Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Sarcoma
Volume 2009 (2009), Article ID 741975, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/741975
Research Article

Histopathological Diagnostic Discrepancies in Soft Tissue Tumours Referred to a Specialist Centre

Department of Histopathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK

Received 4 January 2009; Accepted 19 April 2009

Academic Editor: Jay Wunder

Copyright © 2009 Khin Thway and Cyril Fisher. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. K. Arbiser, A. L. Folpe, and S. W. Weiss, “Consultative (expert) second opinions in soft tissue pathology: analysis of problem-prone diagnostic situations,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 473–476, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. A. Presant, W. O. Russell, R. W. Alexander, and Y. S. Fu, “Soft-tissue and bone sarcoma histopathology peer review: the frequency of disagreement in diagnosis and the need for second pathology opinions. The Southeastern Cancer Study Group experience,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1658–1661, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. A. Alvegard and N. O. Berg, “Histopathology peer review of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma: the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group experience,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1845–1851, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Harris, A. L. Hartley, V. Blair et al., “Sarcomas in North West England: I. Histopathological peer review,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 315–320, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Coindre, M. Trojani, G. Contesso et al., “Reproducibility of a histopathologic grading system for adult soft tissue sarcoma,” Cancer, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 306–309, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Guillou, J.-M. Coindre, F. Bonichon et al., “Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 350–362, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. R. Parfitt, M. Rodriguez-Justo, R. Feakins, and M. R. Novelli, “Gastrointestinal Kaposi's sarcoma: CD117 expression and the potential for misdiagnosis as gastrointestinal stromal tumour,” Histopathology, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 816–823, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. K. Yantiss, I. J. Spiro, C. C. Compton, and A. E. Rosenberg, “Gastrointestinal stromal tumor versus intra-abdominal fibromatosis of the bowel wall: a clinically important differential diagnosis,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 947–957, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. I. Espinosa, C.-H. Lee, M. K. Kim et al., “A novel monoclonal antibody against DOG1 is a sensitive and specific marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 210–218, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. W. H. Henricks, Y. C. Chu, J. R. Goldblum, and S. W. Weiss, “Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 271–281, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. A. L. Hartley, V. Blair, M. Harris et al., “Sarcomas in North West England: II. Incidence,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1145–1150, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. J. Prescott, S. Wells, D. L. Bisset, S. S. Banerjee, and M. Harris, “Audit of tumour histopathology reviewed by a regional oncology centre,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 245–249, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. “Improving Outcomes for People with Sarcoma,” http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/SarcomaFullGuidance.pdf.