Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 10
The comparison results for the INT97 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 0.87 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.57 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.97 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.56 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.64 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.91 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.88 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.54 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.66 |
|
|
