|
Tendon source and size | Decellularization protocol(s) | Assessment of decellularization | Cell reseeding | Animal model | Implant site, size, and time point(s) | Experimental groups | Assessment of tendon repair | Results and comments | Reference |
|
Rabbit ST Undefined size | Frozen −80°C (until use) 1% SDS RT (24 h) | — | Rabbit dermal fibroblasts 2 × 106 cells/mL Static culture by injection for 4 days | Rabbit | ACL replacement 8 weeks | Autologous ST tendon; reseeded allogenic ST matrix; fresh rabbit ACL in knees (ctrl) | Histology Mechanical testing | Before implantation Stiffness → similar in autologous tendon and reseeded matrix EM → higher in reseeded matrix than autologous tendon After implantation Reseeded matrix → weaker biomechanics than autologous tendons; necrosis and tissue remodeling higher than autologous tendon; inflammatory reaction; inhomogeneous cell repopulation | [16] |
|
Rabbit FDP 3 cm length | Frozen −80°C (until use) 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA RT (24 h) 0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h) | — | Rabbit tenocytes (male) 2 × 106 cells/mL Rotating culture for 24 h | Rabbit (female) | FDP replacement 3, 6, 12, and 30 weeks | Acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrix; fresh native FDP tendon (ctrl) | Histology Fluorescent in situ hybridization (donor male tenocytes ≠ female tenocytes) | Reseeded matrix → good cell repopulation; similar to ctrl 6 weeks after implantation | [22] |
|
Rabbit FDP 2 cm length | Frozen −70°C (until use) 0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (24 h) 0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h) | Histology | Rabbit tenocytes, Fs, BMSCs, and ASCs 2 × 106 cells/mL Static culture for 1, 4, and 8 weeks | Rabbit | FDP replacement 4, 6, and 8 weeks | Autologous FDP tendon (ctrl); allogeneic FDP tendon; acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrix | Histology | Reseeded matrix → viable cell distribution on surface, but not into the centre at 1, 4, and 8 weeks, good collagen architecture Autologous, allogenic, and acellularized implants → mild inflammatory response | [21] |
|
Rabbit FDP 2–2.5 cm length | Frozen −70°C (until use) 0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (24 h) 0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h) | — | Rabbit tenocytes, ASCs 2 × 106 cells/mL Static culture | Rabbit | FDP replacement 2, 4, 10, and 20 weeks | Autologous FDP tendon (ctrl); acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrix | Histology Mechanical testing | Reseeded matrix → UTS similar to ctrl up to 4 weeks; weaker compared to ctrl at 10 weeks; greater in tendon reseeded matrix from 2 to 20 weeks; similar to acellularized matrix at 2, 4, and 20 weeks; cell penetration to the core of the grafts | [18] |
|
Canine AT 4 cm length; 0.4 cm width; 0.3 mm thickness | Frozen −80°C/thaw (5 cycles) RNAse/DNAse 37°C (12 h) | — | — | Rabbit | IT full-thickness defect 8 mm length 4, 8, and 12 weeks | Acellularized AT matrix; void defect | Histology Mechanical testing MRI | Acellularized matrix → host cell ingrowth and tissue integration; developing of a tendon-like structure at 12 weeks; UTS similar to void defect at 4, 12 weeks; stiffness greater at 12 weeks than at 4, 8 weeks and compared to void defect at 12 weeks MRI signal → similar in acellularized matrix and contralateral native tendon at 12 weeks; hypertrophy and scar tissue in void defects | [38] |
|
Canine IT 1 cm length; 1 cm width; 0.05 mm thickness | Frozen −80°C (until use) Frozen liquid nitrogen/thaw (5 cycles) RNAse 37°C (12 h) | — | Rabbit BMSCs 5 × 106 cells/mL Static culture for 24 h | Rabbit | Patellar tendon defect 10 mm length; 3 mm width 2 weeks | Reseeded IT matrix; void defect | Histology Gene expression Cell fluorescent labeling | Reseeded matrix → cells aligned to fibrils before implantation; scattered after implantation; higher tenomodulin, collagen III, MMP3-13, and lower collagen I expressions compared to acellularized matrix after implantation; viable cells expressing tendon phenotype in vivo | [36] |
|
Rat AT Undefined | Frozen −80°C (until use) 0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (24 h) 0.5% Triton X100 RT (24 h) | Histology | Rat tenocytes 1 × 106 cells/mL Static culture for 48 h | Rat | Achilles tendon defect Mid 1/3 portion | Autologous AT (ctrl); acellularized AT matrix; reseeded AT matrix | Histology Mechanical testing | Reseeded matrix → preserved collagen at 12 weeks; best histological score and biomechanics at 24 weeks and better organized ECM compared to ctrl and acellularized matrix Acellularized matrix → less inflammatory cells than ctrl and reseeded matrix | [24] |
|
Human FDP; FDS; FPL 8–10 cm length | Frozen −70°C (until use) 0.1% EDTA RT (4 h) 0.1% SDS + 0.1% EDTA RT (24 h) 5% PAA (4 h) | Histology Cell/DNA content Immunohistochemistry TEM Mechanical testing | Human ASCs-luc2-eGFP 1 × 106 cells/mL Rotating seeding (6 h) Static culture for 2 weeks | Athymic rat | Subcutaneous pocket 3 cm length 4 weeks | Surface scored matrix (S); rehydrated matrix (F); surface scored + rehydrated matrix (S + F); fresh human tendons (ctrl) | Cell fluorescent labeling | Reseeded S and S + F → greater viable cell attachment and penetration compared to reseeded F and ctrl; reduced apoptosis, persistent procollagen production, and similar ultrastructure to ctrl Rehydration of F and S + F did not improve reseeding UTS/EM → greater in reseeded matrix than acellularized matrix | [28] |
|
Human FDP 5 cm length | Frozen −70°C (until use) 0.1% EDTA + 0.1% SDS RT (24 h) 5% PAA (6 h) | Immunohistochemistry | — | Rat | Subcutaneous pocket 2, 4 weeks | Acellularized FDP matrix; fresh native FDP tendon (ctrl) | Histology Immunohistochemistry Mechanical testing | Acellularized matrix → cell and MHC-1 complex removal; preserved collagen structure and increased porosity; UTS/EM greater compared to ctrl; lower inflammatory response and abnormal collagen architecture compared to ctrl B-cell infiltration → detected in ctrl compared to acellularized matrix after implantation Macrophage infiltration → absent after implantation | [30] |
|
Human FDP 4 cm length | Frozen −70°C (until use) 0.1% EDTA (4 h) 0.1% SDS + 0.1 EDTA (24 h) 5% PAA (4 h) Manually scored Dehydrated | Histology DNA content | Human ASCs-luc2 1-2 × 106 cells/mL Static culture for 30 h | Rat | Subcutaneous pocket 7, 14, 21, and 28 days | Acellularized FDP matrix; reseeded FDP matrix | Histology Immunohistochemistry Cell fluorescent labeling Mechanical testing | Reseeded matrix → viable cells during implantation up to 4 weeks Host cell invasion, proliferation, and vascularization were observed after implantation UTS → similar between acellularized and reseeded matrixes Collagen I > III → consistent in reseeded matrix after implantation | [32] |
|
Porcine tendon 1 cm length; 1 cm width; 0.08 mm thickness | Frozen liquid nitrogen/thaw (5 cycles) DNAse 4°C (14 h) | Histology Cell/DNA/collagen SEM Gene expression | Human TSPCs 11.5 × 105 cells/cm2 Static culture for 1, 7 days | Athymic mouse Rat | Subcutaneous pocket 4 weeks AT defect (6 mm length) 2, 4 weeks | Acellularized matrix; reseeded matrix | Histology Collagen content TEM Mechanical testing | Reseeded matrix → good cell adhesion and proliferation, promoting a tendon phenotype (scleraxis); mature structure, larger collagen fibrils, and stronger mechanical properties compared to acellularized matrix after implantation No osteogenic behavior was observed in reseeded matrix after implantation | [44] |
|
Chicken FDP 6 cm length; 0.3 cm width; 1 mm thickness | Stored 4°C (until use) 0.05% Trypsin/EDTA 37°C (1 h) 2% Triton X100 + 1.5% PAA 37°C (4 h) | Histology SEM DNA content Mechanical testing | — | Mouse | Subcutaneous pocket 2 mm length; 2 mm width; 1 mm thickness 3, 7, 14, and 21 days | Acellularized FDP matrix; fresh native FDP tendon (ctrl) | Histology | Acellularized matrix → decreased or absent DNA content compared to ctrl; UTS/EM 76–78% of that observed in ctrl No host-cell-mediated foreign-body immune response was observed after implantation | [25] |
|