Research Article

Socioeconomic Characteristics Influencing Level of Awareness of Aflatoxin Contamination of Feeds among Livestock Farmers in Meru District of Tanzania

Table 3

Awareness distribution on fungal toxins contamination of feeds.

Respondents’ perceptions on feed aflatoxinsFrequency (%)

Possible presence of fungal toxins in feeds (n = 258)
Yes133 (52)
No111 (43)
Not certain14 (5)
Specific probable fungal toxins in feeds (n = 133)
Aflatoxins8 (6)
Other toxin fungal names26 (20)
Do not know99 (74)
Feed ingredient susceptible to fungal toxin contamination (n = 133)
Maize bran96 (72)
Wheat feeds3 (2)
Wheat pollard5 (4)
Sunflower seed cake1 (1)
Cotton seed cake1 (1)
Other feed ingredients4 (3)
Do not know23 (17)
Possibility that fungal toxins in feeds affect animal health (n = 133)
Yes113 (84)
Not certain18 (14)
No2 (2)
Possibility that fungal toxins are transferred from feeds to foods of animal origin(n = 133)
Yes21 (16)
Not certain11 (8)
No101 (76)
Signs to suspect presence of fungal toxins in feeds (n = 133)
Abnormal colour66 (48)
Abnormal consistence24 (18)
Bad odour (rotten/soil smell)47 (36)
Insect/larva presence3 (2)
Impaired animal health/deaths13 (5)
Do not know any indicator24 (18)
Ability to detect mould in feeds (n = 133)133
Yes123 (93)
No9 (7)
Not certain1 (1)
Possibility of detoxifying aflatoxins in feeds (n = 133)133
Yes83 (62)
No38 (29)
Not certain12 (9)
Heard about aflatoxins (258)
Yes71 (28)
No187 (72)
Means through which aflatoxins were heard (71)
Reading3 (4)
Mass media (radio/TV)49 (69)
Seminars/experts11 (16)
Friends/neighbours8 (11)
Time when heard about aflatoxin(s)
≤one year ago40 (56)
Two years ago15 (21)
>two years ago16 (23)