How Important Are Social Support, Expectations and Coping Patterns during Cardiac Rehabilitation
Table 2
Multiple linear regression of coping styles and other predictive factors on emotional status (anxiety and depression complaints) measured at short-term followup (6 months) at Krokeide Rehabilitation Centre, Bergen, Norway, included from 2000 to 2002.
Variables
Adjusted modelsa
Final model ( = 182)b
95% CI
value
95% CI
valuec
Age (in years)
0.26
Gender (male/female)
0.41
(0.01, 0.82)
0.04
Employed (yes/no)
161
0.10
(−0.36, 0.55)
0.68
0.84
Cohabiting (yes/no)
180
−0.82
(−1.28, −0.36)
0.001
0.31
Household income
157
−0.34
(−0.49, −0.20)
<0.001
−0.21
(−0.33, −0.08)
0.001
Coping style
Task
183
−0.58
(−1.01, −0.14)
0.01
0.16
Emotion
183
0.01
(−0.41, 0.44)
0.96
0.75
Avoid
183
0.57
(0.14, 1.01)
0.01
0.91
Social support
183
−0.59
(−0.76, −0.43)
<0.001
−0.53
(−0.72, −0.33)
<0.001
Negative expectations
183
0.50
(0.33, 0.66)
<0.001
0.25
(0.1, 0.4)
0.01
Intercept
5.13
(3.7, 6.6)
<0.001
Explained varianced ()
Nonadjusted
0.36
Adjusted
0.34
: subsample size; : estimated regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval.
aEight models adjusted for age and gender.
bObtained by backward stepwise selection.
cThe nonsignificant values were retrieved from the excluded variables table of the backward stepwise selection analysis. for final model.
