Seam-Carved Image Tampering Detection Based on the Cooccurrence of Adjacent LBPs

Table 4

The detection accuracies under cross experimental situations of different methods.

Test	Train
	10%	20%	30%	50%	Mixed
(a) Wei et al. [5]
10%	—	64.86	63.75	61.58	72.47
20%	65.47	—	82.48	62.37	80.67
30%	61.65	92.03	—	71.92	91.92
50%	72.14	94.46	94.83	—	94.35
Mixed	66.21	84.99	83.15	72.57	84.85
(b) Ryu and Lee [24]
10%	—	62.18	62.93	62.48	59.49
20%	72.27	—	69.51	61.06	67.64
30%	79.15	79.75	—	72.94	77.73
50%	85.21	88.42	76.01	—	90.21
Mixed	62.03	61.88	60.62	59.49	62.33
(c) Yin et al. [6]
10%	—	60.24	56.05	51.64	63.83
20%	83.56	—	75.04	56.20	87.52
30%	92.60	92.23	—	84.68	86.47
50%	99.03	99.48	99.48	—	98.51
Mixed	69.28	67.94	66.52	59.04	76.01
(d) Wattanachote et al. [7]
10%	—	55.19	54.67	49.63	54.19
20%	58.52	—	64.05	56.95	63.45
30%	53.70	70.96	—	66.18	72.35
50%	38.15	76.94	82.81	—	75.97
Mixed	52.69	67.00	68.83	65.88	69.74
(e) Ours
10%	—	85.28	66.82	66.37	85.43
20%	99.78	—	80.34	89.39	87.59
30%	99.85	98.03	—	98.32	96.71
50%	100	100	100	—	99.48
Mixed	72.80	70.93	68.54	62.33	85.13