Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stem Cells International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5215824, 2 pages

The Current State of Cell Therapies for Cerebrovascular Diseases

1Institute of Clinical Medicine-Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
2Neurology, Neurocenter, University Hospital of Kuopio, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
3Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
4D’Or Institute of Research and Education, 22281-100 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
5Fraunhofer Research Institution for Marine Biotechnology, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
6Institute for Medical and Marine Biotechnology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
7Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
8Department of Radiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Received 19 August 2016; Accepted 21 August 2016

Copyright © 2016 Jukka Jolkkonen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Although cerebrovascular diseases are among the leading causes of health burden in the world, presently existing therapies have narrow capabilities in the treatment of such ailments [1, 2]. Cell therapies were originally used in hematological disorders and are currently being investigated as potential treatments for diverse conditions [3, 4]. Several preclinical reports have indicated that cell transplantation may generate beneficial functional and structural outcomes in stroke animals, even though the underlying mechanisms for such effects are still the subject of intensive research [57]. In the clinical setting, preliminary studies have been published indicating a good safety profile of systemic cell therapies, but additional trials are needed to assess the possible feasibility and efficacy of cell transplantation in cerebrovascular patients [5, 8, 9]. Furthermore, there are numerous obstacles to be tackled in order to thoroughly translate results from animal studies to patients [5, 8, 9].

This special issue includes reviews that provide insights into the current state of the art in cell therapies for cerebrovascular diseases. In one of the reviews, A. Nowakowski et al. discuss genetic engineering methods to improve the migration and survival of mesenchymal stem cells. In another review, L. S. B. Boisserand et al. debate the diverse uses and the physical and mechanical characteristics of biomaterials associated with cell transplantation in experimental ischemic stroke. In another review, P. H. Rosado-de-Castro et al. analyze characteristics of preclinical and clinical studies of bone marrow-derived cell therapy for hemorrhagic stroke models, such as cell dose, routes of cell delivery, and time window.

This special issue also features original articles investigating different aspects being of direct translational relevance for the study of cell transplantation in cerebrovascular lesions. L. Cui et al. conducted a flow cytometry-based pulse-width test to evaluate the consequences of diverse cell suspension concentrations, storage mediums, storage times, and freeze-thawing technique on the clumping of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, as well as cell viability. Unexpectedly, they found that increased cell concentrations did not lead to increased clumping in vitro. They also reported that fresh cells in normal saline had higher viability and less clumping than frozen-thawed cells.

A. Pikhovych et al. investigated the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the brain of mice. They reported that multisession anodal tDCS at low charge density downregulated cortical microglial constitutive expression of Iba1. On the other hand, anodal and cathodal tDCS increased neurogenesis in the subventricular zone.

B. Yang et al. investigated the influence of cryopreserving bone marrow mononuclear cells on their viability and on their effects in mice after middle cerebral artery occlusion. They reported that although cryopreservation had a negative impact on cell viability, both fresh and cryopreserved mononuclear cells had comparable behavioral and histological effects on the animal stroke model.

F. Moniche et al. carried out pooling data evaluation of two pilot clinical studies with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNC) therapy in ischemic stroke subjects. They found a correlation between higher dose of BM-MNCs and better outcome as assessed by modified Rankin scale score of 0–2 at 6 months, mainly when more than 310 × 106 cells were transplanted.

Finally, W.-H. Fang et al. characterized uptake and release of a p5-CDK5 inhibitory peptide by human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. They reported that the peptide was capable of blocking the CDK5 pathway, associated with apoptosis, indicating potential application for cell therapies after stroke.

In summary, significant findings have been made in cell therapy research for cerebrovascular diseases and the reviews and original articles in this special issue highlight developments and challenges for translation of such promising therapies into the clinic.

Jukka Jolkkonen
Rosalia Mendez-Otero
Gabriel Rodriguez de Freitas
Johannes Boltze
Paulo Henrique Rosado-de-Castro


  1. R. Lozano, M. Naghavi, K. Foreman et al., “Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9859, pp. 2095–2128, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. V. L. Feigin, M. H. Forouzanfar, R. Krishnamurthi et al., “Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9913, pp. 245–254, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. K. Burt, Y. Loh, W. Pearce et al., “Clinical applications of blood-derived and marrow-derived stem cells for nonmalignant diseases,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 299, no. 8, pp. 925–936, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. M. Lalu, L. McIntyre, C. Pugliese et al., “Safety of cell therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells (SafeCell): a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e47559, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Boltze, A. Arnold, P. Walczak, J. Jolkkonen, L. Cui, and D.-C. Wagner, “The dark side of the force—constraints and complications of cell therapies for stroke,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 6, article 155, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. S. Gonzales-Portillo, S. Reyes, D. Aguirre, M. M. Pabon, and C. V. Borlongan, “Stem cell therapy for neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 5, article 147, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. C. Burns, C. M. Verfaillie, and W. C. Low, “Stem cells for ischemic brain injury: a critical review,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 515, no. 1, pp. 125–144, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. I. Savitz, “Developing cellular therapies for stroke,” Stroke, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2026–2031, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. A. Mitsialis and S. Kourembanas, “Stem cell-based therapies for the newborn lung and brain: possibilities and challenges,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 138–151, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus