Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Radiology Research and Practice
Volume 2018, Article ID 4287973, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4287973
Research Article

Impact of the Ceiling-Mounted Radiation Shielding Position on the Physician’s Dose from Scatter Radiation during Interventional Procedures

1Department of the Director, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague 4, Czech Republic
2Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 140 21 Prague 4, Czech Republic

Correspondence should be addressed to Lucie Sukupova; moc.liamg@avopukus.eicul

Received 10 August 2017; Revised 12 December 2017; Accepted 21 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018

Academic Editor: Andreas H. Mahnken

Copyright © 2018 Lucie Sukupova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. P. Little, R. Wakeford, E. J. Tawn, S. D. Bouffler, and A. B. De Gonzalez, “Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do,” Radiology, vol. 251, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Kong, L. Gao, W. Zhuo, and A. Qian, “A survey on radiation exposure of primary operators from interventional X-ray procedures,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 55, pp. 43–45, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. A. Schueler, “Operator shielding: How and why,” Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 167–171, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. P. Kim, D. L. Miller, A. B. De Gonzalez et al., “Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures,” Health Physics Journal, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 80–99, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Heidbuchel, F. H. M. Wittkampf, E. Vano et al., “Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures,” Europace, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 946–964, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Musallam, I. Volis, S. Dadaev et al., “A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 1164–1170, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Ertel, J. Nadelson, A. R. Shroff, R. Sweis, D. Ferrera, and M. I. Vidovich, “Radiation dose reduction during radial cardiac catheterization: evaluation of a dedicated radial angiography absorption shielding drape,” ISRN Cardiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 769167, 5 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. P. Gonzales, C. Moran, and J. E. Silberzweig, “Reduction of operator radiation dose by an extended lower body shield,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 462–468, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. L. Miller, E. Vañó, G. Bartal et al., “Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional radiology society of Europe and the society of interventional radiology,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 230–239, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. W. Lange and H. Von Boetticher, “Reduction of operator radiation dose by a pelvic lead shield during cardiac catheterization by radial access: comparison with femoral access,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 445–449, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. A. Fetterly, D. J. Magnuson, G. M. Tannahill, M. D. Hindal, and V. Mathew, “Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1133–1139, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. A. Schueler, T. J. Vrieze, H. Bjarnason, and A. W. Stanson, “An investigation of operator exposure in interventional radiology,” RadioGraphics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1533–1540, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Radcal Corporation. RC. Low dose rate radiation applications. Specification sheet,.
  14. D. R. Dance, S. Christofides, A. D. A. Maidment, I. D. McLean, and K. H. Ng, Diagnostic Radiology Physics. A Handbook for Teachers and Students, International Atomic Energy Agency, 2014.
  15. S. Agarwal, A. Parashar, N. S. Bajaj et al., “Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 558–566, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Varghese, R. S. Livingstone, L. Varghese et al., “Radiation doses and estimated risk from angiographic projections during coronary angiography performed using novel flat detector,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 433–441, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Kuon, C. Glaser, and J. B. Dahm, “Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 76, no. 906, pp. 406–413, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus