Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Biomedical Applications of Dental and Oral-Derived Stem Cells

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 7695836 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7695836

Qian Zhu, Qiqi Lu, Rong Gao, Tong Cao, "Prospect of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Crest Stem Cells in Clinical Application", Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 7695836, 11 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7695836

Prospect of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Crest Stem Cells in Clinical Application

Academic Editor: Alessandra Pisciotta
Received27 Feb 2016
Revised21 May 2016
Accepted20 Jun 2016
Published20 Dec 2016

Abstract

Neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) represent a transient and multipotent cell population that contributes to numerous anatomical structures such as peripheral nervous system, teeth, and cornea. NCSC maldevelopment is related to various human diseases including pigmentation abnormalities, disorders affecting autonomic nervous system, and malformations of teeth, eyes, and hearts. As human pluripotent stem cells including human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can serve as an unlimited cell source to generate NCSCs, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs can be a valuable tool to study the underlying mechanisms of NCSC-associated diseases, which paves the way for future therapies for these abnormalities. In addition, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs with the capability of differentiating to various cell types are highly promising for clinical organ repair and regeneration. In this review, we first discuss NCSC generation methods from human pluripotent stem cells and differentiation mechanism of NCSCs. Then we focus on the clinical application potential of hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs on peripheral nerve injuries, corneal blindness, tooth regeneration, pathological melanogenesis, Hirschsprung disease, and cardiac repair and regeneration.

1. Neural Crest Stem Cells

Neural crest stem cells (NCSCs), known as “a fourth germ layer” [1], represent a transient and multipotent cell population that contribute to numerous anatomical structures including peripheral nervous system (PNS), fat tissue, craniofacial skeleton, and cornea [24]. NCSCs emerge at the neural plate border between the surface ectoderm and neural ectoderm and migrate extensively to populate diverse derivatives throughout the body [5]. NCSC developmental deficiencies are related to various human diseases including anomalies in facial bone, disorders affecting autonomic nervous system, and malformations of teeth, eyes, and hearts [6]. Previous studies showed that NCSCs were multipotent not only in vivo [79] but also in vitro [1012]. Because of their multipotent property and developmental significance, NCSCs, which could be isolated from the embryo or generated from human pluripotent stem cells, have great clinical application potential in tissue engineering, drug screening [1315], and cell therapies for human disease. As it is difficult to obtain NCSCs directly from the embryonic tissue, exploring the alternative sources of NCSCs has become the focus of many scientists.

1.1. Strategies for NCSC Differentiation from hESCs/hiPSCs

Lots of studies (listed in Table 1) have shown that NCSCs and their lineages could be derived from human pluripotent stem cells including human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) [1622]. In 2005, Pomp et al. [16] first reported the generation of NCSCs from hESCs by coculture with mouse stromal PA6 cells, but only a few molecular NCSC markers were tested. In 2007, Lee and his colleagues [17] showed that NCSCs could be derived from hESCs by coculture with stromal cells (MS-5). Identification of NCSCs was confirmed by molecular and clonal analysis, followed by terminal differentiation into peripheral neurons, Schwann cells, and mesenchymal lineages. The in vivo transplantation was implemented in both chicken embryos and adult mice to confirm NCSC identity as well. Notably, NCSCs generated in this study possessed self-renewal capacity for several passages, which is similar to the result presented by Jiang’s group [18]. In 2009, Hotta et al. [19] developed an efficient method to produce migrating NCSCs from hESCs by using rock inhibitor in the coculture system, and these hESCs-derived NCSCs could differentiate into enteric neurons in the explants of embryonic mouse gut. However, the coculture systems in above studies will result in a mixed population hindering NCSC clinical use. In 2010, one feeder-free system was established by Lee G and his colleagues [20] to generate NCSCs from both hESCs and hiPSCs with defined medium containing Noggin (a BMP inhibitor) and SB431542 (a TGF-β inhibitor), which brought a big breakthrough to this area although the population yield was low. In 2011, Menendez et al. [21] achieved a high enrichment of NCSCs from human pluripotent stem cells (hESCs and hiPSCs) in a feeder-free culture system by the inhibition of activin A/nodal pathway combined with Wnt pathway activation. It was demonstrated that the NCSCs generated in this study were capable of forming a great variety of cell types, such as peripheral neurons and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The in vivo developmental potential of these NCSCs was confirmed by the transplantation into chicken embryos. This one-step protocol not only is efficient, but also generates NCSCs with stable self-renewal capacity for over 30 passages. Liu et al. [22] established a protocol that could get NCSCs from hESC/hiPSC in 14 days, and Schwann cells with in vitro myelination ability that differentiated from NCSCs were first observed in this study. These strategies will facilitate the process of NCSC researches and pave the way for clinical applications of NCSCs.


ReferenceCell sourceCulture systemSupplemental factorsThe yield of NCSCsTime lengthCells induced from NCSCs in vitroIn vivo experimentRemarks

Pomp et al., 2005 [16]hESCsCoculture
(PA6)
Serum42.3%  ±  5.5%1 weekPeripheral sensory and sympathetic neuronsNullFirst paper about NCSC induction from hESCs, but only a few molecular markers were tested

Lee et al., 2007 [17]hESCsCoculture
(MS-5)
Culture were switched to N2 media with serum after neural rosettes emerge from the differentiating hESCs30%1 monthPeripheral nerve system and mesenchymal stem cellsChicken embryos and adult miceFirst report using in vivo transplantation to confirm the identity of hESC-derived NCSCs, which were capable of self-renewal for several passages

Jiang et al., 2009 [18]hESCsCoculture
(PA6)
Serum55.3%  ±  10.6% of the hESC colonies expressing P751 weekPeripheral neurons, glial cells, and myofibroblastsChicken embryosP75+ cells after sorting showed self-renewal capacity

Hotta et al., 2009 [19]hESCsCoculture
(MEF)
Noggin, Y2763297.7%  ±  0.7% of the migrating cells were P75+20 daysEnteric neuronsQuail embryosFirst study reporting the use of Y27632 to induce hESCs into migrating NCSCs

Lee et al., 2010 [20]hESCs
hiPSCs
() Coculture
(MS-5)
() 2D monolayer
(Matrigel)
Noggin, SB431542 in defined media() 30%
() 15%40%
() 30 days
() 12 days
Peripheral neurons, Schwann cells, and myofibroblastsNullA feeder-free system was developed to generated NCSCs from both hESCs and hiPSCs

Menendez et al., 2011 [21]hESCs
hiPSCs
2D monolayer
(Geltrex)
SB431542, BIO80%99%2 weeksPeripheral neurons and mesenchymal stem cellsChicken embryosThis one-step protocol not only is efficient, but also generates NCSCs with stable self-renewal capacity for over 30 passages

Liu et al., 2012 [22]hESCs
hiPSCs
2D monolayer
(Geltrex)
PA6 conditioned media containing FGF2, Rock inhibitor, and ascorbic acid46%14 daysPeripheral neurons, Schwann cells, and mesenchymal lineagesChicken embryosFirst report showed in vitro myelination ability of Schwann cells differentiated from hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs

MEF: mouse embryonic fibroblasts; FGF2: fibroblast growth factor 2.
1.2. Differentiation Mechanism of NCSCs

NCSCs are regarded as a valuable cell source for numerous potential cell-based therapies because of their multipotent potential. However, NCSC therapies are currently at the initial stage; understanding the mechanism of generating neural crest-derived lineages from NCSCs is the first but critical step for future clinical use. As the fate decisions of NCSCs are dependent upon signals in the microenvironment [2325], a given neural crest-derived lineage, such as melanocytes, can be generated from NCSCs with specific factors which either selectively favor NCSC differentiation into a particular lineage or induce NCSCs to a specific cell fate at the expense of other developmental fates [26].

In enteric nervous system (ENS), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is critical for neurogenesis because it promotes the differentiation and survival of NCSCs, while endothelin 3 (ET3) prevents NCSC from differentiating into postmitotic neurons [27]. On the other hand, the development of the melanocytic lineage is favored by stem cell factor (SCF) and ET3 [25, 28]. It has been proved that transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1) stimulates smooth muscle differentiation from NCSCs [29]. Consistent with this finding, some in vivo studies show that conditional inactivation of TGFβ signaling in NCSCs could cause cardiovascular defects with the absence of smooth muscle cells, skull defects, and developmental eye disorders [3032]. What is more, activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in NCSCs was demonstrated to promote sensory neurogenesis [33], and inactivation of this pathway could also result in loss of the melanocyte lineage [34].

Although lots of other factors still remain to be identified, NCSCs under particular culture conditions can differentiate into the expected neural crest-derived lineages, such as neurons and melanocytes, for therapeutic application.

2. Clinical Applications of NCSCs

Great success has been achieved in the field of cell-based therapies and organ reconstructions with utilization of adult stem cells including MSCs [35] and in particular adipose-derived stem cells [36]. MSCs as the typical stem cells for clinical research are present in many organs and tissues including bone marrow, skin, fat, and umbilical cord, and they can differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes [35, 37]. In comparison with MSCs, the quantity of NCSCs that can be isolated from adults is relatively rare [38], but they possess a much broader developmental potential including differentiation into MSCs, which is only topped by ESCs [26]. The discovery of easily accessible sources for NCSC isolation from adult tissues, such as skin and dental pup [38], is of great importance for NCSC clinical application, as it meets the requirement for low invasive isolation procedures. For example, Pisciotta et al. [39] demonstrated that one subpopulation of human dental pulp stem cells possessed characteristics similar to NCSCs including multilineage differentiation potential. These NCSC sources are available throughout adulthood, but NCSCs isolated from adults are still rare and display more restricted multipotency and self-renewal capacity compared to their embryonic counterparts [38]. To tackle such problems, hESCs/hiPSCs are often used as an unlimited cell source to generate NCSCs for their clinical use since it is not feasible to isolate endogenous embryonic population directly. MSCs as the regenerative cells have already been used in lots of clinical trials [40], while the potential clinical applications of NCSCs from human pluripotent cells are still in its infancy now. In spite of some ethical or safety concerns, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs will have wider clinical applications than other stem cell populations including MSCs with further researches because of their astonishing multipotentiality. In addition, hiPSC-derived NCSCs open a door to overcome potential histocompatibility issues during the transplantation. Here, some potential clinical applications of hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs are listed in Figure 1 including regeneration and reconstruction of different tissues and new treatments for NCSC-related diseases.

2.1. Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Damage to peripheral nerves primarily caused by traumatic injury or surgical manipulation is very common. Peripheral nerve injuries ranging from mild (some nerve deficits) to severe (loss of major function) can significantly compromise the quality of patients’ life [41]. It was reported that more than 50,000 repair procedures for peripheral nerves were performed in 1995. However, the actual number of peripheral nerve injuries probably exceeded this figure, as not all peripheral nerve damage could be repaired [42]. Despite novel surgical techniques and modern treatment, functional and structural restoration of peripheral nerves remains a great challenge. Therefore, there is a need to improve the clinical outcomes of peripheral nerve repair. Stem cell-based therapies with tissue-engineered scaffolds are now being developed to accelerate the regeneration of peripheral nerve injuries [43, 44].

It is known that, for peripheral nerve repair, one functional engineered construct involves four central components including support cells, a scaffold supporting axonal migration, the extracellular matrix, and growth factors [42]. Although the underlying mechanisms for regeneration of the injured peripheral nerves remain unclear, NCSCs can be used as a promising stem cell type for peripheral nerve repair. This finding is supported by a study of Vasyliev et al. [44], which reported that after implantation of neural crest-derived multipotent stem cells into the transected region of mice, the intensity of nerve regeneration in this injured region was increased compared with that in mice without transplantation. This work indicated that NCSCs possess a pronounced biological property to promote nerve repair by differentiating into Schwann cells that are indispensable in peripheral nerve regeneration, as Schwann cells not only provide a support for axon migration but also secrete neurotrophic factors to promote nerve growth [42, 45]. Severe skin injuries always come with damage to peripheral nerves, so innervated 3D skin reconstructions could be developed as optimal skin substitutes for the patients to restore neurological function. Sensory neurons in skin models could not only potentially restore the sensibility of the skin [46], but also accelerate keratinocyte reepithelialization through secreting the neuropeptide substance P [47]. As mature neurons are difficult to obtain from human bodies and do not proliferate significantly both in vitro and in vivo, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs, which can provide a large number of peripheral neurons for the innervated dermal substitutes, have great clinical significance for human skin transplantation.

Since NCSCs can differentiate into Schwann cells and neurons for peripheral nerve regeneration, cellular therapies based on hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs will be attractive candidates to repair peripheral nerve injuries.

2.2. Corneal Blindness

The cornea is a transparent organ which not only protects the eyeball from insults, but also transmits visible light to produce images on the retina. The cornea is comprised of five main layers, including the outermost corneal epithelium, Bowman’s layer, the keratocyte-populated corneal stroma, Descemet’s membrane, and the inner corneal endothelium [48]. The corneal stroma that constitutes around 90% of the cornea’s thickness is formed by a transparent extracellular matrix, which is uniquely secreted by keratocytes [49]. Surgical or accidental injuries to corneal stroma will lead to corneal scarring or even corneal blindness because of fibrotic deposit in stroma. In addition, the corneal endothelium, which consists of hexagonal corneal endothelial cells (CECs), is physiologically the most significant barrier in cornea, as it plays an obligatory role in regulating corneal hydration and maintaining corneal transparency and thickness [50, 51]. Corneal endothelial dysfunction caused by infection or trauma will disturb the pumping function of corneal endothelium and further cause corneal edema and even visual blindness [51].

Millions of people in the world are affected by corneal blindness, and currently the surgical cornea transplantation is the only effective approach to restore corneal function and clarity. But this therapy is still with well-known limitations, such as surgical complications, graft failure, and shortage of qualified donor cornea [52]. Since the donor corneal tissues are in a short supply, it is critical to develop alternative approaches to restore vision instead of keratoplasty. Although tissue-engineered corneal equivalents have been explored, there are serious drawbacks in their application such as strong inflammatory responses and unsatisfactory tissue regeneration [53]. Recently, stem cell therapy as another alternative technique to restore corneal transparency and function has attracted more and more attention [4, 5355].

It is known that both corneal keratocytes and CECs are derived from NCSCs [3, 4, 56]. Therefore, NCSC-based cell therapy would ideally be used to produce autologous corneal equivalents without immune rejection. Hertsenberg and Funderburgh [57] used a two-step method to generate keratocytes from hESCs by initial differentiation into NCSCs and subsequent induction toward corneal keratocytes. In addition, Ju et al. [4] proved the feasibility of differentiating rodent NCSCs into functional CECs, and the effect of CECs was confirmed by transplanting them to the rat model with corneal endothelium deficiency. Histological examination showed that these polygonal CECs formed a monolayer to cover the Descemet’s membrane in rats, which is consistent with results of confocal microscopy. In 2015, Chen et al. [58] induced mouse ESCs and iPSCs into CECs by directing mouse pluripotent stem cells into NCSCs at first and subsequently toward CECs, which were characterized by morphology, immunocytochemistry (ICC), and quantitative PCR (QPCR). Moreover, McCabe and his colleagues [59] developed one protocol to generate CECs from hESCs via NCSCs by defined factors. Microarray analysis revealed that the CECs from hESC-derived NCSCs showed close similarity to primary adult human CECs.

In conclusion, it is now possible to generate corneal keratocytes or CECs from hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs in a two-step process in vitro, which provides promising opportunities to develop suitable corneal alternatives for corneal blindness treatment instead of donor cornea.

2.3. Tooth Regeneration

Teeth, the hardest tissues in the human body, are comprised of enamel, dentin, pulp, cementum, and periodontal ligament. Teeth have diverse functions including chewing, pronunciation, and aesthetics, so tooth loss has negatively physical and emotional impacts on patients, which deteriorates their psychosocial well-being and self-esteem [6062]. Currently, many seniors are at risk for tooth loss with advancing age. The prevalence of congenitally missing teeth (CMT) may also increase because of the changes in evolution and the improvement in diagnostic tools and criteria [63, 64].

The current treatments for tooth loss or absence typically involve dental implants or dentures made from synthetic biomaterials. However, there are many complications associated with denture therapy including denture-related oral ulcers and stomatitis [65]. The application of prosthetic implants may also result in implant failures and complications, which are mainly attributable to bacterial infection, impaired healing, and overload [66]. To overcome these issues, candidate approaches have been explored. Considerable progress has been made currently in the field of bioengineered rodent tooth replacement [6770] that suggests the great potential about human tooth regeneration. One of the main barriers in this field is to search for a suitable and stable cell source for regenerating human teeth.

Mammalian teeth development is controlled by two types of cells: ectodermal epithelial cells, which give rise to ameloblasts, and NCSCs, which contribute to most of the dental tissues including dentin matrix, dental pulp, cementum, and periodontal ligament [7173]. In 2008, Xu’s lab [74] indicated that cranial neural crest cells were capable of in vitro odontogenesis with adult extracellular matrix. These cranial neural crest-derived odontoblast-like cells were characterized by morphology, alkaline phosphatase activity, expression of odontoblast markers, and formation of mineralized nodules. Recently, Seki et al. [75] reported one method to induce mouse iPSC-derived neural crest like cells (iNCLCs) into odontoblast-like cells by gene transfection of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (Bmp4) and Pax9. In addition, it was notable that there was no teratoma formation when iNCLCs and transfected iNCLCs were injected subcutaneously in mice. These results suggest that NCSCs derived from pluripotent stem cells could be a safe and unlimited cell source to generate odontoblasts for tooth regeneration. Moreover, it was shown that cementoblast-like cells were generated from cranial neural crest cells in vitro when treated with dental follicle cell conditioned media [76]. Due to the vital role that NCSCs play in tooth development, more and more efforts will be invested into the differentiation of dental tissue-forming cells from hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs in the future.

In summary, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs in combination with ectodermal epithelial cells are considered as an optimal and promising cell source for the whole tooth regeneration. Thus, the regeneration of human teeth would become feasible in the near future by using hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs.

2.4. Pathological Melanogenesis

In vertebrates, melanocytes derived from NCSCs are melanin-producing cells. Human melanocytes, which are primarily located in the hair follicles and skin, not only are essential for skin and hair pigmentation, but also protect the skin from ultraviolet irradiation [77]. It is notoriously known that the abnormal melanocytes are related to a wide range of severe diseases including vitiligo, albinism, and melanoma [78, 79]. Vitiligo characterized by the depigmentation of the skin and hair is a worldwide common pigmentary disorder and may significantly affect the patients’ self-esteem and life satisfaction [80]. As one of the deadliest aggressive skin cancers known for its high metastasis ability, melanoma is getting more prevalent over the past several decades [79, 8183]. To address these issues, it is crucial to understand melanocyte development and function. However, the detailed function and developmental mechanisms of human melanocytes are still absent at present because of the difficulties in obtaining sufficient melanocytes for research models. In addition, the shortage of melanocytes also limits their clinical applications for melanocyte-related diseases including cell transplantation and drug screening. Therefore, it is important to explore efficient ways to generate melanocytes that could be not only used for laboratory researches, but also used as a cell source for clinical therapeutics.

Several groups are now actively investigating the melanocyte differentiation techniques that may provide a stable cell source for melanocyte researches. Shakhova and Sommer [84] have established a differentiation approach to generate melanocytes from embryonic NCSCs in 10 days by the addition of a cocktail of specific growth factors such as ET-3 and mouse SCF. Their study showed that after 10-day differentiation, the majority of NCSCs presented a melanocytic phenotype indicating the in vitro differentiation ability of NCSCs into melanocytes. In 2011, Kawakami lab [85] developed a method to induce hiPSCs into human melanocytes in vitro through an intermediate phase of NCSCs. Several weeks after differentiation, established melanocyte markers were positive in these hiPSC-derived-melanocytes, and melanosome formation could be detected as well. The effectiveness of this in vitro differentiation system was further confirmed by DNA microarray, which showed a high-level similarity of global gene expression between these pigment cells and normal human foreskin-derived epidermal melanocyte. Nissan et al. [86] also supported the in vitro availability of human pluripotent stem cells committed to the melanocytes via neural crest stage. Moreover, human melanocytes derived in this study exhibit both phenotypical and functional characteristics of their adult counterparts. Recently, Mica and colleagues [87] established a stepwise differentiation strategy to obtain functional melanocytes from human pluripotent stem cells by initial NCSC induction, followed by specification of melanoblasts and eventual differentiation into mature pigmented cells. Besides the analysis of gene and protein expression, electron microscopy revealed that lots of pigmented melanosomes were present in the melanocytes generated with this protocol. Intriguingly, an organotypic skin model was established to characterize the function of these melanocytes, which were found to be home to the correct location in the basement membrane zone. The above protocols for melanocyte generation allow the identification of factors regulating the melanocyte development and function. The possible genetic and cellular mechanisms involved in pathological melanogenesis could also be characterized by comparing the melanocytes generated from these protocols with the melanocytes from normal population and patients with pigment cell disorders. Based on this research model, it is possible to predict the incidence or prevalence of melanocyte-related diseases in population in the future.

Access to an unlimited melanocytes resource may also contribute to cell-based therapies for hypopigmentation disorders and therapeutic drug screening for melanocyte relevant diseases. Melanocyte transplantation has been experimentally used as an adjunct cell therapy for vitiligo for years [88]. As early as 1987, Lerner et al. [89] reported the implantation of autologous cultured human melanocytes. They first isolated melanocytes from the normally pigmented skin of the patient with piebaldism and then expanded these normal melanocytes in culture, followed by transplanting them into the hypopigmented skin area of this patient. Six month later, excellent repigmentation was noticed in the grafted area. Melanocytes generated from hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs thus can be used as novel approaches to provide enough grafting material for the patients with hypopigmentation disorders. In addition, the unlimited cell source of melanocytes represents a potential tool for drug testing in melanocyte-related diseases. Mica et al. [87] offered an insight into genetic pigmentation defect models and demonstrated that melanocytes derived from special iPSC of patients with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome and Chediak-Higashi syndrome were capable of reflecting the biological nature of these pigmentation disorders. Such disease-specific melanocytes can be particularly used to identify potential drugs that can reverse pigmentation disorders and correct relevant function. Therefore, it sets a stage for exploring candidate drugs for potential therapeutic intervention.

Taken together, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs have been proved as a useful tool to produce a large number of human melanocytes for basic research, clinical treatment, and drug discovery. Recent advances in the differentiation of melanocytes from hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs have offered exciting opportunities to investigate the developmental mechanisms of human melanocytes with specific phenotypes in normal and pathological conditions. These finding can now provide novel platforms for a broad range of clinical applications, including pathological melanogenesis modeling, potential cell therapies, and therapeutic drug testing. Finally, the clinical application of melanocytes generated from hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs will benefit millions of patients suffering from various melanocyte-associated disorders.

2.5. Cardiac Repair and Regeneration

As the first functional organ developed in mammalian, the heart provides sufficient oxygen and nutrients for embryogenesis. Although the heart originates from mesoderm, NCSCs are crucial for the heart development [90]. As a subpopulation of cranial neural crest cells, cardiac neural crest cells (CNCCs) participate in cardiac valve formation and cardiac parasympathetic innervation. The septation of the outflow tract in heart also critically depends on the development of CNCCs [91, 92].

Notably, defects of CNCCs will lead to various congenital heart diseases such as tetralogy of Fallot, CHARGE syndrome, Noonan syndrome, and double outlet right ventricle [93, 94]. Whereas these heart malformations are rare, they are always life threatening for patients. Therefore, it is imperative to explore potential therapies for these specific defects. NCSCs derived from hESC/hiPSC can serve as a model to investigate the dynamics of relevant congenital heart diseases and subsequently find ways to prevent or correct them.

Furthermore, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs are capable of providing a pool of important cardiac progenitor cells for human heart repair and regeneration. In mammalian, CNCCs reside in the heart as dormant multipotent stem cells after migration, which can give rise to various cell types involved in cardiogenesis including aortic smooth muscle cells, glia cells, and neurons [95]. In 2008, El-Helou et al. [96] demonstrated that the nestin-expressing cells isolated from infarcted hearts were derived from neural crest. To investigate the biological function of theses nestin-positive cells in the infarct regions, this subpopulation was fluorescently labelled and subsequently injected into the hearts of rats with myocardial infarction. This in vivo transplantation model showed that the injected cells were detected exclusively in the injured area and contributed to the cardiovascular structure formation. Recently, a study by Tamura et al. [97] revealed that the adrenergic cells from NCSCs were increased after heterotopic cardiac transplantation in mice, which was tightly coupled to the activation of intrinsic cardiac adrenergic function in transplanted murine hearts. NCSCs thus are essential for neonatal and adult cardiac regeneration in human. Stem cell therapies based on hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs offer an exciting prospect for clinical heart repair after diseases or injuries.

Differentiation protocols that drive hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs to particular cardiac progenitors provide not only a valuable tool to promote the healing process following heart injuries, but also a potential cell source participating in human heart regeneration. What is more, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs can be used as a suitable model for uncovering the underlying mechanisms of NCSC-associated congenital heart diseases as well as developing clinical treatments for these cardiac malformations.

2.6. Hirschsprung Disease

Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) that occurs in approximately 1 in 5000 newborns is a common intestinal mobility disorder characterized by the absence of enteric ganglion cells in distal regions of the colon. As a life-threatening disease of pediatrics, HSCR can lead to tonic contraction of aganglionic bowel, intestinal blockage, and even fatal dilation of the colon (megacolon) [98]. Surgical operation to remove the aganglionic segment of the colon is currently used for children with HSCR. However, gastrointestinal dysfunction of the remaining digestive tract persists in the patients subjected to this life-saving treatment [99]. Furthermore, patients suffering from total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) usually undergo lots of complications, and reoperation is often required [100]. Due to the limited therapeutic strategies for HSCR at present, it is necessary to develop novel and efficient drug-based and cell-based therapies for the patients with HSCR.

HSCR is caused by defects in the development of ENS that is derived from vagal and sacral neural crest [15, 101]. Given the ability of NCSCs to form ENS, NCSCs could not only be a useful tool to study mechanisms underlying HSCR, but also provide feasible alternative treatments for HSCR. In 2003, Iwashita and his colleagues [102] found that compared to whole-fetus RNA, genes implicated in HSCR showed higher expression levels in gut NCSCs, and mutations in these HSCR genes could result in severe ENS defects by affecting gut NCSC function. This result indicated that HSCR is associated with defects in the function of NCSCs. NCSCs generated from hESC/hiPSC can serve as a stable cell source to study the cellular and molecular mechanisms of HSCR. In addition, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs as stem cell transplants are capable of repopulating the ENS for HSCR. In 2009, Hotta et al. [19] showed that hESCs-derived neural crest like cells could differentiate into enteric neurons after transplanting them into mouse gut tissue. A recent report illustrated that enteric neural crest (ENC) precursors derived from hESCs possess the ability to repopulate the colon in the host and rescue the mortality of HSCR mice [15]. What is more, mutant ENC precursors from human pluripotent stem cells can be utilized as a platform to perform candidate drug screening. Since null mutations in the genes encoding endothelin-3-endothelin receptor B (EDNRB) are responsible for a subset of HSCR patients [103], Fattahi et al. [15] used hESCs-derived EDNRB−/− ENC precursors as a HSCR model to screen and identify compounds that could rescue the migration defects associated with HSCR.

Many challenges need to be overcome before applying hESC/hiPSC-derived-NCSCs into HSCR clinical trials; nonetheless, cell-based and drug-based therapies for HSCR by using hESC/hiPSC-derived-NCSCs remain a promising prospect.

3. Conclusions and Discussion

NCSCs are a multipotent cell population with the capacity to differentiate into a diverse array of cell types. There are many congenital diseases associated with maldevelopment of NCSCs, some of which are even life-threatening. As human pluripotent stem cells can serve as an unlimited and stable cell source to generate NCSCs, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs will be a powerful tool to study the underlying causes of relevant diseases and explore new therapies to prevent or correct them. In addition, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSCs provide a pool of various cells, which are large enough for a wide range of clinical organ repair and regeneration.

For future NCSC clinical research, the safety issue of NCSCs seems to be a chief problem to consider due to the versatile but dangerous nature of NCSCs. The study of Seki et al. [75] showed that no teratoma was formed after iNCLC transplantation into mice suggesting the safety of NCSCs derived from pluripotent stem cells. This is in line with the previous report of Wang et al. [104], which indicated that hiPSC-derived NCSCs could be directly utilized for tissue engineering because no teratoma formation was discovered in rats following the transplantation of NCSCs for up to one year. However, the possibilities for hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSC deviant differentiation into unwanted neural crest-derived lineages after in vivo transplantation must be evaluated thoroughly before their clinical applications. The in vivo differentiation fate of NCSCs largely depends on the microenvironment encountered, and there are diverse tumors of neural crest origin including malignant melanoma and neurofibromatosis [105]. It was found that the maintenance or activation of NCSC genetic program was an important pathogenic feature of Ewing sarcoma family tumors (ESFT), which are a group of aggressive tumors occurring in bones and soft tissues, because the results of gene expression profiling showed ESFT were genetically closely associated with NCSCs [106]. Since the application of NCSCs might result in various neural rest-derived cancers, such as neuroblastoma [107, 108] and clear cell sarcoma [109], potential risk of NCSCs should be seriously taken into account before NCSC clinical therapy. Although obstacles such as safety and technical complexities have to be addressed before extensive clinical application, hESC/hiPSC-derived NCSC-based therapies are highly promising. Due to the importance of NCSCs, more efforts will be invested in this field to benefit all humanity.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This review was supported by National University Health System Research Grant R221000085733.

References

  1. B. K. Hall, “The neural crest as a fourth germ layer and vertebrates as quadroblastic not triploblastic,” Evolution & Development, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–5, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. A. Muñoz and P. A. Trainor, “Neural crest cell evolution: how and when did a neural crest cell become a neural crest cell,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 111, pp. 3–26, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. A. Chan, A. J. Hertsenberg, M. L. Funderburgh et al., “Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into cells with corneal keratocyte phenotype,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e56831, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Ju, K. Zhang, and X. Wu, “Derivation of corneal endothelial cell-like cells from rat neural crest cells in vitro,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e42378, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Simões-Costa and M. E. Bronner, “Insights into neural crest development and evolution from genomic analysis,” Genome Research, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1069–1080, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Menendez, M. J. Kulik, A. T. Page et al., “Directed differentiation of human pluripotent cells to neural crest stem cells,” Nature Protocols, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 203–212, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. N. Serbedzija, S. E. Fraser, and M. Bronner-Fraser, “Pathways of trunk neural crest cell migration in the mouse embryo as revealed by vital dye labelling,” Development, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 605–612, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. C. McKinney, K. Fukatsu, J. Morrison, R. McLennan, M. E. Bronner, and P. M. Kulesa, “Evidence for dynamic rearrangements but lack of fate or position restrictions in premigratory avian trunk neural crest,” Development (Cambridge), vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 820–830, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Baggiolini, S. Varum, J. M. Mateos et al., “Premigratory and migratory neural crest cells are multipotent in vivo,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 314–322, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Dupin and L. Sommer, “Neural crest progenitors and stem cells: from early development to adulthood,” Developmental Biology, vol. 366, no. 1, pp. 83–95, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. L. Stemple and D. J. Anderson, “Isolation of a stem cell for neurons and glia from the mammalian neural crest,” Cell, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 973–985, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Baroffio, E. Dupin, and N. M. Le Douarin, “Clone-forming ability and differentiation potential of migratory neural crest cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 85, no. 14, pp. 5325–5329, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Lee, E. P. Papapetrou, H. Kim et al., “Modelling pathogenesis and treatment of familial dysautonomia using patient-specific iPSCs,” Nature, vol. 461, no. 7262, pp. 402–406, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Lee, C. N. Ramirez, H. Kim et al., “Large-scale screening using familial dysautonomia induced pluripotent stem cells identifies compounds that rescue IKBKAP expression,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1244–1248, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Fattahi, J. A. Steinbeck, S. Kriks et al., “Deriving human ENS lineages for cell therapy and drug discovery in Hirschsprung disease,” Nature, vol. 531, no. 7592, pp. 105–109, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. O. Pomp, I. Brokhman, I. Ben-Dor, B. Reubinoff, and R. S. Goldstein, “Generation of peripheral sensory and sympathetic neurons and neural crest cells from human embryonic stem cells,” STEM CELLS, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 923–930, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. Lee, H. Kim, Y. Elkabetz et al., “Isolation and directed differentiation of neural crest stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1468–1475, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. X. Jiang, Y. Gwye, S. J. McKeown, M. Bronner-Fraser, C. Lutzko, and E. R. Lawlor, “Isolation and characterization of neural crest stem cells derived from in vitro-differentiated human embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1059–1070, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Hotta, L. Pepdjonovic, R. B. Anderson et al., “Small-molecule induction of neural crest-like cells derived from human neural progenitors,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2896–2905, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Lee, S. M. Chambers, M. J. Tomishima, and L. Studer, “Derivation of neural crest cells from human pluripotent stem cells,” Nature Protocols, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 688–701, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Menendez, T. A. Yatskievych, P. B. Antin, and S. Dalton, “Wnt signaling and a Smad pathway blockade direct the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to multipotent neural crest cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 48, pp. 19240–19245, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Q. Liu, S. C. Spusta, R. Mi et al., “Human neural crest stem cells derived from human ESCs and induced pluripotent stem cells: induction, maintenance, and differentiation into functional schwann cells,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 266–278, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. M. Le Douarin, S. Creuzet, G. Couly, and E. Dupin, “Neural crest cell plasticity and its limits,” Development, vol. 131, no. 19, pp. 4637–4650, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Sieber-Blum, “Growth factor synergism and antagonism in early neural crest development,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1039–1050, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Sommer, “Growth factors regulating neural crest cell fate decisions,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 589, pp. 197–205, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. O. Shakhova and L. Sommer, “Neural Crest-Derived Stem Cells,” in StemBook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. S. Taraviras and V. Pachnis, “Development of the mammalian enteric nervous system,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. J. Langtimm-Sedlak, B. Schroeder, J. L. Saskowski, J. F. Carnahan, and M. Sieber-Blum, “Multiple actions of stem cell factor in neural crest cell differentiation in vitro,” Developmental Biology, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 345–359, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. M. Shah, A. K. Groves, and D. J. Anderson, “Alternative neural crest cell fates are instructively promoted by TGFβ superfamily members,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 331–343, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. Wurdak, L. M. Ittner, K. S. Lang et al., “Inactivation of TGFβ signaling in neural crest stem cells leads to multiple defects reminiscent of DiGeorge syndrome,” Genes & Development, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 530–535, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Ito, J. Y. Yeo, A. Chytil et al., “Conditional inactivation of Tgfbr2 in cranial neural crest causes cleft palate and calvaria defects,” Development, vol. 130, no. 21, pp. 5269–5280, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. M. Ittner, H. Wurdak, K. Schwerdtfeger et al., “Compound developmental eye disorders following inactivation of TGFβ signaling in neural-crest stem cells,” Journal of Biology, vol. 4, no. 3, article 11, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H.-Y. Lee, M. Kléber, L. Hari et al., “Instructive role of Wnt/β-catenin in sensory fate specification in neural crest stem cells,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5660, pp. 1020–1023, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Hari, V. Brault, M. Kléber et al., “Lineage-specific requirements of β-catenin in neural crest development,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 867–880, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Thakker and P. Yang, “Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for cardiac repair,” Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 7, article 323, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. Senarath-Yapa, A. McArdle, A. Renda, M. T. Longaker, and N. Quarto, “Adipose-derived stem cells: a review of signaling networks governing cell fate and regenerative potential in the context of craniofacial and long bone skeletal repair,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 9314–9330, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. I. R. Murray, C. C. West, W. R. Hardy et al., “Natural history of mesenchymal stem cells, from vessel walls to culture vessels,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 1353–1374, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Achilleos and P. A. Trainor, “Neural crest stem cells: discovery, properties and potential for therapy,” Cell Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 288–304, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Pisciotta, G. Carnevale, S. Meloni et al., “Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells (hDPSCs): isolation, enrichment and comparative differentiation of two sub-populations Integrative control of development,” BMC Developmental Biology, vol. 15, article 14, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. I. R. Murray and B. Péault, “Q&A: mesenchymal stem cells—where do they come from and is it important?” BMC Biology, vol. 13, article 99, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. B. J. Pfister, T. Gordon, J. R. Loverde, A. S. Kochar, S. E. Mackinnon, and D. Kacy Cullen, “Biomedical engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair: surgical applications, state of the art, and future challenges,” Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 81–124, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. R. D. Evans, “Peripheral nerve injury: a review and approach to tissue engineered constructs,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 263, no. 4, pp. 396–404, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. S. Petrova, “The use of stem cells to stimulate regeneration of damaged nerve,” Tsitologiya, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 525–540, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  44. R. G. Vasyliev, A. E. Rodnichenko, S. N. Shamalo et al., “Effects of neural crest-derived multipotent stem cells on regeneration of an injured peripheral nerve in mice,” Neurophysiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 80–83, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Madduri and B. Gander, “Schwann cell delivery of neurotrophic factors for peripheral nerve regeneration,” Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. Biedermann, S. Böttcher-Haberzeth, A. S. Klar et al., “Rebuild, restore, reinnervate: do human tissue engineered dermo-epidermal skin analogs attract host nerve fibers for innervation?” Pediatric Surgery International, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Blais, L. Mottier, M.-A. Germain, S. Bellenfant, S. Cadau, and F. Berthod, “Sensory neurons accelerate skin reepithelialization via substance P in an innervated tissue-engineered wound healing model,” Tissue Engineering—Part A, vol. 20, no. 15-16, pp. 2180–2188, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Ahmad, S. Kolli, M. Lako, F. Figueiredo, and J. T. Daniels, “Stem cell therapies for ocular surface disease,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 15, no. 7-8, pp. 306–313, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. J. Long, M. R. Roth, E. S. Tasheva et al., “Fibroblast growth factor-2 promotes keratan sulfate proteoglycan expression by keratocytes in vitro,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 18, pp. 13918–13923, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. W. M. Bourne, “Clinical estimation of corneal endothelial pump function,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 96, pp. 229–239, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  51. G. S. L. Peh, R. W. Beuerman, A. Colman, D. T. Tan, and J. S. Mehta, “Human corneal endothelial cell expansion for corneal endothelium transplantation: an overview,” Transplantation, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 811–819, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Y. Du, D. S. Roh, M. L. Funderburgh et al., “Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate to keratocytes in vitro,” Molecular Vision, vol. 16, pp. 2680–2689, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  53. F. Arnalich-Montiel, S. Pastor, A. Blazquez-Martinez et al., “Adipose-derived stem cells are a source for cell therapy of the corneal stroma,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 570–579, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K. Zhang, K. Pang, and X. Wu, “Isolation and transplantation of corneal endothelial cell-like cells derived from in-vitro-differentiated human embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1340–1354, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Y. Du, E. C. Carlson, M. L. Funderburgh et al., “Stem cell therapy restores transparency to defective murine corneas,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1635–1642, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. Delfino-Machín, T. R. Chipperfield, F. S. L. M. Rodrigues, and R. N. Kelsh, “The proliferating field of neural crest stem cells,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 236, no. 12, pp. 3242–3254, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. J. Hertsenberg and J. L. Funderburgh, “Generation of corneal keratocytes from human embryonic stem cells,” Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), vol. 1341, pp. 285–294, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. P. Chen, J.-Z. Chen, C.-Y. Shao et al., “Treatment with retinoic acid and lens epithelial cell-conditioned medium in vitro directed the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells towards corneal endothelial cell-like cells,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 351–360, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. L. McCabe, N. J. Kunzevitzky, B. P. Chiswell, X. Xia, J. L. Goldberg, and R. Lanza, “Efficient generation of human embryonic stem cell-derived corneal endothelial cells by directed differentiation,” PloS ONE, vol. 10, no. 12, Article ID e0145266, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  60. I. Polzer, M. Schimmel, F. Müller, and R. Biffar, “Edentulism as part of the general health problems of elderly adults,” International Dental Journal, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 143–155, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. H. Jung, J. I. Ryu, and D. B. Jung, “Association of total tooth loss with socio-behavioural health indicators in Korean elderly,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 517–524, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. Otsu, M. Kumakami-Sakano, N. Fujiwara et al., “Stem cell sources for tooth regeneration: current status and future prospects,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, article 36, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. F. Amini, V. Rakhshan, and P. Babaei, “Prevalence and pattern of hypodontia in the permanent dentition of 3374 Iranian orthodontic patients,” Dental Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  64. V. Rakhshan, “Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): a review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment,” Dental Research Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. P. Holm-Pedersen, K. Schultz-Larsen, N. Christiansen, and K. Avlund, “Tooth loss and subsequent disability and mortality in old age,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 429–435, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Esposito, J. Hirsch, U. Lekholm, and P. Thomsen, “Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 473–490, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  67. M. T. Duailibi, S. E. Duailibi, C. S. Young, J. D. Bartlett, J. P. Vacanti, and P. C. Yelick, “Bioengineered teeth from cultured rat tooth bud cells,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 523–528, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. K. Nakao, R. Morita, Y. Saji et al., “The development of a bioengineered organ germ method,” Nature Methods, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 227–230, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. E. Ikeda, R. Morita, K. Nakao et al., “Fully functional bioengineered tooth replacement as an organ replacement therapy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 32, pp. 13475–13480, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Oshima, M. Mizuno, A. Imamura et al., “Functional tooth regeneration using a bioengineered tooth unit as a mature organ replacement regenerative therapy,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e21531, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Y. Chai, X. Jiang, Y. Ito et al., “Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis,” Development, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 1671–1679, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  72. P. T. Sharpe, “Neural crest and tooth morphogenesis,” Advances in Dental Research, vol. 15, pp. 4–7, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. Abe, K. Hamada, M. Miura, and S. Yamaguchi, “Neural crest stem cell property of apical pulp cells derived from human developing tooth,” Cell Biology International, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 927–936, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. H.-B. Jiang, W.-D. Tian, L.-K. Liu, and Y. Xu, “In vitro odontoblast-like cell differentiation of cranial neural crest cells induced by fibroblast growth factor 8 and dentin non-collagen proteins,” Cell Biology International, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 671–678, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. D. Seki, N. Takeshita, T. Oyanagi et al., “Differentiation of odontoblast-like cells from mouse induced pluripotent stem cells by Pax9 and Bmp4 transfection,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 993–997, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  76. X. Wen, L. Liu, M. Deng, R. Liu, L. Zhang, and X. Nie, “In vitro cementoblast-like differentiation of postmigratory neural crest-derived p75+ stem cells with dental follicle cell conditioned medium,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 76–86, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. N. Mull, A. Zolekar, and Y.-C. Wang, “Understanding melanocyte stem cells for disease modeling and regenerative medicine applications,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 30458–30469, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. P. Manga, R. Kerr, M. Ramsay, and J. G. R. Kromberg, “Biology and genetics of oculocutaneous albinism and vitiligo—common pigmentation disorders in southern Africa,” South African Medical Journal, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 984–988, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Holmes, “The cancer that rises with the sun,” Nature, vol. 515, no. 7527, pp. S110–S111, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. R. Yaghoobi, M. Omidian, and N. Bagherani, “Vitiligo: a review of the published work,” The Journal of Dermatology, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 419–431, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. C. Azoury and J. R. Lange, “Epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, and early detection of melanoma,” The Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 945–962, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Y. Zhu, T. Ye, X. Yu et al., “Nifuroxazide exerts potent anti-tumor and anti-metastasis activity in melanoma,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 20253, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. A. J. Miller and M. C. Mihm Jr., “Melanoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 51–65, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. O. Shakhova and L. Sommer, “In vitro derivation of melanocytes from embryonic neural crest stem cells,” Methods in Molecular Biology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Ohta, Y. Imaizumi, Y. Okada et al., “Generation of human melanocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16182, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. X. Nissan, L. Larribere, M. Saidani et al., “Functional melanocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells engraft into pluristratified epidermis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 36, pp. 14861–14866, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. Y. Mica, G. Lee, S. M. Chambers, M. J. Tomishima, and L. Studer, “Modeling neural crest induction, melanocyte specification, and disease-related pigmentation defects in hESCs and patient-specific iPSCs,” Cell Reports, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1140–1152, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. M. Abu Tahir, K. Pramod, S. H. Ansari, and J. Ali, “Current remedies for vitiligo,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 516–520, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. A. B. Lerner, R. Halaban, S. N. Klaus, and G. E. Moellmann, “Transplantation of human melanocytes,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. Sieber-Blum, “Cardiac neural crest stem cells,” The Anatomical Record. Part A, Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  91. T. Brade, L. S. Pane, A. Moretti, K. R. Chien, and K.-L. Laugwitz, “Embryonic heart progenitors and cardiogenesis,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 3, no. 10, Article ID a013847, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  92. I. Bulatovic, A. Månsson-Broberg, C. Sylvén, and K.-H. Grinnemo, “Human fetal cardiac progenitors: the role of stem cells and progenitors in the fetal and adult heart,” Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 31, pp. 58–68, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. Gessert and M. Kühl, “The multiple phases and faces of Wnt signaling during cardiac differentiation and development,” Circulation Research, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 186–199, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. A. Keyte and M. R. Hutson, “The neural crest in cardiac congenital anomalies,” Differentiation, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. Tomita, K. Matsumura, Y. Wakamatsu et al., “Cardiac neural crest cells contribute to the dormant multipotent stem cell in the mammalian heart,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 170, no. 7, pp. 1135–1146, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. V. El-Helou, P. C. Beguin, J. Assimakopoulos et al., “The rat heart contains a neural stem cell population; role in sympathetic sprouting and angiogenesis,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 694–702, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. Y. Tamura, M. Sano, H. Nakamura et al., “Neural crest-derived resident cardiac cells contribute to the restoration of adrenergic function of transplanted heart in rodent,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 350–357, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. T. A. Heanue and V. Pachnis, “Enteric nervous system development and Hirschsprung's disease: advances in genetic and stem cell studies,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 466–479, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. C. Di Lorenzo, G. F. Solzi, A. F. Flores, L. Schwankovsky, and P. E. Hyman, “Colonic motility after surgery for Hirschsprung's disease,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 1759–1764, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. A. Bischoff, M. A. Levitt, and A. Peña, “Total colonic aganglionosis: a surgical challenge. How to avoid complications?” Pediatric Surgery International, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1047–1052, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. J. I. Lake and R. O. Heuckeroth, “Enteric nervous system development: migration, differentiation, and disease,” American Journal of Physiology—Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 305, no. 1, pp. G1–G24, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. T. Iwashita, G. M. Kruger, R. Pardal, M. J. Kiel, and S. J. Morrison, “Hirschsprung disease is linked to defects in neural crest stem cell function,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5635, pp. 972–976, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. A. Chakravarti, “Endothelin receptor-mediated signaling in Hirschsprung disease,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 303–307, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  104. A. Wang, Z. Tang, I.-H. Park et al., “Induced pluripotent stem cells for neural tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 5023–5032, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. L. H. Maguire, A. R. Thomas, and A. M. Goldstein, “Tumors of the neural crest: common themes in development and cancer,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 244, no. 3, pp. 311–322, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. C. von Levetzow, X. Jiang, Y. Gwye et al., “Modeling initiation of ewing sarcoma in human neural crest cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 4, article e19305, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. M. Jiang, J. Stanke, and J. M. Lahti, “The connections between neural crest development and neuroblastoma,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 94, pp. 77–127, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. N.-K. V. Cheung and M. A. Dyer, “Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 397–411, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. K. Yamada, T. Ohno, H. Aoki et al., “EWS/ATF1 expression induces sarcomas from neural crest-derived cells in mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 600–610, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Qian Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1632
Downloads648
Citations

Related articles