Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Depressive and Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: A Naturalistic Study

Innamorati, Marco; Baratta, Stefano; Di Vittorio, Cristina; Lester, David; Girardi, Paolo; Pompili, Maurizio; Amore, Mario

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/423205

Schizophrenia Research and Treatment

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion and Conclusions References Copyright Related Articles

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2013 | Article ID 423205 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/423205

Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Depressive and Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia: A Naturalistic Study

Marco Innamorati,¹Stefano Baratta,¹Cristina Di Vittorio,¹David Lester,²Paolo Girardi,³Maurizio Pompili,³and Mario Amore⁴

Academic Editor: Robin Emsley

Received02 Nov 2012

Revised25 Dec 2012

Accepted08 Jan 2013

Published21 Jan 2013

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this naturalistic study was to investigate whether treatment with clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for at least 2 years was associated with a reduction in psychotic and depressive symptoms and an improvement in chronic schizophrenia patients’ awareness of their illness. Methods. Twenty-three adult outpatients (15 men and 8 women) treated with clozapine and 23 patients (16 men and 7 women) treated with other atypical antipsychotics were included in the study. Psychotic symptoms were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), depressive symptoms were assessed with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and insight was assessed with the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD). Results. The sample as a whole had a significant reduction in positive, negative, and general symptoms, whereas the reduction in depression was significant only for patients with CDSS scores of 5 and higher at the baseline. At the follow-up, patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics reported a greater reduction in depression than patients treated with clozapine, but not when limiting the analyses to those with clinically relevant depression. Conclusions. Atypical antipsychotics may be effective in reducing psychotic and depressive symptoms and in improving insight in patients with chronic schizophrenia, with no differences in the profiles of efficacy between compounds.

1. Introduction

Schizophrenia is a serious and disabling mental disorder usually associated with a decline in social and occupational functioning, and deficits in communication, control of behavior, the ability to feel pleasure, will, and initiative. The disease affects approximately 1% of the world’s population, or around 1–12 adults in every 1,000, mostly in the 15–35 year-old group [1–3]. Yearly incidence is 16–40 cases per 100,000 according to the ICD-9 criteria and 7–14 cases per 100,000 using more restrictive criteria [4, 5]. The risk of developing schizophrenia during a lifetime is around 0.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3%–2.0%) [3].

The longitudinal course of schizophrenia is characterized by recurrent episodes of illness, periods of complete or partial remission, and often chronicity. Schizophrenia is linked to functional and social disability, it impacts the patients’ ability to engage in productive work and social relationships, and it is associated with a reduced life expectancy as a result of accidents, high comorbidity with medical conditions, and suicide [6–17].

Furthermore, depression in schizophrenic patients is common and disabling [16, 18–30], while suicide is a frequent outcome in schizophrenia patients [17]. Back in the 1970s, Miles [31], in a review of 34 studies, estimated that up to 10% of schizophrenia patients die by suicide. More recently, other studies indicated a lifetime risk ranging between 2% and 5% [32, 33]. Furthermore, at least 50% of schizophrenia patients attempt suicide at least once during their lifetime.

First-generation antipsychotics (e.g., chlorpromazine and haloperidol) demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of positive symptoms [34], but their use was associated with a substantial risk of extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. The introduction of atypical antipsychotics in the 1990s has had a major impact on the treatment of schizophrenia. Clozapine has demonstrated superior efficacy compared with first-generation antipsychotics and has a lower risk of causing extrapyramidal side effects, despite a significant risk of agranulocytosis [35–40]. Today clozapine is recommended when the illness has not responded adequately to previous treatment despite the sequential use of adequate doses of at least two different antipsychotic drugs, one of which is a nonclozapine second-generation antipsychotic [41]. The next set of drugs that were developed (e.g., risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole) demonstrated at least equal efficacy and better tolerability than typical antipsychotics and improved safety compared with clozapine [34, 42–56]. Nevertheless, heterogeneity in the individual response to treatments is still the rule in schizophrenia patients [57–66], and discontinuation of treatment is a very frequent occurrence [64, 67]. Recently, Cuyún Carter et al. [68], analyzing the data from the United States Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Program, reported that only 10% of the sample had a positive outcome after two years.

Some studies have indicated that atypical antipsychotics may be effective for the depressive symptoms accompanying schizophrenia [40, 48, 69–71] and for suicide risk [72], despite some inconsistent results [73]. A few studies have also indicated that some atypical antipsychotics may increase awareness of their illness in schizophrenia patients [74, 75].

The aim of this naturalistic study was to investigate whether treatment with clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for at least 2 years was associated with a reduction in psychotic and depressive symptoms and an improvement in awareness into their illness in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

2. Materials and Methods

This was a naturalistic research studying the outcome of patients with schizophrenia treated either with clozapine or other atypical antipsychotics for at least 2 years. Data collection occurred during routine outpatient visits. The data collected included patient demographics, clinical status, and suicide ideation and behaviors.

2.1. Participants

Twenty-three adult outpatients (15 men and 8 women) treated with clozapine and 23 patients (16 men and 7 women) treated with other atypical antipsychotics were included in the study. All the participants were patients treated at the Department of Psychiatry, University of Parma, between January 2005 and May 2006. Inclusion criteria were an age of 18 years or higher and having been treated with at least two first-generation or atypical antipsychotics with only partial response before the introduction of the current treatment. Exclusion criteria were the presence of dementia, illiteracy, and denial of informed consent.

The mean age of the patients treated with clozapine was years (Min./Max.: 20/63 years). Eighty-seven percent of them were diagnosed with schizophrenia (most with paranoid schizophrenia) and 13% with a Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) (see Table 1). The mean age of the patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics was years (Min./Max.: 25/67 years), and 56.5% of them were diagnosed with schizophrenia and 43.5% with a Psychotic Disorder NOS.

The patients participated voluntarily in the study and gave their informed consent. The design of the research was approved by the local ethics committee.

2.2. Measures

Psychotic symptoms were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [76], depressive symptoms were assessed with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) [77], and insight was assessed with the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD) [78]. All rating scales were administered by psychiatrists who were expert in assessment and who were blind to the aim of the study.

Suicide attempts were defined as any self-harm act with at least some intent to die resulting in physical injuries which requested medical attention.

2.3. Analysis

The wilcoxon signed rank test was used to calculate the significance of changes from baseline in symptoms and insight. Mann-Whitney tests were used to calculate differences between groups. Changes in outcome measures between baseline and follow-up were reported as changes in raw scores. Spearman rho correlations were reported for associations among variables.

All the analyses were performed with the statistical package for the social science SPSS 17.0.

3. Results

The patients had a significant reduction in positive (; ), negative (; ), and general (; ) symptoms. The patients also showed improvement in awareness of their illness (; ) and symptom attribution (; ). However, our sample of patients as a whole did not improve significantly in depressive symptoms (; ), although the reduction was significant for patients with CDSS scores of 5 and higher at baseline.

The differences between the groups are listed in Table 1. At baseline, the groups differed in diagnosis () and age at onset (; ), but they did not differ for mean years spent since diagnosis (; ). Furthermore, patients in the clozapine group had more positive symptoms (; ) and fewer depressive symptoms (; ) than patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics. The groups did not differ for number of patients with CDSS scores of 5 and higher ().

The groups did not differ in negative symptoms (; ), general symptoms (; ), and the SUMD awareness (; ) or symptom attribution (; ).

Treatment with clozapine lasted on average years (versus years for patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics; ; ). At the follow-up, the groups differed only in change from baseline in depressive symptoms, with patients treated with other antipsychotics reporting a greater reduction in depression (; ) than patients treated with clozapine. Nevertheless, when we considered rates of response to treatment (a reduction of 50% of the baseline scores in those with a CDSS score of 5 or higher at the baseline), 71.4% of the depressed patients treated with clozapine versus 60.0% of the depressed patients treated with other antipsychotics had a good response (). Thus, despite the fact that the mean change from baseline was superior for other nonclozapine atypical antipsychotics, when we limited our analyses only to depressed patients, other antipsychotics were no longer superior to clozapine, which demonstrated nonsignificantly higher rates of remission.

The groups did not differ in the mean change in positive symptoms (; ), negative symptoms (; ), and general symptoms (; ) as measured with the PANSS; and they did not differ in change in the SUMD awareness (; ) and the SUMD symptom attribution (; ).

Lastly, the change from baseline in depressive symptoms was not associated with the change in the SUMD awareness (; ) or symptom attribution (; ) dimensions. Reduction in depressive symptoms was associated only with a change in PANSS general symptoms score (; ), and not with changes in negative (; ) or positive (; ) symptoms. Furthermore, a reduction in depression was associated with higher scores on the PANSS negative symptoms at baseline (; ) and with lower CDSS scores at baseline (; ). Thus, a greater reduction in depressive symptoms was predicted by lower depression and higher negative symptoms at baseline, and these results did not change when we considered only patients with CDSS scores of 5 and higher.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

We investigated changes in psychotic and depressive symptoms and insight in patients with chronic schizophrenia treated with clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics for at least 2 years. The main finding was that atypical antipsychotics were associated with significant improvement in positive, negative, and general symptoms as measured with the PANSS, with no differences between drugs. Schizophrenia patients with clinically significant depression at baseline also had a significant reduction in depressive symptoms, which is consistent with previous studies which have indicated that atypical antipsychotics may be effective in reducing depressive symptoms accompanying schizophrenia [40, 48, 69–71].

Furthermore, the administration for long periods of time of atypical antipsychotics may be associated with an improvement in awareness into the illness, as reported by Pallanti and colleagues [74] who investigated the influence of treatment with first-generation versus atypical antipsychotics in relation to awareness into the illness and cognitive functions. The authors found that clozapine was effective in improving awareness into the illness in a group of schizophrenia patients who were shifted to clozapine treatment either because of relapse on or intolerance to conventional antipsychotics. In our sample, we did not find differences in awareness in patients given clozapine versus other atypical antipsychotics.

In our sample, patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics showed a greater reduction in depressive symptoms than patients treated with clozapine, but not when limiting the analyses to patients with clinically significant levels of depression at baseline. A reduction in depressive symptoms was associated with improvement in insight, but not with improvement in negative and positive symptoms. Furthermore, a greater reduction in depression was predicted by lower depressive and higher negative symptoms at baseline.

Our study has several limitations. First, our sample was small, and the lack of differences between groups in some analyses could have been associated with the small number of subjects we enrolled in the study. For example, we should have enrolled 281 subjects for both samples to detect a statistically significant difference between groups for the change in the PANSS positive symptoms with an alpha level of 5% and a statistical power of 80%. Second, we did not consider important outcome measures such as medication side effects and the discontinuation rate which have been reported to be very frequent in schizophrenia patients [64, 67] and which vary between drugs [67]. Furthermore, the treatment was not blind and the patients were not randomly assigned to medication. Thus, our results may be limited by a selection bias affecting the groups of patients differently. Third, we did not exclude from the sample patients with antipsychotic poly-therapy. Fourth, we did not include in the sample patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics, which limits the ability to understand whether atypical compounds have greater effectiveness than conventional neuroleptics. Fifth, the observational nature of the study is associated with the lack of placebo-treated controls, leaving the possibility that atypical antipsychotics may be not superior to placebo. Sixth, the fact that we did not use an intention to treat analysis to examine the effect of dropouts could explain the general improvement from baseline to follow-up in symptoms and awareness of illness of our patients.

In conclusions, atypical antipsychotics may be effective in reducing psychotic and depressive symptoms and in improving insight in patients with chronic schizophrenia, with no differences in the profiles of efficacy between compounds. Greater reduction in depressive symptoms is predicted by greater negative symptom severity and fewer depressive symptoms at baseline, but is not associated with improvement in negative and positive symptoms or in insight.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests for this research.

Authors’ Contribution

All authors have made substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data, have been involved in drafting the paper or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and have given final approval of the version to be published.

References

World Health Organisation, Schizophrenia, vol. 2012, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
R. Tandon, M. S. Keshavan, and H. A. Nasrallah, “Schizophrenia, “just the facts” what we know in 2008. 2. Epidemiology and etiology,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 102, no. 1–3, pp. 1–18, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Saha, D. Chant, J. Welham, and J. McGrath, “A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 5, article e141, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sartorius, A. Jablensky, A. Korten et al., “Early manifestations and first-contact incidence of schizophrenia in different cultures,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 909–928, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Jablensky, N. Sartorius, G. Ernberg et al., “Schizophrenia manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization ten-country study,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 1–97, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Tsuang and R. F. Woolson, “Excess mortality in schizophrenia and affective disorders. Do suicides and accidental deaths solely account for this excess?” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1181–1185, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Tsuang, R. F. Woolson, and J. A. Fleming, “Premature deaths in schizophrenia and affective disorders. An analysis of survival curves and variables affecting the shortened survival,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 979–983, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
C. B. Caldwell and I. I. Gottesman, “Schizophrenics kill themselves too: a review of risk factors for suicide,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 571–590, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Tandon, H. A. Nasrallah, and M. S. Keshavan, “Schizophrenia, “just the facts” 4. Clinical features and conceptualization,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 110, no. 1–3, pp. 1–23, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Casey, M. Rodriguez, C. Northcott, G. Vickar, and L. Shihabuddin, “Schizophrenia: medical illness, mortality, and aging,” International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, vol. 41, pp. 245–251, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lwin, C. Symeon, F. Jan, and A. Sule, “Morbidity and mortality in schizophrenia,” British Journal of Hospital Medicine, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 628–630, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Laursen, “Life expectancy among persons with schizophrenia or bipolar affective disorder,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 101–104, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Allebeck, “Schizophrenia: a life-shortening disease,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 81–89, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pompili, G. Serafini, M. Innamorati et al., “Suicide risk in first episode psychosis: a selective review of the current literature,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shepherd, D. Watt, I. Falloon, and N. Smeeton, “The natural history of schizophrenia: a five-year follow-up study of outcome and prediction in a representative sample of schizophrenics,” Psychological Medicine, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 1–46, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
S. G. Siris, “Suicide and schizophrenia,” Journal of Psychopharmacology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
C. B. Caldwell and I. I. Gottesman, “Schizophrenia-a high-risk factor for suicide: clues to risk reduction,” Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 479–493, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Mulholland and S. Cooper, “The symptom of depression in schizophrenia and its management,” Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, vol. 6, pp. 169–177, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Conwell, P. R. Duberstein, C. Cox, J. H. Herrmann, N. T. Forbes, and E. D. Caine, “Relationships of age and axis I diagnoses in victims of completed suicide: a psychological autopsy study,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 153, no. 8, pp. 1001–1008, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. H. Kim, J. H. Ann, and M. J. Kim, “Relationship between improvements of subjective well-being and depressive symptoms during acute treatment of schizophrenia with atypical antipsychotics,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 172–178, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bobes, A. Ciudad, E. Álvarez, L. San, P. Polavieja, and I. Gilaberte, “Recovery from schizophrenia: results from a 1-year follow-up observational study of patients in symptomatic remission,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Tollefson and S. W. Andersen, “Should we consider mood disturbance in schizophrenia as an important determinant of quality of life?” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 23–30, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
R. R. Conley, “The burden of depressive symptoms in people with schizophrenia,” The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 853–861, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Siris, “Depression in schizophrenia: perspective in the era of 'atypical' antipsychotic agents,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 157, no. 9, pp. 1379–1389, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Huppert, K. A. Weiss, R. Lim, S. Pratt, and T. E. Smith, “Quality of life in schizophrenia: contributions of anxiety and depression,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 51, no. 2-3, pp. 171–180, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sim, R. Mahendran, S. G. Siris, S. Heckers, and S. A. Chong, “Subjective quality of life in first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders with comorbid depression,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hansson, “Determinants of quality of life in people with severe mental illness,” Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum., no. 429, pp. 46–50, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Narvaez, E. W. Twamley, C. L. McKibbin, R. K. Heaton, and T. L. Patterson, “Subjective and objective quality of life in schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 98, no. 1–3, pp. 201–208, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pompili, X. F. Amador, P. Girardi et al., “Suicide risk in schizophrenia: learning from the past to change the future,” Annals of General Psychiatry, vol. 6, article 10, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roy, A. Mazonson, and D. Pickar, “Attempted suicide in chronic schizophrenia,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 303–306, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
C. P. Miles, “Conditions predisposing to suicide: a review,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 231–246, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Dutta, R. M. Murray, M. Hotopf, J. Allardyce, P. B. Jones, and J. Boydell, “Reassessing the long-term risk of suicide after a first episode of psychosis,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1230–1237, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Palmer, V. S. Pankratz, and J. M. Bostwick, “The lifetime risk of suicide in schizophrenia: a reexamination,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 247–253, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Worrel, P. A. Marken, S. E. Beckman, and V. L. Ruehter, “Atypical antipsychotic agents: a critical review,” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 238–258, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Llorca and J. J. Pere, “Clozapine, 10 years after—a clinical review,” L'Encéphale, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 474–491, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Naber and M. Lambert, “The CATIE and CUtLASS studies in schizophrenia: results and implications for clinicians,” CNS Drugs, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 649–659, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Foussias and G. Remington, “Antipsychotics and schizophrenia: from efficacy and effectiveness to clinical decision-making,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 117–125, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
T. C. Manschreck, D. A. Redmond, S. F. Candela, and B. A. Maher, “Effects of clozapine on psychiatric symptoms, cognition, and functional outcome in schizophrenia,” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 481–489, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Bourin, B. Guitton, E. Dailly, P. Hery, and P. Jolliet, “A follow-up study of a population of schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1481–1495, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Lieberman, G. Tollefson, M. Tohen et al., “Comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 160, no. 8, pp. 1396–404, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, The NICE Guideline on Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care, The British Psychological Society and the Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK, 2010.
M. Dossenbach, C. Arango-Dávila, H. S. Ibarra et al., “Response and relapse in patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol: 12-month follow-up of the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1021–1030, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Dossenbach, A. Erol, M. E. M. Kessaci et al., “Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: interim 6-month analysis from a prospective observational study (IC-SOHO) comparing olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and haloperidol,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 312–321, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. G. El-Sayeh, C. Morganti, and C. E. Adams, “Aripiprazole for schizophrenia: systematic review,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 189, pp. 102–108, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Novick, J. M. Haro, D. Suarez, E. Vieta, and D. Naber, “Recovery in the outpatient setting: 36-month results from the Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (SOHO) study,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 108, no. 1–3, pp. 223–230, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Geddes, N. Freemantle, P. Harrison, and P. Bebbington, “Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis,” British Medical Journal, vol. 321, no. 7273, pp. 1371–1376, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Leucht, G. Pitschel-Walz, D. Abraham, and W. Kissling, “Efficacy and extrapyramidal side-effects of the new antipsychotics olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and sertindole compared to conventional antipsychotics and placebo. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 51–68, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Schulz, R. Thomson, and M. Brecher, “The efficacy of quetiapine vs. haloperidol and placebo: a meta-analytic study of efficacy,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 62, no. 1-2, pp. 1–12, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Caccia, L. Pasina, and A. Nobili, “New atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia: iloperidone,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, no. 4, pp. 33–48, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Salimi, L. F. Jarskog, and J. A. Lieberman, “Antipsychotic drugs for first-episode schizophrenia: a comparative review,” CNS Drugs, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 837–855, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Riedel, N. Müller, M. Stradding, I. Spellmann, E. Severus, and H. J. Möller, “Quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia and related disordes,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 219–235, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Leucht, C. Corves, D. Arbter, R. R. Engel, C. Li, and J. M. Davis, “Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 373, no. 9657, pp. 31–41, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Harrison and C. M. Perry, “Aripiprazole: a review of its use in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder,” Drugs, vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 1715–1736, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. DeLeon, N. C. Patel, and M. L. Crismon, “Aripiprazole: a comprehensive review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability,” Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 649–666, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Naber and M. Lambert, “Aripiprazole: a new atypical antipsychotic with a different pharmacological mechanism,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1213–1219, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. M. K. Houthoofd, M. Morrens, and B. G. C. Sabbe, “Cognitive and psychomotor effects of risperidone in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder,” Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1565–1589, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Stroup, “Heterogeneity of treatment effects in schizophrenia,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. S26–S31, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Henry, G. P. Amminger, M. G. Harris et al., “The EPPIC follow-up study of first-episode psychosis: longer-term clinical and functional outcome 7 years after index admission,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 716–728, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Karow, S. Moritza, M. Lambert, D. Schöttle, and D. Naber, “Remitted but still impaired? Symptomatic versus functional remission in patients with schizophrenia,” European Psychiatry, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 401–405, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Kinon, L. Chen, H. Ascher-Svanum et al., “Predicting response to atypical antipsychotics based on early response in the treatment of schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 102, no. 1–3, pp. 230–240, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ascher-Svanum, A. W. Nyhuis, D. E. Faries, B. J. Kinon, R. W. Baker, and A. Shekhar, “Clinical, functional, and economic ramifications of early nonresponse to antipsychotics in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1163–1171, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Miyamoto, G. E. Duncan, C. E. Marx, and J. A. Lieberman, “Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 79–104, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Lieberman, “Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia: efficacy, safety and cost outcomes of CATIE and other trials,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 2, p. e04, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Lieberman, T. Scott Stroup, J. P. McEvoy et al., “Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 12, pp. 1209–1223, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Z. Levine and S. Leucht, “Elaboration on the early-onset hypothesis of antipsychotic drug action: treatment response trajectories,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rabinowitz, S. Z. Levine, R. Haim, and H. Häfner, “The course of schizophrenia: progressive deterioration, amelioration or both?” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 91, no. 1–3, pp. 254–258, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Haro, D. Suarez, D. Novick, J. Brown, J. Usall, and D. Naber, “Three-year antipsychotic effectiveness in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: observational versus randomized studies results,” European Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 235–244, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Cuyún Carter, D. R. Milton, H. Ascher-Svanum, and D. E. Faries, “Sustained favorable long-term outcome in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 3-year prospective observational study,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 11, p. 143, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Farahani and C. U. Correll, “Are antipsychotics or antidepressants needed for psychotic depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing antidepressant or antipsychotic monotherapy with combination treatment,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 73, pp. 486–496, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Tollefson, T. M. Sanger, Y. Lu, and M. E. Thieme, “Depressive signs and symptoms in schizophrenia: a prospective blinded trial of olanzapine and haloperidol,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 250–258, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D. Tollefson, T. M. Sanger, C. M. Beasley, and P. V. Tran, “A double-blind, controlled comparison of the novel antipsychotic olanzapine versus haloperidol or placebo on anxious and depressive symptoms accompanying schizophrenia,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 803–810, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. McDonagh, K. Peterson, S. Carson, R. Fu, and S. Thakurta, Drug Class Review: Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs: Final Update 3 Report, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA, 2010.
M. C. Mauri, D. Moliterno, M. Rossattini, and A. Colasanti, “Depression in schizophrenia: comparison of first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 99, no. 1–3, pp. 7–12, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Pallanti, L. Quercioli, and A. Pazzagli, “Effects of clozapine on awareness of illness and cognition in schizophrenia,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 239–249, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kim, J. H. Ann, and J. Lee, “Insight change and its relationship to subjective well-being during acute atypical antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol. 36, pp. 687–694, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Kay, L. A. Opler, and J. P. Lindenmayer, “Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 99–108, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Addington, J. Addington, and B. Schissel, “A depression rating scale for schizophrenics,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 247–251, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. F. Amador and D. H. Strauss, The Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 1990.

Copyright

Copyright © 2013 Marco Innamorati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4005

Downloads

2365

Citations