Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 482378, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/482378
Research Article

Psychometric Properties of the Hindi Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand: A Pilot Study

1School of Physical Therapy, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA
2Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA
3Shree Swaminarayan College of Physiotherapy, Surat, India
4School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
5Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Received 27 July 2015; Revised 23 September 2015; Accepted 4 October 2015

Academic Editor: Eric Kerckhofs

Copyright © 2015 Saurabh P. Mehta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. F. Snyder, N. K. Aaronson, A. K. Choucair et al., “Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1305–1314, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. J. Collins and E. M. Roos, “Patient-reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: commonly used instruments and attributes of a ‘good’ measure,” Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 367–394, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. L. Hudak, P. C. Amadio, and C. Bombardier, “Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG),” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 602–608, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. S. Dowrick, B. J. Gabbe, O. D. Williamson, and P. A. Cameron, “Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review,” Injury, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 468–476, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J.-S. Roy, J. C. Macdermid, and L. J. Woodhouse, “Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 623–632, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. P. Slobogean and B. L. Slobogean, “Measuring shoulder injury function: common scales and checklists,” Injury, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 248–252, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. V. Smith, R. P. Calfee, K. M. Baumgarten, R. H. Brophy, and R. W. Wright, “Upper extremity-specificmeasures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 277–285, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. E. Beaton, J. G. Wright, and J. N. Katz, “Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume, vol. 87, pp. 1038–1046, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. C. A. Kennedy, D. E. Beaton, P. Smith et al., “Measurement properties of the QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) outcome measure and cross-cultural adaptations of the QuickDASH: a systematic review,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2509–2547, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Guillemin, C. Bombardier, and D. Beaton, “Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1417–1432, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. D. O. Measure, Available Translations, Institute of Work and Health, Toronto, Canada, 2015.
  12. T. D. O. Measure, How to Translate?Institute of Work and Health, Toronto, Canada, 2015.
  13. S. P. Mehta, B. Mhatre, J. C. MacDermid, and A. Mehta, “Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Hindi version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation,” Journal of Hand Therapy, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Chandel, A. Sultan, K. A. Khan, V. Choudhary, and A. Parganiha, “Validation of the Hindi version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) in Indian cancer patients,” Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2957–2964, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. I. H. Mitra and G. Krishnan, “Adaptation and validation of stroke-aphasia quality of life (SAQOL-39) scale to Hindi,” Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Dhyani, R. Rajput, and R. Gupta, “Hindi translation and validation of dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep (DBAS—16),” Industrial Psychiatry Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 80–85, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Grover, R. Shah, and P. Kulhara, “Validation of Hindi translation of SRPB facets of WHOQOL-SRPB scale,” Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 358–363, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Das, T. Ghosh, and S. Gangopadhyay, “Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational health problems among groundnut farmers of West Bengal, India,” Journal of Human Ergology, vol. 42, pp. 1–12, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. A. Dabholkar, P. Nakhawa, and S. Yardi, “Common musculoskeletal problem experienced by fishing industry workers,” Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 48–51, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. W. Muir, C. L. Corea, and L. Beaupre, “Evaluating change in clinical status: reliability and measures of agreement for the assessment of glenohumeral range of motion,” North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 98–110, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. P. E. Shrout and J. L. Fleiss, “Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 420–428, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. E. Kazis, J. J. Anderson, and R. F. Meenan, “Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status,” Medical Care, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. S178–S189, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. H. Liang, A. H. Fossel, and M. G. Larson, “Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation,” Medical Care, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 632–642, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. S. Schmitt and R. P. Di Fabio, “Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1008–1018, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. A. Lehman, M. Woodbury, and C. A. Velozo, “Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire,” American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. M. S. Cheng, R. F. Sampaio, M. C. Mancini, S. T. Fonseca, and R. M. M. Cotta, “Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH): factor analysis of the version adapted to Portuguese/Brazil,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 30, no. 25, pp. 1901–1909, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. Franchignoni, A. Giordano, F. Sartorio, S. Vercelli, B. Pascariello, and G. Ferriero, “Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1370–1377, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus