Research Article
Detecting Malware with an Ensemble Method Based on Deep Neural Network
Table 4
The experiment results for different LSTM networks.
| Strategy | Models | Accuracy (%) | AUC | TPR (FPR = 0.1%) | EER (%) | Training times (h) |
| TAP | LSTM () | 71.43 | 0.8863 | 52.03 | - | 0.41 | LSTM (α = 60) | 87.13 | 0.9791 | 81.67 | 6.45 | 0.54 | LSTM (α = 80) | 91.56 | 0.9854 | 85.39 | 4.88 | 0.89 | LSTM (α = 120) | 94.86 | 0.9931 | 91.53 | 3.17 | - |
| Truncated BPTT | LSTM (α = 30) | 94.37 | 0.9928 | 91.11 | 3.10 | - | LSTM (α = 60) | 96.83 | 0.9950 | 93.37 | - | - | LSTM (α = 80) | 98.08 | 0.9989 | 95.13 | - | 1.24 | LSTM (α = 120) | 98.47 | 0.9993 | 96.81 | - | 1.36 | LSTM (α = 180) | 97.82 | 0.9987 | 95.42 | - | 1.53 |
| Truncated BPTT + subsequence selection | LSTM (α = 120, = 90%) | 97.98 | 0.9988 | 95.01 | 1.34 | 1.16 | LSTM (α = 120, = 95%) | 98.83 | 0.9997 | 97.22 | 0.84 | - | LSTM (α = 120, = 99%) | 98.66 | 0.9996 | 96.69 | 0.92 | - | LSTM (α = 120, = 97.5%) | 99.13 | 0.9999 | 98.69 | 0.54 | 1.34 |
|
|