Research Article

Identifying the Prevalence, Trajectory, and Determinants of Psychological Distress in Extremity Sarcoma

Table 2

Prevalence of caseness for TESS, DASS21, and EORTC QLQ C-30.

Diagnosis
(%)
6 months
(%)
12 months
(%)

TESS*
 Difficulty performing ADLs25 (32.9)34 (44.7)21 (21.6)
 Self-rate as disabled11 (14.5)22 (28.9)16 (21.1)
DASS21**22 (28.9)28 (36.8)24 (31.6)
 Stress13 (17.1)18 (23.7)19 (25.0)
 Anxiety17 (22.4)16 (21.1)15 (19.7)
 Depression10 (13.2)21 (27.6)21 (27.6)
EORTC QLQ C-30***
 QoL20 (26.3)21 (27.6)19 (25.0)
 PF7 (9.2)9 (11.8)3 (3.9)
 RF18 (23.7)27 (35.5)14 (18.4)
 EF6 (7.9)15 (19.7)10 (13.2)
 CF4 (5.3)6 (7.9)6 (7.9)
 SF13 (51.3)17 (22.4)13 (17.1)
 PA39 (63.2)147 (61.8)135 (46.1)1
22 (28.9)227 (35.5)223 (30.3)2
16 (21.1)318 (23.7)315 (19.7)3
 FI20 (26.3)21 (27.6)14 (18.4)

*Caseness for TESS defined as moderate difficulty or harder.
**Caseness for DASS21 defined as being moderate to severe based on DASS Manual guidelines (S. H. Lovibond and P. F. Lovibond 1995 [45]).
***Caseness for EORTC QLQ C-30 subscales: QoL dichotomized at ≤4; other subscales dichotomized as quite a bit or more of difficulty or level of symptoms.
1Pain dichotomized at a little or more; 2pain dichotomized at more than a little; 3pain dichotomized at moderate to severe.