Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Volume 2011, Article ID 381978, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/381978
Clinical Study

Elbow Extension Predicts Motor Impairment and Performance after Stroke

1Health and Exercise Science Department and Occupational Therapy Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2Physical Therapy Program, Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
3NeuroRehabilitation Research Laboratory, Occupational Therapy Department, Colorado State University, 219 Occupational Therapy Building, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

Received 2 September 2010; Revised 11 November 2010; Accepted 7 December 2010

Academic Editor: Johannes Bussmann

Copyright © 2011 Crystal L. Massie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. M. Michaelsen, S. Jacobs, A. Roby-Brami, and M. F. Levin, “Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 162–173, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. F. Levin, J. A. Kleim, and S. L. Wolf, “What do motor "recovery" and "compensationg" mean in patients following stroke?” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 313–319, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Wagner, C. E. Lang, S. A. Sahrmann, D. F. Edwards, and A. W. Dromerick, “Sensorimotor impairments and reaching performance in subjects with poststroke hemiparesis during the first few months of recovery,” Physical Therapy, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 751–765, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Taub, G. Uswatte, and R. Pidikiti, “Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation—a clinical review,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 237–251, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Kunkel, B. Kopp, G. Müller et al., “Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 624–628, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. M. Morris, G. Uswatte, J. E. Crago, E. W. Cook, and E. Taub, “The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 750–755, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. L. Fritz, S. Blanton, G. Uswatte, E. Taub, and S. L. Wolf, “Minimal detectable change scores for the wolf motor function test,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 662–667, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. W. Duncan, M. Propst, and S. G. Nelson, “Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident,” Physical Therapy, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1606–1610, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Platz, C. Pinkowski, F. van Wijck, I. N. H. Kim, P. di Bella, and G. Johnson, “Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 404–411, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Sanford, J. Moreland, L. R. Swanson, P. W. Stratford, and C. Gowland, “Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke,” Physical Therapy, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 447–454, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. F. Levin, S. M. Michaelsen, C. M. Cirstea, and A. Roby-Brami, “Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. F. Levin, R. W. Selles, M. H. G. Verheul, and O. G. Meijer, “Deficits in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: implications for normal motor control,” Brain Research, vol. 853, no. 2, pp. 352–369, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Roby-Brami, A. Feydy, M. Combeaud, E. V. Biryukova, B. Bussel, and M. F. Levin, “Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 369–381, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. G. Kamper, A. N. McKenna-Cole, L. E. Kahn, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 702–707, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. D. Ellis, T. Sukal, T. DeMott, and J. P. A. Dewald, “Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 321–329, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk et al., “Effects of trunk restraint combined with intensive task practice on poststroke upper extremity reach and function: a pilot study,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 78–91, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, “'Mini mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller et al., “Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 296, no. 17, pp. 2095–2104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. H. Thaut, G. P. Kenyon, C. P. Hurt, G. C. McIntosh, and V. Hoemberg, “Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1073–1081, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. P. Malcolm, C. Massie, and M. Thaut, “Rhythmic auditory-motor entrainment improves hemiparetic arm kinematics during reaching movements: a pilot study,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Massie, M. P. Malcolm, D. Greene, and M. Thaut, “The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 571–579, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. L. Wolf, J. P. McJunkin, M. L. Swanson, and P. S. Weiss, “Pilot normative database for the wolf motor function test,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 443–445, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. M. Zackowski, A. W. Dromerick, S. A. Sahrmann, W. T. Thach, and A. J. Bastian, “How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis?” Brain, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 1035–1046, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. A. Beebe and C. E. Lang, “Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1772–1779, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Hakkennes and J. L. Keating, “Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials,” Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 221–231, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus