Clinical Study
Risk Factors and Surgical Refinements of Postresective Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
Table 5
Classification and outcomes of all patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction.
| Case number | Age | Sex | Follow-up period (months) | Type of flap | RT | Eichner classification | CAT classification | Complication |
| 1 | 65 | M | 13.9 | RAM | No | B3 | A | Plate fracture | 2 | 64 | M | 36.3 | Radial forearm | No | B2 | TA | Plate fracture | 3 | 80 | F | 82.4 | PMMC | No | B2 | A | Plate fracture | 4 | 63 | M | 0.65 | PMMC | No | B3 | TA | Plate infection | 5 | 61 | F | 8.5 | RAM | No | B2 | TA | None | 6 | 54 | F | 47.1 | RAM | No | B2 | TA | None | 7 | 68 | M | 56.8 | RAM | No | C2 | TA | Plate fracture | 8 | 52 | M | 12.0 | PMMC | No | B3 | T | Plate fracture | 9 | 73 | F | 0.5 | None | Yes | C3 | TA | Plate exposure | 10 | 70 | M | 21.2 | RAM | Yes | C2 | TT | Plate exposure | 11 | 78 | M | 4.0 | Radial forearm | Yes | C2 | T | Plate exposure | 12 | 78 | F | 27.3 | Radial forearm | No | C3 | TT | Plate exposure | 13 | 26 | F | 9.5 | RAM | Yes | C2 | TA | None | 14 | 77 | M | 7.1 | RAM | No | C3 | TA | None | 15 | 66 | M | 7.9 | RAM | No | C3 | TA | None | 16 | 48 | M | 2.2 | RAM | Yes | C2 | ATT | None | 17 | 69 | M | 43.5 | RAM | No | B3 | TT | None | 18 | 53 | F | 47.0 | RAM | No | B4 | TA | None | 19 | 78 | M | 48.3 | PMMC | No | B3 | T | None | 20 | 69 | F | 50.0 | PMMC | No | B3 | T | None | 21 | 62 | M | 5.0 | RAM | No | B2 | T | None | 22 | 89 | F | 13.2 | PMMC | No | C1 | A | None | 23 | 71 | M | 58.9 | RAM | No | C2 | TT | None | 24 | 66 | F | 143.8 | RAM | No | C2 | TT | None | 25 | 66 | M | 51.1 | RAM | No | C2 | TT | None | 26 | 72 | F | 23.8 | Radial forearm | No | C2 | Body | None | 27 | 76 | M | 41.2 | RAM | No | C2 | TT | None | 28 | 67 | F | 1.0 | PMMC | No | C3 | Body | None |
|
|
RAM: rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap, PMMC: pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap, and RT: radiation therapy.
|