Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Scientifica
Volume 2019, Article ID 3430968, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3430968
Research Article

Morphological Diversity of Gracilaria blodgettii Harvey 1853 (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) from Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo

1Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
2Centre for Pre University Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
3School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11800 Penang, Malaysia

Correspondence should be addressed to Ruhana Hassan; ym.saminu@anahurh

Received 28 December 2018; Revised 19 April 2019; Accepted 11 June 2019; Published 2 July 2019

Academic Editor: Fernando Rosado Spilki

Copyright © 2019 Ruhana Hassan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Gracilaria red algae are notable for their economic importance as agrophytes, sold as salad vegetable, and used as the base for selected food and nonalcoholic beverages. A wild population of Gracilaria exists in coastal areas of Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo, but there is only limited knowledge on species diversity and its abundance leaving the untapped economic potential of this resource. This study was carried out to determine diversity of wild Gracilaria populations in Lawas, Santubong, and Asajaya, Sarawak, using the combination of morphological character examination and 5′ region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1-5P) gene analysis. Identification of the species using morphological characters revealed three species, namely, Gracilaria changii, G. blodgettii, and G. arcuata, had been collected from the sampling sites. However, based on 672 bp CO1-5P gene sequence analysis, all the three species were identified as G. blodgettii; besides, low genetic divergence values (0.17%–0.34%) were scored between samples in this study with the same species in GenBank. In the phylogenetic trees, all samples in this study group together with other G. blodgettii have high bootstrap values; thus, this species is monophyletic. This study implies that species identification of Gracilaria and other seagrass taxa which have a phenotypic plasticity problem should include the CO1-5P gene analysis as it is a reliable gene marker for species diversity assessment.

1. Introduction

Genus Gracilaria Greville consists of more than 170 species worldwide, distributed from tropical to temperate waters, covering from intertidal to subtidal zones [13]. It can be found from Arctic Ocean to tropical seas of the northern hemisphere and countries of Southeast Asian regions such as Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Singapore, and Philippines [4, 5]. Gracilaria is important in production of agar in food industry [6] and culture medium in research industry [7], and it serves as a habitat for various aquatic organisms [8, 9], besides becoming food for the local people.

Up to now, 20 species of Gracilaria had been identified in Malaysia [10], where half of them were found in Sarawak, namely, G. arcuata Zanardini, G. articulata Chang & Xia, G. changii Xia & Abbott, G. coronopifolia J. Agardh, G. blodgettii Harvey, G. Salicornia (Agardh) Dawson, G. edulis (Gmelin) Silva, and G. textorii (Suringar) Hariot and the remaining identified as Gracilaria sp. 1 and Gracilaria sp. 2 [11]. They could be found in Kuching, Bintulu, and Miri, growing in the intertidal area or attached to the man-made structures [12]. In another report, in Asajaya, Sarawak, Gracilaria thalli were found attached on the roots of mangrove trees [13].

Molecular studies have shown positive results in solving the identification and taxonomy of seaweeds worldwide. Gracilaria is known as seaweeds with high plasticity characteristics and simple morphologies with very minor variations among them and sometimes have different structures throughout its life cycles [14, 15]. Various gene markers had been used by researchers in identification of Gracilaria such as 5′ region of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1 (CO1-5P) [16], plastid-encoded large subunit of the ribulose-1,5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) [17], nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) [18], and intergenic spacer between the cytochrome oxidase subunits 2 and 3 (cox2-3 spacer) [19]. Recently, CO1-5P gene marker has been used widely due to its ability to identify red seaweed at the species level, revealing cryptic species [15, 20].

Ho et al. [21] had sequenced the nuclear and chloroplast genomes of Gracilaria changii. They reported that the partial nuclear genome is 35.8 Mb with 10,912 predicted proteins, while the chloroplast genome is 183,855 bp with 201 ORFs, 29 tRNAs, and 3 rRNAs. Esa [22] had produced preliminary CO1-5P gene sequences for Caulerpa spp. inhabiting Sarawak, and Song et al. [10] reported on microsatellite markers from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of seaweed usage in differentiating various Gracilaria species, some of which had been obtained from Sarawak. Since phenotypic plasticity occurs in seaweeds, identification of Gracilaria species becomes a very challenging task. In this study, identification of Gracilaria species collected from Lawas, Santubong, and Asajaya, Sarawak, had used two approaches: (i) CO1-5P gene marker and (ii) conventional approach of identification using morphological characters.

2. Materials and Methods

Thirteen thalli of Gracilaria were collected from cage culture in Santubong (01°40′42.1″N, 110°20′2.4″E) and Lawas (04°56′9.7″N, 115°14′6.8″E), while ten thalli were collected from the mangrove area in Asajaya (01°35′57.8″N, 110°36′15.9″E) (Figure 1). Identification of specimens followed keys by Dhargalkar and Kavlekar [23], Ismail [24], Lin [25], Nurridan [12], Nurridan [11], Ohmi [26], and Yamamoto [27]. The specimens were identified immediately on-site as follows: G. changii (GSA01-GSA10, obtained from Santubong), G. blodgettii (GA01-GA10, from Asajaya), and G. arcuata (GL01-GL03, from Lawas). Furthermore, species identification was carried out accordingly in the laboratory. During the transportation from study sites to the laboratory in the Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), all specimens were kept cool in the cooler box filled with ice tubes. In the laboratory, if the work cannot be done immediately, all specimens were kept in the −20°C freezer.

Figure 1: Map of (a) Sarawak, (b) Lawas, (c) Santubong, and (d) Asajaya. The diamond shape point indicates the specific location of Gracilaria sampling sites.

For molecular analysis, the samples were cleaned using distilled water to remove the epiphytes, aquatic organisms, and sand particles which may trap within the thalli. Then, each thallus was kept separately in a labelled plastic bag and stored in the −20°C freezer until further analysis. The DNA extraction of Gracilaria samples was done following the standard cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol by Doyle and Doyle [28], followed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE).

The amplification of CO1-5P gene was done using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique with primers designed by Saunders [16]: forward primer GazF1 (5′-TCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and reverse primer GazR1 (5′-ACTTCTGGATGTCCAAAAAAYCA-3′). The total volume of PCR reaction was 25 μl, comprising 10.5 μl ultrapure water, 4 μl 10X buffer, 4 μl MgCl2, 2.5 μl dNTPs (Promega), 1.0 μl forward primer GazF1, 1.0 μl reverse primer GazR1, 0.5 μl Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), and 1.5 μl DNA template. The PCR was carried out using a PCR thermocycler (Biometra TAdvanced) under following conditions: predenaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, annealing at 51.3°C for 1 minute 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 1 minute, and final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. The success of PCR was checked using 1% AGE, and successful PCR products were sent to First Base Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia, for single-pass DNA sequencing.

CHROMAS software was used to display the CO1-5P sequences, whereas the validation of species used the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST). CLUSTAL X program (version 1.81) was used to align the DNA sequences. Neighbour joining (NJ) trees were constructed using MEGA 6.0 [31], while a model of K81uf + I + G was used for the Bayesian inference implemented on MrBayes program. All phylogenetic trees were constructed together with other Gracilariaceae species obtained from GenBank where Janczewskia hawaiiana and Osmundea pinnatifida act as outgroups (Table 1). The genetic divergence values were obtained using Kimura’s two-parameter model [32].

Table 1: List of Gracilariaceae and other species analysed in this study.

3. Results

Gracilaria arcuata was found attached to the net of cage culture in Lawas. It had reddish brown colour when fresh with discoid holdfast; the branches were cylindrical, irregular, and arcuate and could grow up to 120 mm tall (Figure 2(a)). Constriction was observed at the base of every branching and the tip either pointed or divided to two to five short stubby spinose branchlets. The medulla was composed of 4-5 layers of parenchymatous cells surrounded by 2-3 layers of small cortical cells (Figure 3(a)).

Figure 2: (a) Whole thallus of G. arcuata found in Lawas (GL01-GL03), (b) whole thallus of G. blodgettii found in Asajaya (GA01-GA10), and (c) whole thallus of G. changii found in Santubong (GSA01-GSA10).
Figure 3: Cross section showing the medulla and cortex structure of (a) G. arcuata, (b) G. blodgettii, and (c) G. changii.

Gracilaria blodgettii was found attached to the root of mangrove in Asajaya. The thallus was dark red in colour with discoid holdfast and could grow up to 200 mm tall (Figure 2(b)). The branching occurs frequently, either secund or irregular with constriction at the base of each branch, and it had pointed tip at the end of branches. The medulla was composed of 3-4 layers of parenchymatous cells surrounded by 2-3 layers of small cortical cells (Figure 3(b)).

Gracilaria changii was found attached to the net of cage culture in Santubong. The colour of G. changii was dark red with discoid holdfast and could grow up to 180 mm–220 mm (Figure 2(c)). The branching occurs occasionally, irregular with constriction at the base of branches. The tip either pointed or divided into two short branchlets. The medulla was composed of 3-4 layers of parenchymatous cells surrounded by 2-3 layers of small cortical cells (Figure 3(c)).

A total of 23 CO1-5P sequences had been successfully amplified with a length between 660 bp and 672 bp. Based on the BLAST results, G. blodgettii (GA01-GA10), G. arcuata (GL01-GL03), and G. changii (GSA01-GSA10) showed approximately 99% similarity with G. blodgettii mitochondrial DNA voucher with accession nos. JQ407591-JQ407596, KX017514, KX017516, KT779907-KT779908, KT779910, KT779926, and KT779928-KT779929 (Table 2). All sequences in this study had significant match with the database as each of the expect value (E value) was zero.

Table 2: Summary of BLAST results for all CO1-5P sequences obtained in this study.

Based on genetic divergence analysis (Table 3), the three Gracilaria species in this study had genetic divergence values between 0% and 0.15%, when compared among each other. The genetic divergence values between the three Gracilaria species and the outgroups ranged from 22.60% to 24.03%. G. blodgettii (GA01-GA10), G. arcuata (GL01-GL03), and G. changii (GSA01-GSA10) had genetic similarity with G. blodgettii from China and the Philippines as mentioned in Table 2 with a variation of 0.17% to 0.35%. For comparison, high genetic variation was observed between G. arcuata in this study and G. arcuata from Japan and the Philippines within the range of 13.59%–14.90%. The comparison of intraspecific values of G. changii found in Santubong and Lawas with those of similar species from other countries could not be obtained due to unavailability of CO1-5P information in GenBank up to December 2018.

Table 3: Genetic distance (%) based on CO1-5P gene sequence analysis in this study.

Phylogenetic trees of Gracilaria found in Sarawak with CO1-5P Gracilariaceae sequences from GenBank with respect to the outgroups J. hawaiiana and O. pinnatifida were successfully constructed using the Bayesian inference (not shown) and neighbour joining (Figure 4). Both trees showed similar topology, with two main clades, namely, Clade I and Clade II. Within Clade I, there are two subclades. The first subclade comprised G. blodgettii in this study with those from GenBank with the significant bootstrap value of 99% neighbour joining (NJ) and 1.00 Bayesian posterior probability (BPP). Therefore, G. blodgettii is monophyletic. The second subclade comprised all other Gracilaria CO1-5P gene sequences from GenBank (G. Gracilis, G. pacifica, G. abbottiana, G. coronopifolia, G. dotyi, G. textorii, G. parvispora, G. incurvata, G. tikvahiae, G. arcuata, and G. changii) with the bootstrap value of 80% (NJ) and 0.9 (BPP). Clade II consists of Gracilariopsis species (Gp. chorda, Gp. longissimi, Gp. andersonii, and Gp. lemaneiformis) with the strong bootstrap value of 92% (NJ) and 0.91 (BPP).

Figure 4: Bootstrap (50% majority rule) consensus neighbour joining tree of G. blodgettii, G. arcuata, and G. changii from Asajaya, Santubong, and Lawas, Sarawak, with species of Gracilariaceae acquired from GenBank and J. hawaiiana and O. pinnatifida as the outgroups. The bootstrap value of neighbour joining is indicated above the branch.

Morphological characteristic data and molecular data showed incongruent results in this study (Table 4). Three species of Gracilaria, namely, G. changii, G. blodgettii, and G. arcuata, were observed in Lawas, Santubong, and Asajaya, Sarawak, using the morphological approach, whereas only one species, namely, G. blodgettii, was found using the molecular approach. Summary of morphological and molecular data on Gracilaria obtained in this study is shown in Table 5.

Table 4: Comparison of Gracilaria species based on morphological characteristics and CO1-5P gene markers.
Table 5: Summary of morphological and molecular data on Gracilaria obtained in this study.

4. Discussion

Based on morphological descriptions, samples GSA01-GSA10, obtained from Santubong, were G. changii; samples GA01-GA10, from Asajaya, were G. blodgettii; and samples GL01-GL03, from Lawas, were G. arcuata as they matched descriptions by Dhargalkar and Kavlekar [23], Ismail [24], Lin [25], Nurridan [12], Nurridan [11], Ohmi [26], and Yamamoto [27]. The presence of these three species in Sarawak is noted in the checklist of seaweed by Nurridan [12] and in her updated checklist in 2013. In addition, Othman et al. [9] had also reported the presence of G. arcuata in Lawas, Sarawak. In another study, based on morphological characters’ examinations alone, Othman et al. [13] claimed that there were three species, namely, G. changii, G. blodgettii, and G. coronopifolia, found attached to the nest of cage culture in Santubong and the root of mangrove trees in Asajaya, Sarawak. Previous researchers, for example, Phang et al. [14] and Saunders [15], reported that Gracilaria possesses high plasticity characteristics and simple morphologies with minor variations among species and may have different structures throughout its life cycle. Thus, the morphological data of Gracilaria in this study should be critically examined.

In this study, CO1-5P sequences obtained were between 660 bp and 672 bp in length. Similarly, Kim et al. [20] reported that the Korean Gracilariaceae sequences had a length of 670 bp to 685 bp, while Gracilariaceae in Qingdao, China, had a length of 664 bp for CO1-5P genes [33]. All 23 sequences obtained in this study matched G. blodgettii from China and the Philippines with the expected value (E value) equal to zero. E value was used to determine the level of significance between DNA sequences obtained with the mitochondrial DNA voucher deposited in GenBank, where the closer the E value to zero, the higher the similarity of the match [34]. Therefore, all sequences in this study had significant match with the database, confirming all samples were G. blodgettii.

According to Kim et al. [20], Le Gall and Saunders [35], and Saunders [15], the intraspecific divergence value more than 2.0% is considered as different species. The low value of genetic divergence (0.17% to 0.35%) among these three species in Sarawak with relevant vouchers from GenBank suggested that they belong to one species, namely, G. blodgettii. In the phylogenetic trees, it is noted that G. blodgettii, G. arcuata, and G. changii in this study with G. blodgettii from GenBank (Clade I, the first subclade) had recorded a high bootstrap support with values of 99% (NJ) and 1.00 (BPP). The strong value of bootstrap support given to this clade means it is very likely that the relationship is true, further supporting that all specimens belonged to the same species.

According to Saunders [15], misidentification of Gracilaria species may likely to happen due to its simple and high plasticity characters. Zhao et al. [33] reported that not all red seaweeds could be identified based on the morphological approach, especially Gracilariaceae due to the following reasons: (i) they have high varieties of morphologies within the species; (ii) they have simple morphological characteristics and highly convergent morphology which make them look similar to others leading to confusion during identification; (iii) lack of distinct parts or features to differentiate among species; and (iv) their reproduction cycle is very complex due to heteromorphic alternation of generation. Similarly, Md Sah et al. [14] also claimed that the identification of Gracilaria could be problematic because of limitations of distinct morphological and reproductive characteristics. For example, in Virginia, Thomsen et al. [36] had corrected the identification of G. vermiculophylla which at first has been referred to as G. verrucosa and G. tikvahiae. Meanwhile, G. vermiculophylla in British Columbia was overlooked because of similar characteristics of Gracilaria species that exist there [15]. There are also cases where the same species have different characteristics because of environmental factors that lead to confusion during identification [37, 38].

In this study, identification of Gracilaria species (G. blodgettii, G. arcuata, and G. changii) using the morphological approach most likely resulted in misidentification because of either a variety of morphologies, complexity of the life cycle, or the environments where they grow. In addition, to avoid further confusion, Thomsen et al. [36] suggested that each specimen should be kept properly using air-drying or herbarium-pressing methods so that future studies could refer to them as reference materials. Guiry and Guiry [3] also reported in their taxonomic note that the samples identified as G. blodgettii should be compared with the topotype material from Key West, Florida, USA, for confirmation and avoiding further misidentification. For now, the sequences of Gracilaria samples in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo, should be identified as Gracilaria aff. blodgettii until we could compare the samples with G. blodgettii from Key West, Florida, USA. Thus, the study on seaweed identification should be continued to resolve the taxonomy and create clear understanding on their morphology including plasticity characteristics that respond to environmental changes.

5. Conclusion

This study suggests that three Gracilaria species obtained in Lawas, Santubong, and Asajaya, Sarawak, which were initially identified as G. blodgettii, G. arcuata, and G. changii, should be renamed into one species, namely, Gracilaria blodgettii Harvey 1853. Minor differences between specimens in terms of morphology may be due to environmental influence. For future seaweed research, CO1-5P gene markers should be sequenced and analysed, besides the conventional methods of using species identification keys provided by previous researchers.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia, through Research Acculturation Collaborative Effort (RACE) Grant Scheme RACE/g(2)891/2012(09). The authors would like to thank local people of Lawas, Santubong, and Asajaya for their kind assistance during sampling trips. Thanks are due to UNIMAS for laboratory facilities and transportation. Muhammad Nur Arif Othman is the recipient of MyBrain15 scholarship and Zamalah Siswazah UNIMAS (ZSU) scholarship.

References

  1. M. Ganesan, N. Sahu, and K. Eswaran, “Raft culture of Gracilaria edulis in open sea along the south-eastern coast of India,” Aquaculture, vol. 321, no. 1-2, pp. 141–151, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. J. Gulbransen, K. J. McGlathery, M. Marklund, J. N. Norris, and C. F. D. Gurgel, “Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Rhodophyta, Gracilariales) in the Virginia coastal Bays, USA: cox1 analysis reveals high genetic Richness of an introduced macroalga,” Journal of Phycology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1278–1283, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. D. Guiry and G. M. Guiry, “AlgaeBase,” 2019, http://www.algarbase.org. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. K. Tseng and B. M. Xia, “On the Gracilaria in the western Pacifica and southeast Asian region,” Botanica Marina, vol. 42, pp. 209–217, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Y. Yang, P. J. L. Geraldino, and M. S. Kim, “DNA barcode assessment of Gracilaria salicornia (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) from southeast Asia,” Botanical Studies, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Ahemad, A. Ismail, and R. M. A. Mohammad, “The seaweed industry in Sabah, East Malaysia,” Journal of Southeast Asean Studies, vol. 7, pp. 97–107, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. F. Bezerra and E. Marinho-Soriano, “Cultivation of the red seaweed Gracilaria birdiae (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) in tropical waters of northeast Brazil,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1813–1817, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. D. Nyberg, M. S. Thomsen, and I. Wallentinus, “Flora and fauna associated with the introduced red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla,” European Journal of Phycology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 395–403, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. N. A. Othman, R. Hassan, M. N. Harith, and A. S. R. Md Sah, “Red seaweed Gracilaria arcuata in cage culture area of Lawas, Sarawak,” Borneo Journal of Resource Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 53–61, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S.-L. Song, P.-E. Lim, S.-M. Phang et al., “Microsatellite markers from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of seaweeds in differentiating various Gracilaria species,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 839–846, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. H. Nurridan, “Diversity and new record of seaweed in Sarawak,” in Aquatic Science Colloqium 2012: Experience Sharing in Aquatic Science Research II, Talang-Satang National Park to Santubong, L. Nyanti, I. Norhadi, M. Samsur, R. Hassan, and S. A. K. A. Rahim, Eds., Department of Aquatic Science, Sarawak, Malaysia, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  12. A. H. Nurridan, Seaweeds of Sarawak Malaysia Borneo, Fisheries Research Institute, Sarawak, Malaysia, 2007.
  13. M. N. A. Othman, H. Mohd Nasarudin, R. Hassan et al., “Morphological characteristics and habitats of red seaweed Gracilaria spp. (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) in Santubong and Asajaya, Sarawak, Malaysia,” Tropical Life Sciences Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 87–101, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. M. Md Sah, P. E. Lim, and K. W. Thong, “Molecular differentiation of two morphological variants of Gracilaria salicornia,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 13, pp. 335–342, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  15. G. W. Saunders, “Routine DNA barcoding of Canadian Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) reveals the invasive species Gracilaria vermiculophyllain British Columbia,” Molecular Ecology Resources, vol. 9, pp. 140–150, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. W. Saunders, “Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 360, no. 1462, pp. 1879–1888, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. M. Gargiulo, M. Morabito, G. Genovese, and F. D. Masi, “Molecular systematics and phylogenetics of Gracilariacean species from the Mediterranean sea,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 18, no. 3–5, pp. 497–504, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Destombe, M. Valero, and M. L. Guillemin, “Delineation of two siblings red algal species, Gracilaria gracilis and Gracilaria dura (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) using multi DNA markers: Resurrection of the species G. dura previously described in the Northern Atlantic 200 years ago,” Journal of Phycology, vol. 46, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y.-Y. Yow, P.-E. Lim, and S.-M. Phang, “Assessing the use of mitochondrial cox1 gene and cox2-3 spacer for genetic diversity study of Malaysia Gracilaria changii (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) from Peninsular,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 831–838, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. S. Kim, M. Y. Yang, and G. Y. Cho, “Applying DNA barcoding to Korean Gracilariaceae (Rhodophyta),” Cryptogamie Algologie, vol. 31, pp. 387–401, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  21. C.-L. Ho, W.-K. Lee, and E.-L. Lim, “Unraveling the nuclear and chloroplast genomes of an agar producing red macroalga, Gracilaria changii (Rhodophyta, Gracilariales),” Genomics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 124–133, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. A. Esa, Taxanomy, Species Composition and Ecology of Seaweed Plus Preliminary Molecular Assessment of Caulerpa spp. in Satang and Sampadi Island, Sarawak, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia, 2014.
  23. V. K. Dhargalkar and D. Kavlekar, Seaweeds—a field manual, National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, India, 2004.
  24. A. Ismail, Rumpai laut Malaysia, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1995.
  25. S. M. Lin, Marine Benthic Macroalgal Flora of Taiwan, National Taiwan Ocean University Publication, Taiwan, 2009.
  26. H. Ohmi, The Species of Gracilaria and Gracilariaopsis from Japan and Adjacent Waters, vol. 5, Faculty of Fisheries Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 1958.
  27. H. Yamamoto, Systematic and Anatomical Study of the Genus Gracilaria in Japan, vol. 25, Memoirs of the Faculty Fisheries Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, 1978.
  28. J. J. Doyle and J. L. Doyle, “A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue,” Phytochemical Bulletin, vol. 19, pp. 11–15, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. R. Sherwood, A. Kurihara, K. Y. Conklin, I. Sauvage, and G. G. Presting, “The Hawaiian Rhodophyta biodiversity survey (2006-2010): a summary of principal findings,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 10, pp. 1–258, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Y. Yang and M. S. Kim, “Molecular analyses for identification of the Gracilariaceae (Rhodophyta) from the Asia-Pacific region,” Genes & Genomics, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 775–787, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2725–2729, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Kimura, “A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. X. Zhao, S. Pang, T. Shan, and F. Liu, “Applications of three DNA barcodes in assorting intertidal red macroalgal flora in Qingdao, China,” Journal of Ocean University of China, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 139–145, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Karlin and S. F. Altschul, “Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 2264–2268, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. Le Gall and G. W. Saunders, “DNA barcoding is a powerful tool to uncover algal diversity: a case study of the Phyllophoraceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) in the Canadian flora,” Journal of Phycology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 374–389, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. S. Thomsen, C. F. D. Gurgel, S. Fredericq, and K. J. McGlathery, “Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Rhodophyta, Gracilariales) in Hog Island Bay, Virginia: a cryptic alien and invasive macroalga and taxanomic correction,” Journal of Phycology, vol. 42, pp. 139–141, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  37. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Training Manual of Gracilaria Culture and Seaweed Processing in China, Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome, Italy, 1990, http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/ab730e/AB730E00.htm#TOC.
  38. N. Kongkittayapun and A. Chirapart, “Morphometric and molecular analysis of Gracilaria salicornia and its adelphoparasite in Thailand,” ScienceAsia, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus