Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2014, Article ID 278039, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/278039
Review Article

A New Approach in Risk Stratification by Coronary CT Angiography

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA 90502, USA

Received 24 April 2014; Accepted 15 August 2014; Published 1 September 2014

Academic Editor: Albert V. Bruschke

Copyright © 2014 Rine Nakanishi and Matthew J. Budoff. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. A. L. Tonino, B. de Bruyne, N. H. J. Pijls et al., “Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 360, no. 3, pp. 213–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. H. J. Pijls, W. F. Fearon, P. A. L. Tonino et al., “Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 177–184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. W. Stone, A. Maehara, A. J. Lansky et al., “A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 3, pp. 226–235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. J. Shaw, J. Hausleiter, S. Achenbach et al., “Coronary computed tomographic angiography as a gatekeeper to invasive diagnostic and surgical procedures: results from the multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter) registry,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, no. 20, pp. 2103–2114, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. Budoff, D. Dowe, J. G. Jollis et al., “Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 21, pp. 1724–1732, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Miller, C. E. Rochitte, M. Dewey et al., “Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 22, pp. 2324–2336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. B. Meijboom, M. F. L. Meijs, J. D. Schuijf et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 25, pp. 2135–2144, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. K. Min, L. J. Shaw, R. B. Devereux et al., “Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1161–1170, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. M. van Werkhoven, J. D. Schuijf, O. Gaemperli et al., “Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 623–632, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. K. Min, A. Dunning, F. Y. Lin et al., “Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings: results from the international multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 849–860, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. R. Patel, E. D. Peterson, D. Dai et al., “Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 10, pp. 886–895, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. R. Patel, S. R. Bailey, R. O. Bonow et al., “ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1995–2027, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. B. J. W. Chow, G. A. Wells, L. Chen et al., “Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 1017–1028, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Y. Lin, L. J. Shaw, A. M. Dunning et al., “Mortality risk in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a prospective 2-center study of 2,583 patients undergoing 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 510–519, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. S. Bittencourt, E. Hulten, and B. Ghoshhajra, “Prognostic value of non-obstructive and obstructive coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomography angiography to identify cardiovascular events,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. K. Min, D. S. Berman, A. Dunning et al., “All-cause mortality benefit of coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy in patients without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN for Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry),” European Heart Journal, vol. 33, no. 24, pp. 3088–3097, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. B. Meijboom, C. A. G. Van Mieghem, N. van Pelt et al., “Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 636–643, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Rossi, S. L. Papadopoulou, F. Pugliese et al., “Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 7, pp. 43–51, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Y. Tashakkor, S. Nicolaou, J. Leipsic, and G. B. J. Mancini, “The emerging role of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of coronary perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Canadian Journal of Cardiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 413–422, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Bamberg, R. P. Marcus, A. Becker et al., “Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging,” JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 267–277, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. C. E. Rochitte, R. T. George, M. Y. Chen et al., “Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study,” European Heart Journal, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 1120–1130, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J.-H. Choi, J. K. Min, and T. M. Labounty, “Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis,” JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1149–1157, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. D. T. L. Wong, B. S. Ko, J. D. Cameron et al., “Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1271–1279, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. E. Yoon, J. H. Choi, J. H. Kim et al., “Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve,” JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1088–1096, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. A. Taylor, T. A. Fonte, and J. K. Min, “Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 61, no. 22, pp. 2233–2241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B.-K. Koo, A. Erglis, J.-H. Doh et al., “Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 19, pp. 1989–1997, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. K. Min, J. Leipsic, M. J. Pencina et al., “Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 308, no. 12, pp. 1237–1245, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. L. Nørgaard, J. Leipsic, S. Gaur et al., “Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1145–1155, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. R. Hachamovitch, B. Nutter, M. A. Hlatky et al., “Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging: Results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease),” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 462–474, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Montalescot, U. Sechtem, S. Achenbach et al., “ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, pp. 2949–3003, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  31. R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D. S. Berman, “Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 23, pp. 2900–2906, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. E. Muller, P. G. Kaufmann, R. V. Luepker, M. L. Weisfeldt, P. C. Deedwania, and J. T. Willerson, “Mechanisms precipitating acute cardiac events: review and recommendations of an NHLBI workshop,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 3233–3239, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Virmani, A. P. Burke, A. Farb, and F. D. Kolodgie, “Pathology of the vulnerable plaque,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. C13–C18, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Falk, M. Nakano, J. F. Bentzon, A. V. Finn, and R. Virmani, “Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists' view,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 719–728, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Achenbach, D. Ropers, U. Hoffmann et al., “Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 842–847, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. S. J. Kröner, J. E. van Velzen, M. J. Boogers et al., “Positive remodeling on coronary computed tomography as a marker for plaque vulnerability on virtual histology intravascular ultrasound,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 1725–1729, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Kashiwagi, A. Tanaka, H. Kitabata et al., “Feasibility of noninvasive assessment of thin-cap fibroatheroma by multidetector computed tomography,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1412–1419, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Nakanishi and J. K. Min, “Coronary CT angiographic measures of adverse atherosclerotic plaque features,” Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. V. Bourantas, H. M. Garcia-Garcia, V. Farooq et al., “Clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients likely to have vulnerable plaques: analysis from the PROSPECT study,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 6, pp. 1263–1272, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  40. P. Schoenhagen, K. M. Ziada, S. R. Kapadia, T. D. Crowe, S. E. Nissen, and E. M. Tuzcu, “Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes: an intravascular ultrasound study,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 598–603, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Ehara, Y. Kobayashi, M. Yoshiyama et al., “Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 22, pp. 3424–3429, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. S. Rathore, M. Terashima, H. Matsuo et al., “Association of coronary plaque composition and arterial remodelling: a optical coherence tomography study,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 405–415, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Hasegawa, S. Ehara, Y. Kobayashi et al., “Acute myocardial infarction: Clinical characteristics and plaque morphology between expansive remodeling and constrictive remodeling by intravascular ultrasound,” American Heart Journal, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 332–337, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. N. Ahmadi, V. Nabavi, F. Hajsadeghi et al., “Mortality incidence of patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by computed tomography angiography,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. S. Kristensen, K. F. Kofoed, J. T. Khl, W. B. Nielsen, M. B. Nielsen, and H. Kelbæk, “Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with NonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multidetector computed tomography study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 502–509, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. Dohi, G. S. Mintz, J. A. McPherson et al., “Non-fibroatheroma lesion phenotype and long-term clinical outcomes: a substudy analysis from the PROSPECT study,” JACC Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 908–916, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Motoyama, T. Kondo, M. Sarai et al., “Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Motoyama, M. Sarai, H. Harigaya et al., “Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. Greenland, L. LaBree, S. P. Azen, T. M. Doherty, and R. C. Detrano, “Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. 210–215, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. Yeboah, R. L. McClelland, T. S. Polonsky et al., “Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals,” JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 308, no. 8, pp. 788–795, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. Greenland, J. S. Alpert, G. A. Beller et al., “2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 25, pp. e584–e636, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. C. Goff Jr., D. M. Lloyd-Jones, G. Bennett et al., “2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,” Circulation, vol. 129, 25, supplement 2, pp. S49–S73, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. J. Perk, G. de Backer, H. Gohlke et al., “European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts),” European Heart Journal, vol. 33, pp. 1635–1701, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  54. K. Nasir, J. Rubin, M. J. Blaha et al., “Interplay of coronary artery calcification and traditional risk factors for the prediction of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic individuals,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 467–473, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. G. Silverman, M. J. Blaha, H. M. Krumholz et al., “Impact of coronary artery calcium on coronary heart disease events in individuals at the extremes of traditional risk factor burden: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis,” European Heart Journal, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. J. Budoff, L. J. Shaw, S. T. Liu et al., “Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 1860–1870, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. Blaha, M. J. Budoff, L. J. Shaw et al., “Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 692–700, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. Tota-Maharaj, M. J. Blaha, J. W. McEvoy et al., “Coronary artery calcium for the prediction of mortality in young adults <45 years old and elderly adults >75 years old,” European Heart Journal, vol. 33, no. 23, pp. 2955–2962, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. J. Shaw, P. Raggi, E. Schisterman, D. S. Berman, and T. Q. Callister, “Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality,” Radiology, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 826–833, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. J. Shaw, P. Raggi, T. Q. Callister, and D. S. Berman, “Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in asymptomatic smokers and non-smokers,” European Heart Journal, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 968–975, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. H. Criqui, J. O. Denenberg, J. H. Ix et al., “Calcium density of coronary artery plaque and risk of incident cardiovascular events,” JAMA, vol. 311, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. I. Cho, H.-J. Chang, J. M. Sung et al., “Coronary computed tomographic angiography and risk of all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in subjects without chest pain syndrome from the CONFIRM registry (Coronary CT angiography evaluation for clinical outcomes: an international multicenter registry),” Circulation, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 304–313, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. K. Min, T. M. Labounty, M. J. Gomez et al., “Incremental prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography over coronary artery calcium score for risk prediction of major adverse cardiac events in asymptomatic diabetic individuals,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 232, pp. 298–304, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. S. Fujimoto, T. Kondo, T. Kodama et al., “Coronary computed tomography angiography-based coronary risk stratification in subjects presenting with no or atypical symptoms,” Circulation Journal, vol. 76, no. 10, pp. 2419–2425, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. Z.-H. Hou, B. Lu, Y. Gao et al., “Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography and calcium score for major adverse cardiac events in outpatients,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 990–999, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. S. J. Lehman, C. L. Schlett, F. Bamberg et al., “Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1262–1270, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. Dey, V. Y. Cheng, P. J. Slomka et al., “Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 372–382, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Dey, T. Schepis, M. Marwan, P. J. Slomka, D. S. Berman, and S. Achenbach, “Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US,” Radiology, vol. 257, no. 2, pp. 516–522, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. J. Budoff, J. E. Hokanson, K. Nasir et al., “Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1229–1236, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. M. J. Budoff, R. Young, V. A. Lopez et al., “Progression of coronary calcium and incident coronary heart disease events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1231–1239, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. Voros, J. J. Rivera, D. S. Berman et al., “Guideline for minimizing radiation exposure during acquisition of coronary artery calcium scans with the use of multidetector computed tomography: a report by the Society for Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention Tomographic Imaging and Prevention Councils in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. S. Halliburton, S. Abbara, M. Y. Chen et al., “SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT,” Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 198–224, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. Marwan, C. Mettin, T. Pflederer et al., “Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. S. Achenbach, M. Marwan, D. Ropers et al., “Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 340–346, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. P. Pazhenkottil, R. N. Nkoulou, J. R. Ghadri et al., “Impact of cardiac hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging on choice of treatment strategy in coronary artery disease,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 22, pp. 2824–2829, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. H. Kawai, M. Sarai, S. Motoyama et al., “A combination of anatomical and functional evaluations improves the prediction of cardiac event in patients with coronary artery bypass,” BMJ Open, vol. 3, Article ID e003474, 2013. View at Google Scholar