An Assessment of Local People’s Support to Private Wildlife Conservation: A Case of Save Valley Conservancy and Fringe Communities, Zimbabwe

Table 1

Proximate and underlying drivers of local resistance to SVC across the villages.

Ward(s)	Village(s)	Proximate			Underlying
		Lack of wildlife-related benefits	Poor control of damage-causing wildlife	Escalating wildlife-induced costs/conflicts	Distrust for SVC owners and workers	Limited and irregular communication	No compensation for losses from wildlife	Lack of participation in wildlife conservation
3	Matsai	3	1	2	2	1	2	0
26	24	3	0	3	1	2	1	0
	26	2	2	2	1	1	1	0
	27	1	3	2	0	1	1	1
	31	2	1	4	1	1	0	1
	Total ()	11 (22%)	7 (14%)	13 (27%)	5 (10%)	6 (12%)	5 (10%)	2 (4%)

Note: contained in this table are numbers of respondents (not bracketed) who provided a response.