Stem Cell Differentiation and Therapeutic UseView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Amy L. Strong, Jeffrey M. Gimble, Bruce A. Bunnell, "Analysis of the Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines Secreted by Adult Stem Cells during Differentiation", Stem Cells International, vol. 2015, Article ID 412467, 12 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/412467
Analysis of the Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines Secreted by Adult Stem Cells during Differentiation
Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) are adult stem cells that have the potential to differentiate into mesenchymal lineage cells. The abundance of ASCs in adipose tissue and easy accessibility with relatively little donor site morbidity make them attractive candidate cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. However, the underlying inflammatory process that occurs during ASC differentiation into adipocytes and osteoblast has not been extensively investigated. ASCs cultured in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation medium were characterized by oil red o staining and alizarin red staining, respectively. ASCs undergoing osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation were isolated on days 7, 14, and 21 and assessed by qRT-PCR for the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. ASCs undergoing osteogenic differentiation expressed a distinct panel of cytokines that differed from the cytokine profile of ASCs undergoing adipogenic differentiation at each of the time points analyzed. Mapping the cytokine expression profile during ASC differentiation will provide insight into the role of inflammation in this process and identify potential targets that may aid in enhancing osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation for the purposes of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) are adult stem cells with multipotential differentiation capacity. The ability for ASCs to differentiate along osteogenic and adipogenic lineage cells makes them ideal candidates for regenerative medicine [1, 2]. Furthermore, the abundance and easy accessibility in harvesting large volumes of adipose tissues allow for large-scale expansion of ASCs for therapeutic purposes [3, 4].
The osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of ASCs has been shown to require the activation of key transcriptional factors that govern cell fate. RUNX2 has previously been shown to be a master regulator of osteoblast differentiation, as RUNX2 activates and regulates many osteogenic signaling pathways, including but not limited to transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), Wingless type Wnt, and Hedgehog [5, 6]. ASCs cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium have also been shown to upregulate a key osteogenic factor dickkopf Wnt signaling pathway inhibitor 1 (DKK-1), as early as one day. Additional osteogenic transcriptional factors (connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFR-β), TGF-β, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and tenascin C (TNC)) were induced after 7 days in osteogenic differentiation medium . In contrast, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is principally regarded as the master regulator of adipogenesis, since no factor can rescue adipocyte formation when PPARγ is knocked out . Induction of CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBPβ, C/EBPδ) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARδ) expression occurs during early adipogenic differentiation, while fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4), C/EBPα, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), leptin, and glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) expression is upregulated during late adipogenic differentiation [9, 10].
While many studies have explored the mechanism(s) governing ASC differentiation, few studies have investigated the associated expression of inflammatory gene expression that occurs during the differentiation of these cells. The expression profile of mRNA encoding these inflammatory cytokines may provide information regarding the mechanism governing ASC differentiation. Herein, ASCs were induced to differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lineage cells and assessed by qRT-PCR for the expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. These studies demonstrated a systemic and robust upregulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines that was time-dependent. These studies demonstrated the plasticity of ASCs and identified inflammatory cytokines secreted at different stages of differentiation that may govern the ultimate cell fate of ASCs.
2. Materials and Methods
Anti-CD45-PeCy7, anti-CD11b-PeCy5, anti-CD166-phycoerythrin (PE), anti-CD105-PE, anti-CD90-PeCy5, anti-CD34-PE, isotype control fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) human IgG1, and isotype-control PE human IgG2a were purchased from Beckman Coulter (Indianapolis, IN). Anti-CD44-allophycocyanin (APC) was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Type 1 collagenase, bovine serum albumin (BSA, fraction V), calcium chloride, cetylpyridinum chloride (CPC) dexamethasone, isobuytlmethylxanthine, indomethacin, ascorbate 2-phosphate, β-glycerol phosphate, alizarin red s, and oil red o were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
2.2. Human Subjects
Primary human ASCs were obtained from subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue of 3 Caucasian females (mean age and mean body mass index ) undergoing elective liposuction. Tissues were obtained with written informed consent under a protocol reviewed and approved by the Pennington Biomedical (Baton Rouge, LA) Institutional Review Board. Lipoaspirates were processed by incubating tissue in 0.1% type I collagenase and 1% BSA dissolved in 100 mL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 2 mM calcium chloride. The mixture was placed in a 37°C shaking water bath at 75 rpm for 60 min and then centrifuged to remove oil, fat, primary adipocytes, and collagenase solution, leaving behind a pellet of cells. Cells were resuspended in medium, which consisted of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone; Logan, UT), plated on 150 cm2 culture dishes (NUNC, Rochester, NY) and maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. Fresh medium was added every 2-3 days until cells achieved 80–90% confluence and were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA (Life Technologies) and cryopreserved prior to experimental use.
2.3. Cell Culture
Frozen vials of approximately 106 ASCs were thawed, plated onto 150 cm2 culture dishes in 20 mL complete culture medium (CCM), which consisted of α-MEM (Life Technologies), 20% FBS (Atlanta Biologicals, Duluth, GA), 1% L-glutamine (Life Technologies), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies), and incubated at 37°C with 5% humidified CO2. After 24 hours, medium was removed and adherent viable cells were washed with PBS, harvested with 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA, and replated at 100 cells per cm2 in CCM. Medium was replaced every 3-4 days. For all experiments, cells between passages 2 and 6 were used.
2.4. Flow Cytometry
ASCs were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA for 3-4 minutes at 37°C. A total of 3 × 105 cells were suspended in 50 μL PBS and incubated with fluorescence-labeled antibodies. The samples were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature and washed with PBS. The samples were then analyzed with Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) running Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter). To assay cells by forward and side scatter, FACScan was standardized with microbeads (Dynosphere uniform microspheres; Bangs Laboratories Inc.; Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA). At least 10,000 events were analyzed and compared with isotype controls.
2.5. Colony Forming Unit Assay
ASCs were plated at a density of 100 cells on a 10 cm2 plate (NUNC) in CCM and incubated for 14 days. Plates were then rinsed with PBS and stained with 3% crystal violet (Sigma) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Plates were washed with PBS and once with tap water. Colonies that were larger than 2 mm in diameter were counted.
2.6. Differentiation Protocols
Osteogenic Differentiation. ASCs were cultured in six-well plates (NUNC) in CCM until 70% confluence. Medium was replaced with fresh osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM) consisting of 50 μM ascorbate 2-phosphate, 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate, and 10 nM dexamethasone. After 14 days, cells were fixed in 10% formalin for 1 hour, washed with distilled water, and stained with 1% alizarin red (pH 4.1) to visualize calcium deposition in the extracellular matrix. Images were acquired at 4x magnification on an Eclipse TE200 (Nikon, Melville, NY) with Digital Camera DXM1200F (Nikon) using ACT-1 software (Nikon). For quantification, alizarin red was extracted from each well with 10% CPC and read at 584 nm (FLUOstar optima). Protein extraction with RIPA buffer (Pierce; Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA) and protein quantification with the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific) were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were normalized to the amount of protein in each sample.
Adipogenic Differentiation. ASCs were cultured in six-well plates in CCM until cells achieved 70% confluence. Medium was replaced with fresh adipogenic differentiation medium (ADM) consisting of CCM supplemented with 0.5 μM dexamethasone, 0.5 mM isobuytlmethylxanthine, and 50 μM indomethacin. After 14 days, cells in ADM were fixed in 10% formalin for 1 hour and stained with oil red o, composed of 2 parts PBS and 3 parts 0.5% oil red o stock solution to visualize neutral lipids. Images were acquired at 10x magnification. For quantification, oil red o was extracted from each well with isopropanol and read at 544 nm (FLUOstar optima). Protein was isolated with RIPA buffer (Pierce; Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA) and quantified with the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific) for normalization.
2.7. RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis
Cells were cultured in CCM, ODM, or ADM and collected after 7, 14, and 21 days. Total RNA was extracted from ASCs using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), purified with DNase I digestion (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and reverse transcribed using the SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen) containing random primers. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the EXPRESS SYBR GreenER qPCR SuperMix Kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forward and reverse primer sequences can be found in Table 1. All qRT-PCR primers were designed using Primer3 (Boston, MA) and purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). The expression of human β-actin was used to normalize mRNA content. Samples were tested in triplicate. No-template controls and no-reverse transcription controls were included in each PCR run.
3.1. Characterization of ASCs
ASCs were isolated from processed lipoaspirates harvested from subcutaneous adipose tissue and characterized based on differentiation potential, self-renewal capacity, and cell surface marker profile. ASCs were able to differentiate into osteoblast and adipocytes when induced with ODM and ADM, respectively (Figure 1(a)). ASCs seeded at low density were able to generate colony-forming units (Figure 1(b)). Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that ASCs were negative for CD34, CD45, and CD11b expression and positive for CD44, CD90, CD105, and CD166 expression (Figure 1(c)).
3.2. Expression of Proinflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines during Osteogenic Differentiation of ASCs Is Time Dependent
ASCs at passage 2 were expanded in CCM until confluent and cultured in ODM. At 7, 14, and 21 days of culture, cells were harvested and the mRNA expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines was assessed in comparison to undifferentiated ASCs. ASCs induced with ODM demonstrated an increase in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 (IL-1; 223.3-fold, ), interleukin-6 (IL-6; 187.3-fold, ), interleukin-12 (IL-12; 39.8-fold, ), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1; 36.7-fold, ), and interferon gamma (IFN-γ; 21.5-fold, ) during the early stages of osteogenic differentiation (day 7), and their expression diminished during the mid and late stages of differentiation (Figure 2(a)). Early and mid stages of osteogenic differentiation of ASCs demonstrated an increase in chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 8 (CCL8; 214.4-fold on day 7 and 192.5-fold on day 14, ) and C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10; 264.5-fold on day 7 and 423.9-fold on day 14, ) expression, which decreased by day 21 (day 21; Figure 2(b)). In contrast, mRNA expression of several proinflammatory cytokines demonstrated a biphasic increase on day 7 and day 21, with minimal induction on day 14: granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mRNA expression was increased by 5507.2-fold and 10381.3-fold, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-) was increased by 119.8-fold and 184.1-fold, interleukin-8 (IL-8) was increased by 2915.0-fold and 2888.3-fold, and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) was increased by 101.1-fold and 43.6-fold on day 7 and day 21, respectively (Figure 2(c)).
The expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines was also assessed during osteogenic differentiation. Of the 14 anti-inflammatory cytokines assessed, seven genes were significantly upregulated in ASCs following culture in ODM for 7 days, which diminished by days 14 and 21 after induction. Increased expression of interleukin-10 (IL-10; 122.8-fold, ), interleukin-13 (IL-13; 59.8-fold, ), interleukin-18 binding protein (IL-18BP; 38.9-fold, ), interleukin-35 (IL-35; 102.7-fold, ), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2; 161.2-fold, ), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2; 614.4-fold, ), and stanniocalcin 1 (STC-1; 230.8-fold, , Figure 3(a)) was observed. In contrast, ASCs cultured in ODM for 7 and 14 days demonstrated a sustained increase in the expression of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA; 2617.7-fold on day 7 and 3024.7-fold on day 14, ) and tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene 6 (TSG-6; 51.2-fold on day 7 and 65.2-fold on day 14, ; Figure 3(b)). Cells cultured in ODM demonstrated a biphasic induction in mRNA expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-11 (IL-11; 4.5-fold on day 7 and 22.9-fold on day 21, ), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member (TNFRSF1A; 4.5-fold on day 7 and 3.5-fold on day 21, ), prostaglandin E synthase 2 (PTGES2; 5.7-fold on day 7 and 5.5-fold on day 21, ), and TGF-β (17.0-fold on day 7 and 28.0-fold on day 21, ; Figure 3(c)). In contrast, mRNA expression of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was reduced by −2.9-fold, −50.0-fold, and −7.1-fold on days 7, 14, and 21, respectively (; Figure 3(d)).
3.3. Proinflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression during Adipogenic Differentiation of ASCs Vary
ASCs were expanded in CCM until confluent at which time ADM was added to the cells. Again, at 7, 14, and 21 days, cells were harvested and the mRNA expression of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines was assessed relative to naive ASCs. ASCs induced with ADM for 7 days and 14 days demonstrated an increase in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-12 (223.3-fold on day 7 and 4.3-fold on day 14, ), interleukin-17 (IL-17; 69.8-fold on day 7 and 11.9-fold on day 14, ), and ICAM-1 (8.4-fold on day 7 and 2.6-fold on day 14, , Figure 4(a)). In contrast, several proinflammatory cytokines demonstrated the highest levels of mRNA expression on day 21: mRNA levels for IL-6 were increased by 9.4-fold, IL-8 was increased by 929.5-fold, G-CSF was increased by 559.4-fold, CCL8 was increased by 163.8-fold, CXCL10 was increased by 43.9-fold, and TNF-α was increased by 139.5-fold (Figure 4(b), ). In contrast, the mRNA expression of several proinflammatory cytokines was significantly reduced during adipogenic differentiation of ASCs: IL-1 (−4.2-fold on day 14 and −2.4-fold on day 21, ), LIF (−5.8-fold on day 14, ), and IFN- (−5.0-fold on day 14 and −3.6-fold on day 21, ).
The analysis of anti-inflammatory cytokines expressed during adipogenic differentiation demonstrated significant differences in induction level that was time dependent. ADM increased gene expression of IL-1RA (1082.6-fold, ), IL-13 (14.9-fold, ), IL-18BP (10.2-fold, ), CCL2 (20.8-fold, ), and COX2 (4.8-fold, ) on day 7 (Figure 5(a)). In contrast, the mRNA expression of STC-1 and TSG6 was most significantly increased by 123.6-fold and 8.4-fold, respectively, on day 14 (, Figure 5(b)). Adipogenic differentiation of ASCs resulted in the most robust induction of IL-10 (8.8-fold, ), IL-35 (40.1-fold, ), TNFRSF1A (5.0-fold, ), PTGES2 (4.6-fold, ), and TGF-β (16.7-fold, , Figure 5(c)) on day 21. IL-11 and HGF mRNA expression were most significantly reduced on day 14 by −33.3-fold and −14.3-fold, respectively (, Figure 5(d)).
The interest in ASCs for tissue engineering purposes and regenerative medicine has grown significantly due to their accessibility, abundance, and capacity to differentiate into mesenchymal lineage cells. While studies have begun to investigate the mechanism by which ASCs differentiate into adipogenic or osteogenic lineage cells, the precise role of inflammatory cytokines has not been explored extensively. The mRNA levels of many pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines expressed by ASCs during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiations were assessed. ASCs undergoing osteogenic differentiation expressed a distinct panel of cytokines that differed from the cytokine profile of ASCs undergoing adipogenic differentiation at each of the time intervals analyzed.
A quantitative comparison of the proinflammatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory cytokines expressed during osteogenic differentiation of ASCs demonstrates three distinct groups of cytokines. These groups of cytokines are categorized based on their induction at early, mid, and late stages of osteogenic differentiation (Figure 6). While the current study investigated the inflammatory cytokines secreted during the osteogenic differentiation of these cells in a cocktail of growth factors, others have taken the approach of treating progenitor cells with a similar cocktail of growth factors and supplemented the medium with additional inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF- and IL-1 [11–14]. Most of these studies were conducted in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), which are derived from the mesodermal lineage and have a similar differentiation potential as ASCs. Human BMSCs treated with TNF-α resulted in the activation of NF-B, leading to increased mineralization and enhanced expression of osteogenic proteins, such as BMP2 and alkaline phosphatase, and transcription factors such as RUNX2 and Osterix [11, 12]. Human BMSCs treated with IL-1, likewise, enhanced differentiation into osteoblasts through the Wnt-5a/receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 pathway . Ferreira et al. found that IL-1 also enhanced mineralization through both nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated cells (NF-B) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways . The results presented in the current study are consistent with previously published reports showing an upregulation of TNF- and IL-1 during differentiation. The present study supplements the current body of literature and highlights specific inflammatory factors that should be investigated further based on their induction during osteogenic differentiation. Additional studies, however, are necessary to elucidate the precise mechanism by which these cytokines effect osteogenic differentiation.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the effects of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines on osteogenesis might be determined by the physical location. For instance, cytokines have been shown to contribute to a decrease in bone mineral density by inhibiting osteoblast proliferation and differentiation and enhancing the rate of osteoclast differentiation in patients with severe inflammatory disease [15, 16]. Thus, patients diagnosed with such diseases as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis have a higher incidence of osteoporosis [15, 16]. In contrast, inflammatory cytokines are strongly suspected to induce ectopic bone formation, for instance, in arteries during atherosclerosis or in postburn heterotopic ossification [17, 18]. Consistent with these observations, anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of ectopic bone formation .
With respect to adipogenesis, the current study demonstrated a time-dependent expression of cytokines in ASCs during adipogenic differentiation (Figure 6). While limited studies have been conducted on the cytokine profile of ASCs undergoing adipogenic differentiation, it has been previously shown that cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF- have the ability to inhibit adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs. PPAR is suppressed by IL-1 and TNF-, and this suppression is mediated through NF-B . In the context of obesity, increased proinflammatory cytokines are secreted by the adipose tissue due to tissue hypoxia that results from hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adipocytes . Based on previous reports, this increase in proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1 and TNF-, should result in decreased adipogenesis. However, due to the obesity-associated dysregulation of adipocytes and ASCs, these cells no longer respond to these cytokines properly . Thus, the increase in IL-1 and TNF-α does not inhibit adipogenesis. Additional studies focusing on the impact of other pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines on adipogenesis will shed light on ASC differentiation for the purposes of soft tissue reconstruction. Furthermore, they may provide insight into what other factors mediate adipogenesis in the context of obesity.
The osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of ASCs alter the expression of an array of cytokines. The levels of induction of these pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines are dependent on the stage (early, middle, or late) and type (osteogenic or adipogenic) of differentiation. The data presented here provides a framework for understanding the role that cytokine expression may play in tissue engineering projects using ASCs. By understanding which cytokines are upregulated during osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation, it will be possible to specifically target these molecules to enhance osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation for soft tissue defects or bone defects. Furthermore, paracrine expression of these cytokines by differentiating ASCs may change the local environment. By understanding the local environment produced by differentiation ASCs, we will also be better equipped to assess the engraftment and survival of tissue engineered constructs prepared with ASCs.
|ADM:||Adipogenic differentiation medium|
|ASCs:||Adipose-derived stromal/stem cells|
|BSA:||Bovine serum albumin|
|BMP:||Bone morphogenic protein|
|C/EBPα:||CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins alpha|
|C/EBPβ:||CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins beta|
|C/EBPδ:||CCAAT-enhancer-binding proteins delta|
|CCL2:||Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2|
|CCL8:||Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 8|
|CCM:||Complete culture medium|
|CTGF:||Connective tissue growth factor|
|CXCL10:||C-X-C motif chemokine 10|
|DKK-1:||Dickkopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor 1|
|DMEM/F-12:||Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12|
|FABP4:||Fatty acid binding protein 4|
|FBS:||Fetal bovine serum|
|G-CSF:||Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor|
|GLUT4:||Glucose transporter 4|
|HGF:||Hepatocyte growth factor|
|IGFBP3:||Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3|
|ICAM-1:||Intercellular adhesion molecule 1|
|IL-1RA:||Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist|
|IL-18BP:||Interleukin-18 binding protein|
|LIF:||Leukemia inhibitory factor|
|MAPK:||Mitogen-activated protein kinase|
|NF-B:||Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells|
|ODM:||Osteogenic differentiation medium|
|PBS:||Phosphate buffered saline|
|PDGFR-β:||Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta|
|PPARδ:||Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta|
|PPARγ:||Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma|
|PTGES2:||Prostaglandin E synthase 2|
|RUNX2:||Runt-related transcription factor 2|
|TGF-β:||Transforming growth factor beta|
|TNF-α:||Tumor necrosis factor alpha|
|TNFRSF1A:||Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A|
|TSG-6:||Tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene 6|
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
- M. Vallée, J.-F. Côté, and J. Fradette, “Adipose-tissue engineering: taking advantage of the properties of human adipose-derived stem/stromal cells,” Pathologie Biologie, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 2009.
- M. Vermette, V. Trottier, V. Ménard, L. Saint-Pierre, A. Roy, and J. Fradette, “Production of a new tissue-engineered adipose substitute from human adipose-derived stromal cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 2850–2860, 2007.
- B. A. Bunnell, M. Flaat, C. Gagliardi, B. Patel, and C. Ripoll, “Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation,” Methods, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 2008.
- J. M. Gimble, A. J. Katz, and B. A. Bunnell, “Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 1249–1260, 2007.
- T. Komori, “Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by transcription factors,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1233–1239, 2006.
- J. Pratap, J. J. Wixted, T. Gaur et al., “Runx2 transcriptional activation of Indian Hedgehog and a downstream bone metastatic pathway in breast cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 19, pp. 7795–7802, 2008.
- J. Lee, D. Gupta, N. J. Panetta et al., “Elucidating mechanisms of osteogenesis in human adipose-derived stromal cells via microarray analysis,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1136–1141, 2010.
- S. R. Farmer, “Transcriptional control of adipocyte formation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 263–273, 2006.
- P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, P. Ashjian et al., “Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 4279–4295, 2002.
- A.-M. Rodriguez, C. Elabd, E.-Z. Amri, G. Ailhaud, and C. Dani, “The human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells,” Biochimie, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 125–128, 2005.
- K. Hess, A. Ushmorov, J. Fiedler, R. E. Brenner, and T. Wirth, “TNFα promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by triggering the NF-κB signaling pathway,” Bone, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 367–376, 2009.
- B. Osta, F. Lavocat, A. Eljaafari, and P. Miossec, “Effects of interleukin-17A on osteogenic differentiation of isolated human mesenchymal stem cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, p. 425, 2014.
- K. Sonomoto, K. Yamaoka, K. Oshita et al., “Interleukin-1β induces differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts via the wnt-5a/receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 pathway,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 3355–3363, 2012.
- E. Ferreira, R. M. Porter, N. Wehling et al., “Inflammatory cytokines induce a unique mineralizing phenotype in mesenchymal stem cells derived from human bone marrow,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 41, pp. 29494–29505, 2013.
- G. R. Mundy, “Osteoporosis and inflammation,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. S147–S151, 2007.
- A. Neve, A. Corrado, and F. P. Cantatore, “Osteoblast physiology in normal and pathological conditions,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 343, no. 2, pp. 289–302, 2011.
- J.-S. Shao, S.-L. Cheng, J. Sadhu, and D. A. Towler, “Inflammation and the osteogenic regulation of vascular calcification: a review and perspective,” Hypertension, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 579–592, 2010.
- J. A. Forsberg, B. K. Potter, E. M. Polfer, S. D. Safford, and E. A. Elster, “Do inflammatory markers portend heterotopic ossification and wound failure in combat wounds?” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 472, pp. 2845–2854, 2014.
- J. R. Peterson, S. de la Rosa, O. Eboda et al., “Treatment of heterotopic ossification through remote ATP hydrolysis,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 255, p. 255ra132, 2014.
- M. Suzawa, I. Takada, J. Yanagisawa et al., “Cytokines suppress adipogenesis and PPAR-γ function through the TAK1/TAB1/NIK cascade,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 224–230, 2003.
- P. Trayhurn, “Hypoxia and adipose tissue function and dysfunction in obesity,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2013.
- A. Iyer, D. P. Fairlie, J. B. Prins, B. D. Hammock, and L. Brown, “Inflammatory lipid mediators in adipocyte function and obesity,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 71–82, 2010.
Copyright © 2015 Amy L. Strong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.