Review Article

A Critical Review of the Impact of Sarcoma on Psychosocial Wellbeing

Table 8

QOL measured by the SF-361.

First authorComparator2Quality of life3Domains3

Davis et al. [41]AMP vs. LSS5PF
Veenstra et al. [101]Reference values45PF, RP
Eiser et al. [44]AMP vs. LSS
Reference values
=5
5
PF, RP, SF, vitality, pain, GH
Malo et al. [64]Reference values5PF, RP
Gerber et al. [51]Reference values=
Hopyan et al. [60]Rotationplasty, AMP vs. LSS=
Thijssens et al. [99]Reference values5PF, RP
Akahane et al. [28]Rotationplasty, AMP vs. LSS=
Aksnes et al. [29]Reference values
Hodgkin’s disease
Testicular cancer



PCS
PCS
Ginsberg et al. [52]Rotationplasty, AMP vs. LSS=
Bekkering et al. [34]Reference values7
+
PCS
MCS
Expósito Tirado et al. [45]AMP vs. LSS=
Barrera et al. [31]AMP vs. LSS
Reference values
=6
Bekkering et al. [33]Time: 3 to 12 months after surgery7
12 to 24 months after surgery7
+
+
BT specific, PCS
PCS
Forni et al. [49]Reference values5
+
PF
MH
Han et al. [55]Time: before surgery to 6 months after surgery
6 to 12 months after surgery
+
=
Sun et al. [95]Time: treatment to 1 year after treatment
Reference values
ns
ns
Liu et al. [63]Reference values
Gradl et al. [53]Reference values+5RS, MH, vitality
Rivard et al. [83]Time: before surgery vs. 12 months after surgery+
Shchelkova and Usmanova [91]GCT vs. OS
GCT vs. CS
5
5
PF, MH, GH, SF
PF, SF
Fidler et al. [48]Reference values
Edelmann et al. [43]Reference values5PF, GH
Poort et al. [79]Severe fatigue vs. none
Bekkering et al. [108]AMP vs. LSS
Time: 3 to >60 months after surgery

+
PCS
PCS
Fernandez-Pineda et al. [47]Reference valuesPCS
Ranft et al. [81]Reference valuesPCS

AMP: amputation; BT: bone tumour; GCT: giant cell tumour; GH: global health; LSS: limb-sparing surgery; MH: mental health; ns: significance not specified; OS: osteosarcoma; PCS: physical component score; PF: physical function; RP: role-physical; RS: role-social; SF: social function. 1Minus (−): poorer in comparison; plus (+): better; equals (=): no difference. 2Direction of significance, i.e., better or worse, based on the first comparator, or the last time point if a longitudinal comparison. 3Result based on overall or summary scores; if these were not provided, result at domain score level was provided (QLQ-C30 functional scale only). 4Reference values either supplied with the measure or collected from noncancer controls as part of the study. 5Total and/or summary scores can be calculated with the measure used, but this was not reported. 6Three quality of life measures used, all giving different results. 7Based on SF-36 and bone tumour-specific measure results reflecting the comparison across the whole sample.