Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Sarcoma
Volume 2010, Article ID 143540, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/143540
Clinical Study

FDG-PET/CT Imaging Predicts Histopathologic Treatment Responses after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Adult Primary Bone Sarcomas

1Ahmanson Biological Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782, USA
2Division of Medical Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782, USA
3Department of Orthopedic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782, USA
4Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782, USA
5Department of Pathology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782, USA
6Abteilung Nuklearmedizin, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
7Division of Surgical Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1782, USA

Received 2 September 2009; Revised 18 December 2009; Accepted 8 February 2010

Academic Editor: Marcus Schlemmer

Copyright © 2010 Matthias R. Benz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. E. Ferner, J. F. Golding, M. Smith et al., “[18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a diagnostic tool for neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs): a long-term clinical study,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 390–394, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. L. Folpe, R. H. Lyles, J. T. Sprouse, E. U. Conrad III, and J. F. Eary, “(F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a predictor of pathologic grade and other prognostic variables in bone and soft tissue sarcoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1279–1287, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Volker, T. Denecke, I. Steffen et al., “Positron emission tomography for staging of pediatric sarcoma patients: results of a prospective multicenter trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 34, pp. 5435–5441, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. H. M. Schwarzbach, A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, F. Willeke et al., “Clinical value of [18-F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in soft tissue sarcomas,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 231, no. 3, pp. 380–386, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. R. Benz, J. Czernin, M. S. Allen-Auerbach et al., “FDG-PET/CT imaging predicts histopathologic treatment responses after the initial cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 2856–2863, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. M. Schuetze, B. P. Rubin, C. Vernon et al., “Use of positron emission tomography in localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” Cancer, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 339–348, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Schulte, D. Brecht-Krauss, M. Werner et al., “Evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy response of osteogenic sarcoma using FDG PET,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1637–1643, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Evilevitch, W. A. Weber, W. D. Tap et al., “Reduction of glucose metabolic activity is more accurate than change in size at predicting histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 715–720, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Picci, T. Bohling, G. Bacci et al., “Chemotherapy-induced tumor necrosis as a prognostic factor in localized Ewing's sarcoma of the extremities,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1553–1559, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Hudson, M. R. Jaffe, N. Jaffe et al., “Pediatric osteosarcoma: therapeutic strategies, results, and prognostic factors derived from a 10-year experience,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1988–1997, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. E. Grier, M. D. Krailo, N. J. Tarbell et al., “Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 8, pp. 694–701, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. S. Halpern, M. Dahlbom, A. Quon et al., “Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 797–801, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. S. Halpern, M. Dahlbom, M. A. Auerbach et al., “Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 603–607, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. E. Kinahan, D. W. Townsend, T. Beyer, and D. Sashin, “Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner,” Medical Physics, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2046–2063, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. R. Benz, V. Evilevitch, M. S. Allen-Auerbach et al., “Treatment monitoring by18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with sarcomas: interobserver variability of quantitative parameters in treatment-induced changes in histopathologically responding and nonresponding tumors,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1038–1046, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. A. Weber and H. Wieder, “Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 33, supplement 1, pp. S27–S37, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. C. Holscher, J. Hermans, M. A. Nooy, A. H. Taminiau, P. C. Hogendoorn, and J. L. Bloem, “Can conventional radiographs be used to monitor the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteogenic sarcoma?” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  18. D. S. Hawkins, S. M. Schuetze, J. E. Butrynski et al., “[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predicts outcome for ewing sarcoma family of tumors,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 34, pp. 8828–8834, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. S. Hawkins, J. G. Rajendran, E. U. Conrad III, J. D. Bruckner, and J. F. Eary, “Evaluation of chemotherapy response in pediatric bone sarcomas by [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography,” Cancer, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 3277–3284, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  20. N. Nair, A. Ali, A. A. Green et al., “Response of osteosarcoma to chemotherapy: evaluation with F-18 FDG-PET scans,” Clinical Positron Imaging, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 79–83, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z. Ye, J. Zhu, M. Tian et al., “Response of osteogenic sarcoma to neoadjuvant therapy: evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 475–480, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Franzius, J. Sciuk, C. Brinkschmidt, H. Jurgens, and O. Schober, “Evaluation of chemotherapy response in primary bone tumors with F-18 FDG positron emission tomography compared with histologically assessed tumor necrosis,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 874–881, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. A. Weber, “Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 983–995, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Dooms, E. Verbeken, S. Stroobants, K. Nackaerts, P. De Leyn, and J. Vansteenkiste, “Prognostic stratification of stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer after induction chemotherapy: a model based on the combination of morphometric-pathologic response in mediastinal nodes and primary tumor response on serial 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1128–1134, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. J. Downey, T. Akhurst, D. Ilson et al., “Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 428–432, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. L. Viglianti, M. Lora-Michiels, J. M. Poulson et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of clinical outcome in canine spontaneous soft tissue sarcomas treated with thermoradiotherapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 4993–5001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Choi, C. Charnsangavej, S. C. Faria et al., “Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 1753–1759, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus