Review Article
Importance of Indigenous Breeds of Chicken for Rural Economy and Their Improvements for Higher Production Performance
Table 2
Effect of crossbreeding using indigenous birds with respect to body weight at 8 and 20 weeks of age.
| Traits | Cross | Cross performance | Indigenous performance | Country | References |
| Body weight at 8 weeks (g) | DR × FU | M = 508, F = 468 |
M = 283, F = 252 | Nigeria |
[25] | FU × DR |
M = 390, F = 372 | DR × Y |
M = 429, F = 389 |
SB × BN | 463 | 237 |
India |
[21] | SB × WN | 444 | 252 | BRN × WLH | M = 264, F = 229 |
M = 212, F = 195 | India |
[26] | WLH × BRN | M = 269, F = 231 |
| Body weight at 20 weeks | DR × FU | M = 1360, F = 1275 |
M = 1191, F = 970 | Nigeria |
[25] | FU × FR | M = 1333, F = 1333 | DR × Y | M = 1336, F = 1143 | SB × BN | 1545 | 879 | India |
[27] | SB × WN | 1532 | 805 | -do- | BRN × WLH | M = 868, F = 691 |
M = 709, F = 601 | -do- |
[26] | WLH × BRN | M = 871, F = 692 | -do- | K × J | M = 1587, F = 103 | 1079 | -do- |
[8] | (K × J) × J | M = 2240, F = 1780 | | -do- | PB2 × A | 998 | 896 | -do- | [8] | NP × DR | 1414 | 1357 | -do- | [8, 28] | R × NU | 1299 | 1382 | -do- |
[8, 28] | NU × R | 1304 | | -do- | PB2 × NU | 2083 | | -do- | NU × R × R | 1653 | | -do- | PB2 × NU × R | 1878 | | -do- | DR × NJ | 1058 | 878 | -do- |
[8] | PB2 × NJ | 1632 | | -do- | DR × (PB2 × NJ) | 1525 | | -do- | (PB2 × NJ) × DR | 1869 | | -do- |
|
|
A: indigenous fowl Guwahati, F: female, M: male, BN: Black Nicobari, BRN: Brown Nicobari, DR: Dahlem Red, FU: Fulani ecotype, K: Kadaknath, J: Jabalpur colour, NP: Palampur native, NJ: Ranchi native, NU: Udaipur native, PB2: meat-type synthetic breed, R: Rhode Island Red, SB: Synthetic broiler, WN: White Niocbari, WLH: White Leghorn, Y: Yoruba, and -do-: same as above.
|