Research Article

Accountable and Transparent TLS Certificate Management: An Alternate Public-Key Infrastructure with Verifiable Trusted Parties

Table 3

Comparison of various log-based public-key infrastructures based on certificate, audit log, security, deployability, and efficiency metrics. Entries underlined indicate major disadvantages of the corresponding scheme.


Terminology
LogLogIntegrated Log ServerIntegrated Log ServerCertificate Log MaintainerLog ServerLog Server
MonitorMonitorValidatorValidator (Optional)-AuditorAuditor

Certificates
Self-signed Certificate Support
Certificate Revocation Support×

Audit Log Properties
Proof of Presence
Proof of Absence×
Proof of Extension×××
Proof of Currency×
Tree Type Chron Lex Lex Chron, Lex Lex Chron, Lex

Security
MitM AttackDetection Prevention Prevention Prevention Prevention Prevention
Multi Domain Certificate××
Certificate Revocation×
Formal Security Proof×××
No. of compromised parties for MitM1/12/31/12/3
Domain Key Recovery××
Client Connection Privacy×
Intermediate CA Discovery×××××
CA Certificate Revocation×××××

Deployability
Client-side-changes Required
Server-side-changes Required

Efficiency
TLS-con-setup Add. Bandwidth BytesKBKBKBKBKB
TLS-con-setup Extra Latency
End User Additional Action