Research Article
Aberrant Hedgehog Signaling and Clinical Outcome in Osteosarcoma
Table 3
Results of DFS analysis by Cox Proportional Hazards model in no metastasis at diagnosis group
for IHH in combination with size.
| Prognostic factor | Univariate | Multivariate* | HR | 95% CI | value | HR | 95% CI | value |
| IHH/size | | | | | | | | | IHH+/≤9 cm versus IHH−/≤9 cm | 12.78 | 1.36 | 1694.88 | 0.1128* | 6.31 | 0.47 | 934.10 | 0.2831 | IHH+/>9 cm versus IHH−/≤9 cm | 17.10 | 1.91 | 2253.96 | 0.0754* | 52.30 | 3.27 | 10906.34 | 0.0378 | IHH−/>9 cm versus IHH−/≤9 cm | 20.48 | 2.14 | 2727.27 | 0.0611* | 17.62 | 1.48 | 2614.55 | 0.0907 | Necrosis | | | | | | | | | >90% versus ≤90% | 0.71 | 0.21 | 2.35 | 0.5716 | 0.62 | 0.16 | 2.39 | 0.5027 | Gender | | | | | | | | | Male versus female | 1.39 | 0.44 | 4.36 | 0.5795 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 2.10 | 0.2700 | Age (years) | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.1676 | 1.03 | 0.99 | 1.07 | 0.2034 |
|
|
Firth correction to handle small sample sizes. IHH+: high IHH levels. IHH−: low IHH levels.
|