Research Article
Jamming Prediction for Radar Signals Using Machine Learning Methods
Table 4
The performance in 16 combinations of feature sets and models.
| Model | Feature set | Training accuracy (%) | Validation accuracy (%) |
| Model 1 | F1 | 95.72 | 95.92 | F2 | 96.77 | 97.09 | F3 | 97.35 | 97.78 | F4 | 97.29 | 97.78 |
| Model 2 | F1 | 95.67 | 95.72 | F2 | 96.81 | 97.30 | F3 | 97.25 | 97.55 | F4 | 97.19 | 97.61 |
| Model 3 | F1 | 96.89 | 97.35 | F2 | 97.21 | 97.65 | F3 | 97.42 | 98.04 | F4 | 97.30 | 97.78 |
| Model 4 | F1 | 96.84 | 97.48 | F2 | 97.80 | 98.19 | F3 | 97.82 | 98.47 | F4 | 97.77 | 98.02 |
|
|