Development of Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy for Chronic Pain

Huang, Yu; Liu, Xin; Dong, Lanlan; Liu, Zhongchun; He, Xiaohua; Liu, Wanhong

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/968218

Pain Research and Treatment

On this page

Abstract Introduction Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 968218 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/968218

Development of Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy for Chronic Pain

Yu Huang,¹Xin Liu,²Lanlan Dong,¹Zhongchun Liu,¹Xiaohua He,^1,3and Wanhong Liu^1,3

Academic Editor: Cyril Rivat

Received14 Dec 2010

Accepted31 Jan 2011

Published07 Apr 2011

Abstract

Chronic pain is a major health concern that affects millions of people. There are no adequate long-term therapies for chronic pain sufferers, leading to significant cost for both society and the individual. The most commonly used therapy for chronic pain is the application of opioid analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but these drugs can lead to addiction and may cause side effects. Further studies of the mechanisms of chronic pain have opened the way for development of new treatment strategies, one of which is gene therapy. The key to gene therapy is selecting safe and highly efficient gene delivery systems that can deliver therapeutic genes to overexpress or suppress relevant targets in specific cell types. Here we review several promising viral vectors that could be applied in gene transfer for the treatment of chronic pain and further discuss the possible mechanisms of genes of interest that could be delivered with viral vectors for the treatment of chronic pain.

1. Introduction

Chronic pain is defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as pain that persists for more than 3 months [1]. This leads to great suffering for patients and results in a heavy burden for society. Chronic pain is not simply related to anatomical reorganization; other changes in neurotransmission and electrophysiological activity are also involved in the pain pathway [2]. Conventional drug treatment has many limitations, such as drug dependence, tolerance, respiratory depression, and other systemic side effects. The development of gene therapy has opened the possibility of using either nonviral or viral vectors to transduce genes encoding antinociceptive substances to treat chronic pain. Compared with nonviral systems, viral vectors are much more efficient in delivering exogenous genes to target cells and inducing long-term gene expression [3]. However, not all viruses are suitable for gene delivery. For instance, murine leukemia virus and lentivirus are both retroviruses, but lentivirus can infect nondividing cells, while murine leukemia virus cannot. This is the reason murine leukemia virus is usually not used as a gene carrier in neurological disease treatments [4]. It was reported that 2 of 11 children receiving gene therapy using a retroviral vector caused leukemia. A possible reason is the integration of viral gene may activate oncogenes. So the safety of retroviral vectors has been paid more and more attention [5, 6]. The ideal gene therapy vector should not be able to replicate its own DNA and be conducive to long-term gene expression. In addition, it should be nonpathogenic and nontoxic [7]. Viral vectors are generally created by deleting nonessential genes from the virus while retaining the structural motifs necessary to transfer its genome into the host [8]. Herpes simplex virus, adeno-associated virus, adenovirus, lentivirus, and human foamy virus can all be used as viral vectors for gene therapy for chronic pain. These viral vectors are most commonly used because of their low immunogenicity, natural integration ability and other features. What’s more, they can infect both dividing and nondividing cells. In this paper, published data about these vectors will be reviewed, and their applications in gene therapy of chronic pain will be discussed.

2. Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)

Herpes simplex virus has neuronotropic features and naturally maintains lifelong residency in the nucleus of infected neurons, making it suitable for transduction in the nervous system [9]. Primary afferent neurons are the natural targets of HSV. HSV vector infects epithelial cells or neurons directly after subcutaneous injection or topical application, then penetrates peripheral afferent nerve terminals, and is retrogradely transported to cell bodies in dorsal root sensory ganglia [10]. For the successful use of HSV vectors, it is important to reduce their toxicity, modulate the time course of transgene expression, and precisely target specific cells [11]. A number of different HSV-based nonreplicative vectors with reduced cytotoxicity have been developed for specific gene therapy applications [11, 12]. Recombinant replication-defective HSV vectors expressing opioid peptides or glutamic acid decarboxylase could inhibit nociceptive neurotransmission at the first synapse between primary nociceptive and second-order neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [1, 13]. These viral vectors have been shown to have analgesic effects in models of inflammatory pain, neuropathic pain and cancer-related pain [1, 13, 14]. The different applications of HSV vectors for gene therapy of chronic pain are summarized in Table 1.

Endogenous opiate peptides acting on synapses in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord inhibit transmission of nociceptive stimuli [15]. Wilson et al. firstly demonstrated the antihyperalgesic potency of HSV-mediated preproenkephalin expression in DRG in a model of acute pain [16]. In a model of ongoing polyarthritis-associated inflammatory pain, Braz et al. enhanced enkephalin synthesis in sensory neurons of polyarthritic rats and reduced hyperalgesia by using recombinant HSV containing rat preproenkephalin A cDNA [17]. It has been reported that application of HSV vectors encoding preproenkephalin (PPE) or endomorphin-2 (EM-2) can lead to an antiallodynic effect in both rat and monkey models of chronic pain [9, 18–20]. Administration of the opioid receptor antagonists naloxone and naloxone methiodide can block this analgesic effect [21], suggesting that endogenous opioid peptides reduce pain perception through both central and peripheral opioid receptors. In addition, animals did not develop tolerance to the continued production of vector-mediated enkephalin over a period of several weeks [22].

Hao et al. demonstrated that expression of interleukin-4 (IL-4) in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons achieved via HSV-mediated gene transfer in vivo reduced mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in a spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model of neuropathic pain. However, it did not prevent the ultimate development of neuropathic pain [23]. Another cytokine, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), is overexpressed by activated microglia and is correlated with the emergence of mechanical allodynia [24]. Thus, HSV vector-mediated gene transfer of the p55 TNF soluble receptor (sTNFRs) could reduce pain, diminish the expression of mTNF-α, and decrease the number of ED1-positive cells as well as phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase (p-p38) in the dorsal horn. This suggests that sTNFR may block the TNF-α signal after injury and reduce pain-related behavior [24].

Transfer of the gene that encodes glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD67) into DRGs using a replication-defective HSV vector could reduce neuropathic pain [25, 26]. This may be because subcutaneous inoculation of HSV vector promotes the release of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA), which inhibits nociceptive neurotransmission [25, 26]. Increased expression of the Na_v1.7 sodium channel in sensory neurons occurs after peripheral inflammation and potentially increases neuronal excitability. Application of a recombinant HSV vector encoding an antisense sequence to the Na_v1.7 gene could produce a long-lasting or even permanent decrease in inflammatory pain and hyperalgesia in treated tissue without affecting untreated tissue [27].

3. Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV)

Adeno-associated viral vectors are commonly used to deliver therapeutic genes to target tissues because of their low immunogenicity [28]. AAV2 is the most widely used serotype in gene therapy, while other new efficient AAV vector types such as AAV8 are under development. Recombinant AAV can insert up to 6 kb of foreign DNA into the host genome [29]. AAV enters the cell through the internalization of clathrin-coated pits and escapes endosomal degradation via acidification of the late endosome [30].

Spinal cord glia and glial proinflammatory cytokines contribute to the initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain. This suggests that targeting glial activation or suppressing proinflammatory cytokines may be an effective therapeutic strategy. Intrathecal administration of an AAV2 vector encoding an anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) can reverse neuropathic pain because IL-10 suppresses the production of proinflammatory cytokines and also antagonizes the signaling pathway activated by these cytokines [31]. Delivery of recombinant AAV encoding a small hairpin RNA against GTP cyclohydrolase I (rAAV-shGCH1) into DRG neurons can also relieve neuropathic pain through downregulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCH1) levels. This may occur because GCH1 downregulation leads to decreased microglial activation in the dorsal horn, implying that transcriptional activation of GCH1 in the DRG is associated with the development of pain and inflammation [32].

Increased μ-opioid receptor expression in DRG neurons achieved by recombinant AAV-mediated gene transfer enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine in rats. The limitation of this study is that direct injection of recombinant AAV into the DRG can lead to tissue damage [33]. Storek et al. found that a self-complementary recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 8 (sc-rAAV8) expressing the analgesic gene prepro-β-endorphin (ppβEP) led to significant reversal of mechanical allodynia, and this antiallodynic effect could be reversed by application of the μ-opioid antagonist naloxone [34].

The levels of neurotrophins in the spinal cord have been proposed to restore normal function after nervous system injury. Intraspinal rAAV-mediated overexpression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) reduces allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by chronic constriction injury (CCI) [35]. However, direct spinal application of BDNF contributes to mechanical hypersensitivity and neuropathic pain via activation of spinal microglia [36]. Microglial-derived BDNF then mediates central sensitization by attenuating inhibitory synaptic transmission [37]. The exact effect of BDNF in the mechanism of pain still requires further clarification. Table 2 presents examples of AAV vector-mediated gene transfer in pain models.

Efficient and long-term gene transfer in the white matter of the spinal cord, DRG neurons, and peripheral nerves can be mediated by intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection of AAV [38]. However, some important issues for gene therapy still need to be explored. First, the extent of transgene expression in the DRG following intrathecal injection is unknown. Second, no studies have demonstrated the effects of the vector on the brain if the vector is injected at thoracic levels of the spinal cord or higher. Third, the potential for infection of other organs beyond the nervous system after intrathecal injection of AAV requires further examination [39].

4. Adenovirus (AV)

Adenoviral vectors have a gene carrying capacity of 7.5 kb and can transduce both dividing and nondividing cells [4]. These viral vectors cannot integrate into the host genome, so there is a low risk of insertional mutagenicity [40]. The first adenoviral vectors were constructed by substituting the viral early gene 1 (E1) with a therapeutic gene. The E1 gene is essential for adenoviral replication, so modification of the adenoviral genome through the deletion of E1 creates a replication-defective vector and provides sufficient space for foreign gene insertion [8]. More efficient gene carriers were obtained by altering more genes in the viral genome, such as E2, or using polyethylene glycol (PEG) to facilitate transfer [29, 41]. Adenoviruses have greater transgenic capacity if more viral genes are removed [29, 41].

Loss of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the spinal cord reduces GABAergic tone and contributes to neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury [42]. Vit et al. constructed a serotype 5 adenovector to transfer the glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) gene into satellite glial cells (SGCs) of the trigeminal ganglion. They found that GAD65 expression in the trigeminal ganglion led to an analgesic effect via increased GABA synthesis. This analgesic effect could be blocked by selective GABA_A receptor antagonists but not by an antagonist of GABA_B receptors [43]. In an inflammation model of persistent pain, administration of a recombinant adenovirus encoding endogenous opioid β-endorphin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) surrounding the spinal cord attenuated inflammatory hyperalgesia but had no effect on basal nociceptive responses [44].

Some anti-inflammatory cytokine genes can also be transduced by adenoviral vectors to attenuate chronic pain. Spinal cord glial cells are critical to the creation and maintenance of pain facilitation through the release of proinflammatory cytokines. Adenoviral vectors encoding human IL-10 (AD-h-IL10) blocked and reversed pain facilitation [45]. Another cytokine gene, IL-2, can be delivered both by adenoviral vectors or plasmids, both of which lead to obvious antinociceptive effects [46, 47]. This effect could be blocked by naloxone, illustrating the relationship between IL-2 and opioid receptors [47]. Previous studies have demonstrated that IL-2 can suppress afferent sensory transmission and act as Ca²⁺ channel blockers, but the mechanism of IL-2-induced antinociception is still unclear [46]. The effects of AV vector-mediated gene transfer in pain models are summarized in Table 3.

5. Lentivirus (LV)

Lentiviral vectors have the advantages of long-term transgene expression, low immunogenicity, and the ability to accommodate larger transgenes [48]. LVs belong to a subclass of retroviruses that integrate into the host cell genome. Due to their natural integration ability, LVs have a lot of potential in central nervous system applications. LVs have been extensively utilized for ex vivo gene transfer because of their strong tropism for neural stem and progenitor cells [29]. Single microinjection of lentiviral vector-mediated intraspinal gene transfer allowed for the diffusion of vectors along the rostrocaudal axis, though expression was still restricted to the gray matter of the ipsilateral dorsal spinal cord. In addition, transgene expression in glial cells did not modify glial activity or alter animals’ locomotor behavior [49].

Lentiviral vectors are efficient tools to induce sustained expression of trophic factors in specific areas of the central nervous system (CNS). Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), which regulates neuronal survival and gene expression, is expressed in both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Reduction in GDNF and its receptor levels in the nociceptive afferent system may contribute to the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain states [50]. Intraspinal administration of lentiviral vectors expressing GDNF lead to a large and sustained expression of transgenes in both neurons and glial cells. Gene delivery of GDNF via lentiviruses produced a partial but significant reversal of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia [51].

Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) is a pleiotropic factor involved in transcriptional control of some inflammation and pain-related molecules. In a model of chronic constriction injury (CCI), lentiviral vector-mediated overproduction of IκBα, which is a natural endogenous inhibitor of NF-κB, inhibited NF-κB activity in glial cells of the dorsal spinal cord and produced prolonged antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects. IκBα overproduction also reduced expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), suggesting that IκBα may relieve pain via the prevention of CCI-associated expression of IL-6 and iNOS [52].

6. Human Foamy Virus (HFV)

Human foamy virus, the first identified human retrovirus, is nonpathogenic and has several unique features related to gene transfer, making it a promising vector system for gene therapy [53]. The potential advantages of FV vectors include a broad host range, the largest packaging capacity of any retrovirus and the ability to persist in quiescent cells [54, 55]. Because of these features, foamy vectors have the unique potential to safely and efficiently deliver several genes into a number of different cell types in vivo [54] and are especially useful for transducing hematopoietic cells. They have been demonstrated to mediate efficient and stable gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in mouse and canine animal models, which indicates that they have a unique integration profile and suggests they may be safer than gammaretroviruses or lentiviral vectors [55].

Liu et al. found that gene transfer using a human foamy virus (HFV) vector can reduce below-injury level mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia after spinal cord injury (SCI). In that study, the glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) gene was transferred into dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells using a novel HFV vector that expresses GAD (vector rdvGAD67) for 7 days after T13 spinal cord hemisection to achieve release of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Subcutaneous inoculation of a replication-defective HFV vector attenuated pain evoked by SCI and also enhanced the production of GAD and tonic GABA release from transduced DRG neurons [56].

7. Possible Mechanisms of Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Therapy for Chronic Pain

Studies have showed that viral vector-mediated therapeutic genes play significant analgesic effects in several different pain models. Understanding the mechanism of viral vector function in the gene therapy of chronic pain will help us to improve treatment efficacy and search for new therapeutic strategies. The mechanisms of viral vector-based gene therapy involve several pathways (Figure 1). Some gene products, such as GABA, can block nociceptive neurotransmission at the first synapse between the primary peripheral nociceptor and the second order neuron in the spinal cord. Anti-inflammatory cytokines expressed by viral vector-mediated therapeutic gene can reduce central neuroimmune activation. Antisense or RNA sequences enact their analgesic effect by reducing the expression of gene products essential to the development of chronic pain [2].

Figure 1

Possible mechanisms of viral vector actions in gene therapy of chronic pain. Recombinant viral vectors encoding therapeutic genes infect target cells and express antinociceptive substances after subcutaneous inoculation or intrathecal administration. Gene products such as GAD and BDNF can lead to the release of GABA, which is an inhibitory neurotransmitter. IL-4 and IL-10 can suppress the expression of proinflammatory cytokines produced by activated glial cells and antagonize the signaling pathway activated by these cytokines. Endogenous opioid peptides have analgesic effects through opioid receptors. Na_v1.7 antisense can prevent an increase in Na_v1.7 expression and decrease inflammatory hyperalgesia.

Activation of nociceptive primary neurons leads to central release of excitatory neurotransmitters or neuromediators, such as glutamate, substance P, and ATP, which are all related to pathological pain [43]. Inhibitory interneurons and descending modulatory control systems are dysfunctional after nerve injury, leading to disinhibition or facilitation of spinal cord dorsal horn neurons and to further central sensitization [57]. Spinal cord glial cells are activated via neuronal chemokines, neurotransmitters, and substances released by damaged neurons [58]. Activated glial cells further enhance neuronal excitability by releasing cytokines, especially proinflammatory cytokines, thus increasing the concentration of glutamate and the downregulation of GABA receptor function [57, 58].

Proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, etc.) enhance pain expression by increasing the excitability of dorsal horn pain transmission neurons and upregulating AMPA and NMDA receptors [45]. Anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) are known to suppress the production of proinflammatory cytokines that are released by activated spinal cord glial cells. It has been shown that viral vectors encoding anti-inflammatory cytokines can block and reverse pain facilitation in various pain models. Hao et al. demonstrated that HSV-mediated expression of IL-4 reduced c-Fos expression in the dorsal horn in the SNL model of neuropathic pain, decreased levels of IL-1β and PGE2 in the dorsal horn and reduced the phosphorylation of spinal p-p38 [23].

Endomorphin-2, β-endorphin, and proenkephalin, which are all endogenous opioid peptides, are often encoded in viral vectors because of their analgesic effect. Endogenous opioid peptides evoke the analgesic effect by stimulating opioid receptors. These receptors can be found in the central and peripheral terminals of primary nociceptors, second-order neurons in dorsal horn of spinal cord and other tissues such as brain [59]. Transduction of other genes, such as GAD and BDNF, via viral vector-mediated gene transfer can increase the release of GABA to relieve pain [46, 51]. Naik et al. speculated that GABA-mediated depolarization influences the excitability of sensory neurons both in cell bodies and nerve terminals by inactivating other voltage-sensitive channels, such as Ca²⁺ and Na⁺. It is also possible that the GABA-activated Cl⁻ current directly inhibits ATP-evoked excitatory currents in DRG neurons [60].

8. Prospects

Viral vector-mediated gene transfer has been applied in some clinical trials to evaluate its safety and tolerance. In 2002, a phase I study of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated double suicide gene therapy of prostate cancer demonstrated that this treatment could be safely applied to humans [61]. Other clinical trials of viral vectors for gene therapy have also been shown to be safe and well tolerated, but the effect of this treatment was not very significant [62, 63]. For chronic pain, the first human trial of gene therapy began enrolling subjects in December 2008. This was a phase 1 study of a nonreplicating herpes simplex virus- (HSV-) based vector that expressed preproenkephalin in patients with intractable pain from cancer [64]. These clinical trials promote the development of gene therapy for chronic pain.

Viral vectors for gene therapy are currently mainly in preclinical trials. Although gene therapy is a promising new treatment and has some advantages over other therapies, there are still several problems left to be solved. Transfection efficiency, specific targeting, and the safety of viral vectors need to be improved. Potential mutations, antiviral response and total inefficacy also limit the application of gene therapy. Achieving a restricted, local production of therapeutic transgenes may decrease some adverse reactions. Previous studies focused on the application of single therapeutic gene, while codelivering antagonizing genes may decrease the side effects and improve efficacy. For instance, Xu et al. demonstrated that recombinant AAV-mediated transgene expression of μ-opioid receptor which targets specifically DRG neurons could avoide undesired systemic effects of opioids and also enhance the antinociceptive effects of morphine [33]. The development of biomedical technologies will lead to the construction of safer and more efficient viral vectors. It is believed that successful application of viral vectors for gene therapy could lead to a breakthrough in the treatment of chronic pain and other diseases.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Nos. 30870856, 30970145, and 30971456), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Wuhan University administered by the Ministry of Education of China (No. NCET-07-0630), the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Scholars administered by the Ministry of Education of China (No. 2010-609), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20090141110010), National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program, No. 2010CB529803), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3081002). Y. Huang and X. Liu contributed equally to this work.

References

D. J. Fink and M. Mata, “HSV gene transfer in the treatment of chronic pain,” Sheng Li Xue Bao, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 610–616, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Mata, S. Hao, and D. J. Fink, “Applications of gene therapy to the treatment of chronic pain,” Current Gene Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Goins, J. R. Goss, M. B. Chancellor, W. C. de Groat, J. C. Glorioso, and N. Yoshimura, “Herpes simplex virus vector-mediated gene delivery for the treatment of lower urinary tract pain,” Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 558–569, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pohl and J. Braz, “Gene therapy of pain: emerging strategies and future directions,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 429, no. 1–3, pp. 39–48, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Marshall, “Clinical research: gene therapy a suspect in leukemia-like disease,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5591, pp. 34–35, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Marshall, “Gene therapy: second child in French trial is found to have leukemia,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5605, article 320, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. U. Dani, “The challenge of vector development in gene therapy,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 133–145, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Hao, M. Mata, and D. J. Fink, “Viral vector-based gene transfer for treatment of chronic pain,” International Anesthesiology Clinics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 59–71, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Yeomans, Y. Lu, C. E. Laurito et al., “Recombinant herpes vector-mediated analgesia in a primate model of hyperalgesia,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 589–597, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Cope and W. R. Lariviere, “Gene therapy and chronic pain,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 6, pp. 1066–1074, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Berto, A. Bozac, and P. Marconi, “Development and application of replication-incompetent HSV-1-based vectors,” Gene Therapy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. S98–S102, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Goins, J. R. Goss, M. B. Chancellor, W. C. de Groat, J. C. Glorioso, and N. Yoshimura, “Herpes simplex virus vector-mediated gene delivery for the treatment of lower urinary tract pain,” Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 558–569, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wolfe, M. Mata, and D. J. Fink, “A human trial of HSV-mediated gene transfer for the treatment of chronic pain,” Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 455–460, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Goss, C. F. Harley, M. Mata et al., “Herpes vector-mediated expression of proenkephalin reduces bone cancer pain,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 662–665, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Goss, M. Mata, W. F. Goins, H. H. Wu, J. C. Glorioso, and D. J. Fink, “Antinociceptive effect of a genomic herpes simplex virus-based vector expressing human proenkephalin in rat dorsal root ganglion,” Gene Therapy, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 551–556, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Wilson, D. C. Yeomans, M. A. Bender, Y. Lu, W. F. Goins, and J. C. Glorioso, “Antihyperalgesic effects of infection with a preproenkephalin-encoding herpes virus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 3211–3216, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Braz, C. Beaufour, A. Coutaux et al., “Therapeutic efficacy in experimental polyarthritis of viral-driven enkephalin overproduction in sensory neurons,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 7881–7888, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Hao, D. Wolfe, J. C. Glorioso, M. Mata, and D. J. Fink, “Effects of transgene-mediated endomorphin-2 in inflammatory pain,” European Journal of Pain, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 380–386, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wolfe, S. Hao, J. Hu et al., “Engineering an endomorphin-2 gene for use in neuropathic pain therapy,” Pain, vol. 133, no. 1–3, pp. 29–38, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yokoyama, K. Sasaki, M. E. Franks et al., “Gene therapy for bladder overactivity and nociception with herpes simplex virus vectors expressing preproenkephalin,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Meunier, A. Latrémolière, A. Mauborgne et al., “Attenuation of pain-related behavior in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain by viral-driven enkephalin overproduction in trigeminal ganglion neurons,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 608–616, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hao, M. Mata, W. Goins, J. C. Glorioso, and D. J. Fink, “Transgene-mediated enkephalin release enhances the effect of morphine and evades tolerance to produce a sustained antiallodynic effect in neuropathic pain,” Pain, vol. 102, no. 1-2, pp. 135–142, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hao, M. Mata, J. C. Glorioso, and D. J. Fink, “HSV-mediated expression of interleukin-4 in dorsal root ganglion neurons reduces neuropathic pain,” Molecular Pain, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1–9, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Peng, Z. G. Zhou, J. C. Glorioso, D. J. Fink, and M. Mata, “Tumor necrosis factor-α contributes to below-level neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 843–851, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Hao, M. Mata, D. Wolfe, J. C. Glorioso, and D. J. Fink, “Gene transfer of glutamic acid decarboxylase reduces neuropathic pain,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 914–918, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, D. Wolfe, S. Hao et al., “Peripherally delivered glutamic acid decarboxylase gene therapy for spinal cord injury pain,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Yeomans, S. R. Levinson, M. C. Peters et al., “Decrease in inflammatory hyperalgesia by herpes vector-mediated knockdown of Na1.7 sodium channels in primary afferents,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 271–277, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xu, Y. Gu, P. Wu, G. W. Li, and L. Y. M. Huang, “Efficiencies of transgene expression in nociceptive neurons through different routes of delivery of adeno-associated viral vectors,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 897–906, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. P. Manfredsson and R. J. Mandel, “Development of gene therapy for neurological disorders,” Discovery Medicine, vol. 9, no. 46, pp. 204–211, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Ziello, Y. Huang, and I. S. Jovin, “Cellular endocytosis and gene delivery,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5-6, pp. 222–229, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. D. Milligan, E. M. Sloane, S. J. Langer et al., “Controlling neurophatic pain by adeno-associated virus driven production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-10,” Molecular Pain, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1–9, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Kim, W. I. Lee, Y. S. Lee et al., “Effective relief of neuropathic pain by adeno-associated virus-mediated expression of a small hairpin RNA against GTP cyclohydrolase 1,” Molecular Pain, vol. 5, no. 67, pp. 1–9, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Xu, Y. Gu, G. Y. Xu, P. Wu, G. W. Li, and L. Y. M. Huang, “Adeno-associated viral transfer of opioid receptor gene to primary sensory neurons: a strategy to increase opioid antinociception,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 6204–6209, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Storek, M. Reinhardt, C. Wang et al., “Sensory neuron targeting by self-complementary AAV8 via lumbar puncture for chronic pain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 1055–1060, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Eaton, B. Blits, M. J. Ruitenberg, J. Verhaagen, and M. Oudega, “Amelioration of chronic neuropathic pain after partial nerve injury by adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated over-expression of BDNF in the rat spinal cord,” Gene Therapy, vol. 9, no. 20, pp. 1387–1395, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-J. Zhou, T. Yang, X. Wei et al., “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor contributes to spinal long-term potentiation and mechanical hypersensitivity by activation of spinal microglia in rat,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 322–334, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Biggs, V. B. Lu, M. J. Stebbing, S. Balasubramanyan, and P. A. Smith, “Is BDNF sufficient for information transfer between microglia and dorsal horn neurons during the onset of central sensitization?” Molecular Pain, vol. 6, no. 44, pp. 1–14, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zheng, C. Qiao, C. H. Wang et al., “Efficient retrograde transport of adeno-associated virus type 8 to spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion after vector delivery in muscle,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pohl and D. J. Fink, “A new player in gene therapy for pain?” Gene Therapy, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 953–954, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Benihoud, P. Yeh, and M. Perricaudet, “Adenovirus vectors for gene delivery,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 440–447, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liu, S. Wang, B. Shan, M. Sang, S. Liu, and G. Wang, “Advances in viral-vector systemic cytokine gene therapy against cancer,” Vaccine, vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 3883–3887, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Meisner, A. D. Marsh, and D. R. Marsh, “Loss of GABAergic interneurons in laminae I-III of the spinal cord dorsal horn contributes to reduced GABAergic tone and neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 729–737, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Vit, P. T. Ohara, C. Sundberg et al., “Adenovector GAD65 gene delivery into the rat trigeminal ganglion produces orofacial analgesia,” Molecular Pain, vol. 5, no. 42, pp. 1–11, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Finegold, A. J. Mannes, and M. J. Iadarola, “A paracrine paradigm for in vivo gene therapy in the central nervous system: treatment of chronic pain,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1251–1257, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. D. Milligan, S. J. Langer, E. M. Sloane et al., “Controlling pathological pain by adenovirally driven spinal production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-10,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2136–2148, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Yao, J. F. Gu, J. H. Wang, L. Y. Sun, H. Liu, and X. Y. Liu, “Adenovirus-mediated interleukin-2 gene therapy of nociception,” Gene Therapy, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1392–1399, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Yao, J. F. Gu, J. H. Wang et al., “Interleukin-2 gene therapy of chronic neuropathic pain,” Neuroscience, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 409–416, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Federici, R. Kutner, X. Y. Zhang et al., “Comparative analysis of HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors bearing lyssavirus glycoproteins for neuronal gene transfer,” Genetic Vaccines and Therapy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Meunier, A. Mauborgne, J. Masson, J. Mallet, and M. Pohl, “Lentiviral-mediated targeted transgene expression in dorsal spinal cord glia: tool for the study of glial cell implication in mechanisms underlying chronic pain development,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nagano, A. Sakai, N. Takahashi, M. Umino, K. Yoshioka, and H. Suzuki, “Decreased expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in rat models of neuropathic pain,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 140, no. 7, pp. 1252–1260, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pezet, A. Krzyzanowska, L. F. Wong et al., “Reversal of neurochemical changes and pain-related behavior in a model of neuropathic pain using modified lentiviral vectors expressing GDNF,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1101–1109, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Meunier, A. Latrémolière, E. Dominguez et al., “Lentiviral-mediated targeted NF-κB blockade in dorsal spinal cord glia attenuates sciatic nerve injury-induced neuropathic pain in the rat,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 687–697, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Liu, Z. Liu, X. Cao et al., “Recombinant human foamy virus, a novel vector for neurological disorders gene therapy, drives production of GAD in cultured astrocytes,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1834–1841, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mergia and M. Heinkelein, “Foamy virus vectors,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 277, pp. 131–159, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
G. D. Trobridge, “Foamy virus vectors for gene transfer,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1427–1436, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Liu, Z. Liu, L. Liu et al., “A novel human foamy virus mediated gene transfer of GAD67 reduces neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 432, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Baron, A. Binder, and G. Wasner, “Neuropathic pain: diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 807–819, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Watkins, M. R. Hutchinson, A. Ledeboer, J. Wieseler-Frank, E. D. Milligan, and S. F. Maier, “Glia as the "bad guys": implications for improving clinical pain control and the clinical utility of opioids,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 131–146, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mata, J. Glorioso, and D. J. Fink, “Development of HSV-mediated gene transfer for the treatment of chronic pain,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. S25–S29, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Naik, S. Pathirathna, and V. Jevtovic-Todorovic, “GABAA receptor modulation in dorsal root ganglia in vivo affects chronic pain after nerve injury,” Neuroscience, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 1539–1553, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. O. Freytag, M. Khil, H. Stricker et al., “Phase I study of replication-competent adenovirus-mediated double suicide gene therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 17, pp. 4968–4976, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Habib, H. Salama, A. A. E. L. Abu Median et al., “Clinical trial of E1B-deleted adenovirus (dl1520) gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 254–259, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Khorana, J. D. Rosenblatt, D. M. Sahasrabudhe et al., “A phase I trial of immunotherapy with intratumoral adenovirus-interferon-gamma (TG1041) in patients with malignant melanoma,” Cancer Gene Therapy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 251–259, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wolfe, J. Wechuck, D. Krisky, M. Mata, and D. J. Fink, “A clinical trial of gene therapy for chronic pain,” Pain Medicine, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1325–1330, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Yu Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2896

Downloads

960

Citations