Effects of Rhythmic Sensory Stimulation on Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome: A Pilot Study

Table 3

Comparison of mean scores across time for all responders (n = 6).

Outcome measure	Preintervention	Postintervention	Washout	value	Effect size (partial η^2)
BPI-severity	24.2 ± 7.8	21.2 ± 6.7	24.3 ± 3.7	0.234	0.252
BPI-interference	51.5 ± 16	43.5 ± 16.4	44.5 ± 11.2	0.028	0.510
CES-D	34.0 ± 15.9	26.8 ± 12.1	28.5 ± 10.0	0.031	0.499
POMS_total	51.83 ± 27.06	45.33 ± 28.72	43.67 ± 20.20	0.31	0.211
SF_general	141.67 ± 106.85	162.50 ± 102.16	150.00 ± 75.83	0.44	0.151

Analysis was done by repeated measures ANOVA. Numbers represent mean and standard deviation. No significant findings for POMS-SF or SF-36. .