Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 392050 |

Jack M. Milwid, Takaharu Ichimura, Matthew Li, Yunxin Jiao, Jungwoo Lee, Joshua S. Yarmush, Biju Parekkadan, Arno W. Tilles, Joseph V. Bonventre, Martin L. Yarmush, "Secreted Factors from Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Upregulate IL-10 and Reverse Acute Kidney Injury", Stem Cells International, vol. 2012, Article ID 392050, 12 pages, 2012.

Secreted Factors from Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Upregulate IL-10 and Reverse Acute Kidney Injury

Academic Editor: Jeffrey L. Spees
Received11 Sep 2012
Accepted02 Nov 2012
Published19 Dec 2012


Acute kidney injury is a devastating syndrome that afflicts over 2,000,000 people in the US per year, with an associated mortality of greater than 70% in severe cases. Unfortunately, standard-of-care treatments are not sufficient for modifying the course of disease. Many groups have explored the use of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) for the treatment of AKI because BMSCs have been shown to possess unique anti-inflammatory, cytoprotective, and regenerative properties in vitro and in vivo. It is yet unresolved whether the primary mechanisms controlling BMSC therapy in AKI depend on direct cell infusion, or whether BMSC-secreted factors alone are sufficient for mitigating the injury. Here we show that BMSC-secreted factors are capable of providing a survival benefit to rats subjected to cisplatin-induced AKI. We observed that when BMSC-conditioned medium (BMSC-CM) is administered intravenously, it prevents tubular apoptosis and necrosis and ameliorates AKI. In addition, we observed that BMSC-CM causes IL-10 upregulation in treated animals, which is important to animal survival and protection of the kidney. In all, these results demonstrate that BMSC-secreted factors are capable of providing support without cell transplantation, and the IL-10 increase seen in BMSC-CM-treated animals correlates with attenuation of severe AKI.

1. Introduction

Each year approximately 2,000,000 people in the US develop acute kidney injury (AKI), with a likelihood of death greater than 70% in cases of dialysis dependence [1, 2]. AKI is an inflammatory organ failure syndrome that is caused by extensive injury to the kidney parenchyma [3]. There are various etiologies of AKI that stem from prerenal, intrinsic renal, or postrenal causes. Regardless of etiology, however, it is thought that there is persistent systemic inflammation that may contribute to prevention of tissue regeneration and disease reversal [4]. Resolution may be achievable if the inflammatory cytokine storm created by AKI can be attenuated, and support is provided to aid in the healing of the injured tissue [5]. Unfortunately, the only existing therapies available to patients with AKI are palliative. Dialysis, while useful to restore electrolyte balance and remove waste products in the blood, weakly supplements the failing kidneys without providing anti-inflammatory or regenerative support [6]. Single molecule therapies directed against AKI have thus far proven insufficient for addressing the complex pathophysiology underlying the disease [7]. New therapies that can resolve the disease by addressing multiple aspects of AKI pathophysiology in parallel are desperately needed.

Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) have been explored in preclinical and clinical studies as a potential therapeutic for patients with AKI [8]. BMSCs have been shown to possess potent immunomodulatory and regenerative properties in vitro and in vivo [9, 10]. The predominant mechanisms of BMSC therapy are unclear. Some studies implicate homing, engraftment and differentiation as critical for therapeutic benefit [11], and others stress the importance of secreted factors from BMSCs as the key mediators [12]. To attempt to resolve this issue, we and others have tested BMSC-secreted factors in various disease models and compared them to whole cell transplantation. These studies have demonstrated that BMSC-secreted factors possess the capacity to provide therapeutic support to rodents suffering from acute diseases associated with inflammation (e.g., liver failure, sepsis), and can provide superior support when compared to cell transplantation [1315]. In particular, we have seen that BMSC-secreted factors are responsible for a reversal of proinflammatory cytokine expression and a concomitant increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10). To date, it has not yet been definitively resolved whether this is also the case in AKI. It has been shown in several models of AKI that these factors are capable of providing significant support [1618], as measured by a reduction in the total injury to the renal tubule epithelium, and preservation of glomerular filtration rate and creatinine clearance in ischemic and rhabdomyolytic injury models. Tögel and colleagues [16] and Duffield et al. [19] demonstrated that when BMSCs are infused in the context of AKI, very few cells engraft within hours of transplantation, and few cells can be detected in the kidneys after 24 hours which is consistent with other studies that also suggest the half life of BMSCs in vivo is on the order of days [20, 21]. Nevertheless, they still observed improvement of the structure and function of kidneys during ischemic AKI. In addition, they observed a similar reduction of the proinflammatory injurious state during AKI as we have seen in other inflammatory disease models with BMSC-secreted factors, as evidenced by suppression of proinflammatory cytokine expression and upregulation of the expression of anti-inflammatory mediators in the kidney at the level of mRNA, including IL-10.

In the current paper, we demonstrate that BMSC-secreted factors are capable of protecting rats from developing severe AKI after cisplatin treatment and can provide a survival benefit without cell transplantation. Compared to vehicle and a mock cell control, we saw a statistically significant survival benefit conferred by BMSC conditioned medium (CM), together with a reduciton of both histological and serum kidney function parameters. In addition, we observed a significant increase in serum IL-10 levels in animals treated with BMSC-CM, and when IL-10 was neutralized using an antibody, the effects of the BMSC-CM were significantly abated. The results of this study clearly indicate that in AKI, the secreted factors alone are sufficient for reduction of injury and prolonged survival.

2. Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Conditioned Medium

BMSCs were isolated, purified, grown, and characterized, and fibroblasts grown as described previously [22, 23]. Briefly, BMSCs were isolated from whole bone marrow (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) by selective adhesion and expanded in colonies for seven days. Colonies were trypsinized and replated for further expansion. Purity of culture (>99%) was determined with flow cytometry (results not shown) by staining BMSCs with BD Pharmingen CD44, CD45, CD29, CD73, CD106, or CD11b antibodies (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). All BMSCs were used at passage 2–5. Fibroblasts were cultured from the cell line PCS-201-012 (ATCC, Manassas, VA). The conditioned medium was collected and concentrated as described previously [24]. Briefly, both cell types (BMSCs and fibroblasts) were grown to 60% confluence, rinsed with PBS twice, and then incubated for 24 hours in the presence of serum-free DMEM containing 0.05% bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The conditioned medium was collected and concentrated using Amicon centrifugal concentrators with a 3 kDa cutoff (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Other than culturing in the presence of different cells, conditioned media from BMSCs and fibroblasts (FBs) were collected and prepared identically. By convention, “1X” refers to the concentration of conditioned medium achieved when 15 mL of conditioning medium was incubated in the presence of cells for 24 hours, collected, and concentrated to a final volume of 1 mL. This preparation was used for both BMSCs and fibroblasts for the purposes of these studies.

2.2. Rat Model of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury and BMSC-CM Treatment

All animal studies were performed in accordance with the animal rights policies of the Massachusetts General Hospital Subcommittee on Research Animal Care. Male SAS-SD rats (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) weighing 275–300 g were given cisplatin (7.5 mg/kg; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in physiological saline via i.p. injection to induce AKI. At various time points after injection, BMSC-CM, FB-CM, physiological saline, or mixtures of BMSC-CM plus anti-rat IL-10Ab (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were administered intravenously via penile vein as treatments for the cisplatin-induced AKI. All BMSC-CM and FB-CM doses consisted of 1 mL of 1X CM per dose, and in all cases, the concentration of IL-10Ab in each dose was 4  g diluted in 1 mL of conditioned medium.

2.3. Tissue Histology and Staining

Rats were anesthetized with isofluorane (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL), and laparotomy was performed to access the abdominal cavity. Euthanasia was performed by severing the abdominal aorta and puncturing the diaphragm. Both kidneys were excised and rinsed with physiological saline before fixation in buffered formaldehyde (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for one week at room temperature. The kidneys were then embedded in paraffin wax and 4 μm sections were created using a microtome. The sections were then analyzed by either (1) staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), (2) TUNEL according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), (3) probed with PCNA antibody as described previously [25], or (4) stained for kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) [26]. All tissues were collected from euthanized animals 5 days following i.p. injection of cisplatin. For the H&E sections, histological scoring was performed on rats subjected to AKI and treated with either saline, BMSC-CM or BMSC-CM + anti-rat IL-10 antibodies, three rats per group, respectively. Three microscopic fields at 40X magnification on a Nikon Optiphot-2 were analyzed per animal for each of three regions of the kidneys, outer cortex (OC), inner cortex (IC), and outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM). Tubular injury was quantified based on observed dilation, loss of brush border, cast, debris, thinning, and cell loss. The quantitative score was based on the following metric: 0 = normal; 1 = 1–25% injury; 2 = 26–50% injury; 3 = 51–75% injury; 4 = 76–100% injury. Apoptosis was quantified by taking the average number of TUNEL positive cells in four fields at 10X of the medulla and cortex of rats subjected to cisplatin AKI and treated with either saline ( ) or BMSC-CM ( ). For the PCNA staining, we used an anti-PCNA clone PC10 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), followed by a secondary sheep anti-mouse (1 : 50; Chemicon, Temecula, CA), and signal development using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). To determine the number of PCNA positive cells per field, representative images were taken at 20X magnification of the kidney samples for each of three animals, 5 images of the medulla and 5 images of the cortex, and the numbers of positive cells per field were counted and tabulated. Kidney injury molecule-1 KIM-1 was stained as described previously [26, 27]. Briefly, 4 μm paraffin sections were rehydrated and KIM-1 was labeled with a goat anti-rat Tim-1/KIM-1 polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The secondary antibody used was donkey anti-goat Biotin-SP-conjugated, and the signal was developed using ABC peroxidase DAB labeling. The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin. For TUNEL, PCNA, and KIM-1 staining, isotype controls were performed, in addition to a healthy kidney control for comparison (results not shown).

2.4. Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Creatinine Measurement

All BUN and creatinine measurements were conducted with blood drawn from the rats and analyzed on a Renal Function Panel according to manufacturer’s instructions (Abaxis, Union City, CA). For BUN and creatinine analysis, all animals were sacrificed five days after i.p. injection of cisplatin and induction of AKI.

2.4.1. IL-10 ELISA

The rat IL-10 ELISA kit used was provided by a commercial vendor and was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (OptEIA ELISA kit; BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Blood was drawn from animals via tail snip on day 3 and sera were analyzed for the presence of IL-10 using this commercial kit. BMSC-CM was also analyzed for IL-10 using the same kit to assess whether the measured IL-10 in the sera of the animals was attributed to the BMSC-CM.

2.4.2. Statistics

Unless otherwise noted, all experiments were repeated in quadruplicate, and all data were assessed for significance using a paired, two-tail Student’s -test. All graphs display the average value of each experimental group with error bars indicating one standard deviation in the spread of the data.

3. Results

3.1. BMSC-CM Attenuates Cisplatin-Induced AKI in Rat

In these studies, we chose to use a cisplatin model of AKI in rats. Cisplatin is used routinely in the clinic as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent and remains the standard of care for many malignancies, including ovarian and cervical cancer, because of its strong therapeutic track record [28, 29]. However, one of the most common and dangerous complications of cisplatin administration is nephrotoxicity [30], which can lead to death with AKI. The primary hypothesis tested was whether BMSC-secreted factors, when used to treat lethal cisplatin administration, could provide the multifactorial support required to protect the kidneys and prevent death by organ failure.

We began our studies by optimizing the cisplatin dose required to induce 75% mortality by two weeks and arrived upon 7.5 mg/kg i.p. [31]. We then determined an effective regimen for treating AKI with BMSC-CM. Previous studies illustrating the kinetics of disease onset demonstrated irreversible damage within the first 72 hours after cisplatin administration [32]. Hence, we chose five time points for repeated i.v. administration of BMSC-CM: 3, 9, 24, 48, and 72 hours after cisplatin was given. This regimen provided a significant survival benefit (Figure 1); compared to controls (FB-CM, ; saline, ), BMSC-CM ( ) improved survival from 25% to 71.4% ( ) [22]. In addition to providing a survival benefit, BMSC-CM also significantly attenuated the severity of cisplatin AKI. When animals were administered the same dose of cisplatin, BUN and creatinine rose dramatically in vehicle-treated rats by day 3 ( ), and continued to climb by day five, indicative of the severity of disease and irreversibility of the injury (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). However, when the animals were treated with BMSC-CM as described above ( ), neither BUN nor creatinine rose dramatically at any point during the first five days after cisplatin administration. This indicated that BMSC-CM prevented extensive injury of the kidneys and preserved enough of the architecture and function of the kidneys such that clearance of BUN and creatinine was not greatly affected.

3.2. BMSC-CM Partially Preserves Histological Integrity of the Kidney in Rats Treated with Cisplatin

From the results of the renal function markers, BUN and creatinine, it seemed likely that the BMSC-CM treatment was protecting the architecture of the kidney, thereby preserving GFR. When the rats were subjected to a lethal dose of cisplatin and then treated with saline ( ), H&E staining of the kidneys revealed cortical damage in the form of collapsed Bowman’s capsule and proximal tubular necrosis, and outer medullary damage in the form of extensive tubular necrosis, deposition of debris and tubule casts, all consistent with cisplatin-mediated AKI (Figure 3). The injury was so severe that upon excision, the kidneys were grossly hemorrhagic and the normal tissue firmness was replaced with softness. The kidneys of the rats administered BMSC-CM ( ), on the other hand, sustained significantly less injury. H&E analysis revealed less tubular necrosis, diminished loss of brush borders, decreased denuding of tubular epithelium, and a reduction in apparent casts or accumulated debris.

We next sought to analyze apoptosis in the kidneys during cisplatin toxicity. TUNEL analysis on day-5 kidney sections revealed extensive apoptotic foci in the medulla of the vehicle-treated kidneys, consistent with injury patterns in the pars recta of the proximal tubule that are precipitated by cisplatin [33] ( , Figure 4(a)). We did not observe significant TUNEL positive staining in the cortex of these animals. The observed medullary apoptosis in the vehicle-treated animals was not present in the BMSC-CM treated animals ( ). Periodic apoptotic cells were observed in the BMSC-CM treated kidneys, but there were approximately 10X more in the vehicle-treated kidneys, indicating far fewer apoptotic events in BMSC-CM-treated kidneys (Figure 4(b)).

We then looked into the prevalence of markers of regeneration in the kidneys to test the hypothesis that BMSC-CM treatment may facilitate regeneration, which could contribute recovery of the animals. PCNA expression was far more extensive in the BMSC-CM treated kidneys ( ) than healthy control kidneys ( ) that only showed scarce PCNA-positive cells (less than one per 10X field on average, data not shown) (Figure 5) [34]. We quantified the number of PCNA positive cells in each 20X field, and found that the extent of positive staining in vehicle-treated kidneys was significantly higher than in BMSC-CM treated kidneys.

3.3. IL-10 Is Important for BMSC-CM Therapy in AKI

Since we saw such a strong response in the rats to BMSC-CM in AKI, we explored mechanistic implications of BMSC-CM therapy, in particular how BMSC-CM might influence the immune state of the animal during AKI. Our previous work revealed that during liver failure, the inflammatory state of rats treated with BMSC-CM was reduced compared to vehicle controls [24]: the vehicle-treated rats developed high systemic levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1ra, and low levels of IL-10, while BMSC-CM treated rats developed high levels of IL-10 and lower levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1ra. In other models as well, IL-10 upregulation has been shown to be a hallmark of BMSC therapy [13, 35], and has been shown to influence the expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 in vitro and in vivo [16, 36]. We evaluated whether BMSC-CM treatment resulted in enhanced IL-10 expression. The serum level of IL-10 in BMSC-CM treated rats ( ) three days after cisplatin administration was significantly higher than that in vehicle controls ( , Figure 6(a)). To confirm that the IL-10 we measured did not arise from the BMSC-CM that we injected, we determined the amount of IL-10 in BMSC-CM. Even though the BMSC-CM was from human cells and the IL-10 we measured in the animals was rat, we nevertheless wanted to confirm there was no cross-reactivity in the ELISA and measured the BMSC-CM independently. We found that the minute positive reactivity of BMSC-CM in the ELISA could not account for the IL-10 seen in the serum (Figure 6(b)).

Finally, to test the extent to which IL-10 may be responsible for the therapeutic effectiveness of the BMSC-CM treatment in AKI, we used the same survival model of cisplatin AKI (7.5 mg/kg) and coadministered BMSC-CM with neutralizing IL-10 antibody at 4 μg per dose. Figure 7 shows the diminished effect of BMSC-CM on the survival of animals when coadministered with neutralizing IL-10 antibody ( ) compared to the survival data presented in Figure 1: fewer animals survived when IL-10 antibody was coadministered with BMSC-CM. It should be noted that when tested for significance using the log rank test, the value of the differences between BMSC-CM versus BMSC-CM with IL-10 antibody were 0.28, suggesting trends rather than significant increases or decreases in survival. Therefore, to further characterize the effect of IL-10 antibody on BMSC-CM administration, H&E histology was performed for the three treatment groups: saline ( ), BMSC-CM, ( ), or BMSC-CM with 4 μg of IL-10 antibody ( ). Staining for the kidney injury marker, KIM-1 and serum analysis of kidney injury markers BUN and creatinine were also performed on the same groups. BUN and creatinine were chosen as common markers of kidney injury, and KIM-1 was chosen as a more specific and sensitive marker of direct kidney injury [27, 37, 38]. H&E highlighted differences between the severity of tissue injury as a result of IL-10 neutralization (Figure 8(a)) and histological scoring revealed a distinction between the kidneys treated with BMSC-CM and those with IL-10 neutralizing antibody (Figure 8(b)). In all groups, the injury to the outer medulla was too severe to see a difference between the treatment arms; however, in the inner and outer cortex, BMSC-CM treated animals exhibited significantly less injury than vehicle-treated and BMSC-CM plus neutralizing IL-10 antibody treated. Supportive of the survival results, the injury evident from H&E staining among the antibody treated animals was as severe as those treated with vehicle. As these results are partially subjective, future studies that quantify the injury more completely might further elucidate the effect of IL-10 neutralization on tissue injury. Nevertheless, these same results were reflected in BUN and creatinine levels (Figure 9) and KIM-1 staining (Figure 10). BMSC-CM treated animals exhibited significantly less BUN and creatinine accumulation and minimal KIM-1-positive staining compared to the marked rise of BUN and creatinine and extensive positive KIM-1 staining of the kidney in vehicle treated and BMSC-CM plus IL-10 antibodies treated groups. Clearly these results support the hypothesis that IL-10 is an important mediator of BMSC-CM therapy and suggest that through IL-10 upregulation, BMSC-CM protects the kidney from injury during AKI.

4. Discussion

We have shown that BMSC-CM alone can provide substantial support in AKI. Several studies have shown that transplanted BMSCs can provide survival benefit in AKI akin to what we observed. In one study, i.v. administration of human BMSCs (  cells/kg) in NOD/SCID mice at 24 hours following lethal cisplatin administration enhanced survival from 0% to 40% [39]. In another, i.p. administration (  cells/kg) was demonstrated to be sufficient for providing survival benefit to NOD/SCID mice, enhancing survival from 10% to 47% [40]. In our study, we used the secreted factors from the equivalent of  cells/kg, which is within the same order-of-magnitude as other work demonstrating i.v. administration of BMSCs, which is why we might expect a similar result in terms of protection during AKI. Nevertheless, this is potentially not a direct comparison as the BMSC-CM consists of secreted factors from only 24 hours of conditioning, compared to permanent engraftment of transplanted BMSCs and continuous secretion of factors over time from the engrafted cells [41]. It should be recognized, however, that in most cases studied, cell survival is very transient.

Our results are consistent with other studies of BMSC-CM in AKI and show for the first time that human BMSC-CM can provide a survival benefit in the context of AKI. Bi and colleagues showed that in addition to BMSC transplantation conferring a survival benefit to mice undergoing cisplatin AKI, mouse BMSC-CM also provided a 60% increase in survival [42]. We observed a marked improvement in survival, which we hypothesize could be attributed to species differences of the CM [11]. However, since the study of Bi et al. was executed differently than ours with a different rodent species, mode of administration of BMSC-CM, treatment regimen, and BMSC-CM harvesting method, it is difficult to compare the results of the studies directly. Also, significant protection against kidney injury has been reported from administration of the ultracentrifuged fraction of BMSC-CM in mice undergoing rhabdomyolytic AKI [18]. The authors present evidence that microvesicles in the ultracentrifuged fraction provide benefit by horizontal gene transfer that is diminished with the coadministration of RNAse. Protection was, evidenced by histology, BUN/creatinine, and electron microscopy. Nevertheless, the authors did not explore whether the ultracentrifuged fraction provides a survival benefit, nor did they report whether the whole conditioned medium can provide a similar or superior benefit. In all, our results here have demonstrated the largest improvement of survival thus far of any BMSC study to our knowledge, and show that the secreted factors alone are sufficient for AKI resolution.

Our previous work has shown that the secreted factors from BMSCs, either administered in the form of conditioned medium (CM) or delivered continuously from an extracorporeal bioreactor, are capable of providing survival benefit to animals undergoing fulminant hepatic failure [22, 24]. We observed reversal of the proinflammatory cytokine profile in these animals, with a marked increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. IL-10 has been implicated in BMSC therapy previously in sepsis [13] and has been cited as one of the more influential factors upregulated during BMSC-mediated T-cell suppression [9, 43]. In sepsis, BMSCs were shown to upregulate IL-10 in macrophages via prostaglandin E2-mediated reprogramming. Others groups have shown that certain factors secreted by BMSCs can directly lead to IL-10 production [12], including TGF-β [44] and IL-6 [45], two proteins that are highly expressed by BMSCs [46, 47]. Clearly there are mechanistic differences that distinguish liver failure and sepsis from AKI, and it was not obvious that the same pattern of cytokine expression would be seen in AKI rats treated with BMSC-CM. Nevertheless, IL-10 has also been shown to be effective as a therapeutic when exogenously delivered to rodents undergoing AKI [48], confirming the important role that IL-10 can play in mitigating the disease. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that we observed upregulation of IL-10, and found that blocking the cytokine caused a decrease in the survival of animals treated with BMSC-CM.

In an effort to leverage what we have learned about BMSC-CM and begin to translate it to clinical use, we have recently been working to scale up the extracorporeal bioreactor we developed to treat fulminant hepatic failure in rodents [22] to accommodate human use during dialysis for AKI [49]. In our studies of hepatic failure, we discovered that continuous delivery of MSC-secreted factors from a bioreactor can provide a superior therapeutic benefit compared to bolus administration of BMSC-CM [22]. This platform might also be applied to existing dialysis circuits to allow for delivery of BMSC-secreted factors directly into the bloodstream of patients with AKI undergoing dialysis. When seeded in the bioreactor, we showed the BMSCs are capable of remaining viable and functional while retaining their undifferentiated phenotype under flow conditions mimetic of clinical operation [49], which suggests that scale-up of the prototype device from our liver failure studies will likely result in a similarly active device for clinical use. The results we report here further support the hypothesis that the secreted factors from BMSCs delivered into the bloodstream of animals suffering from AKI can fundamentally change the outcome of those with AKI.

Future work will be required to fully elucidate the mechanistic details of the phenomena reported here and will be necessary for rigorous comparison with whole cell transplantation. Our experiments have focused on conditioned medium obtained by concentrating BMSC supernatants with a 3 kDa cutoff filter. Small molecule mediators such as prostaglandin-E2 that are likely important for BMSC therapeutic activity were physically excluded in these studies [13, 50]. These and other mediators secreted by BMSCs are likely important for attenuating inflammation as well as providing mitogenic and angiogenic support to restore kidney function, and future efforts to uncover their effects will be informative. We also chose to use human BMSCs to retain relevance to trials with human BMSCs. However, to avoid potential xenogenicity, it may also be informative to repeat these studies with CM from rat BMSCs.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that BMSC-secreted factors, independent of cell transplantation, are capable of stimulating endogenous anti-inflammatory programs via IL-10, leading to a significant survival benefit to rats undergoing cisplatin-induced AKI. These results suggest that the primary mechanism of BMSC therapy is based on the secreted factors of the cells, which should aid in the optimization of proper therapeutic protocols for treatment of AKI patients with BMSCs. It also suggests that alternative approaches to cell transplantation might also prove successful for administering BMSC therapy, including administration of the conditioned medium as a direct injectable, or continuous delivery of these secreted factors from bioreactors into the bloodstream of AKI patients, thereby circumventing potential risks associated with transplantation [51, 52]. In all, these results present a promising and innovative new approach to treating AKI that leverages the natural strengths of the BMSC secretome.


BMSC:Bone marrow stromal cell
IL-10:Interleukin 10
CM:Conditioned medium
PBMC:Peripheral blood mononuclear cell
H&E:Hematoxylin and eosin.

Conflict of Interest

Three of the authors (J. M. Milwid, B. Parekkadan and M. L. Yarmush) are cofounders of Sentien Biotechnologies, Inc. J. V. Bonventre owns equity in Sentien Biotechnologies. T. Ichimura and J. V. Bonventre are coinventors of KIM-1 patents that are assigned to Partners HealthCare and licensed by Partners to Johnson & Johnson, Sekisui Medical, Biogen Idec, and a number of research reagent companies. The other authors do not declare any potential conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

J. M. Milwid conceived the ideas, designed, and executed the experiments, interpreted data, and wrote the paper. T. Ichimura scored the histology and performed KIM-1 staining. M. Li designed and executed the experiments. Y. Jiao designed and executed the experiments. J. Lee assisted in the animal experiments. J. S. Yarmush assisted in analysis of data. B. Parekkadan conceived the ideas, designed, and executed the experiments, interpreted data, wrote the paper, and provided funding. A. W. Tilles conceived the ideas, interpreted data, and reviewed results and the paper. J. V. Bonventre conceived the ideas, reviewed results and the paper. M. L. Yarmush conceived the ideas, reviewed results and the paper, and provided funding.


This work was funded in part by Grant number T32 HG002295 from the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) (J. M. Milwid). This work was also partially supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health: K01DK087770 (B. Parekkadan), R21DK085267 (M. L. Yarmush), DK39773, and DK72381 (J. V. Bonventre) and the Shriners Hospitals for Children (M. L. Yarmush, B. Parekkadan).


The authors would like to acknowledge Patricia Della Pelle for assistance with histology. They would also like to acknowledge David Yarmush and Michael Cima for helpful discussions and insights.


  1. R. W. Schrier and W. Wang, “Acute renal failure and sepsis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 2, pp. 159–169, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. M. Chertow, E. Burdick, M. Honour, J. V. Bonventre, and D. W. Bates, “Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3365–3370, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. V. Bonventre, “Mechanisms of acute kidney injury and repair,” in Management of Acute Kidney Problems, A. Jörres, C. Ronco, and J. A. Kellum, Eds., pp. 13–20, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  4. J. V. Bonventre, “Dialysis in acute kidney injury—more is not better,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 1, pp. 82–84, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. G. Brivet, D. J. Kleinknecht, P. Loirat, and P. J. M. Landais, “Acute renal failure in intensive care units—causes, outcome, and prognostic factors of hospital mortality: a prospective, multicenter study,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 192–198, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. M. Palevsky, J. H. Zhang, T. Z. O'Connor et al., “Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 1, pp. 7–20, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Kyung Jo, M. H. Rosner, and M. D. Okusa, “Pharmacologic treatment of acute kidney injury: why drugs haven't worked and what is on the horizon,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 356–365, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. E. Tögel and C. Westenfelder, “Mesenchymal stem cells: a new therapeutic tool for AKI,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 179–183, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Aggarwal and M. F. Pittenger, “Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1815–1822, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. Uccelli, L. Moretta, and V. Pistoia, “Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 726–736, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Chamberlain, J. Fox, B. Ashton, and J. Middleton, “Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2739–2749, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Pittenger, “Sleuthing the source of regeneration by MSCs,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 8–10, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Németh, A. Leelahavanichkul, P. S. T. Yuen et al., “Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E 2-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 42–49, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. van Poll , B. Parekkadan, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for protection and repair of injured vital organs,” Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  15. H. Yagi, B. Parekkadan, K. Suganuma et al., “Long-term superior performance of a stem cell/hepatocyte device for the treatment of acute liver failure,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3377–3388, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. Tögel, Z. Hu, K. Weiss, J. Isaac, C. Lange, and C. Westenfelder, “Administered mesenchymal stem cells protect against ischemic acute renal failure through differentiation-independent mechanisms,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 289, no. 1, pp. F31–F42, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Tögel, K. Weiss, Y. Yang, Z. Hu, P. Zhang, and C. Westenfelder, “Vasculotropic, paracrine actions of infused mesenchymal stem cells are important to the recovery from acute kidney injury,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 292, no. 5, pp. F1626–F1635, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Bruno, C. Grange, M. C. Deregibus et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles protect against acute tubular injury,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1053–1067, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. S. Duffield, K. M. Park, L.-L. Hsiao et al., “Restoration of tubular epithelial cells during repair of the postischemic kidney occurs independently of bone marrow-derived stem cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 1743–1755, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. H. Lee, A. A. Pulin, M. J. Seo et al., “Intravenous hMSCs improve myocardial infarction in mice because cells embolized in lung are activated to secrete the anti-inflammatory protein TSG-6,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–63, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Zangi, R. Margalit, S. Reich-Zeliger et al., “Direct imaging of immune rejection and memory induction by allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2865–2874, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Parekkadan, D. Van Poll, K. Suganuma et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived molecules reverse fulminant hepatic failure,” PLoS ONE, vol. 2, no. 9, article e941, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Jiao, J. M. Milwid, and M. L. Yarmush, “A mesenchymal stem cell potency assay,” in Suppression and Regulation of Immune Responses, M. Cuturi and I. Anegon, Eds., Humana Press and Springer, Totowa, NJ, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. Van Poll, B. Parekkadan, C. H. Cho et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived molecules directly modulate hepatocellular death and regeneration in vitro and in vivo,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1634–1643, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Tao, J. Kim, R. W. Schrier, and C. L. Edelstein, “Rapamycin markedly slows disease progression in a rat model of polycystic kidney disease,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. T. Ichimura, E. J. P. V. Asseldonk, B. D. Humphreys, L. Gunaratnam, J. S. Duffield, and J. V. Bonventre, “Kidney injury molecule-1 is a phosphatidylserine receptor that confers a phagocytic phenotype on epithelial cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 1657–1668, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Ichimura, J. V. Bonventre, V. Bailly et al., “Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), a putative epithelial cell adhesion molecule containing a novel immunoglobulin domain, is up-regulated in renal cells after injury,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 7, pp. 4135–4142, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. McNeil, “New standard of care for cervical cancer sets stage for next questions,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 500–501, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  29. J. P. Neijt, S. A. Engelholm, M. K. Tuxen et al., “Exploratory phase III study of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 17, pp. 3084–3092, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  30. R. E. Wittes, F. Brescia, and C. W. Young, “Combination chemotherapy with cis diamminedichloroplatinum (II) and bleomycin in tumors of the head and neck,” Oncology, vol. 32, no. 5-6, pp. 202–207, 1975. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. F. Borch and M. E. Pleasants, “Inhibition of cis-platinum nephrotoxicity by diethyldithiocarbamate rescue in a rat model,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 6611–6614, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  32. K. J. Kelly, S. M. Meehan, R. B. Colvin, W. W. Williams, and J. V. Bonventre, “Protection from toxicant-mediated renal injury in the rat with anti-CD54 antibody,” Kidney International, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 922–931, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. P. Fillastre and G. Raguenez-Viotte, “Cisplatin nephrotoxicity,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 46, no. 1–3, pp. 163–175, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. Vogetseder, A. Karadeniz, B. Kaissling, and M. L. Hir, “Tubular cell proliferation in the healthy rat kidney,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Maggini, G. Mirkin, I. Bognanni et al., “Mouse bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells turn activated macrophages into a regulatory-like profile,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e9252, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. De Waal Malefyt, J. Abrams, B. Bennett, C. G. Figdor, and J. E. De Vries, “Interleukin 10(IL-10) inhibits cytokine synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 174, no. 5, pp. 1209–1220, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  37. T. Ichimura, C. C. Hung, S. A. Yang, J. L. Stevens, and J. V. Bonventre, “Kidney injury molecule-1: a tissue and urinary biomarker for nephrotoxicant-induced renal injury,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 286, no. 3, pp. F552–F563, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  38. J. V. Bonventre, “Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1): a urinary biomarker and much more,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 3265–3268, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Morigi, M. Introna, B. Imberti et al., “Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells accelerate recovery of acute renal injury and prolong survival in mice,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2075–2082, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Eliopoulos, J. Zhao, M. Bouchentouf et al., “Human marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells decrease cisplatin renotoxicity in vitro and in vivo and enhance survival of mice post-intraperitoneal injection,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 299, no. 6, pp. F1288–F1298, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. B. Parekkadan and J. M. Milwid, “Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 87–117, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Bi, R. Schmitt, M. Israilova, H. Nishio, and L. G. Cantley, “Stromal cells protect against acute tubular injury via an endocrine effect,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2486–2496, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Nasef, A. Chapel, C. Mazurier et al., “Identification of IL-10 and TGF-β transcripts involved in the inhibition of T-lymphocyte proliferation during cell contact with human mesenchymal stem cells,” Gene Expression, vol. 13, no. 4-5, pp. 217–226, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  44. H. Maeda, H. Kuwahara, Y. Ichimura, M. Ohtsuki, S. Kurakata, and A. Shiraishi, “TGF-β enhances macrophage ability to produce IL-10 in normal and tumor- bearing mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 155, no. 10, pp. 4926–4932, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. J. McGeachy, K. S. Bak-Jensen, Y. Chen et al., “TGF-β and IL-6 drive the production of IL-17 and IL-10 by T cells and restrain TH-17 cell-mediated pathology,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1390–1397, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. E. Haynesworth, M. A. Baber, and A. I. Caplan, “Cytokine expression by human marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells in vitro: effects of dexamethasone and IL-1α,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 585–592, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. D. Nicola, C. Carlo-Stella, M. Magni et al., “Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli,” Blood, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 3838–3843, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Deng, Y. Kohda, H. Chiao et al., “Interleukin-10 inhibits ischemic and cisplatin-induced acute renal injury,” Kidney International, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2118–2128, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Li, A. W. Tilles, J. M. Milwid et al., “Phenotypic and functional characterization of human bone marrow stromal cells in hollow-fibre bioreactors,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 369–377, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. M. Spaggiari, A. Capobianco, H. Abdelrazik, F. Becchetti, M. C. Mingari, and L. Moretta, “Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit natural killer-cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production: role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and prostaglandin E2,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 1327–1333, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. U. Kunter, S. Rong, P. Boor et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells prevent progressive experimental renal failure but maldifferentiate into glomerular adipocytes,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1754–1764, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. Aguilar, E. Nye, J. Chan et al., “Murine but not human mesenchymal stem cells generate osteosarcoma-like lesions in the lung,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1586–1594, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Jack M. Milwid et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.