Review Article

Decellularized and Engineered Tendons as Biological Substitutes: A Critical Review

Table 2

In vivo studies of tendon tissue decellularization and implantation.

Tendon source
and size
Decellularization protocol(s)Assessment of decellularizationCell reseedingAnimal modelImplant site, size, and time point(s)Experimental groupsAssessment of tendon repairResults and commentsReference

Rabbit
ST
Undefined size
Frozen −80°C (until use)
1% SDS RT (24 h)
Rabbit dermal fibroblasts
2 × 106 cells/mL
Static culture by injection for 4 days
RabbitACL replacement
8 weeks
Autologous ST tendon; reseeded allogenic ST matrix; fresh rabbit ACL in knees (ctrl) Histology
Mechanical testing
Before implantation
Stiffness → similar in autologous tendon and reseeded matrix
EM → higher in reseeded matrix than autologous tendon
After implantation
Reseeded matrix → weaker biomechanics than autologous tendons; necrosis and tissue remodeling higher than autologous tendon; inflammatory reaction; inhomogeneous cell repopulation
[16]

Rabbit
FDP
3 cm
length
Frozen −80°C (until use)
0.05% Trypsin-EDTA RT (24 h)
0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h)
Rabbit tenocytes (male)
2 × 106 cells/mL
Rotating culture for 24 h
Rabbit (female)FDP replacement
3, 6, 12, and 30 weeks
Acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrix; fresh native FDP tendon (ctrl)Histology
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (donor male tenocytes ≠ female tenocytes)
Reseeded matrix → good cell repopulation; similar to ctrl 6 weeks after implantation[22]

Rabbit
FDP
2 cm
length
Frozen −70°C (until use)
0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (24 h)
0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h)
HistologyRabbit tenocytes, Fs, BMSCs, and ASCs
2 × 106 cells/mL
Static culture for 1, 4, and 8 weeks
RabbitFDP replacement
4, 6, and 8 weeks
Autologous FDP tendon (ctrl); allogeneic FDP tendon; acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrix HistologyReseeded matrix → viable cell distribution on surface, but not into the centre at 1, 4, and 8 weeks, good collagen architecture
Autologous, allogenic, and acellularized implants → mild inflammatory response
[21]

Rabbit
FDP
2–2.5 cm
length
Frozen −70°C (until use)
0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (24 h)
0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h)
Rabbit tenocytes, ASCs
2 × 106 cells/mL
Static culture
RabbitFDP replacement
2, 4, 10, and 20 weeks
Autologous FDP tendon (ctrl); acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrixHistology
Mechanical testing
Reseeded matrix → UTS similar to ctrl up to 4 weeks; weaker compared to ctrl at 10 weeks; greater in tendon reseeded matrix from 2 to 20 weeks; similar to acellularized matrix at 2, 4, and 20 weeks; cell penetration to the core of the grafts[18]

Canine AT
4 cm length; 0.4 cm
width; 0.3 mm thickness
Frozen −80°C/thaw (5 cycles)
RNAse/DNAse 37°C (12 h)
RabbitIT full-thickness defect
8 mm length
4, 8, and 12 weeks
Acellularized AT matrix; void defect Histology
Mechanical testing
MRI
Acellularized matrix → host cell ingrowth and tissue integration; developing of a tendon-like structure at 12 weeks; UTS similar to void defect at 4, 12 weeks; stiffness greater at 12 weeks than at 4, 8 weeks and compared to void defect at 12 weeks
MRI signal → similar in acellularized matrix and contralateral native tendon at 12 weeks; hypertrophy and scar tissue in void defects
[38]

Canine IT
1 cm
length; 1 cm
width;
0.05 mm
thickness
Frozen −80°C (until use)
Frozen liquid nitrogen/thaw (5 cycles) RNAse 37°C (12 h)
Rabbit BMSCs
5 × 106 cells/mL
Static culture for 24 h
RabbitPatellar tendon defect
10 mm length; 3 mm width
2 weeks
Reseeded IT matrix; void defectHistology
Gene expression
Cell fluorescent labeling
Reseeded matrix → cells aligned to fibrils before implantation; scattered after implantation; higher tenomodulin, collagen III, MMP3-13, and lower collagen I expressions compared to acellularized matrix after implantation; viable cells expressing tendon phenotype in vivo[36]

Rat
AT
Undefined
Frozen −80°C (until use)
0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (24 h)
0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h)
HistologyRat tenocytes
1 × 106 cells/mL
Static culture for 48 h
RatAchilles tendon defect
Mid 1/3 portion
Autologous AT (ctrl); acellularized AT matrix; reseeded AT matrixHistology
Mechanical testing
Reseeded matrix → preserved collagen at 12 weeks; best histological score and biomechanics at 24 weeks and better organized ECM compared to ctrl and acellularized matrix
Acellularized matrix → less inflammatory cells than ctrl and reseeded matrix
[24]

Human
FDP;
FDS;
FPL
8–10 cm
length
Frozen −70°C (until use)
0.1% EDTA RT (4 h) 0.1% SDS + 0.1% EDTA RT (24 h)
5% PAA (4 h)
Histology
Cell/DNA content
Immunohistochemistry
TEM
Mechanical testing
Human ASCs-luc2-eGFP
1 × 106 cells/mL
Rotating seeding (6 h)
Static culture for 2 weeks
Athymic ratSubcutaneous pocket
3 cm length
4 weeks
Surface scored matrix (S); rehydrated matrix (F); surface scored + rehydrated matrix (S + F); fresh human tendons (ctrl)Cell fluorescent labelingReseeded S and S + F → greater viable cell attachment and penetration compared to reseeded F and ctrl; reduced apoptosis, persistent procollagen production, and similar ultrastructure to ctrl
Rehydration of F and S + F did not improve reseeding
UTS/EM → greater in reseeded matrix than acellularized matrix
[28]

Human
FDP
5 cm
length
Frozen −70°C (until use)
0.1% EDTA + 0.1% SDS RT (24 h)
5% PAA (6 h)
ImmunohistochemistryRatSubcutaneous pocket
2, 4 weeks
Acellularized FDP matrix; fresh native FDP tendon (ctrl)Histology
Immunohistochemistry
Mechanical testing
Acellularized matrix → cell and MHC-1 complex removal; preserved collagen structure and increased porosity; UTS/EM greater compared to ctrl; lower inflammatory response and abnormal collagen architecture compared to ctrl
B-cell infiltration → detected in ctrl compared to acellularized matrix after implantation
Macrophage infiltration → absent after implantation
[30]

Human
FDP
4 cm
length
Frozen −70°C (until use)
0.1% EDTA (4 h)
0.1% SDS + 0.1 EDTA (24 h)
5% PAA (4 h)
Manually scored
Dehydrated
Histology
DNA content
Human ASCs-luc2
1-2 × 106 cells/mL
Static culture for 30 h
RatSubcutaneous pocket
7, 14, 21, and 28 days
Acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrixHistology
Immunohistochemistry
Cell fluorescent labeling
Mechanical testing
Reseeded matrix → viable cells during implantation up to 4 weeks
Host cell invasion, proliferation, and vascularization were observed after implantation
UTS → similar between acellularized and reseeded matrixes
Collagen I > III → consistent in reseeded matrix after implantation
[32]

Porcine tendon
1 cm
length;
1 cm
width;
0.08 mm
thickness
Frozen liquid nitrogen/thaw (5 cycles) DNAse 4°C (14 h)Histology
Cell/DNA/collagen
SEM
Gene expression
Human TSPCs
11.5 × 105 cells/cm2
Static culture for 1, 7 days
Athymic mouse
Rat
Subcutaneous pocket
4 weeks
AT defect (6 mm length)
2, 4 weeks
Acellularized matrix; reseeded matrix Histology
Collagen content
TEM
Mechanical testing
Reseeded matrix → good cell adhesion and proliferation, promoting a tendon phenotype (scleraxis); mature structure, larger collagen fibrils, and stronger mechanical properties compared to acellularized matrix after implantation
No osteogenic behavior was observed in reseeded matrix after implantation
[44]

Chicken
FDP
6 cm
length;
0.3 cm
width;
1 mm
thickness
Stored 4°C (until use)
0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (1 h)
2% Triton X100 + 1.5% PAA 37°C (4 h)
Histology
SEM
DNA content
Mechanical testing
MouseSubcutaneous pocket
2 mm length; 2 mm width; 1 mm thickness
3, 7, 14, and 21 days
Acellularized FDP matrix; fresh native FDP tendon (ctrl)HistologyAcellularized matrix → decreased or absent DNA content compared to ctrl; UTS/EM 76–78% of that observed in ctrl
No host-cell-mediated foreign-body immune response was observed after implantation
[25]

FDS = flexor digitorum superficialis; FPL = flexor pollicis longus; GFP = green fluorescent protein; luc2-GFP = luciferase 2-green fluorescent protein; ACL = anterior cruciate ligament; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; MHC-1 = major histocompatibility complex-1.