Corrigendum to “Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years”

---

In the article titled “Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years” [1], there were errors, which should be corrected as follows.

(1) The title should be changed to “Evaluation of complication rates after breast surgery using two different kinds of Acellular Dermal Matrix and one Bovine Pericardium Collagen Membrane: median follow-up of three years.”

(2) Tables , , and along with their legends should be corrected as below.

(3) In the “Material and Methods,” the sentence reading “Sixteen patients had a history of radiotherapy prior to ADM implementation; see Table ” should be changed to “Sixteen patients had a history of radiotherapy prior to ADM implementation; see Table .”

(4) In the “Discussion,” the sentence reading “Other limitations of our study include the relative brevity of follow-up with a mean time period of 36 months” should be changed to “Other limitations of our study include the relative brevity of follow-up with a median time period of 36 months.”

(5) The legends of Figures and 4 should be corrected where “capsular contracture and” should be added to the legend of Figure and “and capsular contracture, followed by” should be added to the legend of Figure . The corrected figures are as below.

Table 1 

Patient collective with ADM-implementation.

Table 2 

Indications for ADM implementation.

Table 4 

Overall complication probabilities for used ADMs.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3 

Case I: A 57-year-old female patient suffering from capsular contracture and implant malposition with lateral deviation, bottoming out, rippling, ptosis with different nipple-areola complex (NAC), and IMF positions preoperatively; (a) frontal view; (b) lateral view; one-year postoperative results after BADM implantation (Strattice/LifeCell) with frontal (c) and lateral view (d).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4 

Case II: skin sparing mastectomy and breast augmentation performed in a 54-year-old female patient with a history of breast carcinoma, complicated by shell rupture of the left-sided implant and capsular contracture, followed by subsequent breast-expander implantation; (a) frontal view; (b) lateral view; three-month postoperative results after HADM usage (Epiflex/DIZG) with frontal (c) and lateral view (d).