Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Volume 2018, Article ID 3059017, 5 pages
Research Article

Occurrence of Interspecific Mating between Two Species of Danaus Kluk, 1780 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Nature

1Nature Mates-Nature Club, 6/7 Bijoygarh Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700032, India
2National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bellary Road, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India
3SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
4Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata, West Bengal 700073, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Sarika Baidya; moc.liamg@mn.nukub

Received 30 November 2017; Accepted 28 February 2018; Published 1 April 2018

Academic Editor: Anna-Karin Borg-Karlson

Copyright © 2018 Sarika Baidya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Mayr, Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1942.
  2. E. Mayr, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1st edition, 1965.
  3. J. Downey, “Inter-specifc pairing in Lycaenidae,” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 16, pp. 235–237, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  4. Y. Sato, J. A. J. Breeuwer, M. Egas, and M. W. Sabelis, “Incomplete premating and postmating reproductive barriers between two parapatric populations of a social spider mite,” Experimental and Applied Acarology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 277–291, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. B. B. Miranda, D. J. Innes, and R. J. Thompson, “Incomplete reproductive isolation in the blue mussel (mytilus edulis and m. trossulus) hybrid zone in the northwest atlantic: role of gamete interactions and larval viability,” The Biological Bulletin, vol. 218, no. 3, pp. 266–281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. A. Clarke and P. M. Sheppard, “Further observations on hybrid swallowtails,” Entomological Records, vol. 65, p. 12, 1953. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Mavárez, C. A. Salazar, E. Bermingham, C. Salcedo, C. D. Jiggins, and M. Linares, “Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7095, pp. 868–871, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Capblancq, L. Després, D. Rioux, and J. Mavárez, “Hybridization promotes speciation in Coenonympha butterflies,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 6209–6222, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Mallet, “Hybrid speciation,” Nature, vol. 446, no. 7133, pp. 279–283, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. A. Clarke, “Handpairing of Papilio machaon in February,” Entomological Records, vol. 64, pp. 98–100, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. A. Clarke and P. M. Sheppard, “The breeding in captivity of the hybrid papilio rutulus female x papilio glaucus male , the lepidopterists' news,” The Lepidopterists' News, vol. 9, no. 2–3, pp. 46–48, 1955. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. A. Clarke, A. Cronin, W. Francke et al., “Mating attempts between the Scarlet Tiger Moth, Callimorpha dominula L., and the Cinnabar Moth, Tyria jacobaeae L. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), involve a common sex pheromone composition,” Experientia, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 636–638, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. L. Hancock, “Classification of the Papilionid (Lepidoptera): a phylogenetic approach,” Smithersia, vol. 2, p. 48, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Hancock, “The Princeps nireus group of swallowtails (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), systematics, phylogeny and biogeography,” Arnoldia Zimbabwe, vol. 9, pp. 181–215, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Bhakare and P. Smetacek, “Two instances of inter-generic mating by Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) in Maharashtra, India,” The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, vol. 43, pp. 23–25, November. View at Google Scholar
  16. N. M. Collins and M. G. Morris, “Threatened Swallowtail Butterflies of the World,” in The IUCN Red Data Book. IUCN, Gland Cambridge, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. P. Platt, G. W. Rawson, and G. Balogh, “Interspecific hybridization involving Limenitis archippus and its congeneric species (Nymphalidae),” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 32, pp. 289–303, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Arbogast, “Capture of a hybrid Limenitis arthemis x L. archippus (Nymphalidae) in southern Georgia,” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 30, p. 4, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  19. L. Spitzer, J. Beneš, P. Vrba, and M. Zlatník, “Three observation of interspecific mating attempts by males of the Meadow Brown (Maniola jurtina (Linnaeus, 1758)) in the wild (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae: Satyrinae, Heliconiinae),” Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 166–168, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  20. W. Wright, Butterflies of the West Coast, Wright, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1906.
  21. R. C. Priestaf, “Hybrid between Colias eurytheme and Colias harfordii (Pieridae) captured in California,” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 28, p. 358, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  22. W. H. Wagner Jr, “A probable natural hybrid of Papilio eurymedon and P. rutulus (Papilionidae) from Idaho,” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 22, pp. 226–228, 1978. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. Blanchard and H. Descimon, “Hybridization between two species of swallowtails, meiosis mechanism and the genesis of gynandromorphs,” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 94–102, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. A. Clarke and P. M. Sheppard, “A Further Report on the Genetics of the Machaon Group of Swallowtail Butterflies,” Evolution, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 66, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. C. F. M. Swynnerton, “Evidence of Mendelian heredity in Papilio dardanus,” pp. 30–33, 1919.
  26. F. A. H. Sperling, “Natural hybrids of Papilio (Insecta: Lepidoptera): poor taxonomy or interesting evolutionary problem?” Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1790–1799, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. M. Brennan, “Attraction of Ereunetis simulans (Lepidoptera: Tineidae) to the sex attractant of peachtree borer, Sanninoidae exitiosa (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae,” in Proceedings of Hawaiian Entomological Society, vol. 22, pp. 457–460, 1977.
  28. W. H. Evans, The Identification of Indian Butterflies, Bombay Natural History Society, 2nd edition, 1932.
  29. M. A. Wynter-Blyth, Butterflies of the Indian Region, Bombay Natural History Society, 1st edition, 1957.
  30. P. Smetacek, “Batesian mimic butterflies taken in by their models and the mimetic status of Argyreus hyperbius L. (Nymphalidae),” Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 362-363, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Hadley, “CombineZM,”, 2017.
  32. M. Savela, “Funet Lepidoptera,”, 2016.
  33. L. Dufour, “Anatomie générale des diptères,” Annales des Sciences Naturelles, vol. 1, pp. 244–264, 1844. View at Google Scholar
  34. D. Goulson, “Variation in the genitalia of the butterfly Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae),” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. M. Gilligan and J. W. Wenzel, “Extreme intraspecific variation in Hystrichophora (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) genitalia - Questioning the lock-and-key hypothesis,” Annales Zoologici Fennici, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 465–477, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Caldas, “Notes on the male genitalia of the Anaea ryphea - Anaea eurypyle complex (Nymphalidae),” Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. Wedell, “Female remating in butterflies: Interaction between female genotype and nonfertile sperm,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 746–754, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus