Research Article
Seam-Carved Image Tampering Detection Based on the Cooccurrence of Adjacent LBPs
Table 3
Comparison of the accuracy of seam-carving detection with different scaling ratios.
| Scaling ratios | Accuracy (%) | Wei et al. [5] | Ryu and Lee [24] | Yin et al. [6] | Wattanachote et al. [7] | Ye et al. [14] | Ours |
| 1% | 50.07 | 52.39 | 51.12 | 87.59 | ā | 91.26 | 2% | 50.97 | 52.77 | 52.47 | 87.86 | ā | 92.10 | 5% | 50.20 | 58.30 | 63.83 | 88.54 | 93.99 | 94.33 | 10% | 57.91 | 65.22 | 80.00 | 89.50 | 96.71 | 96.11 | 20% | 74.18 | 75.37 | 94.48 | 89.70 | 98.55 | 98.83 | 30% | 91.34 | 85.52 | 98.66 | 90.13 | 99.08 | 99.94 | 50% | 94.93 | 96.27 | 99.85 | 94.90 | 99.60 | 100 | Average | 63.88 | 68.87 | 86.35 | 89.75 | 97.59 | 96.08 |
|
|