Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 3053759 |

Cláudia Cardoso Maciel Escalhão, Isalira Peroba Ramos, Camila Hochman-Mendez, Tais Hanae Kasai Brunswick, Sergio Augusto Lopes Souza, Bianca Gutfilen, Regina Coeli dos Santos Goldenberg, Tatiana Coelho-Sampaio, "Safety of Allogeneic Canine Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Intraspinal Transplantation in Dogs with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury", Stem Cells International, vol. 2017, Article ID 3053759, 11 pages, 2017.

Safety of Allogeneic Canine Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Intraspinal Transplantation in Dogs with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

Academic Editor: Yang D. Teng
Received21 Jan 2017
Revised07 Mar 2017
Accepted20 Apr 2017
Published22 May 2017


This is a pilot clinical study primarily designed to assess the feasibility and safety of X-ray-guided percutaneous intraspinal injection of allogeneic canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in dogs with chronic spinal cord injury. Six dogs with chronic paraplegia (≥six months) were intraparenchymally injected with allogeneic cells in the site of lesion. Cells were obtained from subcutaneous adipose tissue of a healthy dog, cultured to passage 3, labeled with 99mTechnetium, and transplanted into the lesion by percutaneous X-ray-guided injection. Digital X-ray efficiently guided cell injection as 99mTechnetium-labeled cells remained in the injection site for at least 24 hours after transplantation. No adverse effects or complications (infection, neuropathic pain, or worsening of neurological function) were observed during the 16-week follow-up period after transplantation. Three animals improved locomotion as assessed by the Olby scale. One animal walked without support, but no changes in deep pain perception were observed. We conclude that X-ray-guided percutaneous intraspinal transplantation of allogeneic cells in dogs with chronic spinal cord injury is feasible and safe. The efficacy of the treatment will be assessed in a new study involving a larger number of animals.

1. Introduction

Severe spinal cord injury (SCI) that interrupts supraspinal input to thoracolumbar spinal circuits may lead to permanent disability in humans and dogs. Treatment of acute SCI focuses on surgical decompression and stabilization of the body/spinal cord instability and on minimizing the progression of the secondary damage to favor eventual endogenous repairing. If the disability persists, it progresses to the chronic phase, when the loss of deep pain perception is an important negative prognosis for the return of function [1]. In this condition, there is no standard treatment to recover locomotion. In the chronic phase, experimental treatments aim mainly at promoting synapse plasticity, axonal sprouting, or regeneration. In addition, networks of neurons in the spinal cord may retain an intrinsic ability to oscillate and generate coordinated and rhythmic motor output [2, 3]. These circuits, called central pattern generators (CPG), could alternatively be stimulated to promote effective motor function [3, 4].

The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in regenerative medicine has provided new strategies for tissue repair and a potential for novel treatments [5]. Mesenchymal stem cells have been successfully isolated from canine umbilical cord blood [6, 7], Wharton’s jelly [8], bone marrow [9], and adipose tissue [10, 11]. MSCs harvested from these sources are selected through their adherence to plastic and self-renewal capacity in culture systems under specific conditions [12]. Adipose tissue is the most abundant and readily available source of MSCs [13], where they reside in a perivascular niche, coexisting with pericytes and endothelial cells [14]. Adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) produce neurotrophic factors and may protect against hypoxia-ischemia and prevent glutamate neurotoxicity [15, 16]. In rodent models of acute spinal cord injury, local transplantation of AT-MSCs promoted nervous tissue protection and functional recovery [17, 18].

In dogs, AT-MSCs, previously induced to neural cells or not, have been used to treat experimental spinal cord injury during the acute phase [8, 19, 20]. All these studies reported that cell transplantation promoted neurological gains and improved locomotion. In addition, morphological analyses revealed reductions in lesion size, astrogliosis, and inflammatory reactions, as well as a fostering of neuronal survival and tissue preservation. Despite the promising effects of treating acute spinal cord injury in dogs with AT-MSCs, little has been done in chronic lesions. Only very recently, Lee and coworkers [21] reported benefits of AT-MSCs in combination with chondroitinase ABC in a model of balloon compression lesion in beagles. Until now, there are no studies with these cells in dogs bearing chronic natural lesions to support future clinical validation.

In the present study, we assessed the feasibility and safety of allogeneic canine AT-MSC transplantation in dogs bearing natural spinal cord lesions provoked by trauma or intervertebral disc disease and not presenting deep pain perception for at least six months. In addition, our study validated percutaneous cell delivery guided by digital X-ray imaging as a valuable method of nonsurgical cell transplantation in the clinical setting.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

Dogs were maintained according to the recommendations of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH) and the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA). The Ethics Committee for Animal Use of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) approved all experiments (01200.001568/2013-87). All owners provided written consent for the participation of their dogs in this study, which includes authorization for publishing data obtained in the study.

2.2. Animals, Inclusion Criteria, and Study Design

Six dogs (four males and two females; mean age 7.17 years; range 6–12 yrs) were enrolled in the study (Table 1). The inclusion criteria were defined as severe chronic SCI, from the thoracic to the lumbar level, caused by vertebral fracture, luxation, or intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) paraplegia without cranial response to noxious stimuli applied to the interdigital space in the pelvic limb with a hemostatic device. Out of the six dogs included, three had had surgery before the injection of AT-MSCs (animals 2, 5, and 6) and three had not (animals 1, 3, and 4). A healthy dog was used for cell isolation. The experimental design of the study is summarized in Figure 1.

AnimalBreed/sexAge (yrs)Weight (kg)HistoryLesion siteExamTime postlesion (yrs)

5Pit bull/M1235IVDDT11-T12CT2

M: male; F: female; IVDD: intervertebral disc disease; CT: computed tomography; XR: X-ray.
2.3. AT-MSC Isolation, Culture, and Expansion

Adipose tissue was aseptically collected under anesthesia from subcutaneous fat of a two-year-old dog during castration, with permission from the owners. Tissue was minced into small pieces for enzymatic digestion with 0.2% collagenase type I (Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ, USA) for 50 min at 37 °C. Cells were plated and expanded in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) low glucose supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cultures were expanded, and experiments were performed at passage 3.

2.4. Immunophenotypic Profile of Canine AT-MSCs

Expression of cell surface molecules of canine AT-MSCs at passage 3 was evaluated by flow cytometry. Briefly, cells were harvested from cell flasks by enzymatic digestion with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich). Next, cells were stained with conjugated antibodies (anti-CD45-Alexa 647, anti-CD19-FITC, anti-CD14-PE, anti-CD73-APC, anti-CD90-APC, anti-CD105-PE, and anti-CD44-FITC; all from eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) diluted in PBS containing 0.5% BSA. AT-MSCs were incubated for 20 min in the dark at 4°C. Following incubation, cells were washed with PBS and centrifuged at 300 ×g for 5 min. Cell pellets were resuspended with PBS for data acquisition using a BD FACSAria™ II flow cytometer. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo LCC, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.5. Cell Differentiation

For adipogenic differentiation, cells were submitted to a 21-day culture protocol with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin-streptomycin, 10 μM dexamethasone, 200 μM indomethacin, 10 μg/mL human insulin, and 0.5 mM isobutyl-methylxanthine (all reagents from Sigma-Aldrich). After this period, cells were fixed and stained with oil red O.

Osteogenic differentiation was induced in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin-streptomycin, 0.01 μM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 0.5 μM ascorbic acid. After this period, cells were fixed and used for the determination of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and von Kossa staining for the detection of mineralization.

Alkaline phosphatase activity was measured using p-nitrophenylphosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) as a substrate in alkaline buffer solution (20 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate + 100 mM diethanolamine 98% + 10 mM MgCl2, pH 9.5). Samples were removed from culture, washed in PBS, permeabilized with 0.5% aqueous Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated with substrate solution for 30 min at 37°C. The same volume of EDTA solution (0.1 M EDTA in 1 M NaOH) was added. Optical density readings were taken using an ELx 800 absorbance reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at 405 nm.

For von Kossa staining, monolayers were incubated with 2% silver nitrate solution in distilled water for 1 h, protected from light, washed five times with distilled water, and exposed to UV light for 10 min. To quantify the degree of mineralization, monolayers were photographed using an inverted microscope (Nikon Eclipse TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an EC3 digital camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Mineralization foci were quantified in 15 random fields using ImageJ software (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and expressed as a percentage of the total area.

Chondrogenic differentiation was induced in DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS, penicillin-streptomycin, 10 ng/mL TGF-β3, 6.25 μg/mL insulin, 6.25 μg/mL transferrin, and antibiotics. Cells were suspended at 107 cells/mL, and 10 μL droplets were carefully placed on a plate and maintained at 37°C for 2 h, followed by an addition of 500 μL of chondrogenic medium. The medium was changed every three days, and the micromasses formed were collected at day 21 of culture. Micromasses were cryopreserved in increasing sucrose concentrations, embedded in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek®, Sakura Finetek, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands), and stored at −80°C. Four-micrometer-thick sections were cut using a cryostat (Leica CM 1800s, Germany) and stained with alcian blue and neutral red.

2.6. Cell Labeling with 99mTc

Approximately, 107 cells were labeled with 99mTc. Briefly, 500 μL of sterile SnCl2 solution was added to the cell suspension in 0.9% NaCl, and the mixture was incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Next, 10 mCi 99mTc was added and the incubation was continued for 10 min. After centrifugation (500 ×g for 5 min), the supernatant was removed, cells were washed in saline solution, and the pellet was resuspended in saline solution. The preparation and labeling of cells were all performed in a laminar flow.

2.7. Clinical Procedure

Premedication was done with intravenous chlorpromazine (1 mg⋅kg−1). Anesthesia was induced with propofol (5 mg⋅kg−1 IV) and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. ECG and CO2 partial pressure were monitored.

To visualize the intervertebral space for needle placement, dogs underwent an X-ray exam (Figure 2). Following lesion localization, 99mTc-labeled AT-MSCs were intralesionally injected in each dog. Scintigraphy images were taken 1 and 24 h after injection to assess localization of AT-MSCs.

2.8. Postoperative Procedures

Bladder management and nursing care were done to prevent urinary infection and decubitus ulcers. The rehabilitation procedures included massage, passive exercises (flexor reflex stimulation and bicycle movements), and active exercise (sit-to-stand with sling) 10–15 min per day across the 16-week follow-up period.

2.9. Imaging

Scintigraphy scans were performed using a GE Millennium® camera system (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Images were acquired 1 and 24 h after cell transplantation, with the animal in the supine position. Whole body images were acquired for 5 min in anterior and posterior views using a dual-head whole body scanner with a high-resolution, low-energy collimator. Planar images of the spine were acquired for 10 min using a 256 × 256 matrix in anterior and posterior views. A germanium flood source was used to draw a shadow of the body of the animal to better visualize 99mTc AT-MSC uptake. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was also performed 1 h after cell transplantation. Image reconstruction was done using a GE Xeleris™ processing workstation.

2.10. Blood Tests

Complete blood count (CBC) and serum chemistry tests were performed. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were measured to determine liver damage. Serum levels of creatinine and urea were determined to evaluate renal function. Blood was taken before and at one and two weeks after AT-MSC injection. Blood tests were performed in private certified laboratories chosen according to the owner’s convenience.

2.11. Clinical and Neurological Exams

Animals were submitted to clinical evaluation at least once before cell injection, immediately before injection and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after surgery. In addition to clinical examination, dogs received specific neurological evaluation, which included segmental reflexes, postural reactions, sensitive analysis, and an additional exam of cranial nerves.

2.12. Functional Evaluation

Locomotor function was evaluated using the Olby scale (0–14: 0 indicates complete paraplegia and 14 indicates normal gait). Dogs were filmed walking on a treadmill or on an antislip floor in a position where the hind limbs could be clearly viewed. Animals were monitored before and four, eight, 12, and 16 weeks after AT-MSC injection.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc analysis was performed using the Bonferroni multiple comparison test or the Student t-test. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data were considered significant at .

3. Results

3.1. Morphological and Immunophenotypic Characterization of Canine AT-MSCs

Canine cells isolated in this study were characterized as mesenchymal cells both morphologically and immunophenotypically. While attached to plastic at passage 3, they presented a thin and elongated fibroblastoid phenotype, typical of mesenchymal cells (Figure 3(a)).

Immunophenotypic analyses of canine AT-MSCs by flow cytometry showed a large proportion of cells expressing CD105 (39.31%), CD90 (83.83%), and CD73 (50.7%) molecules. Additionally, no contamination by cells of hematopoietic origin, expressing CD45, CD14, CD19, and CD44, was observed. Figure 3(b) shows the percentage of cells labeled each with antibody.

3.2. Differentiation Potential of Canine AT-MSCs

In order to confirm that AT-MSCs isolated in this work exhibited the potential to differentiate into multiple mesenchymal lineages, we tested their adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic potentials. Cells grown in adipogenic medium acquire a round shape and accumulate oil red O-positive lipid drops in the cytoplasm (Figure 3(c)). On the other hand, cells cultivated in control medium for the same period did not exhibit positivity for oil red O (Figure 3(d)).

The osteogenic potential of canine AT-MSCs was investigated by assessing alkaline phosphatase activity and von Kossa staining. After 7 days in osteogenic medium, cells presented alkaline phosphatase activity while cells in control medium did not (Figure 3(e)). At day 14, ALP activity decreased 60% in comparison with the activity at day 7, which is compatible with the peak of osteogenic differentiation being at the seventh day after induction. Osteogenesis was additionally confirmed by investigating mineralization foci in the cultures at day 7. Von Kossa staining was carried out as described in Section 2. A representative picture as well as a quantification of the mineralization areas in 15 fields is shown in Figures 3(f)3(h).

Chondrogenic differentiation was assessed using the micromass assay, where highly concentrated droplets of cells are seeded onto culture dishes and cultivated in the presence or in the absence of chondrogenic medium. After 21 days in culture, only cells in differentiation medium formed spherical micromasses. The micromasses were manually collected and processed to reveal the formation of a cartilage-like tissue, containing alcian blue-positive glycosaminoglycans (Figures 3(i)–3(l)). This result confirmed the chondrogenic potential of canine AT-MSCs.

3.3. Analysis of Cell Distribution by Scintigraphy

The biodistribution of AT-MSCs was assessed by scintigraphy. In the present study, we used digital X-ray-guided percutaneous injection of the cells, which was not a validated method for cellular delivery into the spinal cord. For this reason, it was important to confirm that the graft reached the aimed location within the spine and that it remained there for at least 24 hours, When the whole body was scanned one hour after injection, 5 out of 6 animals presented only one single-labeled spot, whose location was compatible with the desired spinal segment. Figure 4(a) shows the scintigraphy of animal 4 one hour after cell transplantation at the thoracic spine (T12-T13). One (animal 1) out of 6 animals presented one major spot at the injection site but also displayed scattered labeling throughout the body, with focuses in regions compatible with the lungs, liver, and kidney. Such secondary spots represented 5–10% of the total radioactivity. Signal diffusion was probably due to the accidental hit of a small blood vessel. Animals were submitted to a second scintigraphy after 24 h, and the spots observed were similar to those obtained after 1 hour for each animal. These results show that after transplantation, cells did not diffuse to other locations within the body (Figure 4(b)).

3.4. Safety of Intraparenchymal AT-MSC Injection

In order to evaluate the safety of injecting AT-MSCs directly into the spinal cord, we have performed two assessments, namely, a detailed clinical/neurological examination and a set of blood tests. No cell-related adverse events (e.g., infection and neuropathic pain) were observed during the procedure or follow-up period, supporting the notion that cell transplantation is safe. On the other hand, none of the dogs recovered deep pain perception or bladder function, although dog 3 recovered ambulation (see Section 3.5). Noteworthy were the observations that animal 2 presented a slight recovery of proprioception, which shifted from absent before transplantation to diminished after 4 weeks. In addition, this same dog stopped self-mutilating the posterior digits, suggesting a reduction of paresthesia.

Blood tests were carried out before and 1 and 2 weeks after injection. None of the biochemical markers of liver and kidney functions were affected by the transplantation procedure. Values for AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, and urea remained within the normal range (Figures 5(a)5(e)). The analysis of cell blood counts did not show alterations (Figures 5(f)5(h)), confirming lack of evidence for deleterious effects of intraspinal injection of AT-MSCs in dogs.

3.5. Functional Evaluation of Locomotor Activity

The locomotor function was evaluated using the Olby scale, which is a practical test to detect eventual functional gains of the treatment but which has the limitation of not assessing possible differences between the affected hind limbs. Animal 1, who had IVDD between L5 and L6 one year before transplantation, received an Olby score of 4 before treatment and did not present improvement at the end of the study. Animal 2, IVDD between T13 and L1 one year before transplantation, received scores of 3 before and after transplantation, despite the clinical observation of improvements in postural reaction (proprioception) and interruption of self-mutilating after AT-MSC transplantation. Dog 3, who had a fracture luxation at T13-L1 without surgical stabilization or decompression and was paraplegic for six months before treatment, showed a progressive increase in locomotor function. The Olby score increased from 0 before treatment to 7, 16 weeks after AT-MSC transplantation. Animal 4, IVDD between T12 and T13 six months before transplantation, also improved locomotor function, changing the Olby score from 0 before treatment to 4 after AT-MSC transplantation. Dog 5, IVDD between T11 and T12, submitted to decompression surgery two years before without report of functional improvement, received Olby scores of 3 before and after cell treatment. Finally, dog 6, who had a T12 fracture followed by surgery with decompression and stabilization one year before transplantation, received Olby scores of 0 before transplantation and 3 after, 4 weeks after cell implant. The score of 3 remained unchanged between 4 and 16 weeks. Out of the 6 dogs included in the study, none presented reduction in the Olby score and three presented improvements (Figure 6). Only one (animal 3) of the dogs in the study regained the ability to walk.

4. Discussion

In this work, we set out to investigate the effects of an intraspinal injection of allogeneic canine AT-MSCs in dogs with natural chronic spinal cord injury. The study was designed as a pilot clinical test with two primary goals, to ascertain the feasibility and the safety of the procedure and the secondary goal of verifying a possible beneficial effect of the treatment. Our study is the first to use adult stem cells in dogs bearing natural lesions that had progressed to the chronic phase. This is important because chronically injured animals displaying stable functional deficits are thought to be the major population to benefit of a future cell therapy-based standard treatment for spinal cord injury in the veterinary set.

The feasibility of the procedure needed to be tested since we chose a novel and rather unrefined procedure for cell delivery, namely, a percutaneous injection guided by a portable digital X-ray device. Previous works had used fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous injection [22] or open surgery for cell grafting [23]. By scintigraphy imaging, we found that cells previously labeled with 99mTc were delivered into the desired region within the lesioned segment of the spinal cord. The observation that cells remained within the injection area after 1 and 24 hours supported the notion that they reached the solid tissue of the spinal parenchyma instead of the cerebrospinal fluid, from which they would have spread along the axis of the cord. Our procedure reduces the complexity of intraspinal cell transplantation, since it can be performed in a simple way with a percutaneous injection, basically only requiring the equipment necessary for deep anesthesia.

Previous works have studied the effects of canine AT-MSCs in dogs with spinal cord injury [1921]. While their overall conclusion was that the treatment promoted functional recovery and tissue preservation, little focus was given to possible detrimental clinical effects of allogeneic cell transplantation into the experimental subjects. Since the absence of detriments is a fundamental point if one wants to move forward to clinical approval of cell therapy, here, we included a detailed evaluation of the clinical status of the experimental animals. Analyses of serum markers of liver and kidney functions showed no alterations at one or two weeks after transplantation, while the values obtained remained within the range of the standard values for each parameter. A similar behavior was obtained when cell blood counts were analyzed. In addition, a detailed neurological examination reported no functional deterioration in any of the animals, which indicates that the intraspinal injection of AT-MSCs was harmless for dogs. We opted for presenting blood analyses results as the means obtained for the whole group of animals because such average represented each dog individually. In none of the six animals evaluated, we found values for CBC or biochemical markers falling out of the standard ranges determined for each parameter.

Mesenchymal stem cells are known to negatively modulate the immune system [24, 25], which is the reason for them to be suitable for allogeneic transplantation. Such immunosuppressive effects may account for the neuroprotection they confer when injected within the first days after SCI [18, 26]. The immune reaction following SCI in dogs has been characterized during the acute and subacute phases as a predominantly innate response, mainly mediated by resident microglia and not involving consistent infiltration of peripheral T cells or B lymphocytes [27, 28]. This is distinct from the occurring in rodents, where the adaptative immune response plays a major role [29, 30]. Moreover, in rodents, peripheral infiltration of inflammatory cells after SCI extends up to the chronic phase, peaking at two months after injury [31]. A similar phenomenon in dogs has not been searched for. However, the fact that, contrary to rodents, dogs do not develop a notable adaptative response, suggests that the predictable immunosuppressive effect of AT-MSCs should not play a role in the context of a chronic lesion as in the present study. Although we have not carried out a direct assessment of inflammation, the lack of alteration in leukocyte counts is in accordance with this interpretation. Interestingly, Lee and coworkers, who injected AT-MSCs in dogs with experimentally inflicted SCI in the chronic phase, reported even a proinflammatory effect of AT-MSCs detected as enhancements in levels of COX2 and TNF-α [21].

The third aim envisaged here was to test possible functional benefits of transplanted AT-MSCs. Despite the drawbacks of the reduced number of animals () and the heterogeneity of the lesions, the fact that all dogs included in the study had stabilized locomotion deficits for at least six months prior to injection allowed for the detection of eventual motor gains after treatment. The Olby scale was used to monitor the locomotor performance. The Olby scale, which is based on the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale [32], had been originally designed in response to the lack of a sufficiently sensitive method for detecting small changes in locomotor ability of dogs that could be used in clinical studies [33], although it does not assess possible differences between the affected hind limbs. It has the advantage of providing a way to quantify the progress in ambulation, which, in a clinical setting, is the most relevant parameter. Recently, the same research group [34] developed a method that quantifies stepping ability and coordination in dogs with a wide range of severities of thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. Thus, the scale has also been validated for monitoring functional progress in other types of injuries, including spinal cord injury, as used here.

Out of the six dogs included in our study, two (animals 1 and 5) did not present any sign of functional improvement after treatment. Animal 1 had a lumbar injury at L5-L6. The fact that only the tip-end of the spinal cord is present at this segment might explain the lack of beneficial effects in animal 1, who probably lost ambulation due to some additional injury. Animal 5 was by far the older, heavier, and most chronically injured dog included. Animal 2 did not show progress in the Olby score but presented a slight improvement in postural reaction, which moved from absent to minimal. More importantly, dog 2 stopped intense self-mutilation after treatment, which is an indication of recovery in sensitivity. The other three dogs, 3, 4, and 6, showed progress in the evaluation by the Olby scale. Animals 4 and 6 moved from 0 to 4 and 3, respectively. Although the final scores reached were not sufficient to permit independent ambulation, these dogs recovered variable degrees of joint movements, which were absent before cell injection. Finally, animal 3 progressed from 0 to 7 and regained independent gait. In the three cases of functional progress, the locomotor gains were obtained within 8 weeks after transplantation and tended to stabilize between 8 and 16 weeks, opening the possibility that a second injection could contribute to further recovery. Curiously, the three animals that improved the Olby scores were those starting with score 0. One explanation for this is that the recovery promoted by AT-MSCs might be restricted to the recuperation of a small number of fibers, which will only result in the control of articulations moved by muscles simultaneously innervated by various groups of fibers. Another interesting observation was that the two animals bearing fractures showed progress in the Olby scale, while out of the four dogs bearing IVDD, only one showed progress.

Recovery of motor function after SCI can be attributed to several mechanisms. In most experimental studies, using models of acute spinal cord injury, benefits promoted by AT-MSCs are thought to result from the secretion of molecules that contribute to protect the nervous tissue to mitigate secondary damage, such as neurotrophic factors, anti-inflammatory cytokines, and extracellular matrix molecules [18, 26]. In chronic injury, however, it is unlikely that cells will promote neuroprotection. Instead, AT-MSCs are urged to play a proregenerative function, either mediated by replacing lost cells, particularly oligodendrocytes, which would facilitate remyelination of uninjured axons, or mediated by some degree of neural plasticity, involving axonal sprouting or the formation of new circuits. In the present work, we have not accessed the spinal tissue because animals were clinical subjects and remained alive after completion of the study. Therefore, it was not possible to ascribe the recovery to any of these specific regenerative mechanisms, although the lack of recovery in deep pain perception in all animals suggests that recovery preferentially attained local motor circuits. Nevertheless, independently of whether recovery occurred due to the stimulation of local generated circuits or to axonal regeneration, such recovery happened only after the therapy was delivered to chronically paralyzed dogs. Therefore, we can establish a correlation between the injection of AT-MSCs and the functional progress. We propose that further studies using AT-MSCs will contribute for the development of an efficient new therapy to treat spinal cord injury in dogs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that none of them have any competing interests in the manuscript.


  1. R. S. Bagley, “Spinal fracture or luxation,” The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 133–153, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. Courtine, Y. Gerasimenko, R. Van Den Brand et al., “Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1333–1342, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Grillner, “Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish,” Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control, pp. 1179–1236, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. O. Kiehn, “Locomotor circuits in the mammalian spinal cord,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 29, pp. 279–306, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. G. McMahill, D. L. Borjesson, M. Sieber-Blum, J. A. Nolta, and B. K. Sturges, “Stem cells in canine spinal cord injury—promise for regenerative therapy in a large animal model of human disease,” Stem Cell Reviews, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 180–193, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. H. Lim, Y. E. Byeon, H. H. Ryu et al., “Transplantation of canine umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in experimentally induced spinal cord injured dogs,” Journal of Veterinary Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275–282, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. S. Park, Y. E. Byeon, H. H. Ryu et al., “Comparison of canine umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation times: involvement of astrogliosis, inflammation, intracellular actin cytoskeleton pathways, and neurotrophin-3,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 11-12, pp. 1867–1880, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H.-H. Ryu, K. A. Byung-Jae, P. A. Sung-Su et al., “Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells derived from fat, bone marrow, Wharton’s jelly, and umbilical cord blood for treating spinal cord injuries in dogs,” The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 1617–1630, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D.-I. Jung, J. Ha, B. T. Kang et al., “A comparison of autologous and allogenic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in canine spinal cord injury,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 285, no. 1-2, pp. 67–77, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Neupane, C.-C. Chang, M. Kiupel, and V. Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, “Isolation and characterization of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Tissue Engineering. Part a, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1007–1015, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. S. Lee, J. J. Nah, B. C. Lee et al., “Maintenance and characterization of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells isolated from canine umbilical cord matrix by collagenase digestion,” Research in Veterinary Science, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Dominici, K. Le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–317, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, P. Ashjian et al., “Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 4279–4295, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. Lin, M. Garcia, H. Ning et al., “Defining stem and progenitor cells within adipose tissue,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1053–1063, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Lattanzi, M. C. Geloso, N. Saulnier et al., “Neurotrophic features of human adipose tissue-derived stromal cells: in vitro and in vivo studies,” Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology, vol. 2011, Article ID 468705, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. X. Wei, Z. Du, L. Zhao et al., “IFATS collection: the conditioned media of adipose stromal cells protect against hypoxia-ischemia-induced brain damage in neonatal rats,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 478–488, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Z. Zhou, Y. Chen, H. Zhang et al., “Comparison of mesenchymal stromal cells from human bone marrow and adipose tissue for the treatment of spinal cord injury,” Cytotherapy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 434–448, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Menezes, M. A. Nascimento, J. P. Gonçalves et al., “Human mesenchymal cells from adipose tissue deposit laminin and promote regeneration of injured spinal cord in rats,” PloS One, vol. 9, no. 5, article e96020, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. H. Ryu, J. H. Lim, Y. E. Byeon et al., “Functional recovery and neural differentiation after transplantation of allogenic adipose-derived stem cells in a canine model of acute spinal cord injury,” Journal of Veterinary Science, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 273–284, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S.-S. Park, Y. J. Lee, S. H. Lee et al., “Functional recovery after spinal cord injury in dogs treated with a combination of Matrigel and neural-induced adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Cytotherapy, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 584–597, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. H. Lee, Y. Kim, D. Rhew et al., “Effect of the combination of mesenchymal stromal cells and chondroitinase ABC on chronic spinal cord injury,” Cytotherapy, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1374–1383, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. Granger, H. Blamires, R. J. M. Franklin, and N. D. Jeffery, “Autologous olfactory mucosal cell transplants in clinical spinal cord injury: a randomized double-blinded trial in a canine translational model,” Brain, vol. 135, Part 11, pp. 3227–3237, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. A. P. Sarmento, M. N. Rodrigues, R. Z. Bocabello, A. M. Mess, and M. A. Miglino, “Pilot study: bone marrow stem cells as a treatment for dogs with chronic spinal cord injury,” Regenerative Medicine Research, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Aggarwal and M. F. Pittenger, “Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1815–1822, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Le Blanc and D. Mougiakakos, “Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 383–396, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. T. Wright, W. El Masri, A. Osman, J. Chowdhury, and W. E. B. Johnson, “Concise review: bone marrow for the treatment of spinal cord injury: mechanisms and clinical applications,” Stem Cells, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. I. Spitzbarth, P. Bock, V. Haist et al., “Prominent microglial activation in the early proinflammatory immune response in naturally occurring canine spinal cord injury,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 703–714, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. I. Spitzbarth, W. Baumgärtner, and A. Beineke, “The role of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of spontaneous canine CNS diseases,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 147, no. 1-2, pp. 6–24, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. G. Popovich, P. Wei, and B. T. Stokes, “Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 377, no. 3, pp. 443–464, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. P. Stirling and V. W. Yong, “Dynamics of the inflammatory response after murine spinal cord injury revealed by flow cytometry,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 1944–1958, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. D. Beck, H. X. Nguyen, M. D. Galvan, D. L. Salazar, T. M. Woodruff, and A. J. Anderson, “Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment,” Brain, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 433–447, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D. M. Basso, M. S. Beattie, and J. C. Bresnahan, “A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. J. Olby, L. D. Risio, K. R. Muñana et al., “Development of a functional scoring system in dogs with acute spinal cord injuries,” American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1624–1628, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. J. Olby, J. H. Lim, K. Babb et al., “Gait scoring in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal cord injuries when walking on a treadmill,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 58, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Cláudia Cardoso Maciel Escalhão et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.