Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Volume 2012, Article ID 415740, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/415740
Clinical Study

Outcome from Complicated versus Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

1Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2A1
2Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, 11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 1100, North Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
3Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere Medical School, PL 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
4Department of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation and Emergency Department Acuta, Tampere University Hospital, PL 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
5Medical Imaging Centre of Pirkanmaa Hospital District and University of Tampere Medical School, PL 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland

Received 4 November 2011; Revised 3 February 2012; Accepted 27 February 2012

Academic Editor: Anne Felicia Ambrose

Copyright © 2012 Grant L. Iverson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. H. Williams, H. S. Levin, and H. M. Eisenberg, “Mild head injury classification,” Neurosurgery, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 422–428, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. T. Lange, G. L. Iverson, M. J. Zakrzewski, P. E. Ethel-King, and M. D. Franzen, “Interpreting the trail making test following traumatic brain injury: comparison of traditional time scores and derived indices,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 897–906, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. L. Iverson, M. D. Franzen, and M. R. Lovell, “Normative comparisons for the controlled oral word association test following acute traumatic brain injury,” Clinical Neuropsychologist, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 437–441, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Iverson, “Complicated vs uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: acute neuropsychological outcome,” Brain Injury, vol. 20, no. 13-14, pp. 1335–1344, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. R. Borgaro, G. P. Prigatano, C. Kwasnica, and J. L. Rexer, “Cognitive and affective sequelae in complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Kurca, S. Sivak, and P. Kucera, “Impaired cognitive functions in mild traumatic brain injury patients with normal and pathologic magnetic resonance imaging,” Neuroradiology, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 661–669, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. P. A. M. Hofman, S. Z. Stapert, M. J. P. G. Van Kroonenburgh, J. Jolles, J. De Kruijk, and J. T. Wilmink, “MR imaging, single-photon emission CT, and neurocognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 441–449, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. E. Hanlon, J. A. Demery, Z. Martinovich, and J. P. Kelly, “Effects of acute injury characteristics on neuropsychological status and vocational outcome following mild traumatic brain injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 873–887, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. T. Lange, G. Iverson, and M. D. Franzen, “Neuropsychological functioning following complicated vs. uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 83–91, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. van der Naalt, J. M. Hew, A. H. van Zomeren, W. J. Sluiter, and J. M. Minderhoud, “Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in mild to moderate head injury: early and late imaging related to outcome,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 70–78, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. T. L. Wilson, D. M. Hadley, L. C. Scott, and A. Harper, “Neuropsychological significance of contusional lesions identified by MRI,” in Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury, B. P. Uzzell and H. H. Stonnington, Eds., pp. 29–50, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  12. N. R. Temkin, J. E. Machamer, and S. S. Dikmen, “Correlates of functional status 3–5 years after traumatic brain injury with CT abnormalities,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. R. McCauley, C. Boake, H. S. Levin, C. F. Contant, and J. X. Song, “Postconcussional disorder following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: anxiety, depression, and social support as risk factors and comorbidities,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 792–808, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Lee, M. Wintermark, A. D. Gean, J. Ghajar, G. T. Manley, and P. Mukherjee, “Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1049–1056, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. S. King, S. Crawford, F. J. Wenden, N. E. G. Moss, and D. T. Wade, “The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 242, no. 9, pp. 587–592, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. T. Beck, R. A. Steer, and G. K. Brown, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II (Finnish version), The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Tex, USA, 1996.
  17. S. R. Borgaro, S. Gierok, H. Caples, and C. Kwasnica, “Fatigue after brain injury: initial reliability study of the BNI Fatigue Scale,” Brain Injury, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 685–690, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Wechsler, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Tex, USA, 3rd edition, 1997.
  19. M. D. Lezak, D. B. Howieson, and D. W. Loring, Neuropsychological Assessment, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2004.
  20. Army Individual Test Battery, Manual of Directions and Scoring, War Department, Adjutant General's Office, Washigton, DC, USA, 1944.
  21. O. Spreen and E. Strauss, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  22. J. van der Naalt, A. H. van Zomeren, W. J. Sluiter, and J. M. Minderhoud, “One year outcome in mild to moderate head injury: the predictive value of acute injury characteristics related to complaints and return to work,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 207–213, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. Denk and A. Rauscher, “Susceptibility weighted imaging with multiple echoes,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 185–191, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Rauscher, M. Barth, K. H. Herrmann, S. Witoszynskyj, A. Deistung, and J. R. Reichenbach, “Improved elimination of phase effects from background field inhomogeneities for susceptibility weighted imaging at high magnetic field strengths,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1145–1151, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. A. Tong, S. Ashwal, B. A. Holshouser et al., “Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results,” Radiology, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 332–339, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. H. Livingston, P. A. Loder, J. Koziol, and C. D. Hunt, “The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury,” Journal of Trauma, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 483–489, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. C. Stein and S. E. Ross, “Mild head injury: a plea for routine early CT scanning,” Journal of Trauma, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 11–13, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. S. Jeret, M. Mandell, B. Anziska et al., “Clinical predictors of abnormality disclosed by computed tomography after mild head trauma,” Neurosurgery, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. G. Moran, M. C. McCarthy, D. E. Uddin et al., “Predictors of positive CT scans in the trauma patient with minor head injury,” American Surgeon, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 533–536, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Borczuk, “Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 731–736, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. L. Iverson, M. R. Lovell, S. Smith, and M. D. Franzen, “Prevalence of abnormal CT-scans following mild head injury,” Brain Injury, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1057–1061, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. P. Thiruppathy and N. Muthukumar, “Mild head injury: revisited,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 146, no. 10, pp. 1075–1082, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. G. Stiell, C. M. Clement, B. H. Rowe et al., “Comparison of the Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria in patients with minor head injury,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 294, no. 12, pp. 1511–1518, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Ono, K. Wada, T. Takahara, and T. Shirotani, “Indications for computed tomography in patients with mild head injury,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 291–298, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Saboori, J. Ahmadi, and Z. Farajzadegan, “Indications for brain CT scan in patients with minor head injury,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 399–405, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus