Models and Molecular Markers of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Vertebrates: To Find Models in Nonmammals
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the germline stem cells that are essential for the maintenance of spermatogenesis in the testis. However, it has not been sufficiently understood in amphibians, reptiles, and fish because numerous studies have been focused mainly on mammals. The aim of this review is to discuss scientific ways to elucidate SSC models of nonmammals in the context of the evolution of testicular organization since rodent SSC models. To further understand the SSC models in nonmammals, we point out common markers of an SSC pool (undifferentiated spermatogonia) in various types of testes where the kinetics of the SSC pool appears. This review includes the knowledge of (1) common molecular markers of vertebrate type A spermatogonia including putative SSC markers, (2) localization of the markers on the spermatogonia that have been reported in previous studies, (3) highlighting the most common markers in vertebrates, and (4) suggesting ways of finding SSC models in nonmammals.
The germ cell lineage in both male and female vertebrates originates from primordial germ cells (PGCs). In males, PGCs become enclosed by somatic supporting cells, which are the precursors of Sertoli cells [1, 2]. Sertoli cells of mice and turtles originate from coelomic epithelial cells in the testis; Sertoli and granulosa cells have a common precursor in mice and medaka [1, 3–8]. PGCs and Sertoli cells then together form solid strands of cells, which are called seminiferous cords (or cysts in fish and amphibians) [2, 9]. Later, these cords (or cysts) form a lumen and become lobules in fish and amphibians or seminiferous tubules in reptiles, birds, and mammals [10–12]. Finally, spermatogenesis, which is an organized process in vertebrate testes to produce from spermatogonia (SPG) to mature spermatozoa (SPZ) through an individual’s lifespan, occurs in the cyst or seminiferous tubule (Figure 1) [13, 14].
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are the germline stem cells that are a rare population with long-term renewal potential in the testis . The SSCs are small in proportion, representing only 0.03% of all germ cells in rodent testes because a majority of testicular germ cells are differentiated SPG, spermatocytes (SPC), spermatids (STD), and SPZ in seminiferous tubules or cysts [10, 14, 15]. It has been reported that active movement of SSCs occurs around the vasculature-associated region to communicate with testicular somatic cells [16, 17]. Localization of the SSC pool labeled with Neurogenin 3/enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) is biased to the vascular network and accompanies Leydig and other interstitial cells in the intact testis of mice [17, 18]. The Glial line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptor alpha-1 (GFRα-1)+SSC pool tends to localize on the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubules near the vasculature and interstitium . Spermatogonia (SPG) undergoing differentiation leave the vasculature-associated region and disperse throughout the basal compartment of the seminiferous epithelium. The prevailing “Asingle SSC Model” in seminiferous tubules has been suggested to represent the ability of SSCs to multiply and self-renew in rodents [10, 15, 19–21]. Asingle (As) SPG as SSCs have the ability to self-renew throughout the lifetime to preserve SSC population size and differentiate into A-paired (Apr) and A-aligned (Aal) SPG to maintain the process of spermatogenesis and preserve male fertility [10, 15, 22, 23]. Currently, there are two rodent SSC models (“revised Asingle model” and “fragmentation model”), which have been performed with transplantation experiments to characterize stem cell activity in mice [22, 24].
The testicular organization consists of tubular testes for reptiles, birds, and mammals and lobular testes for amphibians and fish. The cysts are produced when a Sertoli cell becomes associated with a primary SPG (also called PGCs), which has the largest nuclei among spermatogenic cells, and mitotic divisions of the primary spermatogonium produce a group of secondary SPG that are enclosed by the Sertoli cell, which forms the wall of the cyst [25, 26]. Spermatogenesis occurs in a cyst of a testicular lobule, which consists of unit-termed cysts, including a mix of testicular germ cells and Sertoli cells  (Figure 1). Sperms are released into the lumen of lobules and are transported through sperm ducts connected between each lobule (Figure 1) . Lobular testes are divided into restricted and unrestricted lobular testes, wherein during active spermatogenesis, type A SPG are found only in the periphery of the restricted lobular testis of fish and salamander or type A SPG are seen in all the lobules of the unrestricted lobular testis in fish and frogs, respectively (Figure 1) [25, 28–39]. In the tubular testis, PGCs and pre-Sertoli cells then together form solid strands of cells, which are called seminiferous cords [3, 40, 41]. These cords form a lumen and become seminiferous tubules in reptiles, birds, and mammals [25, 26] (Figure 1). Spermatogenesis developing from SPG to SPZ occurs in seminiferous tubules (Figure 1). Localization of germ cell differentiation is different between anamniote and amniote vertebrates because of diverse testis organization. In addition, the available discussion on the kinetics and models of vertebrate SSC has been limited because identification of SSC models has been reported mainly in mammals. The purpose of this review is to discuss evidence-based SSC models and to find ways for SSC models of nonmammals by searching common SSC and type A SPG markers in vertebrates.
2. Models of Spermatogonial Stem Cells and Type A Spermatogonia among Vertebrates
The transplantation technique is a powerful tool method to characterize SSC activity including germ cell differentiation, progeny production, and lineage tracing using EGFP-transgenic mice, which has been used for demonstrating mouse SSC models [15, 42]. Currently, there are two models in rodents that have been verified via transplantation with a specific marker. “Asingle SSC Model” has been modified by Lord and Oatley who subsequently proposed the “revised Asingle model” (Figure 2(a)) . A previous study has demonstrated the expression and function of inhibitor of differentiation 4 (ID4) in ID4/EGFP mice, wherein the ID4/EGFP-expressing SPG population with high ID4 expression was enriched with SSCs . Spermatogonia with high levels of ID4/EGFP expression are primarily As SPG within the testes, and these cells encompass over 85% of the SSC population in transplantation analysis. In contrast, SPG with low levels of ID4/EGFP expression are identified primarily as Apr and some As SPG with low levels of ID4 expression encompass less than 15% of the self-renewing population in transplantation analysis. The SPG population with the high level of ID4/EGFP expression gives higher levels of putative SSC markers, which led to high colonization efficiency in transplantation, and ID4 overexpression impairs spermatogenesis characterized by a blockade in differentiation [43, 44]. They proposed the “revised Asingle model” which explains that under steady-state conditions, a subset of the As population with higher ID4 expression is considered functionally true SSCs, and some plasticity of As and Apr SPG with lower ID4 expression may exist between SSCs and progenitors (Figure 2(a)).
Yoshida and his colleagues proposed the “fragmentation model” which describes cell kinetics and undifferentiated type A SPG in the mice (Figure 2(a)) [16, 22, 45, 46]. The SSC maintenance not only is dependent on self-renewing cells (As) but also involves a more extensive population comprising Apr and Aal SPG . This population has self-renewing abilities similar to those of stem cells . Live cell imaging and lineage tracing experiments involving EGFP/GFRα-1+SSC pool (including As, Apr, and Aal SPG) during steady-state spermatogenesis have revealed that the SCC pool actively migrates over a large area on the basal lamina without stopping at particular points and that the breakage of intercellular bridges occurs more often than expected . Asingle SPG are generated through self-renewal and the fragmentation of Apr or Aal SPG . Notably, the production of two As SPG by cell division is rare, and the majority of As SPG are generated from the fragmentation of Apr and Aal SPG (Figure 2(a)) . This result supports that SSC maintenance is more regulated by the fragmentation of Apr and Aal SPG than SSC self-renewal. Recently, they have analyzed the fate of transplanted mouse SSCs at the single-cell resolution that a small fraction of EGFP/GFRα-1+SSCs repopulate over the long term in host mouse testes, and it is enhanced to restore host fertility by transient suppression of donor SSC differentiation using retinoic acid . Interestingly, this model is indirectly supported by another study, which reported that purified mouse KIT protooncogene receptor tyrosine kinase+differentiating SPG committed to undergo differentiation can generate functional germinal stem cells that can repopulate germ cell-depleted testes when transplanted into adult mice . This study suggested that stemness could be acquired by differentiating progenitors after tissue injury and throughout life. These findings suggest that the SSC pool is not a fixed entity but a differentiation state that can be lost or regained according to its physical status, thus proposing a new characteristic of the SSC pool . Asingle and Apr SPG have been suggested as the SSC pool in the “revised Asingle model”, and the “fragmentation model” suggests that As, Apr, and Aal SPG are considered the SSC pool (Figure 2(a)). So far, these models are the only evidence-based SSC models in vertebrates.
In primates, dark and pale type A SPG (Adark and Apale SPG) are localized at the basement membrane of primate seminiferous tubules and are morphologically identified by their nuclear architecture and staining intensity with hematoxylin [50, 51]. In the Adark and Apale SPG model, two existing types of SSCs have been suggested. The first type comprises monkey Adark SPG (“reserve” stem cells), which are the stem cells that produce equal numbers of Adark SPG, whereas the second type is the Apale SPG (“active” stem cells), which divide to give rise to type B SPG that differentiate into primary SPC [52–54]. This model has been contested by Ehmcke et al. who claimed that the Adark SPG (“regenerative reserve”) are recognized as true SSCs with a low mitotic activity under steady-state conditions, and the Apale SPG initiate spermatogenesis by self-renewal of Apale SPG as “renewing progenitors” [23, 54–56]. Currently, it has been suggested that the different nuclear architecture of Adark and Apale SPG may strongly correlate with cell cycle stages; Adark and at least some Apale are the same population of cells at different stages of the cell cycle [42, 54, 57]. In terms of the cell cycle, Adark and Apale SPG are considered the SSC pool (undifferentiated type A SPG) (Figure 2(b)). However, the identification of distinct SSCs in the Adark and Apale SPG, which is demonstrated by transplantation experiments with molecular markers, remains unclear.
In birds, the model of SSC identification and renewal has not been established due to insufficient studies on SSCs. The classification of SPG, based on chromatin distribution and nuclear morphology, has been proposed to describe the process of SPG development in birds. In Japanese quail and goose, four different types of SPG are identified in seminiferous tubules: dark type A, two pale A types (pale 1 and 2), and type B SPG [58–60]. In turkey, three types of SPG have been defined: dark type A, pale A type, and type B SPG . The dark type A SPG for both species are analogous to the As/Apr in rodents and Adark/Apale in primates.
In reptiles, it has been reported that there are type A and B SPG based on histological morphology. The seasonal cycle of spermatogenesis has demonstrated different patterns with an increase in seminiferous tubule size in turtles, snakes, and lizards [62–66]. In turtles, there are three major types of SPG, namely, resting, type A, and type B SPG . The resting SPG, which appear during four seasons and have darkly stained chromatin packed tightly within the nuclei and lack visible nucleoli, do not enter meiosis to replenish the spermatogonial population near the end of spermatogenesis . Turtle resting SPG may correspond to undifferentiated SPG as the SSC pool. In snakes and lizards, type A SPG are determined by morphology without classifying such as undifferentiated type A SPG [62, 65, 66, 68]. In amphibians, primary SPG that are located in the periphery of the lobules have been considered undifferentiated type A SPG undergoing mitosis, and secondary SPG are similar to type B SPG (differentiated SPG) in rodents [25, 28, 33–35]. In bullfrogs and newts, PGCs claimed in seasonal spermatogenesis are designated as primary SPG [34, 69–71]. However, evidence of resting and primary SPG that supports their SSC potentials has not been found in both species yet.
The majority of testicular structures are lobular types in fish (Figure 1). SSCs have been studied in classification, in vitro culture, and transplantation in fish more than in reptiles and amphibians. Spermatogenesis including type A SPG, type B SPG, and primary SPC has been well studied in fish [14, 32, 72]. An initial cyst is formed with undifferentiated type A SPG, which is considered a stem cell and comprises a few Sertoli cells. Fish type A SPG are classified into undifferentiated type A and differentiated type A SPG that correspond to undifferentiated As~Aal (2~16 germ cells) and differentiating type A (A1~intermediate) SPG in rodents, respectively [14, 73–76] (Figure 2(b)). The potential activity of SSCs has been evaluated in fish using transplantation experiments, indicating the stemness of undifferentiated type A SPG. In trout, DEAD-box helicase 4 (VASA)/GFP-expressing PGCs or type A SPG, which are xenotransplanted into salmon, can develop into functional sperm cells and egg cells that can form offspring [77–80]. In addition, the SSC activity of type A SPG has been evaluated using molecular markers [72, 80]. In sturgeon, early-stage germ cells which are transplanted into recipient larvae can migrate to genital ridges and the number of SSCs significantly increases in later larval stages . In zebrafish, VASA/EGFP-expressing undifferentiated type A SPG can develop into spermatogenic cells at different stages of spermatogenesis and oocytes after transplantation into germ cell-deficient male and female zebrafish . Furthermore, in vitro culture and purification of type A SPG have been studied for differentiation and enrichment in dogfish, catfish, zebrafish, and carp [83–88]. So far, undifferentiated type A SPG have the SSC potential in fish (Figure 2(b)).
Undifferentiated type A SPG of vertebrates, such as As, Apr, Aal, Adark, and Apale SPG, are considered the SSC pool, based on their localization in the basement membrane of tubules and cysts of lobules, characterization of nuclei, their rarity, and transplantation evidence. To further understand SSCs in nonmammals, we analyzed the expression of putative SSC markers in type A SPG during the early and adult stages of testis development among vertebrates.
3. Class-Crossed Molecular Markers of Spermatogonial Stem Cells and Type A Spermatogonia in Vertebrates
Gonocytes and PGC, which are considered to be the origin of SSCs and also expressed in adult type A SPG, have been used for identifying the SSC pool (Supplementary Table 1) . Putative SSC markers and type A SPG, expressed in testicular tubules (or lobules) and cultured (or isolated) SPG, have been analyzed in the SSC pool of vertebrates; class-crossed and class-specific markers are shown in Supplementary Information including a detailed description of expression of the SSC and SPG markers in vertebrates. According to the “revised Asingle model” and the “fragmentation model,” the vertebrate SSCs include undifferentiated type A SPG as the SSC pool such as As, Apr, and Aal SPG or Adark and Apale SPG. “SSCs” claimed in the previous research studies were intactly used in the marker description of this section and Supplementary Information. The candidate markers for the SSC pool, which are common in two classes or more, were selected by results visualized by immunocytochemistry, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), and fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) in the testicular tubules (or lobules) at specific developmental stages as well as transplantation experiments for producing donor-derived offspring. SSC-related studies only with RT-PCR results were excluded from the selection of putative SSC markers. All genes listed were confirmed for their evolutionary conservation using NCBI Orthologs (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Due to the number of research reports on nonmammals, it was not easy to isolate the common markers for the SSC pool of vertebrates. As shown in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, plenty of putative SSC markers from mammalian testis tissues and their cultured (or isolated) SSCs have been studied more frequently than birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Comparatively, GFRα-1, thymocyte differentiation antigen 1 (THY1), promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein (PLZF), nanos C2HC-type zinc finger 1 (NANO1), nanos C2HC-type zinc finger 2 (NANOS2), and OCT4 are class-crossed markers of the SSC pool (Supplementary Table 1). Here, we review GFRα-1 expression in vertebrates which is the most common molecular marker after investigating putative SSC markers.
In mature male dogfish, GFRα-1 is highly expressed in all undifferentiated SPG and differentiating SPG, as well as in cultured GFRα-1-expressing spermatogonial cells, but it is not detectable in SPC- and STD-related zones [83, 89]. In tilapia, GFRα-1 is detected exclusively in undifferentiated type A SPG with a large nucleus of large single cells in sexually mature male testes, and the density of GFRα-1+SPG is high in the peripheral regions of the tubular testis (near tunica albuginea). Cultured GFRα-1+SPG, isolated from the adult testis, can colonize in recipient adult tilapia . In rainbow trout, GFRα-1 transcripts are detected in type A SPG of mature testes, and their levels decrease in type B SPG . In medaka adult testes, GFRα-1 transcript levels are high in SPG and moderate in SPC, and SPG isolated from immature testes express GFRα-1 [92, 93]. In bullfrogs, PGCs (gonocyte-like SSCs) of adult testes are the largest cells located in the lobular periphery and are surrounded by Sertoli cells, and GFRα-1 immunoexpression is observed in the cytoplasm and plasma membrane of PGCs . In adult scorpion mud turtles, GFRα-1 is expressed in undifferentiated type A SPG (SSC) and is predominantly located in areas where a seminiferous tubule faces the interstitial compartment containing blood vessels . In chicken, the proportion of GFRα-1+ cells is 2.8% in the cells of adult testes. GFRα-1 mRNA and protein expression is detected mainly in type A SPG close to the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule, and GFRα-1-expressing SPG produce the progenies in recipient chickens [95, 96]. Spermatogonia, isolated from juvenile and adult quail using a differential plating technique, express GFRα-1, and SPG cultured from adult pheasant testes also express GFRα-1 [97, 98]. Mammalian GFRα-1 is expressed in gonocytes and undifferentiated type A SPG of the testis and cultured (or isolated) SSCs (Supplementary Table 1). Certainly, mouse GFRα-1 is expressed in the SSC pool (As, Apr, and Aal SPG) during steady-state spermatogenesis (Supplementary Table 1). In vertebrates, GFRα-1 is a common marker for the SSC pool, and its expression is exclusively observed in gonocytes, undifferentiated type A SPG, and cultured SSCs. In addition, GFRα-1+ cells have been used for transplantation experiments to produce donor-derived offspring and for elucidating SSC models in rodents [16, 48]. In analysis of molecular markers, it reveals that GFRα-1 is the most potential SSC marker in vertebrates.
4. Finding Models of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Nonmammals
After analyzing type A SPG localization of putative SSC markers in vertebrates, several characteristics are revealed in the SSC pool of vertebrates. Firstly, the SSC pool is observed in SPG in the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules, the periphery of restricted lobular testes, and the basement membrane near the cyst of unrestricted lobular testes mixed with several types of germ cells. Secondly, many of the putative SSC markers in mammals are not expressed or have not been studied in other classes (Supplementary Table 1). Thirdly, transplantation including SSC markers’ expression with progeny production has been performed in a few gonochoristic fish (nonmammals). Based on these, we discuss ways of verifying SSC models of nonmammals in the evolution of the testicular organization.
As mentioned above, testis organization is divided into tubular and lobular testes for optimal reproductive strategies. Mammals and birds exhibit homeothermy, internal fertilization, specific sex chromosome (ZZ/ZW or XX/XY), tubular testis, and exogenous factor-independent sex determination (Table 1). Reptiles and amphibians show poikilothermy, external fertilization, lobular testis, and exogenous factor-dependent sex determination; additionally, certain species possess specific sex chromosomes (ZZ/ZW or XX/XY) (Table 1). Fish exhibit poikilothermy, external fertilization, lobular testis, various types of sex chromosomes, and exogenous factor-dependent sex determination (Table 1). Reptilian reproductive strategies show the intermediate characteristics between fish-amphibians and birds-mammals (Table 1). Tubular and lobular testes diverge in stability of the sex determination system, fertilization strategy, and animal body type (Table 1). Although spermatogenesis is a universal process in vertebrates, the testicular organization is varied in the reproductive strategies of vertebrates (Figure 1 and Table 1). The SSC pool of amniotes and anamniotes exists in the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules and cysts of lobular testes, respectively (Figure 1). In particular, the difference in testis organization may imply a difference in SSC kinetics in vertebrates and suggest that the SSC kinetics and their markers can vary between tubular and lobular testes. To understand SSC models in nonmammals further, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the “revised Asingle models,” “fragmentation model,” or other models can be applied to elucidate SSC kinetics in the lobular testis of anamniotes or not. In a previous study, GFRα-1, which has been used to trace mouse As, Apr, and Aal SPG to explain the “fragmentation model,” was found to be the only common marker for the vertebrate SSC pool (Supplementary Table 1) [16, 48]. Comparatively, type A SPG of fish are classified in more detail than those of reptiles and birds (Figure 2(b)). In addition, the kinetics of undifferentiated type A SPG using transgenic fish and organ culture has been reported in several studies. In rainbow trout and medaka, VASA/GFP-carrying type A SPG have been used in transplantation experiments and germ cell cultures, which possess the ability to produce donor-derived offspring [77–80, 99–109]. Additionally, the culture of testis fragments has been performed in rainbow trout and medaka, which increased the proliferation of SPC and SPG; GFRα-1 is expressed in undifferentiated type A SPG of both species [110, 111] (Supplementary Table 1). Recently, the in vitro-expanded germline stem cells, enriched from immature VASA/GFP rainbow trout, exhibit stem cell activity and potency to produce functional eggs, sperm, and healthy offspring . In testicular organization, medaka and rainbow trout have restricted and unrestricted lobular testes, respectively [79, 91, 110, 112–114]. In common, two bony fish are gonochoristic in which only each individual develops to a male with testes or a female with ovaries after fertilization . Spermatogenesis in unrestricted lobular testes occurs in a single cyst corresponding to the seminiferous tubules (Figure 1). However, the differentiation and proliferation of germ cells (SPG, SPC, STD, and SPZ) occur in various cysts of restricted lobular testes, and the cysts are located in the peripheral region extending to the central sperm duct; each cyst in the testis is divided into mitotic and meiotic cysts in restricted lobular testes (Figure 1). It is possible that SSC kinetics (self-renewal and division) is different from those in unrestricted lobular and tubular testes. Rainbow trout and medaka satisfy the conditions (GFRα-1 expression in undifferentiated SPG, organ culture of the testis, and establishment of a GFP transgenic animal model) that can apply the live imaging experiments using GFRα-1/EGFP to prove the “fragmentation model”; SCC activity can be analyzed in ID4-EGFP salmon and medaka to verify the “revised Asingle model.” In addition, PLZF and OCT4, which are conserved in vertebrates, are promising undifferentiated SPG markers after GFRα-1. Therefore, finding SSC models using two fish can provide the diversity of SSC kinetics in the lobular testis in nonmammals.
Here, we tried to investigate the common SSC markers after examining the putative markers of the SSC pool in vertebrates. To date, GFRα-1 is the most common marker for the SSC pool in vertebrates, and it can be used to verify SSC models using experiments (transgenic animal model, transplantation, and in vitro culture) in nonmammals. To understand SSC kinetics in nonmammals, further studies including the identification of novel markers, development of organ culture, and establishment of SSC molecular marker-carrying transgenic animal models should be performed in birds, reptiles, and amphibians. If a specific SSC model is common across several classes or a new model of SSCs can appear in other classes with lobular testes, we can understand why self-renewal and differentiation of SSCs are different in the evolution of testis organization and reproductive strategy among vertebrates.
Data sharing is not applicable because no new data was created in this review..
This review was written as part of Konkuk University’s research support program for its faculty on sabbatical leave in 2020.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
HS designed the review contents, wrote and revised the manuscript, and searched molecular markers. HJP wrote and revised the manuscript. WYL wrote the manuscript and searched molecular markers. KHL designed and conceptualized the review contents, wrote and revised the manuscript, and analyzed molecular markers.
Supplementary Table 1. Class-crossed markers on the spermatogonial stem cell pool and type A spermatogonia in testes and cultured (or isolated) spermatogonia in vertebrates. Supplementary Table 2. Molecular markers on the spermatogonial stem cell pool and type A spermatogonia in testes and cultured (or isolated) spermatogonia in mammals. (Supplementary Materials)
H. Schatten, Germ Cell Protocols: Volume 1: Sperm and Oocyte Analysis, Humana Press, 2010.
S. Nakamura, Y. Aoki, D. Saito et al., “Sox9b/sox9a2-EGFP transgenic medaka reveals the morphological reorganization of the gonads and a common precursor of both the female and male supporting cells,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 472–476, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Capel, Sex Determination in Vertebrates, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019.
D. M. Scheltinga and B. G. Jamieson, “Tamieson: Chapter 5 - spermatogenesis and the mature spermatozoon: form, function and phylogenetic implications,” Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Anura, Science Publishers, pp. 119–251, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
B. H. Caneguim, F. L. Beltrame, J. S. da Luz, S. R. Valentini, P. S. Cerri, and E. Sasso-Cerri, “Primordial germ cells (spermatogonial stem cells) of bullfrogs express sex hormone-binding globulin and steroid receptors during seasonal spermatogenesis,” Cells, Tissues, Organs, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 136–144, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Yartsev, J.-M. Exbrayat, and V. Kuranova, “Spermatogenesis in the Siberian salamander, Salamandrella keyserlingii (Caudata: Hynobiidae),” Salamandra, vol. 53, pp. 66–76, 2017.View at: Google Scholar
D. Coveney, J. Cool, T. Oliver, and B. Capel, “Four-dimensional analysis of vascularization during primary development of an organ, the gonad,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 20, pp. 7212–7217, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. P. Hermann, M. Sukhwani, D. R. Simorangkir, T. Chu, T. M. Plant, and K. E. Orwig, “Molecular dissection of the male germ cell lineage identifies putative spermatogonial stem cells in rhesus macaques,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1704–1716, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Aire, “Chapter 7 - spermatogenesis and testicular cycles,” Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Birds, Science Publishers, pp. 279–348, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
M. F. Akhtar, E. Ahmad, S. Mustafa, Z. Chen, Z. Shi, and F. Shi, “Spermiogenesis, stages of seminiferous epithelium and variations in seminiferous tubules during active states of spermatogenesis in Yangzhou goose ganders,” Animals, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 570, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sarkar, S. Arya, U. Rai, and S. S. Majumdar, “A study of differential expression of testicular genes in various reproductive phases of Hemidactylus flaviviridis (wall lizard) to derive their association with onset of spermatogenesis and its relevance to mammals,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, article e0151150, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Rheubert, H. H. McHugh, M. H. Collier, D. M. Sever, and K. M. Gribbins, “Temporal germ cell development strategy during spermatogenesis within the testis of the ground skink, Scincella lateralis (Sauria: Scincidae),” Theriogenology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Lacerda, P. Aponte, G. Costa et al., “An overview of spermatogonial stem cell physiology, niche and transplantation in fish,” Animal Reproduction, vol. 9, pp. 798–808, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
H. Kitano, S. Irie, A. Yamaguchi, and M. Matsuyama, “Diurnal dynamics of S-phase entry of germ cells in the secondary testis of the bambooleaf wrasse (Pseudolabrus sieboldi),” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, vol. 315A, no. 4, pp. 232–241, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Okutsu, K. Suzuki, Y. Takeuchi, T. Takeuchi, and G. Yoshizaki, “Testicular germ cells can colonize sexually undifferentiated embryonic gonad and produce functional eggs in fish,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2725–2729, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kawasaki, K. R. Siegfried, and N. Sakai, “Differentiation of zebrafish spermatogonial stem cells to functional sperm in culture,” Development, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 566–574, 2016.View at: Google Scholar
G. M. J. Costa, A. L. Sousa, A. F. A. Figueiredo, S. M. S. N. Lacerda, and L. R. França, “Characterization of spermatogonial cells and niche in the scorpion mud turtle (Kinosternon scorpioides),” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 273, pp. 163–171, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Bouma, J. G. Cloud, and J. J. Nagler, “An in vitro system for the long-term tissue culture of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) testis,” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Comparative Experimental Biology, vol. 303A, no. 8, pp. 698–703, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Iskandar, B. J. Evans, and J. A. McGuire, “A novel reproductive mode in frogs: a new species of fanged frog with internal fertilization and birth of tadpoles,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, article e115884, 2014.View at: Google Scholar