Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 6
The comparison results for the AGN1 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.87 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| | Recall | Ours | 0.92 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.57 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.29 | 0.87 | | Farid [8] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.57 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.79 |
|
|
