Models and Molecular Markers of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Vertebrates: To Find Models in Nonmammals

Song, Hyuk; Park, Hyun-Jung; Lee, Won-Young; Lee, Kyung Hoon

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4755514

Stem Cells International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4755514 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4755514

Models and Molecular Markers of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Vertebrates: To Find Models in Nonmammals

Hyuk Song,¹Hyun-Jung Park,²Won-Young Lee,³and Kyung Hoon Lee¹

Academic Editor: Shuiqiao Yuan

Received10 Nov 2021

Revised21 Mar 2022

Accepted17 Apr 2022

Published31 May 2022

Abstract

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the germline stem cells that are essential for the maintenance of spermatogenesis in the testis. However, it has not been sufficiently understood in amphibians, reptiles, and fish because numerous studies have been focused mainly on mammals. The aim of this review is to discuss scientific ways to elucidate SSC models of nonmammals in the context of the evolution of testicular organization since rodent SSC models. To further understand the SSC models in nonmammals, we point out common markers of an SSC pool (undifferentiated spermatogonia) in various types of testes where the kinetics of the SSC pool appears. This review includes the knowledge of (1) common molecular markers of vertebrate type A spermatogonia including putative SSC markers, (2) localization of the markers on the spermatogonia that have been reported in previous studies, (3) highlighting the most common markers in vertebrates, and (4) suggesting ways of finding SSC models in nonmammals.

1. Introduction

The germ cell lineage in both male and female vertebrates originates from primordial germ cells (PGCs). In males, PGCs become enclosed by somatic supporting cells, which are the precursors of Sertoli cells [1, 2]. Sertoli cells of mice and turtles originate from coelomic epithelial cells in the testis; Sertoli and granulosa cells have a common precursor in mice and medaka [1, 3–8]. PGCs and Sertoli cells then together form solid strands of cells, which are called seminiferous cords (or cysts in fish and amphibians) [2, 9]. Later, these cords (or cysts) form a lumen and become lobules in fish and amphibians or seminiferous tubules in reptiles, birds, and mammals [10–12]. Finally, spermatogenesis, which is an organized process in vertebrate testes to produce from spermatogonia (SPG) to mature spermatozoa (SPZ) through an individual’s lifespan, occurs in the cyst or seminiferous tubule (Figure 1) [13, 14].

Figure 1

Testicular organization in vertebrates. Amphibians and fish have lobular testes, and the lobular testis is classified into restricted and unrestricted lobules. Type A spermatogonia are found in cysts, located in the periphery of the restricted lobular testis of fish and salamander. Spermiation occurs in the nonperipheral region of the testis. Type A spermatogonia are seen within all cysts which are located in the lobules of the unrestricted lobular testis in fish and frogs. Spermatogenesis occurs in a cyst of a testicular lobule, consisting of unit-termed cysts with a mix of testicular germ cells and Sertoli cells. Mammals, birds, and reptiles have tubular testes where spermatogenesis and type A spermatogonia are observed in the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules. Differentiation of spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes via mitotic cell division and the production of haploid spermatids from the tetraploid primary spermatocytes via meiotic cell division occur in vertebrate spermatogenesis.

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the germline stem cells that are a rare population with long-term renewal potential in the testis [15]. The SSCs are small in proportion, representing only 0.03% of all germ cells in rodent testes because a majority of testicular germ cells are differentiated SPG, spermatocytes (SPC), spermatids (STD), and SPZ in seminiferous tubules or cysts [10, 14, 15]. It has been reported that active movement of SSCs occurs around the vasculature-associated region to communicate with testicular somatic cells [16, 17]. Localization of the SSC pool labeled with Neurogenin 3/enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) is biased to the vascular network and accompanies Leydig and other interstitial cells in the intact testis of mice [17, 18]. The Glial line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha-1 (GFRα-1)+SSC pool tends to localize on the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubules near the vasculature and interstitium [16]. Spermatogonia (SPG) undergoing differentiation leave the vasculature-associated region and disperse throughout the basal compartment of the seminiferous epithelium. The prevailing “A_single SSC Model” in seminiferous tubules has been suggested to represent the ability of SSCs to multiply and self-renew in rodents [10, 15, 19–21]. A_single (A_s) SPG as SSCs have the ability to self-renew throughout the lifetime to preserve SSC population size and differentiate into A-_paired (A_pr) and A-_aligned (A_al) SPG to maintain the process of spermatogenesis and preserve male fertility [10, 15, 22, 23]. Currently, there are two rodent SSC models (“revised A_single model” and “fragmentation model”), which have been performed with transplantation experiments to characterize stem cell activity in mice [22, 24].

The testicular organization consists of tubular testes for reptiles, birds, and mammals and lobular testes for amphibians and fish. The cysts are produced when a Sertoli cell becomes associated with a primary SPG (also called PGCs), which has the largest nuclei among spermatogenic cells, and mitotic divisions of the primary spermatogonium produce a group of secondary SPG that are enclosed by the Sertoli cell, which forms the wall of the cyst [25, 26]. Spermatogenesis occurs in a cyst of a testicular lobule, which consists of unit-termed cysts, including a mix of testicular germ cells and Sertoli cells [27] (Figure 1). Sperms are released into the lumen of lobules and are transported through sperm ducts connected between each lobule (Figure 1) [28]. Lobular testes are divided into restricted and unrestricted lobular testes, wherein during active spermatogenesis, type A SPG are found only in the periphery of the restricted lobular testis of fish and salamander or type A SPG are seen in all the lobules of the unrestricted lobular testis in fish and frogs, respectively (Figure 1) [25, 28–39]. In the tubular testis, PGCs and pre-Sertoli cells then together form solid strands of cells, which are called seminiferous cords [3, 40, 41]. These cords form a lumen and become seminiferous tubules in reptiles, birds, and mammals [25, 26] (Figure 1). Spermatogenesis developing from SPG to SPZ occurs in seminiferous tubules (Figure 1). Localization of germ cell differentiation is different between anamniote and amniote vertebrates because of diverse testis organization. In addition, the available discussion on the kinetics and models of vertebrate SSC has been limited because identification of SSC models has been reported mainly in mammals. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence-based SSC models and to find ways for SSC models of nonmammals by searching common SSC and type A SPG markers in vertebrates.

2. Models of Spermatogonial Stem Cells and Type A Spermatogonia among Vertebrates

The transplantation technique is a powerful tool method to characterize SSC activity including germ cell differentiation, progeny production, and lineage tracing using EGFP-transgenic mice, which has been used for demonstrating mouse SSC models [15, 42]. Currently, there are two models in rodents that have been verified via transplantation with a specific marker. “A_single SSC Model” has been modified by Lord and Oatley who subsequently proposed the “revised A_single model” (Figure 2(a)) [24]. A previous study has demonstrated the expression and function of inhibitor of differentiation 4 (ID4) in ID4/EGFP mice, wherein the ID4/EGFP-expressing SPG population with high ID4 expression was enriched with SSCs [43]. Spermatogonia with high levels of ID4/EGFP expression are primarily A_s SPG within the testes, and these cells encompass over 85% of the SSC population in transplantation analysis. In contrast, SPG with low levels of ID4/EGFP expression are identified primarily as A_pr and some A_s SPG with low levels of ID4 expression encompass less than 15% of the self-renewing population in transplantation analysis. The SPG population with the high level of ID4/EGFP expression gives higher levels of putative SSC markers, which led to high colonization efficiency in transplantation, and ID4 overexpression impairs spermatogenesis characterized by a blockade in differentiation [43, 44]. They proposed the “revised A_single model” which explains that under steady-state conditions, a subset of the A_s population with higher ID4 expression is considered functionally true SSCs, and some plasticity of A_s and A_pr SPG with lower ID4 expression may exist between SSCs and progenitors (Figure 2(a)).

Figure 2

Spermatogonial stem cell models in rodents and proposed kinetics of undifferentiated type A spermatogonia in primates and teleosts. Mouse “revised A_single model” and “fragmentation model” are illustrated in (a), based on the previous reports [16, 22, 24, 45, 46]. In vertebrates, only these models have been verified by transplantation experiment which includes SSC markers’ expression in undifferentiated type A SPG via GFP transgenic animal model or lineage tracing. ID4 positive A_s and A_pr SPG are considered the SSC pool in the “revised A_single model” (a). In the “fragmentation model,” GFRα-1 positive A_s, A_pr, and A_al SPG are suggested as the SSC pool (a). In addition, duplication of A_s SPG by cell division is rare and the majority of A_s SPG production occurs by the fragmentation of A_pr and A_al SPG. Hypothetic schemes of primate and teleost SSCs (undifferentiated SPG) are presented in (b), based on previous reports (b) [23, 42, 73, 75, 116, 117]. However, SSC kinetics has not been verified via transplantation and lineage tracing experiments as performed in mouse SSCs. The SSC pool has been proposed in primates and teleosts; also, the kinetics of the putative SSC pool has not been suggested in birds, reptiles, and amphibians. In primates, A_dark and A_pale SPG are considered the SSC pool including single and paired A_dark/A_pale spermatogonia (b). Only undifferentiated type A SPG (A undifferentiated) are considered the SSC pool in teleosts (b). Red curved arrows indicate self-renewal of A_s spermatogonia (or A_dark/A_pale spermatogonia). Blue curved arrows indicate differentiation from A_pr spermatogonia to A_s spermatogonia. Green curved arrows indicate clonal fragmentation from A_pr and A_al spermatogonia to A_s spermatogonia. The black arrow indicates a division of each germ cell during spermatogenesis. A_single, A_pr, and A_al indicate A_s, A_pr, and A_al spermatogonia. A_dark/A_pale indicates A_dark/A_pale spermatogonia. “A undifferentiated” and “A differentiated” indicate undifferentiated type A and type A differentiated spermatogonia in panel (b), respectively.

Yoshida and his colleagues proposed the “fragmentation model” which describes cell kinetics and undifferentiated type A SPG in the mice (Figure 2(a)) [16, 22, 45, 46]. The SSC maintenance not only is dependent on self-renewing cells (A_s) but also involves a more extensive population comprising A_pr and A_al SPG [47]. This population has self-renewing abilities similar to those of stem cells [47]. Live cell imaging and lineage tracing experiments involving EGFP/GFRα-1+SSC pool (including A_s, A_pr, and A_al SPG) during steady-state spermatogenesis have revealed that the SCC pool actively migrates over a large area on the basal lamina without stopping at particular points and that the breakage of intercellular bridges occurs more often than expected [16]. A_single SPG are generated through self-renewal and the fragmentation of A_pr or A_al SPG [16]. Notably, the production of two A_s SPG by cell division is rare, and the majority of A_s SPG are generated from the fragmentation of A_pr and A_al SPG (Figure 2(a)) [16]. This result supports that SSC maintenance is more regulated by the fragmentation of A_pr and A_al SPG than SSC self-renewal. Recently, they have analyzed the fate of transplanted mouse SSCs at the single-cell resolution that a small fraction of EGFP/GFRα-1+SSCs repopulate over the long term in host mouse testes, and it is enhanced to restore host fertility by transient suppression of donor SSC differentiation using retinoic acid [48]. Interestingly, this model is indirectly supported by another study, which reported that purified mouse KIT protooncogene receptor tyrosine kinase+differentiating SPG committed to undergo differentiation can generate functional germinal stem cells that can repopulate germ cell-depleted testes when transplanted into adult mice [49]. This study suggested that stemness could be acquired by differentiating progenitors after tissue injury and throughout life. These findings suggest that the SSC pool is not a fixed entity but a differentiation state that can be lost or regained according to its physical status, thus proposing a new characteristic of the SSC pool [22]. A_single and A_pr SPG have been suggested as the SSC pool in the “revised A_single model”, and the “fragmentation model” suggests that A_s, A_pr, and A_al SPG are considered the SSC pool (Figure 2(a)). So far, these models are the only evidence-based SSC models in vertebrates.

In primates, dark and pale type A SPG (A_dark and A_pale SPG) are localized at the basement membrane of primate seminiferous tubules and are morphologically identified by their nuclear architecture and staining intensity with hematoxylin [50, 51]. In the A_dark and A_pale SPG model, two existing types of SSCs have been suggested. The first type comprises monkey A_dark SPG (“reserve” stem cells), which are the stem cells that produce equal numbers of A_dark SPG, whereas the second type is the A_pale SPG (“active” stem cells), which divide to give rise to type B SPG that differentiate into primary SPC [52–54]. This model has been contested by Ehmcke et al. who claimed that the A_dark SPG (“regenerative reserve”) are recognized as true SSCs with a low mitotic activity under steady-state conditions, and the A_pale SPG initiate spermatogenesis by self-renewal of A_pale SPG as “renewing progenitors” [23, 54–56]. Currently, it has been suggested that the different nuclear architecture of A_dark and A_pale SPG may strongly correlate with cell cycle stages; A_dark and at least some A_pale are the same population of cells at different stages of the cell cycle [42, 54, 57]. In terms of the cell cycle, A_dark and A_pale SPG are considered the SSC pool (undifferentiated type A SPG) (Figure 2(b)). However, the identification of distinct SSCs in the A_dark and A_pale SPG, which is demonstrated by transplantation experiments with molecular markers, remains unclear.

In birds, the model of SSC identification and renewal has not been established due to insufficient studies on SSCs. The classification of SPG, based on chromatin distribution and nuclear morphology, has been proposed to describe the process of SPG development in birds. In Japanese quail and goose, four different types of SPG are identified in seminiferous tubules: dark type A, two pale A types (pale 1 and 2), and type B SPG [58–60]. In turkey, three types of SPG have been defined: dark type A, pale A type, and type B SPG [61]. The dark type A SPG for both species are analogous to the A_s/A_pr in rodents and A_dark/A_pale in primates.

In reptiles, it has been reported that there are type A and B SPG based on histological morphology. The seasonal cycle of spermatogenesis has demonstrated different patterns with an increase in seminiferous tubule size in turtles, snakes, and lizards [62–66]. In turtles, there are three major types of SPG, namely, resting, type A, and type B SPG [67]. The resting SPG, which appear during four seasons and have darkly stained chromatin packed tightly within the nuclei and lack visible nucleoli, do not enter meiosis to replenish the spermatogonial population near the end of spermatogenesis [67]. Turtle resting SPG may correspond to undifferentiated SPG as the SSC pool. In snakes and lizards, type A SPG are determined by morphology without classifying such as undifferentiated type A SPG [62, 65, 66, 68]. In amphibians, primary SPG that are located in the periphery of the lobules have been considered undifferentiated type A SPG undergoing mitosis, and secondary SPG are similar to type B SPG (differentiated SPG) in rodents [25, 28, 33–35]. In bullfrogs and newts, PGCs claimed in seasonal spermatogenesis are designated as primary SPG [34, 69–71]. However, evidence of resting and primary SPG that supports their SSC potentials has not been found in both species yet.

The majority of testicular structures are lobular types in fish (Figure 1). SSCs have been studied in classification, in vitro culture, and transplantation in fish more than in reptiles and amphibians. Spermatogenesis including type A SPG, type B SPG, and primary SPC has been well studied in fish [14, 32, 72]. An initial cyst is formed with undifferentiated type A SPG, which is considered a stem cell and comprises a few Sertoli cells. Fish type A SPG are classified into undifferentiated type A and differentiated type A SPG that correspond to undifferentiated A_s~A_al (2~16 germ cells) and differentiating type A (A1~intermediate) SPG in rodents, respectively [14, 73–76] (Figure 2(b)). The potential activity of SSCs has been evaluated in fish using transplantation experiments, indicating the stemness of undifferentiated type A SPG. In trout, DEAD-box helicase 4 (VASA)/GFP-expressing PGCs or type A SPG, which are xenotransplanted into salmon, can develop into functional sperm cells and egg cells that can form offspring [77–80]. In addition, the SSC activity of type A SPG has been evaluated using molecular markers [72, 80]. In sturgeon, early-stage germ cells which are transplanted into recipient larvae can migrate to genital ridges and the number of SSCs significantly increases in later larval stages [81]. In zebrafish, VASA/EGFP-expressing undifferentiated type A SPG can develop into spermatogenic cells at different stages of spermatogenesis and oocytes after transplantation into germ cell-deficient male and female zebrafish [82]. Furthermore, in vitro culture and purification of type A SPG have been studied for differentiation and enrichment in dogfish, catfish, zebrafish, and carp [83–88]. So far, undifferentiated type A SPG have the SSC potential in fish (Figure 2(b)).

Undifferentiated type A SPG of vertebrates, such as A_s, A_pr, A_al, A_dark, and A_pale SPG, are considered the SSC pool, based on their localization in the basement membrane of tubules and cysts of lobules, characterization of nuclei, their rarity, and transplantation evidence. To further understand SSCs in nonmammals, we analyzed the expression of putative SSC markers in type A SPG during the early and adult stages of testis development among vertebrates.

3. Class-Crossed Molecular Markers of Spermatogonial Stem Cells and Type A Spermatogonia in Vertebrates

Gonocytes and PGC, which are considered to be the origin of SSCs and also expressed in adult type A SPG, have been used for identifying the SSC pool (Supplementary Table 1) [15]. Putative SSC markers and type A SPG, expressed in testicular tubules (or lobules) and cultured (or isolated) SPG, have been analyzed in the SSC pool of vertebrates; class-crossed and class-specific markers are shown in Supplementary Information including a detailed description of expression of the SSC and SPG markers in vertebrates. According to the “revised A_single model” and the “fragmentation model,” the vertebrate SSCs include undifferentiated type A SPG as the SSC pool such as A_s, A_pr, and A_al SPG or A_dark and A_pale SPG. “SSCs” claimed in the previous research studies were intactly used in the marker description of this section and Supplementary Information. The candidate markers for the SSC pool, which are common in two classes or more, were selected by results visualized by immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), and fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) in the testicular tubules (or lobules) at specific developmental stages as well as transplantation experiments for producing donor-derived offspring. SSC-related studies only with RT-PCR results were excluded from the selection of putative SSC markers. All genes listed were confirmed for their evolutionary conservation using NCBI Orthologs (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Due to the number of research reports on nonmammals, it was not easy to isolate the common markers for the SSC pool of vertebrates. As shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, plenty of putative SSC markers from mammalian testis tissues and their cultured (or isolated) SSCs have been studied more frequently than birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Comparatively, GFRα-1, thymocyte differentiation antigen 1 (THY1), promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (PLZF), nanos C2HC-type zinc finger 1 (NANO1), nanos C2HC-type zinc finger 2 (NANOS2), and OCT4 are class-crossed markers of the SSC pool (Supplementary Table 1). Here, we review GFRα-1 expression in vertebrates which is the most common molecular marker after investigating putative SSC markers.

In mature male dogfish, GFRα-1 is highly expressed in all undifferentiated SPG and differentiating SPG, as well as in cultured GFRα-1-expressing spermatogonial cells, but it is not detectable in SPC- and STD-related zones [83, 89]. In tilapia, GFRα-1 is detected exclusively in undifferentiated type A SPG with a large nucleus of large single cells in sexually mature male testes, and the density of GFRα-1+SPG is high in the peripheral regions of the tubular testis (near tunica albuginea). Cultured GFRα-1+SPG, isolated from the adult testis, can colonize in recipient adult tilapia [90]. In rainbow trout, GFRα-1 transcripts are detected in type A SPG of mature testes, and their levels decrease in type B SPG [91]. In medaka adult testes, GFRα-1 transcript levels are high in SPG and moderate in SPC, and SPG isolated from immature testes express GFRα-1 [92, 93]. In bullfrogs, PGCs (gonocyte-like SSCs) of adult testes are the largest cells located in the lobular periphery and are surrounded by Sertoli cells, and GFRα-1 immunoexpression is observed in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane of PGCs [35]. In adult scorpion mud turtles, GFRα-1 is expressed in undifferentiated type A SPG (SSC) and is predominantly located in areas where a seminiferous tubule faces the interstitial compartment containing blood vessels [94]. In chicken, the proportion of GFRα-1+ cells is 2.8% in the cells of adult testes. GFRα-1 mRNA and protein expression is detected mainly in type A SPG close to the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule, and GFRα-1-expressing SPG produce the progenies in recipient chickens [95, 96]. Spermatogonia, isolated from juvenile and adult quail using a differential plating technique, express GFRα-1, and SPG cultured from adult pheasant testes also express GFRα-1 [97, 98]. Mammalian GFRα-1 is expressed in gonocytes and undifferentiated type A SPG of the testis and cultured (or isolated) SSCs (Supplementary Table 1). Certainly, mouse GFRα-1 is expressed in the SSC pool (A_s, A_pr, and A_al SPG) during steady-state spermatogenesis (Supplementary Table 1). In vertebrates, GFRα-1 is a common marker for the SSC pool, and its expression is exclusively observed in gonocytes, undifferentiated type A SPG, and cultured SSCs. In addition, GFRα-1+ cells have been used for transplantation experiments to produce donor-derived offspring and for elucidating SSC models in rodents [16, 48]. In analysis of molecular markers, it reveals that GFRα-1 is the most potential SSC marker in vertebrates.

4. Finding Models of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Nonmammals

After analyzing type A SPG localization of putative SSC markers in vertebrates, several characteristics are revealed in the SSC pool of vertebrates. Firstly, the SSC pool is observed in SPG in the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules, the periphery of restricted lobular testes, and the basement membrane near the cyst of unrestricted lobular testes mixed with several types of germ cells. Secondly, many of the putative SSC markers in mammals are not expressed or have not been studied in other classes (Supplementary Table 1). Thirdly, transplantation including SSC markers’ expression with progeny production has been performed in a few gonochoristic fish (nonmammals). Based on these, we discuss ways of verifying SSC models of nonmammals in the evolution of the testicular organization.

As mentioned above, testis organization is divided into tubular and lobular testes for optimal reproductive strategies. Mammals and birds exhibit homeothermy, internal fertilization, specific sex chromosome (ZZ/ZW or XX/XY), tubular testis, and exogenous factor-independent sex determination (Table 1). Reptiles and amphibians show poikilothermy, external fertilization, lobular testis, and exogenous factor-dependent sex determination; additionally, certain species possess specific sex chromosomes (ZZ/ZW or XX/XY) (Table 1). Fish exhibit poikilothermy, external fertilization, lobular testis, various types of sex chromosomes, and exogenous factor-dependent sex determination (Table 1). Reptilian reproductive strategies show the intermediate characteristics between fish-amphibians and birds-mammals (Table 1). Tubular and lobular testes diverge in stability of the sex determination system, fertilization strategy, and animal body type (Table 1). Although spermatogenesis is a universal process in vertebrates, the testicular organization is varied in the reproductive strategies of vertebrates (Figure 1 and Table 1). The SSC pool of amniotes and anamniotes exists in the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules and cysts of lobular testes, respectively (Figure 1). In particular, the difference in testis organization may imply a difference in SSC kinetics in vertebrates and suggest that the SSC kinetics and their markers can vary between tubular and lobular testes. To understand SSC models in nonmammals further, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the “revised A_single models,” “fragmentation model,” or other models can be applied to elucidate SSC kinetics in the lobular testis of anamniotes or not. In a previous study, GFRα-1, which has been used to trace mouse A_s, A_pr, and A_al SPG to explain the “fragmentation model,” was found to be the only common marker for the vertebrate SSC pool (Supplementary Table 1) [16, 48]. Comparatively, type A SPG of fish are classified in more detail than those of reptiles and birds (Figure 2(b)). In addition, the kinetics of undifferentiated type A SPG using transgenic fish and organ culture has been reported in several studies. In rainbow trout and medaka, VASA/GFP-carrying type A SPG have been used in transplantation experiments and germ cell cultures, which possess the ability to produce donor-derived offspring [77–80, 99–109]. Additionally, the culture of testis fragments has been performed in rainbow trout and medaka, which increased the proliferation of SPC and SPG; GFRα-1 is expressed in undifferentiated type A SPG of both species [110, 111] (Supplementary Table 1). Recently, the in vitro-expanded germline stem cells, enriched from immature VASA/GFP rainbow trout, exhibit stem cell activity and potency to produce functional eggs, sperm, and healthy offspring [109]. In testicular organization, medaka and rainbow trout have restricted and unrestricted lobular testes, respectively [79, 91, 110, 112–114]. In common, two bony fish are gonochoristic in which only each individual develops to a male with testes or a female with ovaries after fertilization [115]. Spermatogenesis in unrestricted lobular testes occurs in a single cyst corresponding to the seminiferous tubules (Figure 1). However, the differentiation and proliferation of germ cells (SPG, SPC, STD, and SPZ) occur in various cysts of restricted lobular testes, and the cysts are located in the peripheral region extending to the central sperm duct; each cyst in the testis is divided into mitotic and meiotic cysts in restricted lobular testes (Figure 1). It is possible that SSC kinetics (self-renewal and division) is different from those in unrestricted lobular and tubular testes. Rainbow trout and medaka satisfy the conditions (GFRα-1 expression in undifferentiated SPG, organ culture of the testis, and establishment of a GFP transgenic animal model) that can apply the live imaging experiments using GFRα-1/EGFP to prove the “fragmentation model”; SCC activity can be analyzed in ID4-EGFP salmon and medaka to verify the “revised A_single model.” In addition, PLZF and OCT4, which are conserved in vertebrates, are promising undifferentiated SPG markers after GFRα-1. Therefore, finding SSC models using two fish can provide the diversity of SSC kinetics in the lobular testis in nonmammals.

Here, we tried to investigate the common SSC markers after examining the putative markers of the SSC pool in vertebrates. To date, GFRα-1 is the most common marker for the SSC pool in vertebrates, and it can be used to verify SSC models using experiments (transgenic animal model, transplantation, and in vitro culture) in nonmammals. To understand SSC kinetics in nonmammals, further studies including the identification of novel markers, development of organ culture, and establishment of SSC molecular marker-carrying transgenic animal models should be performed in birds, reptiles, and amphibians. If a specific SSC model is common across several classes or a new model of SSCs can appear in other classes with lobular testes, we can understand why self-renewal and differentiation of SSCs are different in the evolution of testis organization and reproductive strategy among vertebrates.

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable because no new data was created in this review..

Disclosure

This review was written as part of Konkuk University’s research support program for its faculty on sabbatical leave in 2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

HS designed the review contents, wrote and revised the manuscript, and searched molecular markers. HJP wrote and revised the manuscript. WYL wrote the manuscript and searched molecular markers. KHL designed and conceptualized the review contents, wrote and revised the manuscript, and analyzed molecular markers.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1. Class-crossed markers on the spermatogonial stem cell pool and type A spermatogonia in testes and cultured (or isolated) spermatogonia in vertebrates. Supplementary Table 2. Molecular markers on the spermatogonial stem cell pool and type A spermatogonia in testes and cultured (or isolated) spermatogonia in mammals. (Supplementary Materials)

References

F. Barrionuevo, M. Burgos, and R. Jiménez, “Origin and function of embryonic Sertoli cells,” Biomolecular Concepts, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 537–547, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schatten, Germ Cell Protocols: Volume 1: Sperm and Oocyte Analysis, Humana Press, 2010.
J. Karl and B. Capel, “Sertoli cells of the mouse testis originate from the coelomic epithelium,” Developmental Biology, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 323–333, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. C. Yao and B. Capel, “Temperature, genes, and sex: a comparative view of sex determination in Trachemys scripta and Mus musculus,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Capel, K. H. Albrecht, L. L. Washburn, and E. M. Eicher, “Migration of mesonephric cells into the mammalian gonad depends on Sry,” Mechanisms of Development, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 127–131, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nakamura, Y. Aoki, D. Saito et al., “Sox9b/sox9a2-EGFP transgenic medaka reveals the morphological reorganization of the gonads and a common precursor of both the female and male supporting cells,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 472–476, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Albrecht and E. M. Eicher, “Evidence that Sry is expressed in pre-sertoli cells and sertoli and granulosa cells have a common precursor,” Developmental Biology, vol. 240, no. 1, pp. 92–107, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. C. Yao, L. DiNapoli, and B. Capel, “Cellular mechanisms of sex determination in the red-eared slider turtle, Trachemys scripta,” Trachemys scripta. Mechanisms of Development, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 1393–1401, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Capel, Sex Determination in Vertebrates, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019.
D. G. de Rooij and J. A. Grootegoed, “Spermatogonial stem cells,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 694–701, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nishimura and M. Tanaka, “Gonadal development in fish,” Sexual Development, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 252–261, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sharma, J. Wistuba, T. Pock, S. Schlatt, and N. Neuhaus, “Spermatogonial stem cells: updates from specification to clinical relevance,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 275–297, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Larose, A. N. Shami, H. Abbott, G. Manske, L. Lei, and S. S. Hammoud, “Gametogenesis: a journey from inception to conception,” Current Topics in Developmental Biology, vol. 132, pp. 257–310, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. W. Schulz, L. R. de Franca, J. J. Lareyre et al., “Spermatogenesis in fish,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 390–411, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. T. Phillips, K. Gassei, and K. E. Orwig, “Spermatogonial stem cell regulation and spermatogenesis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 365, no. 1546, pp. 1663–1678, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Hara, T. Nakagawa, H. Enomoto et al., “Mouse spermatogenic stem cells continually interconvert between equipotent singly isolated and syncytial states,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 658–672, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yoshida, M. Sukeno, and Y. I. Nabeshima, “A vasculature-associated niche for undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mouse testis,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5845, pp. 1722–1726, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Klein, T. Nakagawa, R. Ichikawa, S. Yoshida, and B. D. Simons, “Mouse germ line stem cells undergo rapid and stochastic turnover,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 214–224, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huckins, “The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 533–557, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Oakberg, “Spermatogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 515–531, 1971.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Kluin, M. F. Kramer, and D. G. de Rooij, “Proliferation of spermatogonia and Sertoli cells in maturing mice,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Komeya and T. Ogawa, “Spermatogonial stem cells: progress and prospects,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 771–775, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ehmcke, J. Wistuba, and S. Schlatt, “Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 275–282, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lord and J. M. Oatley, “A revised A_single model to explain stem cell dynamics in the mouse male germline,” Reproduction, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. R55–R64, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Pudney, “Spermatogenesis in nonmammalian vertebrates,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 459–497, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yoshida, “From cyst to tubule: innovations in vertebrate spermatogenesis,” WIREs Developmental Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 119–131, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Flament, D. Chardard, A. Chesnel, and H. Dumond, “Chapter 1 - sex determination and sexual differentiation in amphibians,” Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates, Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 1–19, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Propper, “Chapter 3 - testicular structure and control of sperm development in amphibians,” Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates, Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 39–53, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Billard, “Spermatogenesis and spermatology of some teleost fish species,” Reproduction Nutrition Développement, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 877–920, 1986.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Uribe, H. J. Grier, and V. Mejía-Roa, “Comparative testicular structure and spermatogenesis in bony fishes,” Spermatogenesis, vol. 4, no. 3, article e983400, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Grier, M. C. Uribe, F. L. Lo Nostro, S. D. Mims, and L. R. Parenti, “Conserved form and function of the germinal epithelium through 500 million years of vertebrate evolution,” Journal of Morphology, vol. 277, no. 8, pp. 1014–1044, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Knapp and S. L. Carlisle, “Chapter 3 - testicular function and hormonal regulation in fishes,” Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates, Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 43–63, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Scheltinga and B. G. Jamieson, “Tamieson: Chapter 5 - spermatogenesis and the mature spermatozoon: form, function and phylogenetic implications,” Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Anura, Science Publishers, pp. 119–251, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Abe, “Hormonal control of meiosis initiation in the testis from Japanese newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster,” Cynops pyrrhogaster. Zoological Science, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 691–704, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. H. Caneguim, F. L. Beltrame, J. S. da Luz, S. R. Valentini, P. S. Cerri, and E. Sasso-Cerri, “Primordial germ cells (spermatogonial stem cells) of bullfrogs express sex hormone-binding globulin and steroid receptors during seasonal spermatogenesis,” Cells, Tissues, Organs, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 136–144, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Yartsev, J.-M. Exbrayat, and V. Kuranova, “Spermatogenesis in the Siberian salamander, Salamandrella keyserlingii (Caudata: Hynobiidae),” Salamandra, vol. 53, pp. 66–76, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. Uribe and V. Mejía-Roa, “Testicular structure and germ cells morphology in salamanders,” Spermatogenesis, vol. 4, no. 3, article e988090, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Fraile, R. Paniagua, M. C. Rodriguez, and F. J. Saez, “Effects of photoperiod and temperature on spermiogenesis in marbeled newts (Triturus marmoratus marmoratus),” Copeia, vol. 1989, no. 2, pp. 357–363, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Haczkiewicz, B. Rozenblut-Kościsty, and M. Ogielska, “Prespermatogenesis and early spermatogenesis in frogs,” Zoology, vol. 122, pp. 63–79, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Skinner and M. D. Anway, “Seminiferous cord formation and germ-cell programming: epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1061, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Coveney, J. Cool, T. Oliver, and B. Capel, “Four-dimensional analysis of vascularization during primary development of an organ, the gonad,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 20, pp. 7212–7217, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Fayomi and K. E. Orwig, “Spermatogonial stem cells and spermatogenesis in mice, monkeys and men,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 29, pp. 207–214, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. R. Helsel, Q.-E. Yang, M. J. Oatley, T. Lord, F. Sablitzky, and J. M. Oatley, “ID4 levels dictate the stem cell state in mouse spermatogonia,” Development, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 624–634, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Chan, M. J. Oatley, A. V. Kaucher et al., “Functional and molecular features of the Id4⁺ germline stem cell population in mouse testes,” Genes & Development, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1351–1362, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Makela and R. M. Hobbs, “Molecular regulation of spermatogonial stem cell renewal and differentiation,” Reproduction, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. R169–R187, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. G. de Rooij, “The nature and dynamics of spermatogonial stem cells,” Development, vol. 144, no. 17, pp. 3022–3030, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakagawa, Y. Nabeshima, and S. Yoshida, “Functional identification of the actual and potential stem cell compartments in mouse spermatogenesis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Nakamura, D. J. Jörg, Y. Kon, B. D. Simons, and S. Yoshida, “Transient suppression of transplanted spermatogonial stem cell differentiation restores fertility in mice,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1443–1456.e7, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Barroca, B. Lassalle, M. Coureuil et al., “Mouse differentiating spermatogonia can generate germinal stem cells in vivo,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 190–196, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Clermont and C. P. Leblond, “Differentiation and renewal of spermatogonia in the monkey, Macacus rhesus,” The American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 237–273, 1959.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Clermont and M. Antar, “Duration of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium and the spermatogonial renewal in the monkey Macaca arctoides,” The American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 153–165, 1973.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Clermont, “Kinetics of spermatogenesis in mammals: seminiferous epithelium cycle and spermatogonial renewal,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 198–236, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Clermont, “Two classes of spermatogonial stem cells in the monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops),” American Journal of Anatomy, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 57–71, 1969.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. H. Brian, S. Meena, C. H. Marc, and E. O. Kyle, “Spermatogonial stem cells in higher primates: are there differences from those in rodents?” Reproduction, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 479–493, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ehmcke, D. Simorangkir, and S. Schlatt, “Identification of the starting point for spermatogenesis and characterization of the testicular stem cell in adult male rhesus monkeys,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1185–1193, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Boitani, S. Di Persio, V. Esposito, and E. Vicini, “Spermatogonial cells: mouse, monkey and man comparison,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 59, pp. 79–88, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. P. Hermann, M. Sukhwani, D. R. Simorangkir, T. Chu, T. M. Plant, and K. E. Orwig, “Molecular dissection of the male germ cell lineage identifies putative spermatogonial stem cells in rhesus macaques,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1704–1716, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lin and R. C. Jones, “Renewal and proliferation of spermatogonia during spermatogenesis in the Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 591–601, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Aire, “Chapter 7 - spermatogenesis and testicular cycles,” Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Birds, Science Publishers, pp. 279–348, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. F. Akhtar, E. Ahmad, S. Mustafa, Z. Chen, Z. Shi, and F. Shi, “Spermiogenesis, stages of seminiferous epithelium and variations in seminiferous tubules during active states of spermatogenesis in Yangzhou goose ganders,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 570, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Bakst, V. Akuffo, P. Trefil, and J. P. Brillard, “Morphological and histochemical characterization of the seminiferous epithelial and Leydig cells of the Turkey,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 97, no. 3-4, pp. 303–313, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Gribbins, “Reptilian spermatogenesis: a histological and ultrastructural perspective,” Spermatogenesis, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 250–269, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sarkar, S. Arya, U. Rai, and S. S. Majumdar, “A study of differential expression of testicular genes in various reproductive phases of Hemidactylus flaviviridis (wall lizard) to derive their association with onset of spermatogenesis and its relevance to mammals,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, article e0151150, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Gribbins and D. H. Gist, “Cytological evaluation of spermatogenesis within the germinal epithelium of the male European wall lizard, Podarcis muralis,” Journal of Morphology, vol. 258, no. 3, pp. 296–306, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kumar, B. Roy, and U. Rai, “Chapter 3 - hormonal regulation of testicular functions in reptiles,” Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates, Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 63–88, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Rheubert, H. H. McHugh, M. H. Collier, D. M. Sever, and K. M. Gribbins, “Temporal germ cell development strategy during spermatogenesis within the testis of the ground skink, Scincella lateralis (Sauria: Scincidae),” Theriogenology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Gribbins, D. H. Gist, and J. D. Congdon, “Cytological evaluation of spermatogenesis and organization of the germinal epithelium in the male slider turtle, Trachemys scripta,” Journal of Morphology, vol. 255, no. 3, pp. 337–346, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Gribbins and J. L. Rheubert, “Chapter 6 - the ophidian testis, spermatogenesis, and mature spermatozoa,” Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Snakes, Science Publishers, pp. 183–264, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Sasso-Cerri, E. Freymuller, and S. M. Miraglia, “Testosterone-immunopositive primordial germ cells in the testis of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 206, no. 6, pp. 519–523, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Flament, H. Dumond, D. Chardard, and A. Chesnel, “Lifelong testicular differentiation in Pleurodeles waltl (Amphibia, Caudata),” Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 21, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawasaki, F. Imura, A. Nakada et al., “Functional demonstration of the ability of a primary spermatogonium as a stem cell by tracing a single cell destiny in Xenopus laevis,” Development, Growth & Differentiation, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 525–535, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bellaiche, J.-J. Lareyre, C. Cauty, A. Yano, I. Allemand, and F. Le Gac, “Spermatogonial stem cell quest: nanos2, marker of a subpopulation of undifferentiated a spermatogonia in trout testis,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 90, no. 4, p. 79, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Lacerda, G. M. Costa, and L. R. de França, “Biology and identity of fish spermatogonial stem cell,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 207, pp. 56–65, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Leal, E. R. Cardoso, R. H. Nobrega et al., “Histological and stereological evaluation of zebrafish (Danio rerio) spermatogenesis with an emphasis on spermatogonial generations,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 177–187, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lacerda, P. Aponte, G. Costa et al., “An overview of spermatogonial stem cell physiology, niche and transplantation in fish,” Animal Reproduction, vol. 9, pp. 798–808, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Kitano, S. Irie, A. Yamaguchi, and M. Matsuyama, “Diurnal dynamics of S-phase entry of germ cells in the secondary testis of the bambooleaf wrasse (Pseudolabrus sieboldi),” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, vol. 315A, no. 4, pp. 232–241, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, G. Yoshizaki, and T. Takeuchi, “Surrogate broodstock produces salmonids,” Nature, vol. 430, no. 7000, pp. 629-630, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Okutsu, K. Suzuki, Y. Takeuchi, T. Takeuchi, and G. Yoshizaki, “Testicular germ cells can colonize sexually undifferentiated embryonic gonad and produce functional eggs in fish,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2725–2729, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Okutsu, S. Shikina, M. Kanno, Y. Takeuchi, and G. Yoshizaki, “Production of trout offspring from triploid salmon parents,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5844, pp. 1517–1517, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sato, M. Hayashi, and G. Yoshizaki, “Stem cell activity of type A spermatogonia is seasonally regulated in rainbow trout,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1303–1316, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pšenička, T. Saito, Z. Linhartová, and I. Gazo, “Isolation and transplantation of sturgeon early-stage germ cells,” Theriogenology, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1085–1092, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Nóbrega, C. D. Greebe, H. van de Kant, J. Bogerd, L. R. de França, and R. W. Schulz, “Spermatogonial stem cell niche and spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in zebrafish,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 9, article e12808, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gautier, A. Bosseboeuf, P. Auvray, and P. Sourdaine, “Maintenance of potential spermatogonial stem cells in vitro by GDNF treatment in a chondrichthyan model (Scyliorhinus canicula L.),” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 91, no. 4, p. 91, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shang, B. Su, E. A. Lipke et al., “Spermatogonial stem cells specific marker identification in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus and blue catfish, I. furcatus,” Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1545–1556, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawasaki, K. R. Siegfried, and N. Sakai, “Differentiation of zebrafish spermatogonial stem cells to functional sperm in culture,” Development, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 566–574, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Kawasaki, K. Saito, C. Sakai, M. Shinya, and N. Sakai, “Production of zebrafish offspring from cultured spermatogonial stem cells,” Genes to Cells: Devoted to Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 316–325, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nayak, S. Ferosekhan, S. K. Sahoo, J. K. Sundaray, P. Jayasankar, and H. K. Barman, “Production of fertile sperm fromin vitropropagating enriched spermatogonial stem cells of farmed catfish, Clarias batrachus,” Zygote, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 814–824, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Panda, H. K. Barman, and C. Mohapatra, “Isolation of enriched carp spermatogonial stem cells from Labeo rohita testis for in vitro propagation,” Theriogenology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 241–251, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bosseboeuf, A. Gautier, P. Auvray, S. Mazan, and P. Sourdaine, “Characterization of spermatogonial markers in the mature testis of the dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula L.),” Reproduction, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 125–139, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Santos Nassif Lacerda, “Phenotypic characterization and in vitro propagation and transplantation of the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) spermatogonial stem cells,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 192, pp. 95–106, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nakajima, M. Hayashi, T. Kouguchi, K. Yamaguchi, M. Miwa, and G. Yoshizaki, “Expression patterns of gdnf and gfr α1 in rainbow trout testis,” Gene Expression Patterns, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, Z. Yang, Y. Wang et al., “Both Gfrα1a and Gfrα1b are involved in the self-renewal and maintenance of spermatogonial stem cells in medaka,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 27, no. 23, pp. 1658–1670, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bellaïche, A.-S. Goupil, E. Sambroni, J.-J. Lareyre, and F. Le Gac, “Gdnf-Gfra1 pathway is expressed in a spermatogenetic-dependent manner and is regulated by fsh in a fish testis,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 91, no. 4, p. 94, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. M. J. Costa, A. L. Sousa, A. F. A. Figueiredo, S. M. S. N. Lacerda, and L. R. França, “Characterization of spermatogonial cells and niche in the scorpion mud turtle (Kinosternon scorpioides),” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 273, pp. 163–171, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Mucksová, J. Kalina, M. Bakst et al., “Expression of the chicken GDNF family receptor α-1 as a marker of spermatogonial stem cells,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 142, no. 1-2, pp. 75–83, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-L. Cheng, H.-R. Wu, C.-Y. Li, C.-F. Chen, and H.-C. Cheng, “Characterization of the testicular regeneration potential in premature cockerels,” Journal of Reproduction and Development, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 563–570, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Pramod, B. R. Lee, Y. M. Kim et al., “Isolation, characterization, and in vitro culturing of spermatogonial stem cells in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica),” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 60–70, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Kim, N. Sharma, S. W. Kim et al., “Establishment of a pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) spermatogonial stem cell line for the production of interspecies germ line chimeras,” Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 211–216, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hayashi, M. Sato, Y. Nagasaka, S. Sadaie, S. Kobayashi, and G. Yoshizaki, “Enrichment of spermatogonial stem cells using side population in teleost,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 91, no. 1, p. 23, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shikina, S. Ihara, and G. Yoshizaki, “Culture conditions for maintaining the survival and mitotic activity of rainbow trout transplantable type A spermatogonia,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 529–537, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nagasawa, S. Shikina, Y. Takeuchi, and G. Yoshizaki, “Lymphocyte antigen 75 (Ly75/CD205) is a surface marker on mitotic germ cells in rainbow trout,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 597–606, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Sánchez-Sánchez, E. Camp, A. García-España, A. Leal-Tassias, and J. L. Mullor, “Medaka Oct4 is expressed during early embryo development, and in primordial germ cells and adult gonads,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 239, no. 2, pp. 672–679, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Saito, C. Morinaga, Y. Aoki et al., “Proliferation of germ cells during gonadal sex differentiation in medaka: insights from germ cell-depleted mutant zenzai,” Developmental Biology, vol. 310, no. 2, pp. 280–290, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Seki, K. Kusano, S. Lee et al., “Production of the medaka derived from vitrified whole testes by germ cell transplantation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 43185, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Hong, T. Liu, H. Zhao et al., “Establishment of a normal medakafish spermatogonial cell line capable of sperm production in vitro,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 21, pp. 8011–8016, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shikina and G. Yoshizaki, “Improved in vitro culture conditions to enhance the survival, mitotic activity, and transplantability of rainbow trout type A spermatogonia,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 268–276, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Thoma, T. U. Wagner, I. P. Weber, A. Herpin, A. Fischer, and M. Schartl, “Ectopic expression of single transcription factors directs differentiation of a medaka spermatogonial cell line,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1425–1438, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nishimura, K. Yamada, C. Fujimori et al., “Germ cells in the teleost fish medaka have an inherent feminizing effect,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 14, no. 3, article e1007259, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Iwasaki-Takahashi, S. Shikina, M. Watanabe et al., “Production of functional eggs and sperm from in vitro-expanded type A spermatogonia in rainbow trout,” Communications Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 308, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Bouma, J. G. Cloud, and J. J. Nagler, “An in vitro system for the long-term tissue culture of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) testis,” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Comparative Experimental Biology, vol. 303A, no. 8, pp. 698–703, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Song and H. O. Gutzeit, “Effect of 17-alpha-ethynylestradiol on germ cell proliferation in organ and primary culture of medaka (Oryzias latipes) testis,” Development, Growth & Differentiation, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 327–337, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Xu, Z. Li, M. Li, L. Wang, and Y. Hong, “Boule is present in fish and bisexually expressed in adult and embryonic germ cells of medaka,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 6, article e6097, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Liu, N. Hong, H. Xu et al., “Medaka dead end encodes a cytoplasmic protein and identifies embryonic and adult germ cells,” Gene Expression Patterns, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 541–548, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Xu, M. Li, J. Gui, and Y. Hong, “Cloning and expression of medaka dazl during embryogenesis and gametogenesis,” Gene Expression Patterns, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 332–338, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Devlin and Y. Nagahama, “Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences,” Aquaculture, vol. 208, no. 3-4, pp. 191–364, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Shetty, J. M. Mitchell, T. N. A. Lam et al., “Donor spermatogenesis in de novo formed seminiferous tubules from transplanted testicular cells in rhesus monkey testis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2249–2255, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xie, R. Nóbrega, and M. Pšenička, “Spermatogonial stem cells in fish: characterization, isolation, enrichment, and recent advances of in vitro culture systems,” Biomolecules, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 644, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schartl, M. Schmid, and I. Nanda, “Dynamics of vertebrate sex chromosome evolution: from equal size to giants and dwarfs,” Chromosoma, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 553–571, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Miura, “Sex determination and sex chromosomes in amphibia,” Sexual Development, vol. 11, no. 5-6, pp. 298–306, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Holleley, S. D. Sarre, D. O'Meally, and A. Georges, “Sex reversal in reptiles: reproductive oddity or powerful driver of evolutionary change?” Sexual Development, vol. 10, no. 5-6, pp. 279–287, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pokorná and L. Kratochvíl, “Phylogeny of sex-determining mechanisms in squamate reptiles: are sex chromosomes an evolutionary trap?” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 168–183, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ezaz, B. Moritz, P. Waters, J. A. M. Graves, A. Georges, and S. D. Sarre, “The ZW sex microchromosomes of an Australian dragon lizard share no homology with those of other reptiles or birds,” Chromosome Research, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 965–973, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Kohno, B. B. Parrott, R. Yatsu et al., “Gonadal differentiation in reptiles exhibiting environmental sex determination,” Sexual Development, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 208–226, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Graves, “Avian sex, sex chromosomes, and dosage compensation in the age of genomics,” Chromosome Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Russell, “Genetics of mammalian sex chromosomes,” Science, vol. 133, no. 3467, pp. 1795–1803, 1961.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Katsura, M. Iwase, and Y. Satta, “Evolution of genomic structures on mammalian sex chromosomes,” Current Genomics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 115–123, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Baroiller, H. D'Cotta, and E. Saillant, “Environmental effects on fish sex determination and differentiation,” Sexual Development, vol. 3, no. 2-3, pp. 118–135, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Camerino, P. Parma, O. Radi, and S. Valentini, “Sex determination and sex reversal,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 289–292, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Flament, “Sex reversal in amphibians,” Sexual Development, vol. 10, no. 5-6, pp. 267–278, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. B. Hayes, “Sex determination and primary sex differentiation in amphibians: genetic and developmental mechanisms,” Journal of Experimental Zoology, vol. 281, no. 5, pp. 373–399, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wallace, G. M. I. Badawy, and B. M. N. Wallace, “Amphibian sex determination and sex reversal,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 901–909, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. J. Janzen and P. C. Phillips, “Exploring the evolution of environmental sex determination, especially in reptiles,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1775–1784, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. R. Parenti and H. J. Grier, “Evolution and phylogeny of gonad morphology in bony fishes,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 333–348, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. de Siqueira-Silva, R. M. da Silva, and R. H. Nóbrega, “Testis structure, spermatogonial niche and Sertoli cell efficiency in neotropical fish,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 273, pp. 218–226, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Aire, “Spermiogenesis in birds,” Spermatogenesis, vol. 4, no. 3, article e959392, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Hess and L. Renato de Franca, “Spermatogenesis and cycle of the seminiferous epithelium,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 636, pp. 1–15, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-I. Hamano, R. Y. O. Sugimoto, H. Takahashi, and H. Tsujii, “Spermatogenesis in immature mammals,” Reproductive Medicine and Biology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 139–149, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Roosen-Runge, “The process of spermatogenesis in mammals,” Biological Reviews, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 343–376, 1962.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Long, K. Trinajstic, and Z. Johanson, “Devonian arthrodire embryos and the origin of internal fertilization in vertebrates,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7233, pp. 1124–1127, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Pratt, “The storage of spermatozoa in the oviducal glands of western North Atlantic sharks,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 38, no. 1-3, pp. 139–149, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kobayashi and T. Iwamatsu, “Fine structure of the storage micropocket of spermatozoa in the ovary of the guppy Poecilia reticulata,” Zoological Science, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 545–555, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. P. Lampert, K. Blassmann, K. Hissmann et al., “Single-male paternity in coelacanths,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2488, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Iskandar, B. J. Evans, and J. A. McGuire, “A novel reproductive mode in frogs: a new species of fanged frog with internal fertilization and birth of tadpoles,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, article e115884, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Hyuk Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1806

Downloads

536

Citations