Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Volume 2013, Article ID 614825, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/614825
Research Article

Content Analysis of Work Limitation, Stanford Presenteeism, and Work Instability Questionnaires Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and Item Perspective Framework

1University of Western Ontario, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 1201 Western Road, London, ON, Canada N6G 1H1
2Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, School of Rehabilitation Science, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8
3Clinical Research, Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph’s Hospital, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, ON, Canada N6A 4L6

Received 22 July 2013; Revised 31 October 2013; Accepted 4 November 2013

Academic Editor: Jari P. A. Arokoski

Copyright © 2013 Vanitha Arumugam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Boles, B. Pelletier, and W. Lynch, “The relationship between health risks and work productivity,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 737–745, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Aronsson, K. Gustafsson, and M. Dallner, “Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 502–509, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. Aronsson and K. Gustafsson, “Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 958–966, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Cocker, A. Martin, J. Scott, A. Venn, P. Otahal, and K. Sanderson, “Factors associated with presenteeism among employed Australian adults reporting lifetime major depression with 12-month symptoms,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 135, no. 1–3, pp. 231–240, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Heponiemi, M. Elovainio, J. Pentti et al., “Association of contractual and subjective job insecurity with sickness presenteeism among public sector employees,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 830–835, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Despiegel, N. Danchenko, C. Francois, B. Lensberg, and M. F. Drummond, “The use and performance of productivity scales to evaluate presenteeism in mood disorders,” Value Health, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1148–1161, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. M. Lack, “Presenteeism revisited a comprehensive review,” AAOHN Journal, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 77–91, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Jourdain and M. Vezina, “How psychological stress in the workplace influences presenteeism propensity: a test of the demand control support model,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. W. F. Stewart, J. A. Ricci, E. Chee, S. R. Hahn, and D. Morganstein, “Cost of lost productive work time among us workers with depression,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 289, no. 23, pp. 3135–3144, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. A. Cox, K. M. Ness, and R. F. Carlson, “International perspectives on depression in the workplace [Internet],” 2000, http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas10/Article_04.pdf.
  11. D. Lerner, B. C. Amick III, W. H. Rogers, S. Malspeis, K. Bungay, and D. Cynn, “The work limitations questionnaire,” Medical Care, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Koopman, K. R. Pelletier, J. F. Murray et al., “Stanford Presenteeism Scale: health status and employee productivity,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Gilworth, M. A. Chamberlain, A. Harvey et al., “Development of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 349–354, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J.-S. Roy, F. Desmeules, and J. C. MacDermid, “Psychometric properties of presenteeism scales for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. “Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF [Internet],” 2002, http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf.
  16. A. Cieza, S. Geyh, S. Chatterji, N. Kostanjsek, B. Üstün, and G. Stucki, “ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 212–218, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. World Health Organization, “ICF core sets for vocational rehabilitation [Internet],” 2003, http://www.icf-research-branch.org/icf-core-sets-projects-sp-1641024398/diverse-situations/icf-core-sets-for-vocational-rehabilitation.
  18. T. A. Stamm, A. Cieza, K. P. Machold, J. S. Smolen, and G. Stucki, “Content comparison of occupation-based instruments in adult rheumatology and musculoskeletal rehabilitation based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 917–924, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Cieza, T. Brockow, T. Ewert et al., “Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 205–210, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Rosa, “Content validation of patient-rated outcomes using the item perspective framework. user guide v2. 0. [Internet],” 2012, https://sites.google.com/site/ipcframework/course-materials.
  21. R. M. Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values, HarperPerennial, 2005.
  22. “An introduction to robert pirsig's metaphysics of quality [Internet],” 2005, http://www.robertpirsig.org/Intro.htm.
  23. N. Fayed and K. Elizabeth, “Comparing quality of life scales in childhood epilepsy: what’s in the measures,” Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  24. A. Cieza and G. Stucki, “Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF),” Quality of Life Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1225–1237, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. N. Burton, C.-Y. Chen, D. J. Conti, G. Pransky, and D. W. Edington, “Caregiving for III dependents and its association with employee health risks and productivity,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1048–1056, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. H. Allaire, “Measures of adult work disability: the work limitations questionnaire (WLQ) and the rheumatoid arthritis work instability scale (RA-WIS),” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 49, pp. S85–S89, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. Lerner, J. I. Reed, E. Massarotti et al., “The Work Limitations Questionnaire's validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 197–208, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. E. Beaton, K. Tang, M. A. M. Gignac et al., “Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of five at-work productivity measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. Tang, D. E. Beaton, M. A. M. Gignac, and C. Bombardier, “Rasch analysis informed modifications to the Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis for use in work-related upper limb disorders,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 1242–1251, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. Tang, D. E. Beaton, M. A. M. Gignac et al., “The Work Instability Scale for rheumatoid arthritis predicts arthritis-related work transitions within 12 months,” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1578–1587, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Tang, D. E. Beaton, D. Lacaille et al., “The Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS): does it work in osteoarthritis?” Quality of Life Research, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1057–1068, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. K. Grayson and R. Rust, “Interrater Reliability,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 71–73, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus