Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Alzheimer’s Disease

Hernández, A. E.; García, E.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7834421

Stem Cells International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine 2021

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 7834421 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7834421

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Alzheimer’s Disease

A. E. Hernández¹and E. García¹

Academic Editor: Huseyin Sumer

Received15 Jun 2021

Accepted09 Aug 2021

Published01 Sept 2021

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease responsible for 60-70% of the 50 million cases of dementia worldwide. It is characterized by neuronal cell death, shrinkage of brain tissue, and progressive cognitive, motor, and behavioral impairment, which often leads to death. Although current treatment has helped improve the patient’s quality of life, it has not been able to alter the underlying disease pathology of AD. Studies have shown that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)—a group of multipotent stem cells—have the ability to stimulate neuroregeneration and inhibit disease progression. More recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs) from cytokine-preconditioned MSCs have also shown to induce immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects in AD models. This review will aim to compile pertinent preclinical AD research on transgenic mice as well as clinical trials on MSC-based therapy from diverse sources.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization, around 50 million individuals worldwide suffer from dementia [1]. This figure is expected to double every 20 years, until 2050 [2]. The most common form of dementia is Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and may be responsible for 60-70% of the cases [1]. AD is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the accumulation of extracellular amyloid plaques primarily composed of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of hyperphosphorylated tau protein [3]. Alois Alzheimer first described the disease in 1906 when he reported a 51-year-old woman with cognitive disturbances, delusions, disorientation, and other behavioral changes. AD is associated with neuronal cell death, shrinkage of brain tissue, and progressive cognitive, motor, and behavioral impairment, which often leads to death. As of today, disease-modifying treatments capable of altering the underlying disease pathology of AD are not available [4].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a group of multipotent stem cells capable of differentiating into nonmesenchymal lineages [5]. MSCs are considered a very promising approach to stimulate neuroregeneration due to their immunomodulatory properties and high biosafety but also because of their ability to synthetize neurotrophic and proangiogenic factors [6]. In AD, stem cell therapies have attempted to replace neurons that have been impaired or lost. MSC-based therapies have shown potential to restore damaged neural tissue as well as slow disease progression. Although the specific therapeutic mechanism effect of stem cell transplantation is not known, MSC therapy has shown to be an alternative therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative diseases such as AD [5].

2. Pathogenesis of AD and Current Treatment

AD is believed to occur when extracellular senile plaques and intracellular NFTs of hyperphosphorylated tau protein accumulate in the brain. These pathological processes cause a series of downstream events that include neurodegeneration with neuronal and synaptic loss leading to macroscopic atrophy [7]. Although the pathophysiology of AD is still subject to debate, the predominant hypothesis known as the amyloid cascade hypothesis predicts that the accumulation and aggregation of Aβ provoke a pathological set of events that ultimately produce what we know as AD [3, 4]. The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is a transmembrane protein that plays an important role in neuronal development, signaling, and intracellular transport [8]. In the central nervous system (CNS), APP can undergo cleavage either by the nonamyloidogenic or amyloidogenic pathway. In the nonamyloidogenic pathway, APP is first cleaved by α-secretase secreting the extracellular soluble peptide alpha (sAPPα) and an amino acid fragment known C83, which is later cleaved by γ-secretase producing a fragment known as p3. On the other hand, in the amyloidogenic pathway, APP is first cleaved by β-secretase, secreting the extracellular soluble peptide beta (sAPPβ) and an amino acid fragment called C99. γ-Secretase also participates in this pathway by cleaving C99, producing a 37-49 amino acid residue peptide known as Aβ [4]. The two main isoforms of Aβ are Aβ40 and Aβ42. The only difference between them is that Aβ42 has two extra residues at the C-terminus. Most amyloid plaques in AD consist of predominantly Aβ42 [9]. The accumulation of Aβ monomers, as well as the decreased clearance, causes it to self-assemble and aggregate into oligomers and eventually into highly regular amyloid fibrils, generating plaques that lead to neurotoxicity and dementia [4]. Soluble Aβ and amyloid plaques are thought to induce a series of events like inflammation, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, and hyperphosphorylation of tau. This is a protein known for stabilizing and assembling neuronal microtubules. In AD, the hyperphosphorylation of tau promotes insoluble filamentous aggregates that are part of the intracellular NFTs characteristic of the disease [10]. Although the amyloid cascade hypothesis establishes that the hyperphosphorylation of tau is a downstream event of Aβ accumulation, it is possible that tau and Aβ act in parallel pathways causing AD and intensifying each other’s toxic effects [2]. In addition, neuroinflammation has also demonstrated to play a key role in AD pathological process. Specifically, microglia have shown to be one of the main players orchestrating inflammation. In AD, uncontrolled microglia activity aggravates tau pathology, stimulates the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines, and causes neuronal injury [11]. Lastly, mass neuronal and synaptic loss is also involved in the AD pathological process. Neurodegeneration affects the entorhinal cortex first, and then the subiculum and CA1 hippocampal subregion and basal forebrain networks. In the advanced stages of AD, the temporal lobes are also affected, ultimately spreading through most cortical layers [12].

AD is commonly divided into familial AD (fAD) and sporadic AD (sAD). fAD is associated with early symptoms of onset and affects <5% of all AD patients. This type of AD is caused by mutations in APP, presenilin 1 (PS1), and/or presenilin 2 (PS2) [13]. Presenilin 1 along with presenilin 2 is the catalytic components of the γ-secretase enzyme, which as we previously mentioned, cleaves APP into Aβs of varying lengths [14]. Thus, fAd-related mutations in presenilins alter the γ-secretase cleavage site, resulting in the generation of longer and more fibrillogenic Aβ [15]. On the other hand, sAD, which is associated with late onset, represents nearly 95% of patients with AD. sAD is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental risk factors without a documented familial history of AD. The apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) and the triggering-receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) have been considered the two major risk factors for sAD [13]. APOE genotypes have a significant impact on the deposition of Aβ to form senile plaques and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), two main hallmarks of amyloid pathology in AD [16]. Moreover, TREM2 mutations linked to AD generate a loss of TREM2 protein function, which is a receptor primarily expressed by microglia. This mutation affects the behavior of microglial cells, especially their response to Aβ plaques [17].

For both fAD and sAD, the current treatment includes two different types of pharmacological therapy. On one hand, cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine are prescribed for mild, moderate, or severe AD dementia [18]. ChEIs improve cognitive symptoms by inhibiting the biological activity of acetylcholinesterase and as a result increases acetylcholine levels in the synaptic cleft, a neurotransmitter used by cholinergic neurons which has been shown to improve the function of brain cells [19]. Response rates vary with approximately around one-third of individuals with AD showing no benefit at all and one-fifth having greater benefit. Similarly, about one-third of patients do not tolerate the ChEIs treatment approach because of side effects [20]. Meanwhile, in moderate to severe AD cases, patients are prescribed memantine, which inhibits the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and as a consequence may prevent neuron loss, as well as improve symptoms by restoring damaged neurons. In comparison, NMDA receptor antagonists have fewer side effects than ChEIs [18, 20]. Moreover, a nutraceutical, known as Huperzine A, is also used as an alternative treatment; however, it is not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). It is important to note that although the current treatment has helped improve the quality of life of patients living with AD when used at the appropriate time, it has not changed the course or rate of decline of the disease [18]. It has a relatively small average overall effect over AD and is not capable of altering the course of the underlying neurodegenerative process [20].

3. MSC as an Alternative Treatment

Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that have the ability to self-renew, proliferate from a single cell, and differentiate into different types of cells and tissues. These cells can be grouped into 4 groups according to their origin: embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and fetal and adult stem cells. MSCs are an example of adult stem cells that can be obtained from various tissues including bone marrow, adipose tissue, bone, Wharton’s jelly, umbilical cord blood, and peripheral blood [21]. According to the International Society for Cellular Therapy, MSCs are defined by expressing cluster differentiation (CD), CD90, CD73, CD105, and CD44 while not expressing CD45 and CD31 MSCs normal function in the body includes migrating to injury sites and taking part of a reparative process [22]. In comparison to other stem cells, MSCs differentiation potential is superior as they can differentiate into neuronal cells, osteocytes, chondrocytes, or adipocytes when stimulated with certain growth factors. In addition, MSCs also possess a low risk of differentiating into cancer cells and are infrequently immunogenic [23]. The latter is due to not expressing MHC class II and costimulatory molecules [24]. Moreover, MSCs also possess the ability to migrate to injury and hypoxia sites, boosting tissue repair, reducing apoptosis, and promoting angiogenesis [25].

In AD models, the reduction of Aβ plaques, β-secretase, and tau hyperphosphorylation as well as the reversal of microglial inflammation, and the stimulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines are among the mechanisms postulated to have a therapeutic effect in MSC therapy. Upregulating neuroprotection and downregulating proinflammatory cytokines have also been shown to have immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects [26]. In addition, MSC excreted neurotrophic factors have been shown to be able to stimulate neurogenesis and synaptogenesis, alter immune cell response through overexpressing neuroprotective cytokines like IL-10, while reducing proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, increase the phagocytic activity of microglial cells, improve neovascularization, overcome cell death induced by Aβ and tau, reduce oxidative stress and apoptosis, alter autophagy pathways, and decrease plaque size [27]. Secreted MSC neurotrophic growth factors include glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), insulin-like growth factor 1(IGF-1), nerve growth factor (NGF), and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) [22, 27]. MSCs have also demonstrated to set off immune responses through microglia activation, which as a consequence sets off anti-inflammatory response. They have also revealed to change microglia phenotype from classically activated to alternatively activated, causing a drop in proinflammatory cytokines and a rise of anti-inflammatory cytokines [28]. Moreover, MSCs also enhance nerve regeneration because of their ability to differentiate into Schwann cell-like cells, which are known for promoting regeneration. MSCs have also demonstrated to boost nerve regeneration via secretion of neurotrophic factors that induce axonal growth and stem cell differentiation into myelinating cell lines [25].

However, the specific mechanism effect of stem cell transplantation is still not known. Possible theories include direct cell replacement of injured neural cells, activation of endogenous stem cells, and secretion of neurotrophic and neuroprotective factors to increase cell survival [29]. In this regard, studies have suggested that the paracrine activity could be the key therapeutic mechanism due to research that indicated that secreted substances in MSC-derived conditioned media, rather than cell incorporation, were responsible for the considerable therapeutic effect in both in vitro and in vivo contexts [24].

4. Preclinical Studies

Many animal models of AD have been studied using different species, such as C. elegans, D. melanogaster, mouse, rat, and nonhuman primates [29]. However, the most used animal models are transgenic mice which overexpress or silence APP, PS1, and PS2 genes associated with fAD. However, these transgenic mice alone have not been able to replicate most of the pathophysiology of AD. With this in mind, a triple transgenic mouse model with modified APP, PS1, and PS2 was generated. However, it is important to highlight that although a triple transgenic mouse is able to produce Aβ plaques and NFTs, the progressive neuronal loss in the hippocampus and other regions of the human AD brain was not found [30, 31]. On the other hand, no animal model is able to nearly resemble the mechanism and progression of the use of sAD, which is a significant restriction given that this type of AD is significantly more frequent than fAD. As a result, many outcomes found in animal models are rarely seen in clinical studies [13]. The latest findings on MSC therapy in transgenic mouse models of AD will be presented in the next section. A summary is provided in Table 1.

The transplantation of Wharton’s Jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) has been studied in AD mouse models. Lee et al. investigated the stereotactic administration of human WJ-MSCs and their secreted Agouti-related peptide (AgRP) into the hippocampi of 5XFAD mice which improved proteasome activity and reduced the accumulation of ubiquitin-conjugated proteins. The investigators suggest that either WJ-MSCs or AgRP may be used to delay the clinical progression of AD by improving proteasome activity and consequently lowering abnormal protein aggregation [32]. In another study, Xie et al. found that four weeks after transplantation, WJ-MSCs significantly enhanced spatial learning and mitigated memory decline in APP/PS1 mice. In addition, Aβ deposition and soluble Aβ levels were significantly reduced, while anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 significantly increased. Proinflammatory microglial activation and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNFα were also significantly reduced [33]. More recently, a group of researchers evaluated the difference between “prime” and “naïve” human WJ-MSCs. Prime human WJ-MSCs were previously exposed to an AD cell line via a coculture system and “naïve” human WJ-MSCs. Although both showed promising results in reducing cell death, ubiquitin conjugate levels, and Aβ levels, “prime” human WJ-MSCs showed greater results. This suggests that exposure of human WJ-MSCs to an AD environment improves its therapeutic effects [34].

The transplantation of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UCB-MSCs) has also showed promising results in AD mouse models. In a 5xFAD mouse AD model, human UCB-MS mitigated spatial learning and memory deterioration and alleviated the hyperphosphorylation of tau by GAL-3 secretion [35]. In the same regard, Kim et al. demonstrated that recurring intrathecal (I.T.) administration of human UCB-MSCs improves adult hippocampal neurogenesis and synaptic activity through growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) secretion in an AD model [36]. Human UCB-MSCs have also demonstrated potential to attenuate Aβ42-induced synaptic dysfunction by regulating thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) secretion [37]. In a study using Tg2576 mice, Cui et al. discovered that human UCB-MSC transplantation significantly mitigated cognitive deterioration of AD mice without altering Aβ levels in the hippocampus. They suggest that human UCB-MSCs may enhance cognitive deterioration by reducing oxidative stress and promoting hippocampal neurogenesis [38]. Moreover, Wang et al. demonstrated that resveratrol facilitates UCB-MSC engraftment in the hippocampus and enhances its therapeutic effect [39]. Similarly, Park et al. studied the coculture of UCB-MSCs, WJ-MSCs, and SVZ-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) in an in vitro 5XFAD mouse model. Results demonstrated neuronal development and neurite outgrowth and an increased secretion of activin A. This suggests that both MSCs and activin A may be used to improve neurogenesis for cortical regeneration to treat AD [40].

On the other hand, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) have also been investigated. Intracerebroventricular (I.C.V.) BM-MSCs have shown potential to improve cognitive deterioration in AD model mice by mitigating astrocytic inflammation and synaptogenesis. Exosomal transfer of miR-146a—which accumulates in astrocytes—is suggested by Nakano et al. to be involved in the improvement of cognitive deterioration [41]. In another study, IL-1, IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels were reduced after human BM-MSC treatment [42]. More recently, a group of researchers investigated the effects of BM-MSCs in 3xTg AD mice using serial [18F] florbetaben positron emission tomography to evaluate the changes in Aβ deposits after MSC therapy. Results showed that a reduction of Aβ deposits in AD mice during BMSC treatment could be confirmed by PET. This opens the possibility that noninvasive PET imaging may be used for the evaluation of MSC response in clinical applications [43]. In the same regard, Park et al. demonstrated that a small number of mouse BM-MSCs are able to reach the brain by intravenous (I.V.) infusion, and a greater distribution of BM-MSCs was found in the 3 × Tg-AD mice compared to a control group. In addition, the results showed that brain uptake increased in the AD group, while the control group did not change significantly [44]. BM-MSC systemic administration in APP/PS1 mouse has also shown the potential to reduce pyroglutamate-modified amyloid-beta (pE3-Aβ) plaque size, a potential biomarker for Aβ plaque pathology [45, 46]. The systemic administration of secretomes isolated from mouse BM-MSCs exposed to AD mouse brain homogenates has also been studied. Santamaria et al. demonstrated that the secretome derived from AD-conditioned MSCs can fully replicate the neuroreparative effects previously associated with MSC direct transplantation. Repeated intranasal (I.N.) infusions of the secretome of APP/PS1 fully restored mouse memory and improved the neuropathology in advanced stages of the disease. Preconditioning BM-MSCs to an AD environment showed to be crucial to induce the therapeutic activity of the secretome [47].

The therapeutic effects of adipose tissue, menstrual blood, and amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells have also been studied. Zhao et al. studied menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MenSCs) that showed that intracerebral (IC) injection of them improved Aβ plaques, reduced tau hyperphosphorylation, and enhanced the spatial learning and memory of APP/PS1 mice. They also demonstrated that MenSCs were able to increment various Aβ degrading enzymes and decrease several proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α, which as we previously mentioned are associated with an altered microglial phenotype [48]. On the other hand, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) showed to improve endogenous neurogenesis in both the subgranular and subventricular zones, reduce oxidative stress, and mitigate cognitive deterioration in APP/PS1 mice [49]. Similarly, human amniotic mesenchymal stem cell (AM-MSC) intrahippocampal transplantation significantly diminished Aβ deposition and improved the spatial learning and memory deficits in APP/PS1 mice. Zheng et al. suggest that improved cognition may be associated with an increment in hippocampal synaptic density and neurogenesis that is regulated by BDNF [50].

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from cytokine-preconditioned MSCS are also being investigated as a therapeutic approach for AD due to MSCs reporting paracrine activity. EVs such as exosomes and microvesicles are lipid bilayer vesicles secreted by cells into the extracellular space [11, 51]. Lourdo et al. found that mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MCS-EVs) regulate the microglia activation and decreases dendritic spine loss in a triple-transgenic 3xTg mouse [11]. Another study showed that I.V. injected exosomes accumulate mainly in the spleen and liver and not in the brain [52]. Therefore, Cui et al. proposed surface-modified MSC-EVs that target the cortex and hippocampus of AD mice by using a specific rabies viral glycoprotein (RVG) peptide to prevent memory deficits in AD. Results showed that RVG-conjugated mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes (MSC-RVG-Exo) improved memory deficits, decreased plaque deposition and Aβ levels, and normalized levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to unmodified exosomes [53].

5. Clinical Studies

Many clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the role of MSCS derived from various sources in patients with AD. It is important to note that only a few have been officially completed and have published results. A summary of the clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov evaluating MSCs for AD treatment can be found in Table 2.

5.1. Completed

A phase 1 clinical trial evaluated a single stereotactic brain infusion of human UCB-MSCs in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. 3 subjects received a single low dose infusion ( cells/60 μL) while 6 subjects received a high dose infusion ( cells/60 μL). Results showed that a single injection of human UCB-MSCs was safe and well tolerated and did not cause serious adverse effects during the two-year follow-up. However, it failed to produce the same therapeutic effect as seen in animal studies. Kim et al. speculate that the discrepancy between animal and human studies may be related to the Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (PiB-PET), which may not be sensitive enough to detect soluble amyloid or diffuse amyloid plaques in comparison with immunohistochemical staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and Western blot used in preclinical studies, which are capable of detecting soluble and insoluble amyloid as well as different types of amyloid plaques. Another reason as to why the human brain did not replicate findings from the animal studies may be due to their AD microenvironment differences. Similarly, preclinical studies rely on xenogeneic transplantation where as human clinical trials rely on allogenic transplantation. Some limitations of this clinical study include the lack of a control group and the small number of participants [54–56].

A phase 1/2a trial evaluated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, and exploratory efficacy of 3 repeated intraventricular administrations (I.V.T.) of NEUROSTEM® (human UCB-MSCs) versus placebo via an Ommaya reservoir at 4 week intervals in subjects with AD was completed in December 2019. The study was divided into two stages, stage 1 consisted of a dose escalation in which 3 subjects received a low dose ( cells/2 mL) and 6 subjects a high dose ( cells/2 mL). On the other hand, stage 2, made up by a randomized and multiple-dose cohort parallel design, consisted of 36 individuals, in which 24 subjects received a high dose with the concentration previously mentioned and 12 received placebo. All groups received 3 repeated I.V.T. infusions via an Ommaya Reservoir at 4 week intervals. The study has yet to publish the results [57].

A phase 1/2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was completed on 2019. 21 subjects were randomly assigned into the AstroStem (autologous human AD-MSCs) and placebo control groups in a 1 : 1 ratio. Both groups received 9 repeated I.V. infusions at 2 week intervals, however, only 7 subjects completed the AstroStem infusions and 5 the placebo. Results showed 3 serious adverse effects in the AstroStem group including diarrhea, oesophageal, squamous cell carcinoma stage IV, and pulmonary embolism. Other reported adverse effects were open-angle glaucoma, dysphagia, fatigue, infusion site reaction, fall, dehydration, abnormal loss of weight, syncope, and ecchymosis. The changes in ADAS-Cog score from baseline to week 30 in the AstroStem group were 5.9 (6.8) and 3.0 (5.4) in the control group [58].

5.2. Ongoing

A phase 1/2a, open-label, which is currently an ongoing schedule to end in February 2022, was designed to evaluate the safety profile of 4 I.V. infusions of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (HB-adMSCs) in 24 subjects as a possible treatment for AD. 4 I.V. infusions were administered on weeks 0, 2, 6, and 8 at a dose of total HB-adMSC cells. The main purpose was to evaluate the adverse effects of their treatment as well as the ability of HB-adMSCs to alter AD-related inflammation via measuring the levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), and markers associated with amyloid deposition, Aβ40, and Aβ42. Participants will also be evaluated for cognitive deficits determined by changes in standard values of MMSE, ADCS-ADL, Alzheimer’s disease Related Quality of Life (ADRQL), Altoida Neuro Motor Index (NMI) for Digital Biomarkers, and Clinical Dementia Rating Questionnaire (CDR) [59].

A phase 1 placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Longeveron Mesenchymal Stem Cells (LMSCs) in individuals with AD is currently ongoing.

A single peripheral I.V. infusion was administered in 25 subjects. Group 1 (10 individuals) received 20 million LMSCs (low-dose), group 2 (10 individuals) received 100 million LMSCs (high-dose), and group 3 (5 individuals) received placebo. To evaluate the safety of the infusion, the incidence of any treatment-emergent serious adverse events was assessed within the first 30 days after treatment administration. Preliminary efficacy was determined by changes in standard values for ADAS-Cog, MMSE, NPI, GDS, University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), ADCS-ADL, Quality of Life-Alzheimer’s Disease (QOL-AD), blood inflammatory and AD biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory biomarkers, CSF biomarkers of AD, and brain volumetry calculated using MRI at baseline, 2, 4, 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks’ postinfusion [60].

5.3. Challenges

Despite all favorable findings found in MSC-AD therapy, this treatment has several limitations. To begin, no animal model is able to fully replicate the entire pathophysiology of the disease. Similarly, most transgenic mice utilized in preclinical studies rely on the expression of fAD mutations, the least frequent type of AD, while most clinical trials consist of patients with sAD. This complicates the translation of fundamental research findings into clinical investigations. The lack of an effective model that can replicate the entire pathophysiology of the disease is one of the biggest setbacks in the search for an effective AD treatment [31].

Human UCB-MSCs are the most often employed MSCs in clinical studies. However, further research is required to determine if this source is truly the most effective. Correspondingly, the number of injections and delivery routes must also be optimized [71]. In this regard, of the only three completed clinical trials, they all used a different delivery route including I.V., I.V.T., and I.C. The most effective and noninvasive route must be used as repeated infusions will be needed considering that NCT01297218 showed that a single infusion of MSCs was not enough to alter the AD pathophysiological process [11, 54]. Furthermore, further research and appropriate assessment techniques are required to prove the absence of adverse effects from MSC treatment on a long-term basis.

In regard to the administration of MSC-EVs, although preclinical studies have shown promising potential therapeutic effects, it has yet to be studied in patients with AD. As of May 31, 2021, only one clinical trial which is currently recruiting participants is set to study the safety and efficacy of exosomes for AD treatment. However, as suggested by Salem et al., some limitations including EVs heterogeneity, isolation, and production techniques need to be assessed first [28].

6. Conclusions

Many preclinical trials evaluating MSC treatment in transgenic mouse models of AD have yielded promising therapeutic outcomes. However, this has not been the case with human clinical trials. Although MSC therapy has demonstrated to be safe and tolerable in a single clinical study with published findings, the therapeutic benefit was not replicated. The frequency of unsuccessful clinical trials might be lowered by developing a successful AD model, notably the one for sAD, which accounts for the vast majority of AD patients. This will allow for a more efficient transition from basic research to clinical trials. Nonetheless, we believe that MSC therapy has a promising future and that its paracrine function, in particular, must be harnessed to establish a successful treatment for AD.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This review was funded by Fondo de Investigación de la Universidad Anáhuac, México.

References

Dementia, “Who.int,” 2021, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia/.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Scheltens, K. Blennow, M. Breteler et al., “Alzheimer's disease,” The Lancet, vol. 388, no. 10043, pp. 505–517, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Lauritzen, R. Pardossi-Piquard, C. Bauer et al., “The -secretase-derived C-terminal fragment of APP, C99, but not A , is a key contributor to early intraneuronal lesions in triple-transgenic mouse hippocampus,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 46, pp. 16243–16255, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Soria Lopez, H. González, and G. Léger, “Alzheimer's disease,” in Handbook of Clinical Neurology, pp. 231–255, Geriatric Neurology. ST. DeKosky and S. Asthana Editors. Elsevier, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Chakari-Khiavi, S. Dolati, A. Chakari-Khiavi et al., “Prospects for the application of mesenchymal stem cells in Alzheimer's disease treatment,” Life Sciences, vol. 231, article 116564, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Mukhamedshina, O. Gracheva, D. Mukhutdinova, Y. Chelyshev, and A. Rizvanov, “Mesenchymal stem cells and the neuronal microenvironment in the area of spinal cord injury,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 14, no. 2, article 244778, pp. 227–237, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lane, J. Hardy, and J. Schott, “Alzheimer's disease,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Chen, T. Xu, Y. Yan et al., “Amyloid beta: structure, biology and structure-based therapeutic development,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1205–1235, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Gu and Z. Guo, “Alzheimer's Aβ42 and Aβ40 peptides form interlaced amyloid fibrils,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 305–311, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Barragán Martínez, M. García Soldevilla, A. Parra Santiago, and J. Tejeiro Martínez, “Alzheimer's disease,” Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado, vol. 12, no. 74, pp. 4338–4346, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Losurdo, M. Pedrazzoli, C. D'Agostino et al., “Intranasal delivery of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles exerts immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects in a 3xTg model of Alzheimer's disease,” STEM CELLS Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1068–1084, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Duncan and M. Valenzuela, “Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and stem cell therapy,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 111, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, C. Chen, M. Mak et al., “Advance of sporadic Alzheimer's disease animal models,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 431–458, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. De Strooper, “Loss-of-function presenilin mutations in Alzheimer disease,” EMBO reports, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 141–146, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kabir, M. Uddin, J. Setu, G. Ashraf, M. Bin-Jumah, and M. Abdel-Daim, “Exploring the role of PSEN mutations in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 833–849, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Liu, C. C. Liu, T. Kanekiyo, H. Xu, and G. Bu, “Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms and therapy,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 106–118, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Carmona, K. Zahs, E. Wu, K. Dakin, J. Bras, and R. Guerreiro, “The role of TREM2 in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 721–730, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Weller and A. Budson, “Current understanding of Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis and treatment,” F1000Research, vol. 7, article 1161, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sharma, “Cholinesterase inhibitors as Alzheimer's therapeutics (Review),” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1479–1487, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Briggs, S. Kennelly, and D. O'Neill, “Drug treatments in Alzheimer’s disease,” Clinical Medicine, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 247–253, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Kolios and Y. Moodley, “Introduction to stem cells and regenerative medicine,” Respiration, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Staff, D. Jones, and W. Singer, “Mesenchymal stromal cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 892–905, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kim, Y. Lee, S. Lee, K. Kim, M. Song, and J. Lee, “Mesenchymal stem cell therapy and Alzheimer’s disease: current status and future perspectives,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liew, T. Katsuda, L. Gailhouste, H. Nakagama, and T. Ochiya, “Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a glimmer of hope in treating Alzheimer’s disease,” International Immunology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Cooney, E. Wimmers, Z. Ibrahim et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells enhance nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve repair and hindlimb transplant model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, L. Yang, and L. Zhao, “Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease,” World Journal of Stem Cells, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 787–802, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Alipour, S. Nabavi, L. Arab et al., “Stem cell therapy in Alzheimer’s disease: possible benefits and limiting drawbacks,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1425–1446, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Salem, G. Colpo, and A. Teixeira, “Stem cells in Alzheimer’s disease: current standing and future challenges,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1079, pp. 93–102, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Han, J. Bi, L. Qiao, and O. Arancio, “Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer’s disease,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1266, pp. 39–55, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Han, W. Wang, and C. Chen, “Research progress in animal models and stem cell therapy for Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neurorestoratology, vol. 2015, no. 3, pp. 11–22, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Drummond and T. Wisniewski, “Alzheimer’s disease: experimental models and reality,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 133, no. 2, article 1662, pp. 155–175, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Lee, S. Park, S. Kwon et al., “Agouti Related Peptide Secreted Via Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Upregulates Proteasome Activity in an Alzheimer's Disease Model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Xie, Z. Liu, X. Zhang et al., “Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate memory deficits and reduce amyloid-β deposition in an APP/PS1 transgenic mouse model,” Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Park, H. Kim, S. Kwon et al., “Exposure of mesenchymal stem cells to an Alzheimer’s disease environment enhances therapeutic effects,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2021, Article ID 6660186, 14 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lim, D. Lee, W. Choi, S. Choi, W. Oh, and D. Kim, “Galectin-3 secreted by human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduces aberrant tau phosphorylation in an Alzheimer disease model,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2020, Article ID 8878412, 14 pages, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kim, D. Lee, E. Chang et al., “GDF-15 secreted from human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells delivered through the cerebrospinal fluid promotes hippocampal neurogenesis and synaptic activity in an Alzheimer's disease model,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 2378–2390, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kim, H. Lim, D. Lee et al., “Thrombospondin-1 secreted by human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells rescues neurons from synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease model,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, article 18542, p. 354, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cui, S. Ma, C. Zhang et al., “Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation improves cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease mice by decreasing oxidative stress and promoting hippocampal neurogenesis,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 320, pp. 291–301, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, S. Ma, B. Yang et al., “Resveratrol promotes hUC-MSCs engraftment and neural repair in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 339, pp. 297–304, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Park, J. Lee, E. Chang et al., “Activin A secreted by human mesenchymal stem cells induces neuronal development and neurite outgrowth in an in vitro model of Alzheimer’s disease: neurogenesis induced by MSCs via activin A,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1171–1179, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nakano, K. Kubota, E. Kobayashi et al., “Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve cognitive impairment in an Alzheimer's disease model by increasing the expression of microRNA-146a in hippocampus,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, article 10772, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wei, Z. Xie, J. Bi, and Z. Zhu, “Anti-inflammatory effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on mice with Alzheimer's disease,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 5015–5020, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Park, J. Kim, T. Lim et al., “Therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease evaluated by β-amyloid positron emission tomography imaging,” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 883–891, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Park, T. Lim, J. Yoon, and Y. An, “In vivo tracking of intravenously injected mesenchymal stem cells in an Alzheimer’s animal model,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1203–1209, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Naaldijk, C. Jäger, C. Fabian et al., “Effect of systemic transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on neuropathology markers in APP/PS1 Alzheimer mice,” Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 299–314, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Wang, K. Lin, H. Liu et al., “Plasma pyroglutamate-modified amyloid beta differentiates amyloid pathology,” Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, vol. 12, no. 1, article e12029, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Santamaria, E. Brandi, P. Vitola et al., “Intranasal delivery of mesenchymal stem cell secretome repairs the brain of Alzheimer's mice,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 203–218, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, X. Chen, Y. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Li, and C. Xiang, “Transplantation of human menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in APP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 11, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Gong, Y. Yan, T. Ma, K. Gong, Q. Ao, and X. Zhang, “Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation promotes adult neurogenesis in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease mice,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 9, no. 8, article 131596, pp. 798–805, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zheng, Q. Wan, C. Zheng et al., “Amniotic mesenchymal stem cells decrease Aβ deposition and improve memory in APP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2191–2207, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Doyle and M. Wang, “Overview of extracellular vesicles, their origin, composition, purpose, and methods for exosome isolation and analysis,” Cell, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 727, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lai, O. Mardini, M. Ericsson et al., “Dynamic biodistribution of extracellular vesicles in vivo using a multimodal imaging reporter,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 483–494, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Cui, H. Guo, H. Li et al., “RVG-modified exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells rescue memory deficits by regulating inflammatory responses in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Immunity & Ageing, vol. 16, no. 1, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kim, S. Seo, J. Chang et al., “Stereotactic brain injection of human umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in patients with Alzheimer's disease dementia: a phase 1 clinical trial,” Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“The safety and the efficacy evaluation of NEUROSTEM®-AD in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01297218.
View at: Google Scholar
“The long-term safety and efficacy follow-up study of subjects who completed the Phase I Clinical Trial of Neurostem®-AD,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01696591.
View at: Google Scholar
“Safety and exploratory efficacy study of NEUROSTEM® versus placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02054208.
View at: Google Scholar
“A study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AstroStem in treatment of Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03117738.
View at: Google Scholar
“A clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of hope biosciences autologous mesenchymal stem cell therapy (HB-adMSCs) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04228666.
View at: Google Scholar
“Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cell infusion versus placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02600130.
View at: Google Scholar
“Follow-up study of safety and efficacy in subjects who completed NEUROSTEM® Phase-I/IIa Clinical Trial,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03172117.
View at: Google Scholar
“Autologous human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04855955?term=Mesenchymal+stem+cell&cond=Alzheimer+Disease&draw=3&rank=3.
View at: Google Scholar
“Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02833792.
View at: Google Scholar
“Alzheimer's disease stem cells multiple infusions,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04040348.
View at: Google Scholar
“The safety and the efficacy evaluation of allogenic adipose MSC-Exos in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04388982.
View at: Google Scholar
“Evaluation of the safety and potential therapeutic effects after intravenous transplantation of CB-AC-02 in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02899091.
View at: Google Scholar
“Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of various chronic and acute conditions,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04684602.
View at: Google Scholar
“Study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AstroStem in treatment of Alzheimer's disease,” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04482413.
View at: Google Scholar
“Safety and efficiency of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells(UC-MSC) in patients with Alzheimer's disease (SEMAD),” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01547689.
View at: Google Scholar
“Safety and exploratory efficacy study of UCMSCs in patients with Alzheimer's disease (SEESUPAD),” 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02672306.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Wang, C. Lee, and H. Lim, “Stem cell therapies for Alzheimer's disease,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 105–116, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 A. E. Hernández and E. García. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

5255

Downloads

1875

Citations