determined using the Spearman correlation coefficient (data were not normally distributed). The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test and parametric Student’s t-test were used to compare the variables between early (1 or 2) and late (3 or 4) Kellgren–Lawrence radiological stages. Spearman correlation coefficient was performed to determine the relationships between the EQ-5D and WOMAC scores. values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was conducted using the program SPSS (version 17).

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics

All patients were agricultural workers. The average age of the knee OA patients was ±8.4 years, and 75% of them were female. In more than half of patients, the disease lasted for more than five years. The average value of BMI was 30.0 ± 3.0, which indicates that most of the patients in our study were obese. The majority of patients had moderate degenerative changes in both knees (Table 1).


VariableTotal (n = 100)

Age (years), mean ± SD64.6 ± 8.4
Males/females, n (%)25/75
Duration of disease (years)
 ≤546
 6–1033
 >1021
 Affection of both knee joints, n (%)92
 Body mass index (kg/m2), mean ± SD30.0 ± 3.0
Kellgren–Lаwrence scale, n (%)
 Grade 1, n (%)3
 Grade 2, n (%)15
 Grade 3, n (%)62
 Grade 4, n (%)20

SD: standard deviation.
3.2. WOMAC, EQ-5D, and VAS Scores and Their Correlation with Patient Characteristics

Table 2 shows the arithmetic means and standard deviations for certain WOMAC, EQ-5D, and VAS scores in patients with knee OA. A mean VAS score of 7.5 indicated that most of the patients suffer from severe pain. Also, the EQ-5D pain/discomfort mean score was higher than the scores in the four other dimensions.


Mean (SD)

WOMAC pain subscale10.4 (2.6)
WOMAC stiffness subscale3.3 (1.3)
WOMAC function subscale47.8 (7.9)
Visual analogue scale7.5 (1.1)
EQ-5D subscales
 Mobility2.03 (0.17)
 Self-care2.00 (0.28)
 Usual activities2.06 (0.28)
 Pain/discomfort2.80 (0.40)
 Anxiety/depression2.02 (0.24)

SD: standard deviation.

Patient characteristics (age, BMI, and duration of disease) were checked for possible significant correlations with the WOMAC, EQ-5D, and VAS scores. The age of the subjects was significantly positively correlated with the VAS, WOMAC pain and function, and EQ-5D self-care, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression scores. The duration of disease significantly correlated with all scores, except for EQ-5D mobility score. In contrast, the BMI of patients significantly positively correlated only with EQ-5D mobility score (Table 3).


AgeDuration of diseaseBMI

WOMAC pain scale0.2800.525−0.109
WOMAC stiffness scale0.1680.216−0.187
WOMAC functional scale0.3360.3970.029
EQ-5D score
 Mobility0.1620.1790.205
 Self-care0.2370.2730.058
 Usual activities0.3320.2610.161
 Pain/discomfort0.2520.5040.065
 Anxiety/depression0.1850.2420.148
 Visual analogue scale0.2910.4510.107

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level; correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
3.3. Radiography Features and Other Patient Characteristics

Patients with higher Kellgren–Lawrence scores (3 or 4) were significantly older (), with a significantly higher BMI () and longer duration of disease () in comparison with patients with a lower Kellgren–Lawrence score (1 or 2). In addition, significantly higher VAS scores (), pain/discomfort EQ-5D subscores (), and WOMAC pain () and function subscores () were recorded in the late stage group (Table 4).


CharacteristicKellgren–Lawrence stage
1 or 23 or 4 value

Age56.0 ± 6.669.5 ± 5.3<0.001
Duration of disease2.3 ± 1.24.8 ± 1.2<0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2)28.1 ± 2.530.4 ± 3.00.004
EQ-5D
 Mobility2.0 ± 0.02.0 ± 0.20.412
 Self-care1.9 ± 0.22.0 ± 0.30.360
 Usual activities2.0 ± 0.02.1 ± 0.30.303
 Pain/discomfort2.5 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.3<0.001
 Anxiety/depression2.0 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.20.711
 Visual analogue scale6.7 ± 1.37.6 ± 1.10.002
WOMAC
 Pain8.9 ± 3.010.8 ± 2.40.041
 Stiffness3.2 ± 1.53.4 ± 1.30.413
 Function42.3 ± 9.748.9 ± 6.90.005

Values are expressed as means ± SD. According to t-test; according to Mann–Whitney U-test. Numbers in bold: statistically significant difference.
3.4. Correlation between Instruments

The WOMAC pain and function scores best correlated with the pain/discomfort dimension in the EQ-5D scale. In contrast, WOMAC stiffness score showed no significant correlation only with pain/discomfort dimension in the EQ-5D scale. The correlations between the instruments were satisfactory (Table 5).


PainWOMAC stiffnessFunction

EQ-5D
Mobility0.3040.3090.298
Self-care0.4440.4060.430
Usual activities0.4060.3420.424
Pain/discomfort0.5050.1290.549
Anxiety/depression0.2800.3450.280

Correlation is significant at 0.05 level, correlation is significant at 0.01 level.

4. Discussion

The majority of patients in our study had moderate degenerative changes in both knees that were most probably the result of the constant, excessive, and bilateral physical load on the knee joints. Agricultural workers are at increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis because of the repetitive forceful work that can aggravate and accelerate the development of disease [15]. Certain work activities such as kneeling, squatting, lifting, and climbing especially increase the risk of knee OA [16]. Some studies indicated that both squatting/kneeling and high BMI were independent risk factors for knee OA, but that their combination was particularly harmful and significantly increased the risk of developing disease [1618]. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies showed that the risk of knee OA increases by 35% with a 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI and that obesity was an independent predictor of knee OA risk regardless of the study country, sample size, gender, duration of follow-up, presence of adjusted knee injury, and quality of the study [19]. Obesity was observed in most of our patients. Therefore, overuse and constant knee load during performing agricultural activities associated with obesity, advanced age, and female gender were significantly associated with an increased risk of radiographic knee OA in our patients. All patients in our study live and work in rural areas and have participated in agricultural activities since their early childhood. Multiple studies have shown a consistent association between years of farming and knee OA [15].

Pain is a key symptom among patients with knee OA that influences the decision to seek medical care and is an important precursor of disability [20]. All three scales used in our study indicated that patients suffered from severe pain. Pain in knee OA patients in our study was significantly correlated with age, duration of disease, and radiographic features according to the Kellgren–Lawrence grading scale. OA is the commonest knee pathology in older people, and radiographs appropriately identify moderate and severe OA [21]. A systematic summary of the literature in which 20 studies were included indicates that knee pain is an imprecise marker of radiographic knee OA, even in older age groups, and that imprecision depends on the extent of the radiographic views of the joint obtained [21]. Although they were moderate, the morphological, progressive, and degenerative changes of the knees in elderly, obese subjects in our study performing heavy farming activities were accompanied by severe pain and significantly influenced everyday activities and quality of life. Some studies suggested that associations between radiographic OA and quality of life may be mediated by pain [21, 22]. In our patients, there is an unjustified opinion that the degenerative process on the joints is part of the normal process of aging, and that patients spend a long time on their own analgesics and go to the physician late.

According to results of our study, radiological severity was correlated with functional disability but not with mobility in knee OA patients. The discordance between radiographic OA and the occurrence of clinical symptoms is well documented [23, 24]. Study conducted in Japan indicated that the EQ-5D utility scores were not significantly associated with the KL grade of the knee after adjustment for age, BMI, and grip strength [25].

Using the WOMAC scale, our study showed a positive correlation between pain severity and disability, which is in accordance with results from other studies [26]. The high level of functional reduction among patients in our study is most probably the result of reporting late to a physician and self-medicating. The patients in our study spared their joints by avoiding physical activity due to discomfort and fear of pain, as well as due to the notion that increased activity can worsen the disease and cause a loss of cartilage, thereby worsening the already existing limited function. The pronounced deficit in body activities significantly further affects mental wellbeing, leading to depression and a poorer quality of life, limiting daily and self-care activities. The Wisconsin study indicated that those with arthritis reported lower physical activity, higher coexisting health conditions, and lower perceived general health status than those without disease [15]. The patients recognised that there was a discrepancy between their desires, real needs, and opportunities, and revised their expectations in terms of performing heavy physical work. Also, at the suggestion of the physician, patients began to change their lifestyle, including minimising activities to protect joints, using exercise that is designed to strengthen muscles, and changing their dietary habits.

The correlations between the WOMAC and EQ-5D scales in our study were satisfactory, although the stiffness component on the WOMAC scale had the lowest correlation with the EQ-5D, which is in accordance with other studies [12].

Our study has several limitations. It was designed as a cross-sectional instead of a follow-up study. Another limitation could be the small sample size which may restrict the generalisation of the observed results. Also, data about possible confounders such as smoking, physical activity, and use of analgesics were not collected, and data about comorbidity were not presented in this paper. We did not measure knee medial-lateral instability which is often associated with knee pain.

5. Conclusion

The severity of clinical manifestations and radiographic features may affect functional ability and quality of life in knee OA patients living in rural areas and should all be taken into account when making final clinical decisions to direct proper treatment.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. R. Traistaru, R. Popescu, C. Gruia, and O. Rogoveanu, “A complex assessment of patients with knee osteoarthritis and Baker’s cyst: observational study,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 593–601, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Grazio and D. Balen, “Obesity: risk factor and predictor of osteoarthritis,” Liječnički vjesnik, vol. 131, no. 1-2, pp. 22–26, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  3. D. Pereira, M. Severo, H. Barros, J. Branco, R. A. Santos, and E. Ramos, “The effect of depressive symptoms on the association between radiographic osteoarthritis and knee pain: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 214, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. A. Davis, W. H. Ettinger, J. M. Neuhaus, J. D. Barclay, and M. R. Segal, “Correlates of knee pain among US adults with and without radiographic knee osteoarthritis,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1943–9, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  5. K. E. Covinsky, K. Lindquist, D. D. Dunlop, T. M. Gill, and E. Yelin, “Effect of arthritis in middle age on older-age functioning,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. P. Fried and J. M. Guralnik, “Disability in older adults: evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 92–100, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. P. Fried, C. M. Tangen, J. Walston et al., “Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. M146–M157, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. M. Gill, J. T. Robison, and M. E. Tinetti, “Difficulty and dependence: two components of the disability continuum among community-living older persons,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 96–101, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. C. Corti and C. Rigon, “Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact,” Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 359–363, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. J. Davis, T. O Smith, C. B. Hing, and N. Sofat, “Are bisphosphonates effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain? A meta-analysis and systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e72714, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. K. Leidy, D. A. Revicki, and B. Genesté, “Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promotion,” Value in Health, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 113–127, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Wailoo, M. Hernandez Alava, and A. Escobar Martinez, “Modelling the relationship between the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and EQ-5D,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 37, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Statistical Office of Kosovo, “Report on population, households and housing census in Kosovo,” 2011, http://ask.rks-gov.net/media/3282/report-census-in-kosovo-2011.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  14. R. Altman, E. Asch, D. Bloch et al., “Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1039–1049, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Kirkhorn, R. T. Greenlee, and J. C. Reeser, “The epidemiology of agriculture-related osteoarthritis and its impact on occupational disability,” WMJ, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 38–44, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  16. K. T. Palmer, “Occupational activities and osteoarthritis of the knee,” British Medical Bulletin, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 147–170, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Coggon, P. Croft, S. Kellingray, D. Barrett, M. McLaren, and C. Cooper, “Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1443–1449, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. Vrezas, G. Elsner, U. Bolm-Audorff, N. Abolmaali, and A. Seidler, “Case-control study of knee osteoarthritis and lifestyle factors considering their interaction with physical workload,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 291–300, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Zheng and C. Chen, “Body mass index and risk of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies,” BMJ Open, vol. 5, no. 12, Article ID e007568, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Wang, H. A. Kim, D. T. Felson et al., “Radiographic knee osteoarthritis and knee pain: cross- sectional study from five different racial/ethnic populations,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1364, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. Sanghi, A. Mishra, A. Singh, R. Nath Srivastava, S. Avasthi, and S. Agarwal, “Is radiology a determinant of pain, stiffness, and functional disability in knee osteoarthritis? A cross-sectional study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 719–725, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. L. Laslett, S. J. Quinn, T. M. Winzenberg, K. Sanderson, F. Cicuttini, and G. Jones, “A prospective study of the impact of musculoskeletal pain and radiographic osteoarthritis on health related quality of life in community dwelling older people,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 168, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Bedson and P. R. Croft, “The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 116, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. H. Finan, L. F. Buenaver, S. C. Bounds et al., “Discordance between pain and radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis: findings from quantitative sensory testing of central sensitization,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 363–372, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Muraki, T. Akune, H. Oka et al., “Association of radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with health-related quality of life in a population-based cohort study in Japan: the ROAD study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1227–1234, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Cubukcu, A. Sarsan, and H. Alkan, “Relationships between pain, function and radiographic findings in osteoarthritis of the knee: a cross-sectional study,” Arthritis, vol. 2012, Article ID 984060, 5 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Gordana Nikolic et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1693
Downloads601
Citations

Related articles