Scientifica

Scientifica / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Restoration and Management of Healthy Wetland Ecosystems

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 8742480 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8742480

Composition and Biomass of Aquatic Vegetation in the Poyang Lake, China

Academic Editor: Roger P. Mormul
Received25 Nov 2016
Accepted15 Jan 2017
Published09 Feb 2017

Abstract

The distribution of aquatic vegetation and associated community diversity and biomass in the Poyang Lake were investigated. The results showed that (1) 43 species of aquatic vascular plants were found in the Poyang Lake watershed which belonged to 22 families; (2) the vegetation of the Poyang Lake scattered in different areas which could be divided into 31 major plant communities and 5 plant zones including amphibian, emergent, floating-leaved, submerged, and floating input; (3) there were 67 aquatic plants in the lake area, and the standing stock (fresh weight) was 1519.41 t. The number of amphibians was the dominant plant species in the Poyang Lake, and the quantity and percentage of amphibians were predominant, which was far more than the other three life forms.

1. Introduction

Aquatic plants are an important component of lake ecosystems and are often regarded as indicators of lake environmental changes; they play an important role in maintaining the structure and function of lake ecosystems [1, 2]. Aquatic plants are the primary producers of aquatic ecosystems, being a kind of food source of many kinds of fish and other aquatic animals [3, 4]. They can regulate the lake water body, degrade various pollutants, and improve the transparency [5, 6]. In addition, aquatic plants can provide habitat to many organisms and increase the spatial niche of aquatic ecosystems [7, 8]. Therefore, it is important to know the distribution of aquatic plants and their communities to analyze the status of aquatic plants in the lake area.

Vegetation is an important component of wetland ecosystems, and biomass can quantify the contribution of wetland vegetation to carbon sinks and carbon sources [9]. Biomass estimation of wetlands plays an important role in understanding dynamic changes of the wetland ecosystem [10]. In previous studies, biomass estimation using indirect and direct methods has been conducted. For example, remote sensing technology and radar data have been widely used to estimate the biomass in recent years [2, 11]. Han et al. [11] investigated four decades of winter wetland changes in the Poyang Lake based on Landsat observations between 1973 and 2013. Luo et al. [2] revealed the distribution of aquatic vegetation types in Taihu Lake, China, by using a series of remotely sensed images with a resolution of 30 m (HJ-CCD and Landsat TM). Shen et al. [9] retrieved vegetation biomass in the Poyang Lake wetland by using polarimetric RADARSAT-2 data. These indirect methods offer the ability to continuously monitor growth and phenology on the same individuals over large areas but depend on the existence of strong relationships between the predictor variables and plant biomass [1214]. Therefore, ground investigation of biomass is also very essential.

Poyang Lake, the largest freshwater lake in China, is well known for its ecological importance as a wetland system [9, 11]. The Poyang Lake region provides significant environmental benefits, such as supplying water resources and maintaining carbon storage and biodiversity [15, 16]. Guan et al. [17] pointed out that aquatic vegetation of Poyang Lake is very rich in number of species. The vegetation distributes in about 2262 km2 and accounts for 80.8% area of the lake. Jian et al. [18] studied the distribution area and biomass of Poyang Lake beach vegetation in the years of 1999 and 2000, and they found there were 28 families, 56 genera, 95 species, and 3 varieties. In April, 2000, they found that the total biomass of beach vegetation was 3.81 106 tons (fresh weight), with an average biomass of 3736 gm−2 (fresh weight). Peng et al. [19] studied the association type diversity, community species diversity, community coverage, and biomass of aquatic plants in the fresh water lakes of the Poyang Plain District of China in 2001, and they found 42 associations of aquatic plants in the lakes, which include 11 amphibian, 6 emergent, 11 leaf-floating, and 14 submerged associations. Among all the associations, Carex cinerascens Ass. and Zizania latifolia Ass. possess the highest coverage and highest biomass, respectively. Although some survey of aquatic plants in the Poyang Lake has been conducted, ground investigation of aquatic plants in Poyang Lake was very rare in recent years.

In this paper, the species and biomass of aquatic plants in the Poyang Lake were investigated based on ground survey data in September, 2013. And the objective of this study is to investigate the composition of aquatic plants and community types and habitats of major aquatic plants in the Poyang Lake. This study will provide information for the monitoring and conservation of aquatic plant in the Poyang Lake.

2. Data and Methodology

2.1. Study Area and Data

Poyang Lake is located on the southern bank of the lower Yangtze reach (28° 22′~29° 45′N and 11° 47′~116° 45′E). It has five main tributary rivers: Ganjiang River, Fuhe River, Xinjiang River, Raohe River, and Xiushui River, and several smaller rivers. The basin area of the five rivers is 162,200 km2, occupying 9% of Yangtze River basin. The climate is characterized as a subtropical, humid, monsoon climate with a 1620 mm mean annual precipitation and an annual average temperature of approximately 17°C [20].

The environmental conditions of the Poyang Lake are very suitable for the growth and reproduction of aquatic plants. Aquatic plants can provide habitat for many organisms, improve habitat diversity, and increase the spatial niche of aquatic ecosystem [21]. But the annual water level of the Poyang Lake changes greatly, especially in the flood season (April to November) and dry season (December to March). The characteristics of periodical variation of water level in the Poyang Lake might lead to the conversion of the lake beach and grassland.

2.2. Methodology

The species, community structure, coverage, and biomass of the Poyang Lake were investigated from September 7, 2013, to September 14, 2013. GPS and lake electronic map were used to set sampling points, and the samples of aquatic plants were collected at each sampling site. The category of aquatic plants in the Poyang Lake was defined according to the reference of Cook [22]. Division of “cluster” is based on the principle of dominant species, which is named as the name of the group. If a cluster is with two or more dominant species, different dominant species of the same layer were connected with “+,” and the dominant species of different layers were connected with “−.” At the sampling sites, amphibians, emergent plants, floating-leaved plants, and floating input plants were directly observed and recorded. Submerged plants were preliminarily identified with water sickle after collecting water and the characters of flowers, leaves, and fruits of each plant as well as field growth photos and accurate identification of aquatic plant species and genus [23]. For amphibian and emergent plant clusters, 6 samples of 2 m 2 m were set randomly within 500 m2 of each sampling point, and the total biomass (fresh quality) of the aerial parts of all the plants was measured and the biomass per unit area was calculated. For plants with large plant biomass, such as Phragmites communis Trin., we could estimate the number of plants in the quadrats. After selecting the representative fresh weight of the plants, we could calculate the standing amount of the plants. As the species with smaller biomass, such as Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb., all the plants in the quadrats were collected and their fresh weight was calculated, and the mean values were calculated after several measurements of plant height. The floating-leaved plant cluster, the floating input plant cluster, and the submerged plant cluster were harvested 6 times randomly in the range of 500 m2 for each sampling point with an underwater sickle with a cross-sectional area of 0.785 m2, and the plant was uprooted and then washed, removing residual sticks and other impurities. The fresh weight of each plant was weighed and the frequency, coverage area, and coverage were recorded (visual method). All the plants, together with the roots, were dug and washed, and the plant depth was measured [24].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of Aquatic Plants in the Poyang Lake

There were 43 species of aquatic plants in the lake area which belonged to 37 genera and 22 families according the survey in 2013 (see Figure 1 and Table 1). And it could be found that there were 16, 13, and 9 species, accounting for 37.21%, 30.23%, and 20.93% of the total species for the amphibians, emergent plants, and submerged plants, respectively. However, there were only 2 and 3 species for floating input plants and floating-leaved plants in the Poyang Lake, accounting for 4.65% and 6.98% of the total species.


Serial numberPlant communityPhenological periodLifestyle

1Sagittaria pygmaea Miq.Flowering fruit bearing stageEmerged plant
2Trapella sinensis Oliv.Fruit period (florescence)Floating-leaved plant
3Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey.Vegetative periodAmphibian
4Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) SolmsFlorescenceFloating input plant
5Aeschynomene indica Linn.Flowering fruit bearing stageEmerged plant
6Sambucus chinensis Lindl.Vegetative periodAmphibian
7Isachne globosa (Thunb.) KuntzeFlorescenceAmphibian
8Limnophila sessillflora (Vahl.) Bl.Vegetative periodAmphibian
9Paspalum distichum L.Vegetative periodEmerged plant
10Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Back.Fruit periodFloating input plant
11Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers.Flowering fruit bearing stageSubmerged plant
12Ludwigia adscendens (L.) HaraFlowering fruit bearing stageAmphibian
13Juncellus serotinusFlowering fruit bearing stageAmphibian
14Blyxa japonica (Miq.) Maxim.Submerged plant
15Marsilea quadrifolia L.Vegetative periodAmphibian
16Nephrolepis cordifolia (L.) PreslFruit periodAmphibian
17Carex spp.FlorescenceAmphibian
18Microcarpaea minima (Koen.) Merr.Vegetative periodAmphibian
19Oryza rufipogon Griff.Flowering fruit bearing stageAmphibian
20Myriophyllum spicatum L.Vegetative periodSubmerged plant
21Typha angustifolia L.Fruit periodEmerged plant
22Monochoria vaginalis (Burm.f.) PreslEmerged plant
23Rotala rotundifolia (Buch.-Ham) KoehneEmerged plant
24Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) BeauvVegetative periodAmphibian
25Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.Vegetative periodEmerged plant
26Najas marinaFruit periodSubmerged plant
27Triarrherca saccharifloraVegetative periodEmerged plant
28Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.Vegetative periodAmphibian
29Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M.Vegetative periodEmerged plant
30Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) RoyleVegetative periodSubmerged plant
31Utricularia aurea Lour.FlorescenceSubmerged plant
32Ceratophyllum demersum L.Vegetative periodSubmerged plant
33Vallisneria natans (Lour.) HaraFlowering fruit bearing stageSubmerged plant
34Utricularia vulgaris L.Flowering fruit bearing stageSubmerged plant
35Polygonum L.Vegetative periodAmphibian
36Trapa bispinosa Roxb.Flowering fruit bearing stageFloating-leaved plant
37Phragmites communis Trin.Vegetative periodEmerged plant
38Triarrhena lutarioripariaVegetative periodAmphibian
39Alternanthera Philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.FlorescenceEmerged plant
40Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. KuntzeFlorescenceFloating-leaved plant
41Limnophila heterophylla (Roxb.) Benth.Flowering fruit bearing stageEmerged plant
42Myriophyllum tuberculatum RoxburghFruit periodEmerged plant
43Elymus dahuricus Turcz.Vegetative periodAmphibian

It could be seen that the distribution of all kinds of plants was different; the most extensive degrees of various classes were Carex spp., Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult., Polygonum L., and Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze. Most of the species were distributed in a large area or in a continuous distribution in the wetland or near shore of the lake, which were widely distributed and had strong adaptability to adversity. Most of the plants in the whole lake were in vegetative period.

The survey recorded 22 families, 37 genera, and 43 aquatic plant species; the number of species was significantly lower than the survey of aquatic plant species number in Poyang Lake [3], which may be because the latter sampling sites in the Poyang Lake were a bit too much. The results of this study were compared with the results of the survey of 28 families, 56 genera, 95 species, and 3 varieties of aquatic vegetation in the Poyang Lake [18]. The number of species was different and the reason may be the strength of this investigation was not enough, and the accuracy of traditional field survey research method was much lower than that of TM Landsat remote sensing technology. In view of this survey was only a single survey in autumn and was limited to water habitat, lakeside vegetation was not a detailed investigation, and, therefore, the actual distribution of Poyang Lake aquatic plant species should be lower than the findings of Guan et al. [3] and Jian et al. [18].

3.2. Community Types and Habitats of Major Aquatic Plants in the Poyang Lake

The species of aquatic plants, the spatial structure, and ecological environment of the community were listed in Table 2 in the Poyang Lake. There were 31 main plant clusters in the Poyang Lake.


Serial numberPlant community

1Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara + Carex spp. + Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl.) Bl. + Ceratophyllum demersum L.
2Carex spp. + Elymus dahuricus Turcz. +Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara + Myriophyllum tuberculatum Roxburgh + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Ceratophyllum demersum L. + Limnophila heterophylla (Roxb.) Benth. + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.
3Carex spp.
4Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. + Paspalum distichum L. + Paspalum distichum L.-Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.+Typha angustifolia L.-Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.
5Aeschynomene indica Linn. + Juncellus serotinus + Oryza rufipogon Griff.
6Carex spp. + Polygonum L.
7Marsilea quadrifolia L.
8Paspalum distichum L.
9Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze
10Trapa bispinosa Roxb. + Microcarpaea minima (Koen.) Merr. + Isachne globosa (Thunb.) Kuntze + Carex spp.
11Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Ludwigia adscendens (L.) Hara + Elymus dahuricus Turcz.-Carex spp. + Myriophyllum spicatum L.-Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle + Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle-Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara.
12Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey.
13Blyxa japonica (Miq.) Maxim. + Juncellus serotinus + Sagittaria pygmaea Miq.-Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle + Monochoria vaginalis (Burm.f.) Presl-Rotala rotundifolia (Buch.-Ham) Koehne.
14Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Marsilea quadrifolia L. + Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.-Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms.
15Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Back.+ Triarrherca sacchariflora + Carex spp. + Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle + Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara + Ceratophyllum demersum L. + Najas marina-Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Carex spp.-Triarrherca sacchariflora.
16Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Carex spp. + Limnophila heterophylla (Roxb.) Benth. + Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. + Trapa bispinosa Roxb.-Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. + Utricularia aurea Lour. + Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Back.-Trapa bispinosa Roxb. + Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey. + Trapella sinensis Oliv. + Sagittaria pygmaea Miq. + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.
17Carex spp. + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M. + Elymus dahuricus Turcz. + Phragmites communis Trin. + Ceratophyllum demersum L.
18Carex spp.
19Elymus dahuricus Turcz.
20Carex spp. + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.-Polygonum L.
21Carex spp. + Polygonum L. + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.-Polygonum L. + Carex spp.-Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.
22Carex spp. + Polygonum L.
23Carex spp. + Polygonum L. + Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.
24Carex spp. + Elymus dahuricus Turcz. + Phragmites communis Trin.-Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.
25Ceratophyllum demersum L. + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) Beauv + Carex spp. + Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle + Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.
26Carex spp.
27Carex spp. + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) Beauv.
28Carex spp. + Trapa bispinosa Roxb. + Ceratophyllum demersum L. + Utricularia aurea Lour. + Triarrhena lutarioriparia + Triarrherca sacchariflora.
29Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle + Najas marina + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Ceratophyllum demersum L. + Carex spp. + Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze + Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara.
30Najas marina + Trapa bispinosa Roxb. + Carex spp. + Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M. + Triarrhena lutarioriparia.
31Polygonum L. + Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl.) Bl. + Utricularia vulgaris L. + Carex spp. + Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult. + Elymus dahuricus Turcz. + Polygonum L.

The amphibians mainly distributed in the water depth of 0.5–2.5 m meters of the beach in the flood season. The main species were amphibious plants that grew in both shallow and wetlands. There were 16 kinds of amphibians in the Poyang Lake, of which the most important and wide distribution was Carex spp., the least distribution was Sambucus chinensis Lindl., Isachne globosa (Thunb.) Kuntze, Microcarpaea minima (Koen.) Merr., and Oryza rufipogon Griff.

Emergent plants were located in the 12–15 m elevation of the shoal, and the water depth was generally 0.5–3.5 m in the flood season. The main species were plants that had only the base or lower part of the plant to be submerged in water, but the upper part of the plant was quite out of water. There were 13 kinds of emergent plants in the Poyang Lake, of which the most important and wide distribution was Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult., and the least distribution was Aeschynomene indica Linn., Typha angustifolia L., Monochoria vaginalis (Burm.f.) Presl, Rotala rotundifolia (Buch.-Ham) Koehne, and Myriophyllum tuberculatum Roxburgh.

Floating-leaved plants were located 11–13 meters above the lake bottom, where the lake water level was generally 2.5–4.5 meters in the flood season. The main species were some plants rooted in the lake, but the leaves were floating on the surface of the water. Moreover, a large number of submerged plants could also be found in this plant belt, such as Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara and Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle. There were 3 kinds of floating-leaved plants in the Poyang Lake, of which the most important and wide distribution was Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze, and the least distribution was Trapella sinensis Oliv.

Submerged plants distributed in the 9–12 m elevation of the lake, and the lake water depth was generally 3.5–6.5 meters in the flood season. The main species were some of the plants immersed in water, such as Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle, Ceratophyllum demersum L. There were 9 kinds of submerged plants in the Poyang Lake, of which the most important and wide distribution was Ceratophyllum demersum L. and Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara, and the least distribution was Blyxa japonica (Miq.) Maxim., Myriophyllum spicatum L., and Utricularia vulgaris L.

The distribution area for floating input plant was very small, and the floating input plant was mainly located in small patches or sporadic distribution in the bay. There were 2 kinds of floating input plant in the Poyang Lake, of which the most important and wide distribution was Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms, and the least distribution was Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Back.

The main habitat types of aquatic macrophytes in the Poyang Lake were summarized in Table 3. Among the amphibians, the coverage of the typical Carex spp. cluster was generally 40–80%, and the plant height was about 25–100 cm. But in the lower edge of the distribution area, the growth of the Carex spp. cluster was delayed, and the plant coverage and height were relatively small. At the upper edge of the distribution area, with the increase of the elevation, the plant growth rate began to decline, and the coverage reduced accordingly. The plant height of the typical Phragmites communis Trin. cluster in the emerged plant was 56–250 cm, and the coverage was lower and was only 10–15%. The height of submerged plant cluster was 15–70 cm, and its coverage was large and up to 90%. The coverage of floating input plant cluster was about 50–95% and the plant height was 10–55 cm. The cluster coverage of floating-leaved plants was about 60% and plant height was 3–55 cm.


Serial numberCluster typeSampling dateMultiplicity-cluster degreeHeight (cm)Number of plantsCoverage (%)

1Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl.) Bl.2013/9/74, 315–258260
2013/9/143, 33-37860
2Limnophila heterophylla (Roxb.) Benth.2013/9/75, 437–4514490
2013/9/134, 43–1013550
3Carex spp.2013/9/74, 545–7029480
2013/9/73, 350–8017040
2013/9/85, 550–1003600100
2013/9/134, 525–6530070
4Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara2013/9/75, 345–702690
2013/9/125, 315–302090
5Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.2013/9/73, 320–5085030
2013/9/115, 530–85100090
2013/9/141, 418–3535010
6Phragmites communis Trin.2013/9/72, 260–2508015
2013/9/141, 156–703610
7Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M.2013/9/74, 560–12026060
2013/9/135, 470–16814485
8Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem.et Schult.-Polygonum L.2013/9/83, 33–6024040
2013/9/95, 525–49100095
9Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.2013/9/95, 410–50900100
2013/9/95, 542–7067295
10Paspalum distichum L.-Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.2013/9/94, 310–25160070
11Typha angustifolia L.-Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb.2013/9/94, 380–2002560
12Paspalum distichum L.2013/9/94, 532–5560080
2013/9/104, 520–351000100
13Aeschynomene indica Linn.2013/9/95, 3180–2002385
14Oryza rufipogon Griff.2013/9/95, 570–120160100
15Juncellus serotinus2013/9/92, 190–1202330
2013/9/105, 320–6085090
16Carex spp.-Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.2013/9/94, 343–7964060
17Polygonum L.2013/9/93, 44–10200040
2013/9/105, 520–45100090
2013/9/143, 320–725760
18Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.2013/9/105, 56–1042090
19Marsilea quadrifolia L.2013/9/103, 215–2536840
20Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms2013/9/103, 245–552180
2013/9/115, 412–2517095
21Isachne globosa (Thunb.) Kuntze2013/9/105, 420–3570080
22Elymus dahuricus Turcz.-Carex spp.2013/9/102, 570–12015030
23Ludwigia adscendens (L.) Hara2013/9/105, 420–4010895
24Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey.2013/9/103, 3100–15075050
25Sagittaria pygmaea Miq.-Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle2013/9/103, 310–172340
26Phragmites communis Trin.-Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.2013/9/113, 330–909540
27Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze2013/9/114, 33–856060
2013/9/134, 335–553060
28Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) Beauv2013/9/115, 535–65256090
2013/9/125, 460–11096080
2013/9/125, 460–11096080
29Triarrhena lutarioriparia2013/9/125, 470–16565085
2013/9/135, 470–9857080
30Triarrherca sacchariflora2013/9/125, 580–10320095
31Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Back.2013/9/123, 310–153050
32Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers.2013/9/133, 4152080
2013/9/134, 415–302080
33Hydrocharis dubia (Bl.) Back.-Trapa bispinosa Roxb.2013/9/134, 410–159670
34Carex rhynchophysa C. A. Mey.2013/9/134, 460–10035060
35Sagittaria pygmaea Miq.2013/9/135, 310–205275
36Nephrolepis cordifolia (L.) Presl2013/9/145, 513–2550095
2013/9/145, 513–2040090
37Sambucus chinensis Lindl.2013/9/142, 210–2710040
38Elymus dahuricus Turcz.2013/9/71, 210–3034010
2013/9/113, 320–704050
2013/9/145, 462–13128080

3.3. Quantitative Characteristics of Aquatic Plant Communities in the Poyang Lake

The number of aquatic plants in the lake area was 67, and the total of the aquatic plants’ fresh weight was 1519.41 t. Among them, the Carex spp., Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult., and emergent plants were 919.66 t, while the submerged plants and floating-leaved plants were up to 599.75 t. The distribution of amphibians accounted for 58.21% of the total number of samples, and there were 14.93%, 16.42%, and 10.45% of the total plants number for the emergent plants, submerged plants, and floating-leaved plants in the Poyang Lake, respectively. It could be found that the number of amphibians was the dominant plant species in the Poyang Lake, and their quantity and percentage of the total biomass were predominant, which were far more than the other three life forms (Table 4).


Serial numberPlant communityQuadrat number Existing quantity (t)
Fresh weightFresh weight rangeDry weightDry weight range

1Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) Beauv338.3335–4510.269.18–10.8
2Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.694.0811.5–3806.2854.62–11.34
3Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.-Polygonum L.2137.575–20021.34520.65–22.04
4Najas marina13525.53
5Triarrherca sacchariflora1409.32
6Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.1405.8
7Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M.299.769.52–190104.086.46–201.7
8Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle242.535–506.1953.61–8.78
9Utricularia aurea Lour.15015.28
10Elymus dahuricus Turcz.3148.0514.15–34023.863335.99–55
11Ceratophyllum demersum L.48035–1506.77753.07–10.08
12Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara229.754.5–553.863.24–4.48
13Utricularia vulgaris L.1253.6
14Polygonum L.634.1133310.34–506.2183334.6–9.71
15Trapa bispinosa Roxb.257.555–606.352.93–9.77
16Phragmites communis Trin.112015.43
17Phragmites communis Trin.-
Cynodon dactylon (Linn.) Pers.
1209.4
18Triarrhena lutarioriparia127.0311.73
19Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl) Blume112.84.29
20Carex spp.2072.99224.84–3608.74254.22–16.96
21Carex spp.-Eleocharis tuberosa (Roxb.) Roem. et Schult.1358.53
22Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze528020–28043.43.3–43.4

Among the 16 typical cluster types, the total biomass was the highest in the Carex spp. cluster, followed by the Polygonum L. cluster, the Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M. cluster, and the Imperata cylindrica (Linn.) Beauv cluster (Figure 2). This was in contrast to 1998 aquatic vegetation survey [25], the difference was large, and the proportion of Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara and Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle was the largest, while the proportion of Carex spp. and Polygonum L. was very low. In the amphibians, Carex spp. cluster was the dominant species, and the distribution number was 34. In the emergent plants, Zizania caduciflora (Turcz. ex Trin.) H.-M. cluster, and Phragmites communis Trin. cluster distribution were in large quantities, each for 2. In the submerged plants, the distribution of Ceratophyllum demersum L. cluster was the largest, with 4 species. In the floating-leaved plants, the distribution of Nymphoides peltatum (Gmel.) O. Kuntze cluster was the largest, with 4 species. This pattern of distribution was associated with its reproductive strategies. The vast majority of grassland vegetation in the Poyang Lake interrupted their breeding during the summer season, which was suitable for plant growth during the flood season. Therefore, the plant with vigorous regenerative ability, for example, Carex spp., had become the most dominant species in the Poyang Lake grassland vegetation and Carex spp. were submerged by flood and became the carp and crucian carp spawning attachment. cluster in Poyang Lake was not only beneficial to grazing firewood and green manure, but also conducive to the reproduction of grass-laying fish sand the growth of herbivorous fish. The production of carp and crucian carp in the fishery of the Poyang Lake was about half of the total output, which was closely related to the seasonal succession of Carex spp. [26].

4. Conclusions

In this study, the distribution of aquatic vegetation and associated community diversity and biomass in the Poyang Lake were investigated with the aim of getting information for the monitoring and protection of aquatic plants in the Poyang Lake. Some interesting conclusions were obtained as follows:(1)Nine species of aquatic plants were found in the Poyang Lake and Carex spp. dominated absolutely with multi grads 58 in the Poyang Lake. Most of the aquatic plant species were amphibians and a small number of the species were found on the beach floating plants or submerged plants or emergent plants.(2)The vegetation of the Poyang Lake scattered in different areas which could be divided into 31 major plant communities and 5 plant zones including amphibian, emergent, floating-leaved, submerged, and floating input. The majority of aquatic vegetation distribution area in the Poyang Lake was Carex spp. cluster.(3)There were 67 aquatic plants in the Poyang Lake, and the total of the aquatic plants’ fresh weight was 1519.41 t. Moreover, it could be found that the amphibians were the dominant plant species in the Poyang Lake.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Wei Du, Ziqi Li, and Zengxin Zhang analyzed the data, drew the figures, and finished the draft of the manuscript. Qiu Jin, Xi Chen, and Shanshan Jiang participated in the writing of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This paper is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 51190090 and 41171020) and Distinguished Young Scholars Fund of Nanjing Forestry University and supported by Open Research Fund Program of State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science (Grant no. 2011B079) and Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant no. WSGS2015005), Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (Grant no. 2015-JY-017), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References

  1. H. Jun, G. Xiao-hong, and L. Guo-feng, “Aquatic macrophytes in East Lake Taihu and its interaction with water environment,” Journal of Lake Sciences, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 790–795, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Luo, X. Li, R. Ma et al., “Applying remote sensing techniques to monitoring seasonal and interannual changes of aquatic vegetation in Taihu Lake, China,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 60, pp. 503–513, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Guan, Q. Lang, and B. Zhang, “Aquatic vegetation of Poyang Lake,” Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 1987 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  4. C. Lan, Y. Shen, B. Wang et al., “Investigation of aquatic plants and benthic macroinvertebrates of lakes in Inner Mongolia-Xinjiang Plateau,” Journal of Lake Sciences, no. 6, pp. 888–893, 2010 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  5. C. Mânzatu, B. Nagy, A. Ceccarini, R. Iannelli, S. Giannarelli, and C. Majdik, “Laboratory tests for the phytoextraction of heavy metals from polluted harbor sediments using aquatic plants,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 605–611, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Rezania, S. M. Taib, M. F. Md Din, F. A. Dahalan, and H. Kamyab, “Comprehensive review on phytotechnology: heavy metals removal by diverse aquatic plants species from wastewater,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 318, pp. 587–599, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Massicotte, A. Bertolo, P. Brodeur, C. Hudon, M. Mingelbier, and P. Magnan, “Influence of the aquatic vegetation landscape on larval fish abundance,” Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 873–880, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. T. J. Churchill, M. L. Schummer, S. A. Petrie, and H. A. L. Henry, “Long-term changes in distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation and dreissenid mussels in Long Point Bay, Lake Erie,” Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1060–1069, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Shen, J. Liao, H. Guo, and J. Liu, “Poyang Lake wetland vegetation biomass inversion using polarimetric RADARSAT-2 synthetic aperture radar data,” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Liao, G. Shen, and L. Dong, “Biomass estimation of wetland vegetation in Poyang Lake area using ENVISAT advanced synthetic aperture radar data,” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 12215, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Han, X. Chen, and L. Feng, “Four decades of winter wetland changes in Poyang Lake based on Landsat observations between 1973 and 2013,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 156, pp. 426–437, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. J. Daoust and D. L. Childers, “Quantifying aboveground biomass and estimating net aboveground primary production for wetland macrophytes using a non-destructive phenometric technique,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 115–133, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. S. F. Silva, M. P. F. Costa, and J. M. Melack, “Assessment of two biomass estimation methods for aquatic vegetation growing on the Amazon Floodplain,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 161–167, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Zhao, H. Jiang, T. Yang, Y. Cai, D. Xu, and S. An, “Remote sensing of aquatic vegetation distribution in Taihu Lake using an improved classification tree with modified thresholds,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 98–107, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Zhang, J. Yin, Y. Jiang, and H. Wang, “Relationship between the hydrological conditions and the distribution of vegetation communities within the Poyang Lake National Nature Reserve, China,” Ecological Informatics, vol. 11, pp. 65–75, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. X. Wang, L. Xu, R. Wan, and Y. Chen, “Seasonal variations of soil microbial biomass within two typical wetland areas along the vegetation gradient of Poyang Lake, China,” Catena, vol. 137, pp. 483–493, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Guan, Q. Lang, and B. Zhang, “Biomass of macrophytes of the Poyang Lake with suggestions of its rational exploitation,” Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, no. 3, pp. 219–227, 1987 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Jian, R. Li, J. Wang, and J. Chen, “Aquatic plant diversity and remote sensing of the beach vegetation in lake Poyang,” Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 581–642, 2001 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  19. Y. Peng, Y. Jian, and R. Li, “Community diversity of aquatic plants in the lakes of Poyang Plain District of China,” Journal of Central South Forestry University, no. 4, pp. 22–27, 2003 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  20. Z. Zhang, X. Chen, C.-Y. Xu, Y. Hong, J. Hardy, and Z. Sun, “Examining the influence of river-lake interaction on the drought and water resources in the Poyang Lake basin,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 522, pp. 510–521, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Vereecken, J. Baetens, P. Viaene, F. Mostaert, and P. Meire, “Ecological management of aquatic plants: effects in lowland streams,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 570, no. 1, pp. 205–210, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. D. K. Cook, Water Plants of the World, Springer Science & Business Media, Bath, UK, 1974.
  23. H. Chen, “The structure and dynamicsofaquatic vascular plant communities in DongLake, Wuhan,” Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, no. 3, pp. 275–284, 1980 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  24. W. Hua, C. Shuiping, C. Peihong et al., “Investigation of aquatic macrophytes in lakes of Beihu Watershed of East Lake area in Wuhan, in the autumn of 2009,” Journal of Lake Sciences, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 401–408, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. Li, G. Liu, B. Xiong et al., “The restoration of aquatic vegetation in lakes of Poyang Lake nature reserve after catastrophic flooding in 1998,” Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, no. 4, pp. 301–306, 2004 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
  26. B. Zhang and J. Wang, “Preliminary opinions on the protection and utilization of natural resources in Poyang Lake,” Freshwater Fisheries, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 1982 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Wei Du et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1510 Views | 480 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up