Pasteurized Autograft-Prosthesis Composite Reconstruction May Not Be a Viable Primary Procedure for Large Skeletal Defects after Resection of Sarcoma

Table 4

Comparison with previous studies.

Author	Case Nr/mean FU (years)	Type of prosthesis	Failure rate (%)	Implant survival (%)		Loosening (%)	Implant, pasteurized bone, periprosthetic fracture (%)	Infection (%)	LR (%)	Amputation (%)
				10-year	20-year
Current Series	142/9.2	PPC	52/142; (36.6%)			8	14	12	1	9
Jeys et al.	661/10	TP	227/661; (34%)	58^†	38^†	11	4	11	5	10.6
Henderson et al.^‡	2174/NA	TP	534/2174; (24.5%)	78	74	4	4	8	4	NA
Henderson et al.^§	4359/NA	TP	1271/4359; (29.2%)	NA	NA	10	5.2	7.8	5.3	NA

Nr: number, FU: follow-up, PPC: pasteurized bone prosthesis composite, TP: tumor prosthesis, implant removal for any cause, ^†revision surgery for any cause, ^‡result of five institutions, ^§literature review in Henderson et al. study, and NA: not assessed.