Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Radiology Research and Practice
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 867218, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/867218
Research Article

Invalidity of SUV Measurements of Lesions in Close Proximity to Hot Sources due to “Shine-Through” Effect on FDG PET-CT Interpretation

Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, 150 Bergen Street, H-141, Newark, NJ 07103, USA

Received 12 April 2012; Accepted 19 September 2012

Academic Editor: Sotirios Bisdas

Copyright © 2012 Yiyan Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Boellaard, “Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, pp. 11S–20S, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Tomasi, F. Turkheimer, and E. Aboagye, “Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 14, pp. 131–146, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. P. D. Acton, H. Zhuang, and A. Alavi, “Quantification in PET,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1055–1062, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Liu, N. V. Ghesani, and L. S. Zuckier, “Physiology and pathophysiology of incidental findings detected on FDG-PET scintigraphy,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 294–315, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. W. Keyes, “SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value?” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1836–1839, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Lodge, M. A. Chaudhry, D. N. Udall, and R. L. Wahl, “Characterization of a perirectal artifact in 18F-FDG PET/CT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1501–1506, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. C. Huang, “Anatomy of SUV,” Nuclear Medicine and Biology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 643–646, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Boellaard, N. C. Krak, O. S. Hoekstra, and A. A. Lammertsma, “Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1519–1527, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. A. Thie, “Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1431–1434, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. C. Adams, T. G. Turkington, J. M. Wilson, and T. Z. Wong, “A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 310–320, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. T. Wu, E. T. Morita, P. A. Treseler et al., “Failure to harvest sentinel lymph nodes identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients,” Breast Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 86–90, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Motomura, A. Noguchi, T. Hashizume et al., “Usefulness of a solid-state gamma camera for sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 12–17, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. E. Cox, F. Haddad, S. Bass et al., “Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer,” Oncology, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1283–1292, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. C. Hsueh and A. E. Giuliano, “Sentinel lymph node technique for staging of breast cancer,” Oncologist, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 165–170, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Tonouchi, Y. Mohri, K. Tanaka, M. Kobayashi, Y. Ohmori, and M. Kusunoki, “Laparoscopic lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsies for early-stage gastric cancer: the cause of false negativity,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 418–421, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Ueda, K. Suga, Y. Kaneda et al., “Radioisotope lymph node mapping in nonsmall cell lung cancer: can it be applicable for sentinel node biopsy?” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 426–430, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Liu, K. J. Chun, and L. M. Freeman, “‘Shine through’ on dual tracer parathyroid scintigraphy: a potential pitfall in interpretation,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 145–149, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus