Clinical Study

Risk Factors and Surgical Refinements of Postresective Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study

Table 5

Classification and outcomes of all patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction.

Case numberAgeSexFollow-up period (months)Type of flapRTEichner classificationCAT classificationComplication

165M13.9RAMNoB3APlate fracture
264M36.3Radial forearmNoB2TAPlate fracture
380F82.4 PMMCNoB2APlate fracture
463M0.65PMMCNoB3TAPlate infection
561F8.5RAMNoB2TANone
654F47.1RAMNoB2TANone
768M56.8RAMNoC2TAPlate fracture
852M12.0PMMCNoB3TPlate fracture
973F0.5NoneYesC3TAPlate exposure
1070M21.2RAMYesC2TTPlate exposure
1178M4.0Radial forearmYesC2TPlate exposure
1278F27.3Radial forearmNoC3TTPlate exposure
1326F9.5RAMYesC2TANone
1477M7.1RAMNoC3TANone
1566M7.9RAMNoC3TANone
1648M2.2RAMYesC2ATTNone
1769M43.5RAMNoB3TTNone
1853F47.0RAMNoB4TANone
1978M48.3PMMCNoB3TNone
2069F50.0PMMCNoB3TNone
2162M5.0RAMNoB2TNone
2289F13.2PMMCNoC1ANone
2371M58.9RAMNoC2TTNone
2466F143.8RAMNoC2TTNone
2566M51.1RAMNoC2TTNone
2672F23.8Radial forearmNoC2BodyNone
2776M41.2RAMNoC2TTNone
2867F1.0PMMCNoC3BodyNone

RAM: rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap, PMMC: pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap, and RT: radiation therapy.