How Important Are Social Support, Expectations and Coping Patterns during Cardiac Rehabilitation
Table 3
Multiple linear regression of coping styles and other predictive factors on emotional status (anxiety and depression complaints) measured at long-term followup (24 months) at Krokeide Rehabilitation Centre, Bergen, Norway, included from 2002–2004.
Variables
Adjusted modelsa
Final model ( = 173)b
95% CI
value
95% CI
valuec
Age (in years)
−0.03
(0.05, 0.01)
0.001
Gender (male/female)
0.32
(−0.06, 0.70)
0.10
Employed (yes/no)
173
−0.02
(−0.45, 0.41)
0.92
0.17
Cohabiting (yes/no)
170
−0.59
(−1.05, −0.13)
0.01
0.51
Household income
168
−0.35
(−0.48, −0.21)
<0.001
−0.23
(−0.36, −0.11)
<0.001
Coping style
Task
174
−0.97
(−1.40, −0.54)
<0.001
−0.79
(−1.22, −0.36)
<0.001
Emotion
174
−0.16
(−0.61, 0.28)
0.47
0.23
Avoid
174
0.38
(−0.07, 0.83)
<0.10
0.18
Social support
174
−0.46
(−0.64, −0.29)
<0.001
−0.33
(−0.52, −0.15)
0.001
Negative expectations
174
0.36
(0.19, 0.53)
<0.001
0.17
(−0.01, 0.36)
0.07
Intercept
7.95
(6.02, 9.87)
<0.001
Explained varianced ()
Nonadjusted
0.36
Adjusted
0.34
: subsample size; : estimated regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval.
aEight models adjusted for age and gender.
bObtained by backward stepwise selection.
cThe nonsignificant values were retrieved from the excluded variables table of the backward stepwise selection analysis. for final model.
