Research Article

Effect of Plant Spacing on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in Shewarobit, Central Ethiopia

Table 1

Main effect of intrarow spacing on yield and yield components of tomato at Shewarobit

MFY (kg ha−1)UMFY (kg ha−1)NMFNUMFFD (cm)No. branchDTF (days)

Intra‐row spacing
20 cm6992a756.56155525138.14.78b7.6744.08
30 cm4477b858.80110747148.85.39a8.1744.33
40 cm4419b892.3198239122.85.05ab7.0044.33
Sig. levelnsnsnsnsns
CV (%)4951545410.833.89.4

Inter‐row spacing
60 cm7674a3961.0a207529a198.3a4.5189c44.87.1
80 cm5840ab3701.5ab122558ab153.2ab4.8733bc44.76.6
100 cm3848b2024.9b83003b103.7b5.7067a43.97
120 cm3821b1749.4b72924b91.1b5.0589b43.76.9
Sign. levelnsns

CV (%)4951545410.89.47.8

Means in columns with the same letter(s) in each treatment are not significantly different, UMF: unmarketable fruit yield; NMF: number of marketable fruit; NUMF: number of unmarketable fruit yield; FD: fruit diameter; No. branch: number of primary branches; PH = plant height; FL = fruit length; DTF: days to first flowering.